supercointeam (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2014, 03:35:01 AM |
|
We would be better off without these complaining non-believers. I have never lost my expectations for this coin. SuperSend works flawlessly, devs delivered good piece of tech, it's all about people, really. I haven't dumped even 1 SUPER, buying more... SUPER has potential, just need some good marketing.
I don't know how is the progress with new wallet, but as I got freshly gained experience in customizing wallet look I would be happy to help the communuty and create nice skin for new wallet - for free. Just PM me if you're interested.
Yes you can do us new skin, better look has good appeal, we can plan and apply at the next wallet update. I hope its not too complex one should not take much time to apply changes.
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2014, 03:41:44 AM |
|
Please do not mine on supermultipool.com our contact with pool owner is over We don't know pool dev about situation. we will look for a new multipool service soon.
Ok, miners disconnected. Please superteam make sure that pool owner will pay miners for 8 days mining period. ok i will ask this from the pool dev. Any news about the payments from the multipool? I have mined on the multipool on the last 8 days period and i`m waiting for my payment. Thanks! Not so far, i am trying to reach pool dev about this (you can email schizoph7@gmail.com) please be patient. it should not be much problem left anymore, you better mine other pools and buy manually SUPER after that.
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2014, 03:54:59 AM Last edit: September 18, 2014, 04:19:32 AM by supercointeam |
|
Supercointeam I think you should stop advertising until you have a finished product that installs easily to release. Advertising something that does not install easily just chases away half the new users. I will post this question again, because a working installer is a standard feature of professional software release. The current windows build does not have an installer, and does not work as downloaded. When are you going to fix this? What is the schedule for creating a working installer for all platforms? +1000 He's right on all accounts. Though I'm doubtful Dev will respond. Ugh. A couple days ago there were 0.7BTC. May we know what have been spent on? It's not couple of days ago its last month. @cryptobull the community leader and brokefinancial planned most of the payments, we paid coin-telegraph 0.45 BTC for an ads pack, before that we paid some place for promos, and paid for new logo and mac wallet compilation this what i can remember right now there were some more payment activities you can find them either in old thread or new one.
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2014, 03:57:22 AM Last edit: September 18, 2014, 04:17:12 AM by supercointeam |
|
"To do" list with could be made with the community, if dev would kindly accept to do some thing from that list.
Obviously, POD and audit are rejected by him.
He has the right to do so, but...
If not doing that, there are dozens of other things that could be done.
Let me fix this audit is never ever rejected by us. We just cant find competenet & able developers can really check what we did (multisig based trustless system) it's such an advanced technology we cant find a good dev to check. This technology never seen before in any altcoin. it's very audit-able if you check our whitepaper and we accepted to share some part of codes which maybe asked by this audit dev or we can answer him. The only multisig product dev we can find was openBazaar and they seem to be too busy with their project. we still look for some people can check our whitepaper and some of our codes and confirm it's trustless and works.
|
|
|
|
apojii
|
|
September 18, 2014, 06:27:57 AM |
|
As we are the fastest anon coin, we should implement the chat system and in-wallet trading
|
|
|
|
CryptoBull
|
|
September 18, 2014, 08:11:56 AM |
|
As we are the fastest anon coin, we should implement the chat system and in-wallet trading +1
|
Captain Positive
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 18, 2014, 08:13:17 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 18, 2014, 08:14:03 AM |
|
"To do" list with could be made with the community, if dev would kindly accept to do some thing from that list.
Obviously, POD and audit are rejected by him.
He has the right to do so, but...
If not doing that, there are dozens of other things that could be done.
Let me fix this audit is never ever rejected by us. We just cant find competenet & able developers can really check what we did (multisig based trustless system) it's such an advanced technology we cant find a good dev to check. This technology never seen before in any altcoin. it's very audit-able if you check our whitepaper and we accepted to share some part of codes which maybe asked by this audit dev or we can answer him. The only multisig product dev we can find was openBazaar and they seem to be too busy with their project. we still look for some people can check our whitepaper and some of our codes and confirm it's trustless and works. +1
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 18, 2014, 08:14:52 AM |
|
As we are the fastest anon coin, we should implement the chat system and in-wallet trading +1
|
|
|
|
nomad13666
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 18, 2014, 08:21:18 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
CoinMin3r
|
|
September 18, 2014, 08:25:31 AM |
|
As we are the fastest anon coin, we should implement the chat system and in-wallet trading And how about hard coding nodes within wallet in next release so that wallet can be synced right away without adding conf file.
|
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
| ██▄▄██████████▄▄█████████ █▄██████████████▄████████ ███████▀▀▀▀███████▄▄▄▄███ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ████████████▀▀▀▀▀████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ████████████▄▄▄▄▄████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████▄▄▄▄███████▀▀▀▀███ █▀██████████████▀████████ ██▀▀██████████▀▀█████████ | | | I © I |
|
|
|
|
Grgechkapitalac
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 278
Merit: 250
Back to the real world
|
|
September 18, 2014, 10:49:40 AM Last edit: September 18, 2014, 11:45:19 AM by Grgechkapitalac |
|
"To do" list with could be made with the community, if dev would kindly accept to do some thing from that list.
Obviously, POD and audit are rejected by him.
He has the right to do so, but...
If not doing that, there are dozens of other things that could be done.
Let me fix this audit is never ever rejected by us. We just cant find competenet & able developers can really check what we did (multisig based trustless system) it's such an advanced technology we cant find a good dev to check. This technology never seen before in any altcoin. it's very audit-able if you check our whitepaper and we accepted to share some part of codes which maybe asked by this audit dev or we can answer him. The only multisig product dev we can find was openBazaar and they seem to be too busy with their project. we still look for some people can check our whitepaper and some of our codes and confirm it's trustless and works. +1 Don't let me be misunderstood. My intentions were never been disrespectful. I had the my own conclusion that our team is not doing that. I still do. No offense,please, i don't mean anything wrong, or bad. Superteam, how is possible that nobody is competent? Crypto Cobain, Kristov Atlas, Mike Murphy (my choice for such an audit, because he's really a great crypto fan, and honest man), gmaxwell???, Mike Hearn???,Peter Todd??? Last 3 are from the Bitcoin team... Call me uninformed, and i would even confess that myself , but isn't the Open Bazaar based on slightly different coding? How would they review us? If they are competent, @CryptoBull and others, let's literally beg them to do so. Please explain. Finally, if nothing of that is done - it is not really a problem. Those who have done POD could put somebody else as a dev, and still to remain unknown. It's not a 100% proof method... What really the problem is, it would be on the list today, or in a couple of days. Those are some ideas : investigating about coin issues, help members who had trouble, or put them on the pillar of shame in public, if it would be proven that they were liars. Wallet update, with integrated conf, so that non-experienced users could install it too, and stop saying that wallet is not working (it does, but not all of us know how to install it properly). Version with the installer would be great too. We will talk more these days. Best regards, folks.
|
Who knows where the cold wind blows, maybe I'm gonna return one day.
|
|
|
Grgechkapitalac
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 278
Merit: 250
Back to the real world
|
|
September 18, 2014, 10:51:58 AM |
|
|
Who knows where the cold wind blows, maybe I'm gonna return one day.
|
|
|
Ense04
|
|
September 18, 2014, 11:04:26 AM |
|
Having issues with Mintpal. My deposits havent posted in 12 hours.
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2014, 12:32:24 PM |
|
Supermultipool made the final payment after my communication to the pool dev. This was the last payment from the pool. Sometime later when pool dev finish its product for real (auto payments etc) we can ask and get it online. We may apply coinking.io or hasco.ws or another multipool service in the future.
Transaction ID: 195b7a232e9f252a5850e2b34fe6c757d37b4f65753ff4a2222fb4e8081a8b8a
Date: 2014-09-18 08:18:46 (GMT)
Miner Percent Reward (Paid out) SeqgB31vhdpjFpBzZZnQq4pweyxVia8TsG 18.72 % 2690.34818514 SUPER SP3NgUvYKj8Rd2S3biptxwoVss63FxfLFZ 15.27 % 2194.75921144 SUPER STR7WjmENeoGpTRVXTTSpwQbZGKYrE2Vw4 15.12 % 2172.81418429 SUPER STsFRDKXmLq4ZMHUXMsCqxRqEEkjwiuafS 10.18 % 1462.37883530 SUPER SQC5h7RHVDUTHSNWuEKBAJokSvKjC2WwHf 7.67 % 1102.84470524 SUPER SRqtDWCCjLiLwCs4FwY2nZH9ZsvuJo228C 6.83 % 981.98432206 SUPER SNEi2HLtDgXHmxhGzGZML4VawvmvY5wMNu 5.80 % 834.16044495 SUPER Sb1P7ejyyjx4fafR4PNzdoP3qNXVQZHPUZ 5.79 % 831.61821740 SUPER ST4tPG72m4eh5L1HwVh1bQRksCG3s8scDx 3.57 % 512.97335126 SUPER SWfW71oMjRdaaKJRbC2ayxHEcxsreWERWL 2.26 % 325.03268354 SUPER Sf4sDHYH1mZRP3odwoRcEbHDTCT9du15rX 2.00 % 287.66615141 SUPER Sek9AA7cD3maLpRC6uJvURVGixCwGjmUD2 1.83 % 262.75649698 SUPER ShEa32seDEYDY7y6C5moXAEKcFT4XeZNGq 1.70 % 244.73013148 SUPER ShpxNMAgoCrGPgKZe79P9k6LUyKyC2um5n 0.81 % 115.93213769 SUPER SNo8bfDdXyBwf8WjFgMSDpNeQ1KvK6L5z1 0.45 % 64.90900822 SUPER SSNnxRR2ASUhsAL7iAKiEWMS3nAk7EKR6L 0.44 % 63.40842663 SUPER SYSBppSeP1WuxpLQZXhzoJ2w4AwAY8JSUo 0.42 % 60.82593503 SUPER SeqDsTsoccYZnGjUGYNQmxZuEg7MT19uNs 0.27 % 39.50500070 SUPER Se166G8hte3kaBHLvFcKfUzWN8JEpekkxE 0.26 % 37.87840754 SUPER SWPMdc3F6XGouwHnJSqXWVZUEMVtYi8Deo 0.22 % 30.92055555 SUPER SMMkCsVpTe2fDcB2DZGWyWPgA7gZVx6fz2 0.21 % 29.67348836 SUPER STotBBVKY7y9g4awfaweKFdJ7wKceK7xzi 0.16 % 23.17718172 SUPER
|
|
|
|
exemplaar
|
|
September 18, 2014, 01:15:53 PM |
|
Supermultipool made the final payment after my communication to the pool dev. This was the last payment from the pool. Sometime later when pool dev finish its product for real (auto payments etc) we can ask and get it online. We may apply coinking.io or hasco.ws or another multipool service in the future.
Transaction ID: 195b7a232e9f252a5850e2b34fe6c757d37b4f65753ff4a2222fb4e8081a8b8a
Date: 2014-09-18 08:18:46 (GMT)
Miner Percent Reward (Paid out) SeqgB31vhdpjFpBzZZnQq4pweyxVia8TsG 18.72 % 2690.34818514 SUPER SP3NgUvYKj8Rd2S3biptxwoVss63FxfLFZ 15.27 % 2194.75921144 SUPER STR7WjmENeoGpTRVXTTSpwQbZGKYrE2Vw4 15.12 % 2172.81418429 SUPER STsFRDKXmLq4ZMHUXMsCqxRqEEkjwiuafS 10.18 % 1462.37883530 SUPER SQC5h7RHVDUTHSNWuEKBAJokSvKjC2WwHf 7.67 % 1102.84470524 SUPER SRqtDWCCjLiLwCs4FwY2nZH9ZsvuJo228C 6.83 % 981.98432206 SUPER SNEi2HLtDgXHmxhGzGZML4VawvmvY5wMNu 5.80 % 834.16044495 SUPER Sb1P7ejyyjx4fafR4PNzdoP3qNXVQZHPUZ 5.79 % 831.61821740 SUPER ST4tPG72m4eh5L1HwVh1bQRksCG3s8scDx 3.57 % 512.97335126 SUPER SWfW71oMjRdaaKJRbC2ayxHEcxsreWERWL 2.26 % 325.03268354 SUPER Sf4sDHYH1mZRP3odwoRcEbHDTCT9du15rX 2.00 % 287.66615141 SUPER Sek9AA7cD3maLpRC6uJvURVGixCwGjmUD2 1.83 % 262.75649698 SUPER ShEa32seDEYDY7y6C5moXAEKcFT4XeZNGq 1.70 % 244.73013148 SUPER ShpxNMAgoCrGPgKZe79P9k6LUyKyC2um5n 0.81 % 115.93213769 SUPER SNo8bfDdXyBwf8WjFgMSDpNeQ1KvK6L5z1 0.45 % 64.90900822 SUPER SSNnxRR2ASUhsAL7iAKiEWMS3nAk7EKR6L 0.44 % 63.40842663 SUPER SYSBppSeP1WuxpLQZXhzoJ2w4AwAY8JSUo 0.42 % 60.82593503 SUPER SeqDsTsoccYZnGjUGYNQmxZuEg7MT19uNs 0.27 % 39.50500070 SUPER Se166G8hte3kaBHLvFcKfUzWN8JEpekkxE 0.26 % 37.87840754 SUPER SWPMdc3F6XGouwHnJSqXWVZUEMVtYi8Deo 0.22 % 30.92055555 SUPER SMMkCsVpTe2fDcB2DZGWyWPgA7gZVx6fz2 0.21 % 29.67348836 SUPER STotBBVKY7y9g4awfaweKFdJ7wKceK7xzi 0.16 % 23.17718172 SUPER
Thanks superteam again for very fast delivery. I will donate 500super from this mining portion. Why we ended mining there anyway and when we can expect to get back again? Any ETA?
|
|
|
|
supercointeam (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2014, 01:26:28 PM |
|
"To do" list with could be made with the community, if dev would kindly accept to do some thing from that list.
Obviously, POD and audit are rejected by him.
He has the right to do so, but...
If not doing that, there are dozens of other things that could be done.
Let me fix this audit is never ever rejected by us. We just cant find competenet & able developers can really check what we did (multisig based trustless system) it's such an advanced technology we cant find a good dev to check. This technology never seen before in any altcoin. it's very audit-able if you check our whitepaper and we accepted to share some part of codes which maybe asked by this audit dev or we can answer him. The only multisig product dev we can find was openBazaar and they seem to be too busy with their project. we still look for some people can check our whitepaper and some of our codes and confirm it's trustless and works. +1 Don't let me be misunderstood. My intentions were never been disrespectful. I had the my own conclusion that our team is not doing that. I still do. No offense,please, i don't mean anything wrong, or bad. Superteam, how is possible that nobody is competent? Crypto Cobain, Kristov Atlas, Mike Murphy (my choice for such an audit, because he's really a great crypto fan, and honest man), gmaxwell???, Mike Hearn???,Peter Todd??? Last 3 are from the Bitcoin team... Call me uninformed, and i would even confess that myself , but isn't the Open Bazaar based on slightly different coding? How would they review us? If they are competent, @CryptoBull and others, let's literally beg them to do so. Please explain. Finally, if nothing of that is done - it is not really a problem. Those who have done POD could put somebody else as a dev, and still to remain unknown. It's not a 100% proof method... What really the problem is, it would be on the list today, or in a couple of days. Those are some ideas : investigating about coin issues, help members who had trouble, or put them on the pillar of shame in public, if it would be proven that they were liars. Wallet update, with integrated conf, so that non-experienced users could install it too, and stop saying that wallet is not working (it does, but not all of us know how to install it properly). Version with the installer would be great too. We will talk more these days. Best regards, folks. My English is not native one as you can see, it may seem to you sometimes rude but i try to communicate always in a good mood to my members. So when you read think positive. I am a motivator kind person. I like to excite people and sell coins ... but not always, i have bad days and good days. When i read posts i may misunderstand as well. Open baazar dev team can know what is trustless system looks like. They can ask the right questions needed. Like "if this is trustless how you generate multisig address? What is your multisig address? How do you use escrow, guarantor show me codes from this step, where can i see the flow chart after this or that etc. " for example they have in open bazaar mixer, guarantor, escrow concepts but as a different names. But they do basically same job so it becomes trustless system in the end. If their team someone can code C & Java desktop can read the lines, it's very possible they have that kind competent dev. So we don't need to have same coding. It's a kind of engineering stuff. We have concepts and we can understand each others. They use same engine type they drive car (marketplace) but we drive airplane (altcoin) with it. This could be another example. we like and respect other dev teams (including Bitcoin devs) and we showed them the path going to the trustless wallet, the real simple & necessary solution for the altcoin increased anonymity without vias (TOR or coin mixer services). Bitcoin devs work for already a good coin so they might not want to take risks it can be disastrous to make changes. It's up to them in the end. Or they may have other reasons. I dont know. But its crystal clear we did not see multisig based any altcoin before us. This answers actually itself. If they could, they would already see? :-) We don't afraid because we are new and nothing to lose and we have to innovate to be a good choice within many coins. We don't afraid because we can do. We can see & solve problems at the same time. I think we proved this many times, two fork fixes and many wallet updates. Our wallet can be evolved in the future to simplicity. I agree more tutorials and helpful documents needed. we will see.
|
|
|
|
CryptoBull
|
|
September 18, 2014, 04:17:21 PM |
|
You all know that Super is comming back return from the abyss Next week i will post the plan cause i wont be here the weekend but i will try to watch the thread closely All members who wanna participate send me a mssg SuperCoin rullz CryptoBull
|
Captain Positive
|
|
|
nfox
|
|
September 18, 2014, 04:22:36 PM |
|
You all know that Super is comming back return from the abyss Next week i will post the plan cause i wont be here the weekend but i will try to watch the thread closely All members who wanna participate send me a mssg SuperCoin rullz CryptoBull Count me in, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|