crypti (OP)
|
|
September 11, 2014, 09:30:47 PM |
|
Is there any chance we will be able to pull 0.1.6c through Boot2Docker or will we go straight to the Windows client?
We will not support Boot2Docker. We had meeting in Russia, last few days was very busy, SyRenity will release Windows client soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the
core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
jari76
Member
Offline
Activity: 165
Merit: 10
|
|
September 11, 2014, 09:52:40 PM |
|
I have a question regarding the Transaction fee's and the whitepaper,
why is the crypti transaction fee based on cumulative network volume, and not on network volume/amount of blocks? If the ultimate goal is to stablilize network revenue by decrasing the fee on increased network volume, wouldnt a volume number weighted with teh amount of blocks be a better representation of the reality? the way the system is right now, the transactions fee's just keep going down and down.
|
|
|
|
starik69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 11, 2014, 10:32:13 PM |
|
Why db file is so huge? More than 100Mb for some months and very little transacrions. NXT db now is less than 500Mb
|
|
|
|
GreXX
|
|
September 11, 2014, 10:39:25 PM |
|
Why db file is so huge? More than 100Mb for some months and very little transacrions. NXT db now is less than 500Mb How much time has NXT had to optimize their code? How much time have we had? Give us time. We continue to work on reducing the db size every iteration and have some ideas for a long term solution.
|
|
|
|
starik69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 11, 2014, 11:04:49 PM |
|
Why db file is so huge? More than 100Mb for some months and very little transacrions. NXT db now is less than 500Mb How much time has NXT had to optimize their code? How much time have we had? If i remember correct, at the same time NXT db was much less than Crypti, so your argument is not valid.
|
|
|
|
megashira1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1146
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 11, 2014, 11:10:31 PM |
|
Why the such high withdrawal fee for XCR on bter(1%)?
|
|
|
|
crypti (OP)
|
|
September 11, 2014, 11:15:12 PM |
|
Why db file is so huge? More than 100Mb for some months and very little transacrions. NXT db now is less than 500Mb How much time has NXT had to optimize their code? How much time have we had? If i remember correct, at the same time NXT db was much less than Crypti, so your argument is not valid. Crypti is not Nxt, we have different PoS, code, technology. It can take disk space, but we working to reduce it.
|
|
|
|
crypti (OP)
|
|
September 11, 2014, 11:15:37 PM |
|
Why the such high withdrawal fee for XCR on bter(1%)?
Ask owners of Bter
|
|
|
|
matrix961
|
|
September 11, 2014, 11:28:47 PM |
|
Huge improvement on download time and loading time after restart in new version. Great job.
|
|
|
|
Litoshi
|
|
September 11, 2014, 11:42:10 PM |
|
Why the such high withdrawal fee for XCR on bter(1%)?
This question has been asked and answered three times already.........BY ME. Dont you guys read the previous posts??? ANYWAY..... the 1% fee is the escrow fee that BTER charges for hosting the IPO/pre-sale. Bter chose to deduct it from the XCR withdrawals as they occur, instead of taking 1% of the genesis block. SO....... whoever withdraws XCR from Bter, pays the 1% fee. Figure this in when you purchase from another investor.
|
|
|
|
megashira1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1146
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 12, 2014, 01:53:29 AM |
|
Why the such high withdrawal fee for XCR on bter(1%)?
This question has been asked and answered three times already.........BY ME. Dont you guys read the previous posts??? ANYWAY..... the 1% fee is the escrow fee that BTER charges for hosting the IPO/pre-sale. Bter chose to deduct it from the XCR withdrawals as they occur, instead of taking 1% of the genesis block. SO....... whoever withdraws XCR from Bter, pays the 1% fee. Figure this in when you purchase from another investor. I would rather have taken a 1 time 1% hit on my genesis XCR than a 1% lifetime tax on all my holdings.
|
|
|
|
GreXX
|
|
September 12, 2014, 02:09:38 AM |
|
Has anyone had a chance to upgrade and get 0.1.6c running? We want to ensure we aren't seeing the syncing and other issues people were noting in the previous version.
It was running well for us in tests (I ran nodes for 2 days with no issues), but it seems like we see the issues creep up once everyone on different platforms and systems starts running their nodes so any feedback would be appreciated!
Thanks guys!
|
|
|
|
hobogo
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
September 12, 2014, 02:13:48 AM |
|
Why the such high withdrawal fee for XCR on bter(1%)?
This question has been asked and answered three times already.........BY ME. Dont you guys read the previous posts??? ANYWAY..... the 1% fee is the escrow fee that BTER charges for hosting the IPO/pre-sale. Bter chose to deduct it from the XCR withdrawals as they occur, instead of taking 1% of the genesis block. SO....... whoever withdraws XCR from Bter, pays the 1% fee. Figure this in when you purchase from another investor. This can't make much of an explanation. taking 1% until the end of times is >= 1 at best (assuming those funds need to at least exit once from their platform) The 1% fee should be one time event or limited by time. it can't be moved between investors like hot potato until the end of times. We can guess the natural behavior where the mass of the volume will stay on Bter for a long time. We can't accept worsening the trading experience for our token on this platform. Even if the volumes will move to a different platform, we can't allow the discrimination of the token against other tokens on a platform which we are trading in. Also, instead of choosing to take the fee from the funds that been invested, they choose to deduct it from the tokens being brought? I can't remember they notified and prompted this fact properly on their platform when buying, but my memory may deceive me. I don't think we can justify or ignor this. Edit: actually, I was looking into buying a nice round number, with intention to redraw my newly brought token. If I was aware of this fee, I would have try to put it in my calculations. So no memory loss this time.. Edit2: although the numbers are relative, this still conceptually little bit piss me off
|
|
|
|
matrix961
|
|
September 12, 2014, 02:14:54 AM |
|
Has anyone had a chance to upgrade and get 0.1.6c running? We want to ensure we aren't seeing the syncing and other issues people were noting in the previous version.
It was running well for us in tests (I ran nodes for 2 days with no issues), but it seems like we see the issues creep up once everyone on different platforms and systems starts running their nodes so any feedback would be appreciated!
Thanks guys!
Been running great here. The initial download is much faster and the rescan after a restart is as well. Forging turns on as expected via the admin panel etc. No issues yet.
|
|
|
|
GreXX
|
|
September 12, 2014, 02:26:00 AM |
|
Has anyone had a chance to upgrade and get 0.1.6c running? We want to ensure we aren't seeing the syncing and other issues people were noting in the previous version.
It was running well for us in tests (I ran nodes for 2 days with no issues), but it seems like we see the issues creep up once everyone on different platforms and systems starts running their nodes so any feedback would be appreciated!
Thanks guys!
Been running great here. The initial download is much faster and the rescan after a restart is as well. Forging turns on as expected via the admin panel etc. No issues yet. Thanks! Glad to hear it. Keep us posted over the next 24 hours or so. We want to make sure all of the nodes maintain sync and don't have any issues.
|
|
|
|
suppersz
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
There is a day to be born, and another to die
|
|
September 12, 2014, 02:52:41 AM |
|
Thanks for the hard work. Now do we have any plan to more exchange?
Mintpal V2 will list XCR
|
|
|
|
Litoshi
|
|
September 12, 2014, 02:56:33 AM |
|
Why the such high withdrawal fee for XCR on bter(1%)?
This question has been asked and answered three times already.........BY ME. Dont you guys read the previous posts??? ANYWAY..... the 1% fee is the escrow fee that BTER charges for hosting the IPO/pre-sale. Bter chose to deduct it from the XCR withdrawals as they occur, instead of taking 1% of the genesis block. SO....... whoever withdraws XCR from Bter, pays the 1% fee. Figure this in when you purchase from another investor. This can't make much of an explanation. taking 1% until the end of times is >= 1 at best (assuming those funds need to at least exit once from their platform) The 1% fee should be one time event or limited by time. it can't be moved between investors like hot potato until the end of times. We can guess the natural behavior where the mass of the volume will stay on Bter for a long time. We can't accept worsening the trading experience for our token on this platform. Even if the volumes will move to a different platform, we can't allow the discrimination of the token against other tokens on a platform which we are trading in. Also, instead of choosing to take the fee from the funds that been invested, they choose to deduct it from the tokens being brought? I can't remember they notified and prompted this fact properly on their platform when buying, but my memory may deceive me. I don't think we can justify or ignor this. Edit: actually, I was looking into buying a nice round number, with intention to redraw my newly brought token. If I was aware of this fee, I would have try to put it in my calculations. So no memory loss this time.. Edit2: although the numbers are relative, this still conceptually little bit piss me off NODE, which started trading on Bter today, also has a 1% fee plus 1 NODE for withdrawal.
|
|
|
|
matrix961
|
|
September 12, 2014, 03:01:23 AM |
|
Has anyone had a chance to upgrade and get 0.1.6c running? We want to ensure we aren't seeing the syncing and other issues people were noting in the previous version.
It was running well for us in tests (I ran nodes for 2 days with no issues), but it seems like we see the issues creep up once everyone on different platforms and systems starts running their nodes so any feedback would be appreciated!
Thanks guys!
Been running great here. The initial download is much faster and the rescan after a restart is as well. Forging turns on as expected via the admin panel etc. No issues yet. Thanks! Glad to hear it. Keep us posted over the next 24 hours or so. We want to make sure all of the nodes maintain sync and don't have any issues. Will definitely keep you posted. I'm also interested in testing early builds when available. I'm currently running 2 dedicated nodes. One at home and the other on digital ocean with nginx in front for ssl. I damn near have the install process memorized now. Can update versions in minutes now lol.
|
|
|
|
hala
|
|
September 12, 2014, 03:14:59 AM |
|
it seems some good news will come
|
|
|
|
GreXX
|
|
September 12, 2014, 03:51:03 AM |
|
Just to keep everyone posted, we've been working on getting some of the data copied over to the new Wiki as well. It's starting to get a little more fleshed out, so feel free to give it a look. Let us know what else you want to see in there! http://wiki.crypti.me/index.php/Welcome_to_Crypti_Wiki!
|
|
|
|
|