[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[URSAY]

I don't care about blocknet.  I want to know why does it even exist.  Any feature you can add to blocknet can be added directly to XC.  

Generating revenue through fees is a pipedream.  How are we supposed to believe in small fees when XC is consistently losing massive value?  We need a stable currency first.  And I don't see how blocknet helps us get there at all.  Maybe it's useful.  If it just involves borrowing other coins' features I don't see the use.  Any coin can add any feature it wants.  It would be much more preferable to have one coin with all the features of the other coins.  

Let's talk about this in the Blocknet thread.

It's not true that any feature you can add to blocknet can be added directly to XC.  

The pipedream is the belief that features are going to make a crypto currency stable.  Let's get this straight right now, the only feature that will make any crypto stable is demand to use it for something other than holding for price appreciation.  The demand to use it is the only feature that will change the crypto environment to anything other than a trading game.  The crypto that solves this puzzle wins and none are close yet.

Hmm... stay tuned.

(We've been dead-set on the objective of real-world usability from the beginning. Something new is coming.)

We don't want something new.  We want the features you say are working to actually work on all platforms.

Also...you may of missed my questioning...

What is the name of Dan's corporation?

Can you break down how the pre-mine was spent on the projects you mention?  The Reddit thread said this would be done during the spending process but that did not happen.  Now you have an opportunity to correct this.

[tat123]

Arlyn... I have not posted one bad thing about XC. Not once. So please answer Ursay. Its a relevant question that I would like to know.

[synechist]

I don't care about blocknet.  I want to know why does it even exist.  Any feature you can add to blocknet can be added directly to XC.  

Generating revenue through fees is a pipedream.  How are we supposed to believe in small fees when XC is consistently losing massive value?  We need a stable currency first.  And I don't see how blocknet helps us get there at all.  Maybe it's useful.  If it just involves borrowing other coins' features I don't see the use.  Any coin can add any feature it wants.  It would be much more preferable to have one coin with all the features of the other coins.  

Let's talk about this in the Blocknet thread.

It's not true that any feature you can add to blocknet can be added directly to XC.  

The pipedream is the belief that features are going to make a crypto currency stable.  Let's get this straight right now, the only feature that will make any crypto stable is demand to use it for something other than holding for price appreciation.  The demand to use it is the only feature that will change the crypto environment to anything other than a trading game.  The crypto that solves this puzzle wins and none are close yet.

Hmm... stay tuned.

(We've been dead-set on the objective of real-world usability from the beginning. Something new is coming.)

We don't want something new.  We want the features you say are working to actually work on all platforms.

Also...you may of missed my questioning...

What is the name of Dan's corporation?

Can you break down how the pre-mine was spent on the projects you mention?  The Reddit thread said this would be done during the spending process but that did not happen.  Now you have an opportunity to correct this.

Apologies for not responding to this.

I messaged Dan to ask whether he'd like to respond, but I haven't heard back yet.

I think it should be him who discloses this. I don't have the relevant info anyway regarding spending.

[qawzsx]

I learned one thing from having patience with a coin which is no SCAM.

When everybody was selling BlackCoin and everybody was fuding their thread I was buying like crazy for ~700 - ~900 sat each coin.
As soon as the coin proved to be developed and taken care of by legit and skilled people I knew that I was going to make lots of money from that investment.

My 8 BTC investment turned into ~370 BTC when I sold my BlackCoins for ~45k - 65k sat

I have the same feelings with XC right now and I'm very happy with my stash

BlockNet is going to push this baby near NXT with no problem.

You don't deserve to call yourselves investors, panicking like little babies when mommy is not around.
You all start crying right and left when you "loose" money when the price goes down. It's your own impatience and fear that makes you loose. You gonna loose money only if you DUMP.

Yes, there is some risk of losing all, so what? Invest only what you afford to lose.

Stop calling yourselves investors, bunch of scaredy cats

This is my last post on this thread. I had enough

Cheers

[shockstar]

I learned one thing from having patience with a coin which is no SCAM.

When everybody was selling BlackCoin and everybody was fuding their thread I was buying like crazy for ~700 - ~900 sat each coin.
As soon as the coin proved to be developed and taken care of by legit and skilled people I knew that I was going to make lots of money from that investment.

My 8 BTC investment turned into ~370 BTC when I sold my BlackCoins for ~45k - 65k sat

I have the same feelings with XC right now and I'm very happy with my stash

BlockNet is going to push this baby near NXT with no problem.

You don't deserve to call yourselves investors, panicking like little babies when mommy is not around.
You all start crying right and left when you "loose" money when the price goes down. It's your own impatience and fear that makes you loose. You gonna loose money only if you DUMP.

Yes, there is some risk of losing all, so what? Invest only what you afford to lose.

Stop calling yourselves investors, bunch of scaredy cats

This is my last post on this thread. I had enough

Cheers

those were the days lol

You should of cashed out at peak 90k
Buy back at 25k and sell at 50k lol

[infinitechaos]

XC has got to be the most FUDed coin in all of crypto.

Seriously...  Even some of you who have been here for awhile don't know which way is which any longer.

If I were a whale or market maker of sorts and wanted to manipulate/profit from the market, I would have manipulated you all into behaving exactly as you are right now. Divide and conquer. Divide...and conquer.

Make no mistake, someone is going to profit huge from all of this FUD and the resulting market volatility.

Might I remind you all that Dan plans to incorporate XC next year? This is his incentive. Fuck the premine. XC is on a level beyond what the rest of crypto can comprehend.

Synechist, you look like you need a hand deflecting all this, but you're doing a wonderful job by yourself. Wish I could be around more to help deflect some of the babble in here.

[synechist]

XC has got to be the most FUDed coin in all of crypto.

Seriously...  Even some of you who have been here for awhile don't know which way is which any longer.

If I were a whale or market maker of sorts and wanted to manipulate/profit from the market, I would have manipulated you all into behaving exactly as you are right now. Divide and conquer. Divide...and conquer.

Make no mistake, someone is going to profit huge from all of this FUD and the resulting market volatility.

Might I remind you all that Dan plans to incorporate XC next year? This is his incentive. Fuck the premine. XC is on a level beyond what the rest of crypto can comprehend.

Synechist, you look like you need a hand deflecting all this, but you're doing a wonderful job by yourself. Wish I could be around more to help deflect some of the babble in here.

Thanks for the perspective there - and the compliment.

I agree with your analysis, for what it's worth.

[G-Bert]

You don't deserve to call yourselves investors, panicking like little babies when mommy is not around.
You all start crying right and left when you "loose" money when the price goes down. It's your own impatience and fear that makes you loose. You gonna loose money only if you DUMP.

Yes, there is some risk of losing all, so what? Invest only what you afford to lose.

Stop calling yourselves investors, bunch of scaredy cats

This is my last post on this thread. I had enough

Cheers

I think its natural to go into panic mode. I've done it every time, its like an instinct. you have to step back and assess the situation and relax. If you have trust in the coin then just hold tight. A few hours ago i had my head in my hands, now after thinking rationally, I'm not (too) worried.

Don't give people shit for worrying though. it's been a pretty harsh dump in the last couple weeks.

[Crypto-in-tha-blood]

XC has got to be the most FUDed coin in all of crypto.

Seriously...  Even some of you who have been here for awhile don't know which way is which any longer.

If I were a whale or market maker of sorts and wanted to manipulate/profit from the market, I would have manipulated you all into behaving exactly as you are right now. Divide and conquer. Divide...and conquer.

Make no mistake, someone is going to profit huge from all of this FUD and the resulting market volatility.

Might I remind you all that Dan plans to incorporate XC next year? This is his incentive. Fuck the premine. XC is on a level beyond what the rest of crypto can comprehend.

Synechist, you look like you need a hand deflecting all this, but you're doing a wonderful job by yourself. Wish I could be around more to help deflect some of the babble in here.

Well said.  

Anyway, the majority of this FUD is from an organized group put together by another coin, to try and ruin XC and BLOCK.    

On that note, to those FUDding....

Who cares about the Pre-mine.  It was used for it's intended purpose.  To develop XC.  Get over it.  

[G-Bert]

XC has got to be the most FUDed coin in all of crypto.

Seriously...  Even some of you who have been here for awhile don't know which way is which any longer.

If I were a whale or market maker of sorts and wanted to manipulate/profit from the market, I would have manipulated you all into behaving exactly as you are right now. Divide and conquer. Divide...and conquer.

Make no mistake, someone is going to profit huge from all of this FUD and the resulting market volatility.

Might I remind you all that Dan plans to incorporate XC next year? This is his incentive. Fuck the premine. XC is on a level beyond what the rest of crypto can comprehend.

Synechist, you look like you need a hand deflecting all this, but you're doing a wonderful job by yourself. Wish I could be around more to help deflect some of the babble in here.

Well said.

Also, appropriate username!

[URSAY]

- Specifically, XC's funding comes from Dan's corporation, which has pioneered IP over RF in marine environments.

If you want to bring up Dan's corporation in an official statement and mention that it funds XC development then there should not be a problem naming that corporation, right?  If XC is official as the name suggests and everything is legit then transparency shouldn't be an issue.

Clear information helps investors make sound decisions.

[braxx]

- Specifically, XC's funding comes from Dan's corporation, which has pioneered IP over RF in marine environments.

If you want to bring up Dan's corporation in an official statement and mention that it funds XC development then there should not be a problem naming that corporation, right?  If XC is official as the name suggests and everything is legit then transparency shouldn't be an issue.

Clear information helps investors make sound decisions.

have you noticed Dan's linked-in?

[synechist]

- Specifically, XC's funding comes from Dan's corporation, which has pioneered IP over RF in marine environments.

If you want to bring up Dan's corporation in an official statement and mention that it funds XC development then there should not be a problem naming that corporation, right?  If XC is official as the name suggests and everything is legit then transparency shouldn't be an issue.

Clear information helps investors make sound decisions.

It's ATC Corp.

[Aderks]

- Specifically, XC's funding comes from Dan's corporation, which has pioneered IP over RF in marine environments.

If you want to bring up Dan's corporation in an official statement and mention that it funds XC development then there should not be a problem naming that corporation, right?  If XC is official as the name suggests and everything is legit then transparency shouldn't be an issue.

Clear information helps investors make sound decisions.

From Linked-in:

CEO
XC
April 2014 – Present (7 months) Boston

XC - The leading software company in decentralized applications, current products include XCurrency and XChat - XC the worlds first decentralized Infrastructure as a Service platform

Consultant
ATC CORP
January 2011 – Present (3 years 10 months) Boston

ATC Corp

Technology Consulting & Solutions

[braxx]

http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Daniel-Metcalf/1744594237

Daniel R. Metcalf
Chief Executive Officer

Phone: (339) ***-****
Email: d***@***.com
Local Address: Massachusetts, United States
ATC Corp

Background
Employment History:
Consultant
ATC Corp
OSAIR Technologies LLC
LinkedIn
Hy-Line WiFi

[synechist]

Sorry, I think I just deleted someone's post by mistake.

(This wasn't yours, Tylerdurden.)

[URSAY]

- Specifically, XC's funding comes from Dan's corporation, which has pioneered IP over RF in marine environments.

If you want to bring up Dan's corporation in an official statement and mention that it funds XC development then there should not be a problem naming that corporation, right?  If XC is official as the name suggests and everything is legit then transparency shouldn't be an issue.

Clear information helps investors make sound decisions.

It's ATC Corp.

Was it incorporated in MA.?

[atcsecure]

- Specifically, XC's funding comes from Dan's corporation, which has pioneered IP over RF in marine environments.

If you want to bring up Dan's corporation in an official statement and mention that it funds XC development then there should not be a problem naming that corporation, right?  If XC is official as the name suggests and everything is legit then transparency shouldn't be an issue.

Clear information helps investors make sound decisions.

It's ATC Corp.

Was it incorporated in MA.?

Yes it was

[atcsecure]

You can delete my posts all you want but being that the guy in charge here is the same guy who just proved he cant be trusted, it is relevant to this coin or token or whatever it is.

'

Trusted? Really - I used it to run this project - the proof is in the puddy and I did nothing wrong or un-ethical with the premine.  So stop spreading FUD

[URSAY]

- Specifically, XC's funding comes from Dan's corporation, which has pioneered IP over RF in marine environments.

If you want to bring up Dan's corporation in an official statement and mention that it funds XC development then there should not be a problem naming that corporation, right?  If XC is official as the name suggests and everything is legit then transparency shouldn't be an issue.

Clear information helps investors make sound decisions.

It's ATC Corp.

Was it incorporated in MA.?

Yes it was

I've discovered an ATC Corp. and ATC Corporation in MA, both dissolved in the 80s.  I can provide those links to show I am not fudding if needed.  Any further search suggestions?