rockethead
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1016
|
|
October 20, 2014, 12:34:13 PM |
|
guys we need to do something with NEM price on NXT AE ,because stake cost 40k .No chinees going to buy for that price ,because it means "DEATH". NEM IS DOOMED
What exactly do you mean? Is that too high or too low and why the chinese? Do chinese people need a special price? ) Appearantly they do. They need their own supply so I think a special price isn't too much to ask yeah they need a price without 4 in it You know nothing about chinese culture. Don't kick fud and troll.
|
|
|
|
rockethead
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1016
|
|
October 20, 2014, 12:36:16 PM |
|
i am afraid to see what happens if nem marketcap reach 4k btc most likely it will mean the end for NEM devs are there any "4"'s in the source code? if there is best remove them or make them "8"'s.. no one will use the code if there are 4's in the source.. I got a better idea. Those with 4 on their tokens get their NEMs burnt. THat should solve the problem.
|
|
|
|
Doriangrayz
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
October 20, 2014, 12:39:00 PM Last edit: October 20, 2014, 12:50:02 PM by Doriangrayz |
|
new chinese generation doesn't even care anymore about numbers...we would care maybe if the coin it's named Fourcoin or something like that, but not because it has a 4 billion supply. All this discussion it's useless... devs dont' worry about , focus instead on the official launch.
|
|
|
|
mattadc
|
|
October 20, 2014, 12:44:22 PM |
|
i am afraid to see what happens if nem marketcap reach 4k btc most likely it will mean the end for NEM devs are there any "4"'s in the source code? if there is best remove them or make them "8"'s.. no one will use the code if there are 4's in the source.. Well... I think that the 4's wont't be The prob. The bigger problem is the attitude of these comments: you are seriously making fun of other people's believings and show no respect. That may make more harm than not changing the 4. And: the 4, which is talked about would be the base of the NEM blockchain, isn't it? It is not comparable to any other 4's in NEM. You know it, so stop laughing to other's believings.
|
|
|
|
marek3ball-orig
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:01:57 PM |
|
Some minor changes have been added to the newsletter. Did anyone read this ? This thread was filled with the discussion regarding a longer redemption period for a week and now an announcement regarding that doesn't even spark any reaction ? Let me post the direct link then: https://medium.com/@xtester/extended-redemption-period-d6e7ceaf3a53that's shocking.. Soo many people kicked up a stink over the unclaimed and now that a solution is put into practice by the devs.. No one can even say thank you... I just caught this post now. The devs did well. Basically if somebody didn't claim their token during the regular period then after launch, redemption will be possible for 3 further months. During this period, redemption will happen with reduced equivalences for NEM stakes. during the 1st month after launch: 1 NEM stake is worth 750 000 NEM during the 2nd month after launch: 1 NEM stake is worth 500 000 NEM during the 3rd month after launch: 1 NEM stake is worth 250 000 NEM As soon as the 3 months are over, not a single NEM stake will be able to be redeemed and remaining NEMs will be available for NEM development. This will have given a person more than 4 months to get on board with claiming their NEM. More than a month pre-genesis and many months after. After launch the volume of conversations about NEM will go up, maybe a few people that signed up and forgot will have their memories rekindled and will come join us. For the most part, I doubt it will be an issue. On time = 1 000 000 NEM? If yes, how long will take launch time (no penalty time).
|
|
|
|
yshin365new
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:09:22 PM |
|
i am afraid to see what happens if nem marketcap reach 4k btc most likely it will mean the end for NEM devs are there any "4"'s in the source code? if there is best remove them or make them "8"'s.. no one will use the code if there are 4's in the source.. No problem. Just correct 4 into F. In our country, every elevator button is like this : 1 2 3 F 5 6.... (F = Four)
|
|
|
|
rockethead
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1016
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:10:04 PM |
|
i am afraid to see what happens if nem marketcap reach 4k btc most likely it will mean the end for NEM devs are there any "4"'s in the source code? if there is best remove them or make them "8"'s.. no one will use the code if there are 4's in the source.. Well... I think that the 4's wont't be The prob. The bigger problem is the attitude of these comments: you are seriously making fun of other people's believings and show no respect. That may make more harm than not changing the 4. And: the 4, which is talked about would be the base of the NEM blockchain, isn't it? It is not comparable to any other 4's in NEM. You know it, so stop laughing to other's believings. This is becoming too much. If the chinese are so superstitious, Doge coin would not have been supported by them. Why are there so many supporters of Doge Coin. How can money be named a dog. In chinese, if something good is named an animal like a dog, it means bad omen. 人不要做, 要做狗
|
|
|
|
devphp
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:12:27 PM |
|
The chinese can just wait for the price to go into 5xxxx or go back to 3xxxx. Problem solved
|
|
|
|
DarkhorseofNxt
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:22:38 PM |
|
If it is ridiculous, i will say it is ridiculous. Keep your superstition to yourself, dont force it on others.
|
|
|
|
mattadc
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:30:42 PM |
|
If it is ridiculous, i will say it is ridiculous. Keep your superstition to yourself, dont force it on others.
It is not anymore "ridiculous". There has been given arguments and even calculations, why 8 billion would be better. THe ones who are against 8 billion, are afraid of change, small, tiny change, only one number is changed. And they are afraid of that! . Isn't that ridiculous?
|
|
|
|
amytheplanarshift
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:33:14 PM |
|
I think that it is time someone with more power/influence in the community to step in and end this discussion by making a decision. Unfortunately, it has gotten to a point where people are fighting instead of discussing, and that is not something I want to see at all.
If we could just get a dev to come in and give the final word on this we can end the discussion and be done with it, because I am really not happy with how things are going right now.
|
|
|
|
Conurtrol
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:35:59 PM |
|
If it is ridiculous, i will say it is ridiculous. Keep your superstition to yourself, dont force it on others.
I think all religions and superstitions are ridiculous but pragmatism dictates that this be taken seriously for business reasons.
|
|
|
|
yshin365new
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:42:30 PM Last edit: October 20, 2014, 02:52:24 PM by yshin365new |
|
If it is ridiculous, i will say it is ridiculous. Keep your superstition to yourself, dont force it on others.
It is not anymore "ridiculous". There has been given arguments and even calculations, why 8 billion would be better. THe ones who are against 8 billion, are afraid of change, small, tiny change, only one number is changed. And they are afraid of that! . Isn't that ridiculous? Right! "Being afraid of small change" is not in harmony with " New Economy Movement"
|
|
|
|
nembit86
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:47:02 PM |
|
By now everyone has given lots of thought and comment to the subject of amount of coins. Twice on the poll there was a clear majority for 8 billion. If a core developer were to say it was too late or difficult to change to this number then keep things as they are but if its easy to change then just do it.
|
NDZ4YPCKVKWAIIZBB5T7T5EL67N2XWPQODGGWIYT
|
|
|
yshin365new
|
|
October 20, 2014, 01:58:29 PM Last edit: October 20, 2014, 02:53:43 PM by yshin365new |
|
By now everyone has given lots of thought and comment to the subject of amount of coins. Twice on the poll there was a clear majority for 8 billion. If a core developer were to say it was too late or difficult to change to this number then keep things as they are but if its easy to change then just do it.
Maybe....there may be...a fierce fighting between dev team members over the amount of NEMcoin. "Go ahead until good conclusion, I can wait NEM launch forever."
|
|
|
|
wangjj1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
October 20, 2014, 02:02:40 PM |
|
we can vote ,but since the voters is so few, less than 50,compared to over 2 thousand stakeholders,so the final decision should be made by all developers, because the total supply number is key parameter for a new coin ,and developers must balance the pros and cons seriously. Anyway,if stay unchanged( 3.99billion or 4 billion), I like to hold for long time ,if doubled, I like to sell half in short time.
|
|
|
|
nembit86
|
|
October 20, 2014, 02:06:50 PM |
|
we can vote ,but since the voters is so few, less than 50,compared to over 2 thousand stakeholders,so the final decision should be made by all developers, because the total supply number is key parameter for a new coin ,and developers must balance the pros and cons seriously. Anyway,if stay unchanged( 3.99billion or 4 billion), I like to hold for long time ,if doubled, I like to sell half in short time.
I think the people who vote are the ones that care . The devs will have taken note and read most of the comments and Im sure they will do the right thing.
|
NDZ4YPCKVKWAIIZBB5T7T5EL67N2XWPQODGGWIYT
|
|
|
yshin365new
|
|
October 20, 2014, 02:07:07 PM |
|
we can vote ,but since the voters is so few, less than 50,compared to over 2 thousand stakeholders,so the final decision should be made by all developers, because the total supply number is key parameter for a new coin ,and developers must balance the pros and cons seriously. Anyway,if stay unchanged( 3.99billion or 4 billion), I like to hold for long time ,if doubled, I like to sell half in short time.
Even though you sell half, you are still NEMillionaire!
|
|
|
|
wangjj1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
October 20, 2014, 02:10:44 PM |
|
we can vote ,but since the voters is so few, less than 50,compared to over 2 thousand stakeholders,so the final decision should be made by all developers, because the total supply number is key parameter for a new coin ,and developers must balance the pros and cons seriously. Anyway,if stay unchanged( 3.99billion or 4 billion), I like to hold for long time ,if doubled, I like to sell half in short time.
Even though you sell half, you are still NEMillionaire! Yes, a lot will take same action as me , I am still NEMillionaire even sell half if the number doubled.
|
|
|
|
yshin365new
|
|
October 20, 2014, 02:26:36 PM |
|
we can vote ,but since the voters is so few, less than 50,compared to over 2 thousand stakeholders,so the final decision should be made by all developers, because the total supply number is key parameter for a new coin ,and developers must balance the pros and cons seriously. Anyway,if stay unchanged( 3.99billion or 4 billion), I like to hold for long time ,if doubled, I like to sell half in short time.
Even though you sell half, you are still NEMillionaire! Yes, a lot will take same action as me , I am still NEMillionaire even sell half if the number doubled. If every Nember do like you, NEM coin distribution will hit a home run! So, how about supporting 8 billion?
|
|
|
|
|