merc84
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:32:52 PM |
|
[METERS] 25354.000000 SPS | 32.833333 PPS | Height = 100
Too many orphans, in fact, almost all...
Your prob on the right fork at least... Seems i am not
|
|
|
|
jorneyflair
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:32:59 PM |
|
06:32:07  [ { "addr" : "69.195.149.114:9323", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1411511528, "lastrecv" : 1411511529, "conntime" : 1411510011, "version" : 10100, "subver" : "Coinshield Core[vv0.1.0.0]/ DB [0.1.1] PROTOCOL [v0.1.1]", "inbound" : false, "releasetime" : 0, "height" : 0, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "204.27.62.226:9323", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1411511529, "lastrecv" : 1411511529, "conntime" : 1411510012, "version" : 10100, "subver" : "Coinshield Core[vv0.1.0.0]/ DB [0.1.1] PROTOCOL [v0.1.1]", "inbound" : false, "releasetime" : 0, "height" : 0, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "104.131.122.25:9323", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1411511511, "lastrecv" : 1411511528, "conntime" : 1411510571, "version" : 10100, "subver" : "Coinshield Core[vv0.1.0.0]/ DB [0.1.1] PROTOCOL [v0.1.1]", "inbound" : false, "releasetime" : 0, "height" : 0, "banscore" : 0 } ] are these the seednodes? yup, it seems i got a block not orphaned but only 1.25coin , am i forked or what , lots of orphans
|
|
|
|
Videlicet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1058
Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:34:25 PM |
|
These are:
{ "addr" : "69.195.149.114:9323", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1411511528, "lastrecv" : 1411511529, "conntime" : 1411510011, "version" : 10100, "subver" : "Coinshield Core[vv0.1.0.0]/ DB [0.1.1] PROTOCOL [v0.1.1]", "inbound" : false, "releasetime" : 0, "height" : 0, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "204.27.62.226:9323", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1411511529, "lastrecv" : 1411511529, "conntime" : 1411510012, "version" : 10100, "subver" : "Coinshield Core[vv0.1.0.0]/ DB [0.1.1] PROTOCOL [v0.1.1]", "inbound" : false, "releasetime" : 0, "height" : 0, "banscore" : 0 },
The seed nodes are all on the same fork. Block 112
Viz.
|
[ Nexus] Created by Viz. [ Videlicet] : "videre licet - it may be seen; evidently; clearly"
|
|
|
Hix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1971
Merit: 1036
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:34:40 PM |
|
Block 85.
Can you compile wallet for ubuntu 12.04 I have this error on 12.04 irvo@:~$ ./coinshield ./coinshield: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.17' not found (required by ./coinshield) I have working wallet on 14.04 but miner crashing every 10-20 seconds if i try to connect to external machine(14.04 with wallet)
|
|
|
|
wisnon
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:35:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
vedran82
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:36:58 PM |
|
22 blocks, 22 orphans.
|
|
|
|
Videlicet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1058
Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:37:06 PM |
|
I am keeping to my word, no matter the circumstances nor cost to myself. Viz.
|
[ Nexus] Created by Viz. [ Videlicet] : "videre licet - it may be seen; evidently; clearly"
|
|
|
Superxfast
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:37:48 PM |
|
My wallet say 33 blocks why it is diff from you These are:
{ "addr" : "69.195.149.114:9323", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1411511528, "lastrecv" : 1411511529, "conntime" : 1411510011, "version" : 10100, "subver" : "Coinshield Core[vv0.1.0.0]/ DB [0.1.1] PROTOCOL [v0.1.1]", "inbound" : false, "releasetime" : 0, "height" : 0, "banscore" : 0 }, { "addr" : "204.27.62.226:9323", "services" : "00000001", "lastsend" : 1411511529, "lastrecv" : 1411511529, "conntime" : 1411510012, "version" : 10100, "subver" : "Coinshield Core[vv0.1.0.0]/ DB [0.1.1] PROTOCOL [v0.1.1]", "inbound" : false, "releasetime" : 0, "height" : 0, "banscore" : 0 },
The seed nodes are all on the same fork. Block 112
Viz.
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:39:29 PM |
|
[METERS] 18601.666667 SPS | 26.166667 PPS | Height = 135 hope i am on right fork now
|
|
|
|
Videlicet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1058
Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:39:51 PM |
|
It can take time for the longest chain to be realized and merged by all nodes. Difficulty just passed 3.0 the orphans are so many because someone on the network has a very large hash rate. It is taking all the blocks anyone has mined and making the longest chain.
Viz.
|
[ Nexus] Created by Viz. [ Videlicet] : "videre licet - it may be seen; evidently; clearly"
|
|
|
Videlicet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1058
Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:40:22 PM |
|
[METERS] 18601.666667 SPS | 26.166667 PPS | Height = 135 hope i am on right fork now
I can confirm you are. I am on the same fork with 9 nodes. Viz.
|
[ Nexus] Created by Viz. [ Videlicet] : "videre licet - it may be seen; evidently; clearly"
|
|
|
paulthetafy
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:41:59 PM |
|
I'm just getting Failed to Update Height but I have the latest ubuntu bin
|
|
|
|
Superxfast
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:42:34 PM |
|
Hello Vi, I am on block 40, How can i chang fork as you. [METERS] 18601.666667 SPS | 26.166667 PPS | Height = 135 hope i am on right fork now
I can confirm you are. I am on the same fork with 9 nodes. Viz.
|
|
|
|
fakeshadow
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:43:08 PM |
|
it just keep forking every time i synced.don't know how you guys keep up with the main chain.
imo this launch is failed and not fair (for me at least).im out.
|
|
|
|
skunk
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:43:15 PM |
|
i'm on the right chain (height 147) but all the few transactions are unconfirmed because not accepted
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:43:44 PM |
|
what are the dependencies for the miner? One box built fine on Linux Mint 17, another on Ubuntu 12.04 is giving me this :: ~/primeminer$ make -f makefile.unix g++ -c -pthread -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-unused-parameter -Wformat -Wformat-security -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_LIB -I/home/slicify/primeminer -I/home/slicify/primeminer/build -I/home/slicify/primeminer/hash -O2 -MMD -o build/miner.o miner.cpp miner.cpp:53:27: warning: integer constant is so large that it is unsigned [enabled by default] miner.cpp:53:7: warning: this decimal constant is unsigned only in ISO C90 [enabled by default] In file included from util.h:5:0, from types.h:4, from core.h:5, from miner.cpp:1: hash/templates.h: In function ‘uint256 SK256(const std::vector<unsigned char>&)’: hash/templates.h:40:23: warning: unused variable ‘pblank’ [-Wunused-variable] In file included from core.h:5:0, from miner.cpp:1: types.h: In member function ‘LLP::DDOS_Score& LLP::DDOS_Score::operator++(int)’: types.h:125:3: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] types.h: In constructor ‘LLP::DDOS_Filter::DDOS_Filter(unsigned int)’: types.h:136:22: warning: ‘LLP::DDOS_Filter::cSCORE’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder] types.h:133:16: warning: ‘unsigned int LLP::DDOS_Filter::BANTIME’ [-Wreorder] types.h:138:3: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] In file included from core.h:5:0, from miner.cpp:1: types.h: In member function ‘virtual bool LLP::Connection::ProcessPacket()’: types.h:249:40: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] types.h: In constructor ‘LLP::Connection::Connection()’: types.h:254:18: warning: ‘LLP::Connection::DDOS’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder] types.h:219:17: warning: ‘LLP::Packet LLP::Connection::INCOMING’ [-Wreorder] types.h:258:3: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] types.h: In constructor ‘LLP::Connection::Connection(LLP::Socket_t, LLP::DDOS_Filter*)’: types.h:254:18: warning: ‘LLP::Connection::DDOS’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder] types.h:219:17: warning: ‘LLP::Packet LLP::Connection::INCOMING’ [-Wreorder] types.h:259:3: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] In file included from miner.cpp:1:0: core.h: In constructor ‘LLP::Outbound::Outbound(std::string, std::string)’: core.h:61:19: warning: ‘LLP::Outbound::PORT’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder] core.h:80:79: warning: base ‘LLP::Connection’ [-Wreorder] core.h:80:3: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] In file included from miner.cpp:1:0: core.h: In member function ‘uint64 LLP::Miner::bytes2uint64(std::vector<unsigned char>)’: core.h:256:79: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default] core.h:256:98: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default] core.h:256:117: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default] core.h:256:136: warning: left shift count >= width of type [enabled by default] miner.cpp: At global scope: miner.cpp:15:28: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization of member ‘nSearches’ [-fpermissive] miner.cpp:15:28: error: making ‘nSearches’ static [-fpermissive] miner.cpp:15:28: error: ISO C++ forbids in-class initialization of non-const static member ‘nSearches’ miner.cpp:15:41: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization of member ‘nPrimes’ [-fpermissive] miner.cpp:15:41: error: making ‘nPrimes’ static [-fpermissive] miner.cpp:15:41: error: ISO C++ forbids in-class initialization of non-const static member ‘nPrimes’ miner.cpp: In constructor ‘Core::ServerConnection::ServerConnection(std::string, std::string, int, int)’: miner.cpp:76:21: warning: ‘Core::ServerConnection::PORT’ will be initialized after [-Wreorder] miner.cpp:72:7: warning: ‘int Core::ServerConnection::nThreads’ [-Wreorder] miner.cpp:78:3: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] make: *** [build/miner.o] Error 1
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:44:52 PM |
|
Just delete appdata>coinshield if ur not on correct chain and resync.
|
|
|
|
Videlicet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1058
Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:45:58 PM |
|
What is the C++ version you are using? I initialize variables in the constructor, which is a C++11 feature.
Viz.
edit: someone definitely has a very high hashrate. I see reorganizations of 5 blocks or more every little bit. As difficulty rises the chain will stabilize.
|
[ Nexus] Created by Viz. [ Videlicet] : "videre licet - it may be seen; evidently; clearly"
|
|
|
jorneyflair
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:48:21 PM |
|
Let's put in some constants and swap the last variable to 1 since block time won't vary that much on this coin...
Block 120 (2 hours): Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*120)+3 = 52.99 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 120) + 0.1 = 1.09
Block 525600 (1 year): Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*525600)+3 = 31.04 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 525600) + 0.1 = 0.83
Block 2628000 (5 year): Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*2628000)+3 = 5.776 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 2628000) + 0.1 = 0.312
So you start taking roughly 2%, rising to 2.7% after a year, and 5.4% after 5 years.
Unsure what to say, that's a horrible unfair greedy amount to try and take, and to try and mask using relatively complex equations.
You are forgetting the Coinshield Channels, and that value per block does not mean higher value overall in exponential decay: Block 120 (2 hours): 1.09 / 67.07 = [1.6% per block]Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*120)+3 = 52.99 Channels: 10 * e^(-0.00000055 * 120) + 3 = 12.99 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 120) + 0.1 = 1.09 Block 525600 (1 year): 0.83 / 42.36 = [1.9% per block]Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*525600)+3 = 31.04 Channels: 10 * e^(-0.00000055 * 525600) + 3 = 10.49 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 525600) + 0.1 = 0.83 COIN SUPPLY, 1 YEAR: 28,545,067Total Mined: 21,801,631 [76% to miners]Total Channel: 6,231,778 [21% to traders]Total Dev: 511,658 [1.7% dev]Block 2628000 (5 year): 0.312 / 11.438 = [2.7% per block] Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*2628000)+3 = 5.776 Channels: 10 * e^(-0.00000055 * 2628000]) + 3 = 5.35 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 2628000) + 0.1 = 0.312 COIN SUPPLY, 5 YEARS: 74,341,701Total Mined: 50,888,959 [68% to miners]Total Channel: 21,850,548 [29% to traders]Total Dev: 1,602,194 [2.1% dev]Block 5256000 (10 year): 0.145 / 6.845 = [2.1% per block]Miners: 50*e^(-0.0000011*5256000) + 3 = 3.15 Channels: 10 * e^(-0.00000055 * 5256000]) + 3 = 3.55 Dev: e^(-0.00000059 * 5256000) + 0.1 = 0.145 COIN SUPPLY 10 YEARS: 96,156,860Total Mined: 61,077,806 [63% to miners]Total Channel: 32,935,024 [34% to traders]Total Dev: 2,144,030 [2.2% dev]This graph is from the modeling program I used to design the equations. EDIT: As you will notice, the channels do increase in [%] over time. This gives them more longevity. ~Videlicet Long long journey to go Only got one block so far (1.25coin) , so little comparing the total coins suply is 100m Ok , its time for supper
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
September 23, 2014, 10:49:31 PM |
|
4770k on ubuntu 13.10 seems to be segfaulting alot, while 3570k on same distro remains stable the whole time.
|
|
|
|
|