billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
|
May 01, 2015, 12:57:08 PM |
|
lol yeah duh, you said you had blocks...
ok, anything fishy lookin in your log? if not sure, up it somewhere and we can take a lookie lou
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Biomech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
|
|
May 01, 2015, 02:12:31 PM |
|
Some mod really didn't like the superhero thing My comment got deleted and didn't even have a picture. EDIT: I thought mods weren't supposed to do shit in self moderated threads? Since Press was in on the joke, they definitely are out of line. Can it be connected with the DMCA? no, apparently someone hasn't been taking his cunt pills lately and has been delete happy in the alts forum... ive had a lot of post deleted recently that would lead me to believe a certain mod has an agenda and should no longer be a mod. in other news, sorry been afk all week.... came down hardcore with stomach flu only to end my week with my father having another heartattack early yesterday morning. fuck a doodle doo Oh, man! sorry to hear that. My dad had a heart attack 8 years ago. He beat it, but that's some scary shit Here's hoping all goes well going forward. ...and yeah, I think the mod you're referring to is not, well, mmMPREPared? Definitely Can't Understand Normal Thinking. No way it was DMCA, since it was an oblique reference. X-men fans would recognize it.
|
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 01, 2015, 03:30:20 PM |
|
A quick FYI: The open source version of CCE 4.0 is very close to being released. I have decided to release a complete package including both the database loader and web server. This will be a very basic version of CCE 4.0, some features will be added to this version (see README). About a week ago, I took down the private git with an initial version of the database loader that I was showing to a few developers. This was in anticipation of the public release and the decision to release a complete basic explorer. The database loader has gone through a couple of revisions and some features have been removed. Some of these features will be added back in. Anyway, The official public repository is at : https://github.com/cryptocoinexplorer/Open-Source-CCE-4.0At the moment, only the README is present.
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
May 01, 2015, 03:35:03 PM Last edit: May 01, 2015, 03:45:39 PM by Trimegistus |
|
This new version actually decreases the CPU usage.Altough I believe I still have a problem, now there was a significant improvement. The wallet process still takes 50% of the CPU quiet frequently but at least now it fluctuates between 20% - 50%. BTW, this is my .conf file: rpcuser=fodaxHYP rpcpassword=l3IeiH3OSwTuPriffksssfrfv026OQ7nQBvRaHOO5lz rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 gen=0 server=1 daemon=1 listen=1 maxconnections=32 Can this be the cause of my problems? EDIT: Aditional info, the locked wallet takes less than 1% CPU power... but as soon as I unlock it (to mint only) it explodes!
|
|
|
|
presstab (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
May 01, 2015, 03:45:31 PM |
|
A quick FYI: The open source version of CCE 4.0 is very close to being released. I have decided to release a complete package including both the database loader and web server. This will be a very basic version of CCE 4.0, some features will be added to this version (see README). About a week ago, I took down the private git with an initial version of the database loader that I was showing to a few developers. This was in anticipation of the public release and the decision to release a complete basic explorer. The database loader has gone through a couple of revisions and some features have been removed. Some of these features will be added back in. Anyway, The official public repository is at : https://github.com/cryptocoinexplorer/Open-Source-CCE-4.0At the moment, only the README is present. I love the work and also the open source spirit of sending all of your hard work out for everyone to see Good job sir.
|
|
|
|
johan11
|
|
May 01, 2015, 03:47:00 PM |
|
A quick FYI: The open source version of CCE 4.0 is very close to being released. I have decided to release a complete package including both the database loader and web server. This will be a very basic version of CCE 4.0, some features will be added to this version (see README). About a week ago, I took down the private git with an initial version of the database loader that I was showing to a few developers. This was in anticipation of the public release and the decision to release a complete basic explorer. The database loader has gone through a couple of revisions and some features have been removed. Some of these features will be added back in. Anyway, The official public repository is at : https://github.com/cryptocoinexplorer/Open-Source-CCE-4.0At the moment, only the README is present. I love the work and also the open source spirit of sending all of your hard work out for everyone to see Good job sir. I too sent litlle balls to snow4 and not shows - is frozen wallet?
|
|
|
|
presstab (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
May 01, 2015, 03:55:36 PM |
|
This new version actually decreases the CPU usage.Altough I believe I still have a problem, now there was a significant improvement. The wallet process still takes 50% of the CPU quiet frequently but at least now it fluctuates between 20% - 50%. BTW, this is my .conf file: rpcuser=fodaxHYP rpcpassword=l3IeiH3OSwTuPriffksssfrfv026OQ7nQBvRaHOO5lz rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 gen=0 server=1 daemon=1 listen=1 maxconnections=32 Can this be the cause of my problems? EDIT: Aditional info, the locked wallet takes less than 1% CPU power... but as soon as I unlock it (to mint only) it explodes! I would say that you would be fine without anything in your conf at all. Server, listen, and maxconnections flags could be slowing you down a little. Also try going into the debug window and typing "strictincoming true" and "strictprotocol true". If this doesn't solve your cpu problems then we have some more digging to do
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
May 01, 2015, 04:18:58 PM |
|
I'm now running the wallet with this conf file: rpcuser=hyperfodaxHYP rpcpassword=l3IeiH3OSwTuPriffksssfrfv026OQ7nQBvRaHOO5lz rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 gen=0 daemon=1 I tried the "strictincoming true" and "strictprotocol true" commands but there was no apparent effect. I also tried to repair the wallet but there was no need for it. This is really weird cause I've been running this wallet for a few weeks with no problems. But suddenly... it behaves like a very heavy app. Any other sugestions? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 01, 2015, 04:37:06 PM |
|
I'm now running the wallet with this conf file: rpcuser=????? rpcpassword=?????????? rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 gen=0 daemon=1 I tried the "strictincoming true" and "strictprotocol true" commands but there was no apparent effect. I also tried to repair the wallet but there was no need for it. This is really weird cause I've been running this wallet for a few weeks with no problems. But suddenly... it behaves like a very heavy app. Any other sugestions? Thanks! I would change your rpcuser and rpcpassword now that they are public information.
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
May 01, 2015, 04:39:29 PM |
|
I would change your rpcuser and rpcpassword now that they are public information. Hehehe, already done that. But thanks anyway ;-)
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 01, 2015, 04:57:26 PM |
|
I love the work and also the open source spirit of sending all of your hard work out for everyone to see Good job sir. At the moment, I am waiting on a fresh database build with Hyperstake in order to test the newest server code with a POS chain. I am having a bit of a debate on whether I should release under MIT or GPL. What were your reasons for using MIT over GPL? For those that mat not know the difference, the MIT license allows anybody to do whatever they want with the code. GPL is basically the same but with the restriction that one must also release any derivative work as GPL.
|
|
|
|
presstab (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
May 01, 2015, 05:30:00 PM |
|
I love the work and also the open source spirit of sending all of your hard work out for everyone to see Good job sir. At the moment, I am waiting on a fresh database build with Hyperstake in order to test the newest server code with a POS chain. I am having a bit of a debate on whether I should release under MIT or GPL. What were your reasons for using MIT over GPL? For those that mat not know the difference, the MIT license allows anybody to do whatever they want with the code. GPL is basically the same but with the restriction that one must also release any derivative work as GPL. I don't know much about either of them. I do know the BTC and most things BTC related seem to be MIT and that MIT is less restrictive.
|
|
|
|
iantunc
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 433
Merit: 250
We are the first to program your future (c)
|
|
May 01, 2015, 07:27:30 PM |
|
I would change your rpcuser and rpcpassword now that they are public information. Hehehe, already done that. But thanks anyway ;-) In fact, BTC wallet code allows RPC commands only from local host by default. It surely means that you don't have any malware.
|
|
|
|
presstab (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
|
May 02, 2015, 05:45:02 PM |
|
Just upgraded some of the visual things on my RPC based explorer. Made a little live chain on the side of the front page that updates the chain automatically. I will try to expand the charting capabilities soon. http://presstab.pw
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 03, 2015, 12:23:58 AM |
|
While working on CCE 4, I found some interesting things about the account balances. Some people have mentioned some discrepancies in account balances, but for the most part I believed they were just misunderstandings about how the transaction system works in regards to txin/txout and change addresses, and many were. However, A short time after I started work on CCE4, I discovered the MySQL has a strange way of handling float type fields over 7/8 digits in either direction from the decimal regardless of how you set the field parameters. Even so, logic dictated that it would only vary by a small amount, within rounding generally <= 1. The first solution was simply to change the database fields in 4.0 to the Double and later to the Decimal type. I could not change the current live databases, because it would require complete database rebuilds as values entered into the database before the change would still have the float rounded values. In later versions of the database loader itself, I changed all the float types to Decimal types to account for any strangeness in Python float handling. However, I was still finding a significant difference difference between the account balances CCE 4 and the live version. I expected to find a small difference due to the float rounding in the live version, but not as large as I saw. In CCE 4, one of the added features is tracking the amount of transactions on each account, in live versions this is not kept track of in any way. I saw some of the top ranked addresses had 40K+ transactions! It hit me. A small rounding issue in a transaction or even a hundred would not be largely noticeable, but multiplied by 40,000 would most certainly make a difference. As of a short time ago, this is what the top 6 addresses look like on my local development system. To the holders of these addresses, do these balances look closer to what is shown in your wallets? Rank Address Balance Number of TX 1 p73uYHEB6eRC51HqB8Z6gU2xNRXyUtXByy 10216824.908994000011 16875 2 pRbwpBsgumVu2pUA4u2BajC9NU5HEQ7Xuq 8434645.521655999985 41074 3 pUJ3ezaz8RLoU41xGLovQQaWPmbY7gGhtc 6063668.166964000001 22154 4 pM5CVBkTXUkbQmuyouHa267LM6Ro4SsAKo 6002632.044782000036 15443 5 pDrF5118EMcjGKxs3yfow6fhkELyLoiC4u 4712980.250774999973 7861 6 pSCDj9QScyCCGwmHHo7WFra7ZDhk7iXUo4 4400883.232435999998 37258
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
|
May 03, 2015, 02:32:01 PM |
|
press is there any easy way to figure out how much of the coin supply is in dead wallets?
|
|
|
|
Biomech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
|
|
May 03, 2015, 02:43:34 PM |
|
press is there any easy way to figure out how much of the coin supply is in dead wallets?
I highly doubt it. A cold wallet and a dead wallet would both show the same amount of activity
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
|
May 03, 2015, 04:11:28 PM |
|
well isnt that kinda the same? they are not competing for the PoS blocks and that is kinda what I am interested in
|
|
|
|
|