[HYP] HyperStake | Generous Reward Staking | Advanced Staking Controls & Wallet

[billotronic]

You are close...

setstakesplitthreshold Edit

Syntax: setstakesplitthreshold <1 - 999,999>

Description: A stake output will split (in two parts), when the resulting amount for each of the outputs equals or exceeds the threshold value specified. For example: by setting a threshold of 5,000, stake outputs greater than 10,000 will be split into two.

groovy?

[1714691256]

1714691256

[1714691256]

1714691256

[1714691256]

1714691256

[cyberpinoy]

You are close...

setstakesplitthreshold Edit

Syntax: setstakesplitthreshold <1 - 999,999>

Description: A stake output will split (in two parts), when the resulting amount for each of the outputs equals or exceeds the threshold value specified. For example: by setting a threshold of 5,000, stake outputs greater than 10,000 will be split into two.

groovy?

OK I get that now no problems there but I still have the problem that when I enter

setstakesplitthreshold 10000

 it says

{
"split stake threshold set to " : 10000,
"saved to wallet.dat " : "true"
}

But it sure does not seem to be doing it. I had a block of 17449 that staked and then split into 2 blocks of 9224.75. Shouldnt it have not split this block as the 2 blocks it made were both under 10,000 HYP ? Is there something I am missing here.

[Crestington]

You are close...

setstakesplitthreshold Edit

Syntax: setstakesplitthreshold <1 - 999,999>

Description: A stake output will split (in two parts), when the resulting amount for each of the outputs equals or exceeds the threshold value specified. For example: by setting a threshold of 5,000, stake outputs greater than 10,000 will be split into two.

groovy?

OK I get that now no problems there but I still have the problem that when I enter

setstakesplitthreshold 10000

 it says

{
"split stake threshold set to " : 10000,
"saved to wallet.dat " : "true"
}

But it sure does not seem to be doing it. I had a block of 17449 that staked and then split into 2 blocks of 9224.75. Shouldnt it have not split this block as the 2 blocks it made were both under 10,000 HYP ? Is there something I am missing here.

17,449 is greater than 10,000 so it split the Block into two.

If you want your Block of 17,449 not to split into two then you could set the threshold at 20,000.

[CodeR70]

You are close...

setstakesplitthreshold Edit

Syntax: setstakesplitthreshold <1 - 999,999>

Description: A stake output will split (in two parts), when the resulting amount for each of the outputs equals or exceeds the threshold value specified. For example: by setting a threshold of 5,000, stake outputs greater than 10,000 will be split into two.

groovy?

OK I get that now no problems there but I still have the problem that when I enter

setstakesplitthreshold 10000

 it says

{
"split stake threshold set to " : 10000,
"saved to wallet.dat " : "true"
}

But it sure does not seem to be doing it. I had a block of 17449 that staked and then split into 2 blocks of 9224.75. Shouldnt it have not split this block as the 2 blocks it made were both under 10,000 HYP ? Is there something I am missing here.

17,449 is greater than 10,000 so it split the Block into two.

If you want your Block of 17,449 not to split into two then you could set the threshold at 20,000.

That is not how it's explained in the help example. The example specifically says 5000 so blocks bigger then 10000 are split.

[presstab]

You are close...

setstakesplitthreshold Edit

Syntax: setstakesplitthreshold <1 - 999,999>

Description: A stake output will split (in two parts), when the resulting amount for each of the outputs equals or exceeds the threshold value specified. For example: by setting a threshold of 5,000, stake outputs greater than 10,000 will be split into two.

groovy?

OK I get that now no problems there but I still have the problem that when I enter

setstakesplitthreshold 10000

 it says

{
"split stake threshold set to " : 10000,
"saved to wallet.dat " : "true"
}

But it sure does not seem to be doing it. I had a block of 17449 that staked and then split into 2 blocks of 9224.75. Shouldnt it have not split this block as the 2 blocks it made were both under 10,000 HYP ? Is there something I am missing here.

17,449 is greater than 10,000 so it split the Block into two.

If you want your Block of 17,449 not to split into two then you could set the threshold at 20,000.

That is not how it's explained in the help example. The example specifically says 5000 so blocks bigger then 10000 are split.

Yes it is *supposed* to be set to not split if the block will result in an amount less than 10k (in that example). I will double check the code to see if there is some leakage in the calculated value somewhere.

[Hilux74]

I'm surprised to notice the price of HYP dropping below 100sat today with how advanced and well functioning the wallet is and how damn hard it is getting to stake.  I think over the longer term HYP is a great buy.

I think HYP is getting some blow back from the few horrible, horrible...I mean REALLY horrible, ultrahigh% POS coins that have salted the earth lately.  I think people see original 750% and think similar out of control inflation. 

It is actually far from it.  I did some quicky math, possibly with errors...

Yesterday when I looked there was 184,615,385 HYP in existence.  Lets call that the total for Apr28, true number is give or take...  We have already hit the capped ceiling and know that the new HYP generated each day is 960,000. 

So the daily inflation rate for Apr28 was 0.52% (960,000/184,615,385).  Today it will be 0.517% and so on getting smaller each day. 

The instantaneous yearly inflation on Apr28 was 190% (Bottlecaps territory).  But if the actual yearly inflation rate is the sum of the daily inflation rate from x to x+365 then the yearly inflation from Apr28, 2015 (to Apr28, 2016) is only 106% (Hobonickels territory)...and dropping fast. 

Looking forward, on july1, 2015 the actual yearly inflation rate works out to 89%.  April 1, 2016 the actual inflation rate is 52%. (DMD PHS territory)

It will be interesting to see how things play out.

[Hilux74]

  mods deleted my Aquaman post...the super hero of the sea gets no respect.

[Crestington]

I'm surprised to notice the price of HYP dropping below 100sat today with how advanced and well functioning the wallet is and how damn hard it is getting to stake.  I think over the longer term HYP is a great buy.

I think HYP is getting some blow back from the few horrible, horrible...I mean REALLY horrible, ultrahigh% POS coins that have salted the earth lately.  I think people see original 750% and think similar out of control inflation. 

It is actually far from it.  I did some quicky math, possibly with errors...

Yesterday when I looked there was 184,615,385 HYP in existence.  Lets call that the total for Apr28, true number is give or take...  We have already hit the capped ceiling and know that the new HYP generated each day is 960,000. 

So the daily inflation rate for Apr28 was 0.52% (960,000/184,615,385).  Today it will be 0.517% and so on getting smaller each day. 

The instantaneous yearly inflation on Apr28 was 190% (Bottlecaps territory).  But if the actual yearly inflation rate is the sum of the daily inflation rate from x to x+365 then the yearly inflation from Apr28, 2015 (to Apr28, 2016) is only 106% (Hobonickels territory)...and dropping fast. 

Looking forward, on july1, 2015 the actual yearly inflation rate works out to 89%.  April 1, 2016 the actual inflation rate is 52%. (DMD PHS territory)

It will be interesting to see how things play out.

Hyper's inflation if all Blocks are 1000 Coins each is 350 million a year (only 200% from current rate), as the price drops down lower into the 100 Satoshi mark it creates stronger walls, it's then a 1-2% gap playing the highs and lows so there is more profit arbitraging different exchanges. Coins not Staking or in Flux creates more Coins for Stakers.

What is the added benefit of having the Fees of Coins destroyed? Wouldn't you want to have Fees as part of the reward and increase the amount of active Coins in circulation?

[presstab]

Inflation rate has come down dramatically since the beginning 750% rate. But as noted, we still are in fact a high PoS coin, 200-300% annual money supply inflation over the next year and decreasing naturally every year after. As mentioned this puts us into the lower end of the high PoS coins, and we will keep sliding down that range.

[Biomech]

Inflation rate has come down dramatically since the beginning 750% rate. But as noted, we still are in fact a high PoS coin, 200-300% annual money supply inflation over the next year and decreasing naturally every year after. As mentioned this puts us into the lower end of the high PoS coins, and we will keep sliding down that range.

Going forward, that might be something to emphasize.

[LiteBit]

Talking about HYP as High PoS versus 750% High PoS sounds better anyways. I see the topic header was changed to that effect, good move.

[presstab]

Talking about HYP as High PoS versus 750% High PoS sounds better anyways. I see the topic header was changed to that effect, good move.

Yeah at this point it is a bit misleading to say HYP is 750% PoS. Sure the code has 750% in there, but with the maximum generation of 1k HYP, I am seeing more along the lines of 150-500% depending on my blocks size and time to stake.

[Biomech]

Some mod really didn't like the superhero thing My comment got deleted and didn't even have a picture.


EDIT: I thought mods weren't supposed to do shit in self moderated threads? Since Press was in on the joke, they definitely are out of line.

[mafort1469]

Talking about HYP as High PoS versus 750% High PoS sounds better anyways. I see the topic header was changed to that effect, good move.

Yeah at this point it is a bit misleading to say HYP is 750% PoS. Sure the code has 750% in there, but with the maximum generation of 1k HYP, I am seeing more along the lines of 150-500% depending on my blocks size and time to stake.

Yes, your model has worked flawlessly. Experiment successful and presstab wins, hands down! Good job my friend.

[Crestington]

Some mod really didn't like the superhero thing My comment got deleted and didn't even have a picture.


EDIT: I thought mods weren't supposed to do shit in self moderated threads? Since Press was in on the joke, they definitely are out of line.

Yeah I agree! mods deleted my Ace and Gary picture after that as well and it wasn't even racey! It's a SNL cartoon as a joke to AnalCoin, and the whole superhero thing was like 8 posts and then back on topic.

[iantunc]

Some mod really didn't like the superhero thing My comment got deleted and didn't even have a picture.


EDIT: I thought mods weren't supposed to do shit in self moderated threads? Since Press was in on the joke, they definitely are out of line.

Can it be connected with the DMCA?

[Trimegistus]

Lately I've noticed that my qt-wallet is using a lot of CPU power with no apparent reason. I reduced the number of blocks to 5 and none of them are yet mature but the wallet keeps on using almost 50% of my CPU (Celeron 2.16 GHz on the Intel NUC). 

Any ideas?

[billotronic]

Some mod really didn't like the superhero thing My comment got deleted and didn't even have a picture.


EDIT: I thought mods weren't supposed to do shit in self moderated threads? Since Press was in on the joke, they definitely are out of line.

Can it be connected with the DMCA?

no, apparently someone hasn't been taking his cunt pills lately and has been delete happy in the alts forum... ive had a lot of post deleted recently that would lead me to believe a certain mod has an agenda and should no longer be a mod.

in other news, sorry been afk all week.... came down hardcore with stomach flu only to end my week with my father having another heartattack early yesterday morning. fuck a doodle doo

[billotronic]

Lately I've noticed that my qt-wallet is using a lot of CPU power with no apparent reason. I reduced the number of blocks to 5 and none of them are yet mature but the wallet keeps on using almost 50% of my CPU (Celeron 2.16 GHz on the Intel NUC). 

Any ideas?

what version?

does the wallet have coins in it?

[Trimegistus]

what version?

does the wallet have coins in it?

version 1.1.0.2

Yes, it does :-)