KnCMiningOp
|
|
November 19, 2013, 01:16:24 AM |
|
Make sure you have created Havelock accounts for each email address. They can't create accounts for you, so they will only transfer shares when an account exists.
Alright that's it. I'll wait for them now. Thanks for your reply.
|
|
|
|
stabs
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
November 19, 2013, 03:19:01 AM |
|
Looks like someone is trying to get out at .06.
|
|
|
|
investr
|
|
November 19, 2013, 03:20:25 AM Last edit: April 17, 2014, 06:10:43 PM by investr |
|
Given the rise in BTC price, anyone want to take a shot at what COG is "worth" these days? I was reading a comment on the Soylent discussion forums and it reminded me of Cognitive, so I thought I would share. http://discourse.soylent.me/t/soylent-batch-2-time/12201/5Soylent is primarily rice based.
|
|
|
|
Tafelpoot
|
|
November 19, 2013, 12:48:04 PM |
|
To evaluate Cog, have a look at the following:
At 0.077, CEX.io is 0.077btc per GH, fully hashing now as we speak. (100 pct to dividends) At 0.06, Cognitive is 0.83btc per GH now, and expecting to become 0.06btc per GH at end of January... (50 pct to dividends)
Garret, could you please update the website to indicate what people may expect now and in January? There are some essential numbers missing on that website.
Now: - current number of shares: 10420 - current hash rate: 750 GH/s - current hash rate per share: 0.072 GH/s - current holdings: ? - CogF and CogF2 shares sold: 800 ?? (each CogF funding share will become 20 Cognitive shares)
In January - expected number of shares: 26420 ?? - expected hash rate at end of January: 28-29 TH/s - expected hash rate at end of January: 1.1 GH/s
I find it really unacceptable that you insist in ignoring your financials for months now. You are running a mining coop with a market cap of about 1M USD as we speak. That is very cool, but it comes with responsibilities...
It shouldn't be up to us to come up with clear numbers on the current status of Cognitive.
|
|
|
|
logicbomb666
|
|
November 19, 2013, 01:34:15 PM |
|
Disappointing to see the price drop although the volume is non existent. I thought the BTC price increase would help the price, because it makes mining that much more profitable. I do think there is a chance the price will rebound a bit if we do actually get new mining equipment in the end. We'll just have to wait and see.
from what I have witnessed, every time the BTC value skyrockets, share prices drop. Every time the BTC value drops, share prices go up.
|
I think snare rolls should be used as a currency.
|
|
|
Tafelpoot
|
|
November 19, 2013, 03:39:45 PM |
|
Looks like the discount shares are gone again...
|
|
|
|
theterabyte
Member
Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
|
November 20, 2013, 12:57:41 AM |
|
I stand by my prior maths/assumptions. The value of COG is primarily in the BTC that it can produce, and crazy fluctuations in the value of BTC doesn't really change that. (you but X shares with Y BTC and earn Z btc dividends, regardless of what BTC is worth). The main thing that has changed is X BTC buys more hardware than it used to since generally bitcoin miners are built using supply chains and workers paid in USD. This means the BTC our upcoming 28TH miners earn can buy that much more hardware in the future if the prices stay high.
The current dips are due to people profit-taking, their getting out (possibly at a profit despite the lower price, due to BTC value increase) is your cheap entry to future profits. I see no reason not to predict COG shares being worth between 0.25 to 0.5 BTC per share when our hardware arrives (and possibly even more, depending on demand, difficulty trends, and other market conditions)
|
My Bitcoin Tip Jar: 11Ws5nzwy44cMcymu6ddRxdp9uvDonNqB
|
|
|
medicine
|
|
November 20, 2013, 01:34:29 PM |
|
Whoever has the bot running on this security on Havelock...very annoying. The volume is non existent and still someone has to run a bot. No rules against bots, but frustrating when trying to pick up cheap shares. Peace.
|
|
|
|
theterabyte
Member
Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
|
November 20, 2013, 05:50:02 PM |
|
Does it just outbid you by 1 satoshi or something?
This is why the acceptable number of bots to have running are 0 or 2+. Someone should run another one =)
|
My Bitcoin Tip Jar: 11Ws5nzwy44cMcymu6ddRxdp9uvDonNqB
|
|
|
investr
|
|
November 20, 2013, 05:52:35 PM |
|
Does it just outbid you by 1 satoshi or something?
This is why the acceptable number of bots to have running are 0 or 2+. Someone should run another one =)
show me the github repo
|
|
|
|
Garr255 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
What's a GPU?
|
|
November 20, 2013, 06:34:17 PM |
|
Tafelpoot, I am working on updating the web site today; you can expect periodic updates being pushed to it throughout the week until it meets our satisfaction.
--Garrett
|
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” -- Mahatma Gandhi
Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
|
|
|
lightbox
|
|
November 21, 2013, 01:46:01 AM |
|
Does it just outbid you by 1 satoshi or something?
This is why the acceptable number of bots to have running are 0 or 2+. Someone should run another one =)
Agreed if someone's bot is annoying you, you should write a bot to annoy their bot. bot wars! We encourage bots (thats why we released our API) as it (theoretically) adds liquidity.
|
|
|
|
vasart
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
November 21, 2013, 07:54:01 PM |
|
What should I do in case of having Havelock account but registered at other mail address than used at BTCTC?
Garrett did not respond to my emails for over a week, so I have to ask here.
|
|
|
|
lunarboy
|
|
November 21, 2013, 08:43:00 PM |
|
What should I do in case of having Havelock account but registered at other mail address than used at BTCTC?
Garrett did not respond to my emails for over a week, so I have to ask here.
I had the same issue, the easiest answer is to create another account (under you BTC-TC e-mail) with havelock and then transfer them yourself. I actually managed to avoid this via proving ownership of the shares, by signing my BTC-TC public address. However it took several e-mails with Garrett and Havelock to convince everyone concerned I was the owner. best of luck
|
|
|
|
lightbox
|
|
November 21, 2013, 09:37:06 PM |
|
What should I do in case of having Havelock account but registered at other mail address than used at BTCTC?
Garrett did not respond to my emails for over a week, so I have to ask here.
Simplest and quickest - create new account with btctc email address, and transfer shares to your other user
|
|
|
|
havelock
|
|
November 21, 2013, 10:55:21 PM |
|
To whom it may concern, If you have not received your units yet and have created an account with Havelock, please send us a quick e-mail to Support@HavelockInvestments.com using the e-mail address you used to register the account. We will process your request as soon as possible. Thank you, HavelockInvestments.com
|
|
|
|
Guybrush01
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
November 22, 2013, 04:13:53 AM |
|
Looks like the discount shares are gone again...
Yeah, my bad, sorry. Whenever rock-bottom shares are showing up, I buy them. We'll see if I am ultimately marked crazy or not. :-)
|
|
|
|
Garr255 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
What's a GPU?
|
|
November 22, 2013, 05:42:15 AM |
|
What should I do in case of having Havelock account but registered at other mail address than used at BTCTC?
Garrett did not respond to my emails for over a week, so I have to ask here.
Please email me using the email associated with my bitcointalk account, I usually answer that within a few hours. --Garrett
|
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” -- Mahatma Gandhi
Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
|
|
|
dunchy
|
|
November 22, 2013, 09:23:15 AM |
|
Any news when COG.F1/2 will be listed?
|
|
|
|
helloge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1057
Merit: 1000
The Experience Layer of the Decentralized Internet
|
|
November 22, 2013, 10:40:02 AM |
|
Any news when COG.F1/2 will be listed?
+1 why not till now?
|
|
|
|
|