Scientific proof that God exists?

[prodigy8]

"God doesn't exist." In my mind, it's absolutely bullshit to take that position with no proof. It's just  as Religious folks saying he exist. Both positions lack proof.

[1715435647]

1715435647

[1715435647]

1715435647

[Decksperiment]

You clearly have missed some of the latest evidence, go back to page 2005-2010 somewhere and read from there, then come back and comment on the tree's?

[QuestionAuthority]

Good. Now that we have cleared up that all this talk about Bible ad trees is off-topic, lets get on with on-topic stuff, like showing evidence for or against the existence of God, so that we can start to prove that God exists or doesn't. Oh wait, I have posted a universe full of evidence that God exists, at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, and the OP at his initial post top of page 1. Therefore, it should, now be evident to everyone that God exists.

Your "proofs" could also be used to prove the existence of some super advanced alien intelligence with the ability to manipulate nature. It might not be God but Thor from the stargate series that is controlling everything. Or maybe he is actually Q from Star Trek next generation.

The belief in God is too self serving for me. "God made me and spends all of his time playing with me because I'm his favorate toy therefore I'm special" Maybe when really bad things happen that make no sense like a surge in children born with birth defects or a plague that wipes out men, women and children from around the world that God is cheating on us with another world he created on the other side of the universe. He wanted to help us but got all involved with this mass extermination flood game he was playing with his other world full of people.

[Lethn]

"God doesn't exist." In my mind, it's absolutely bullshit to take that position with no proof. It's just  as Religious folks saying he exist. Both positions lack proof.

The problem is god existing is in itself a paradox, if he's all powerful and invisible how do we know he's there regardless? The point is the non-religious base their evidence on what's right in front of them and actually exists and the overwhelming evidence out there point against the existence of any gods, so while you're right in taking sides with certainty is stupid taking sides with the people who provide the least evidence beyond beheadings and shooting at us is even more stupid.

I remember seeing a great cartoon posted up here which perfectly describes the argument about god, oh wait! here it is!

[(oYo)]

Studies continue to show proof, as shown in the graphic below, that the decline in the number of pirates worldwide has resulted in an increase in global temperature.

The discovery was first made by Einstein which lead to his famous 'Theory of Pirativity'. Using his formula {Pirates/Global Temperature=Flying Spaghetti Monster}, scientists (and atheists) around the world concur that a decrease in the pirate population is the direct cause for global warming.

He also proved that mountains, trees and midgets were the first things to exist on the planet, with his lesser known formula {mountain+trees+midget=FSM}, thereby inadvertently disproving the accounts of 'Genesis', as depicted by Phil Collins in one of his greatest works, 'The Bible'.

[Buffer Overflow]

Good. Now that we have cleared up that all this talk about Bible ad trees is off-topic, lets get on with on-topic stuff,

LOL, so this is your Sequoia refute:

"Sequoia is off topic, so we'll pretend they don't exist. Let's talk about what I want to talk about!"

LOL, thanks for the laugh.

[Decksperiment]

You must all realise of course, that the OP's probably asked for scientific proof of god, that god being the christian god.. and if correct, I have 100% debunked the bible so far.. thanks to the tree's.. and believe it or not, lol, asking god to help me find an answer..

So he either answered me correctly by waking me up to the audio program aptly called Sequoia, which in turn lead me to older tree's, that have been alive since pre flood times, based on the bibles timeline, proving the god I asked exist's..

Or the tree's gave me a sigh of releif by allowing me to breath in the correct information that cannot be disputed, stating god does not exist..

Take yer pick

[Decksperiment]

Good. Now that we have cleared up that all this talk about Bible ad trees is off-topic, lets get on with on-topic stuff,

LOL, so this is your Sequoia refute:

"Sequoia is off topic, so we'll pretend they don't exist. Let's talks about what I want to talk about!"

LOL, thanks for the laugh.

Haha, I just ignored him again, perm this time.. I did try..

[Decksperiment]

Better look out, BADecker's trying to stay on topic and avoid the tree's whilst doing so..

[no141]

I think the problem is that downloading a copy of something is not stealing and you can't be considered a pirate. Otherwise temperatures would be going down. Where's the chart on CO2 levels and....shoot I forgot what it was compared against.

This thread is looking a whole lot better. Can we all just agree the best position is to be an agnostic? Agnostic Atheist is better, but we can't all be awesome, not room for everyone, it's an exclusive club.

[Decksperiment]

FFS, piss off wi the off topic crap.. what the fuck are you on about, someone else's off topic crap? The same loser that likes to jump in here when vod get's an ear bashin? Dont you know a paedo lover when you see one? No? Try reading their trust ratings.. now reply to them.. just do it elsewhere, new topic's are free ya know..

Apart from that, why not just be the god you are/wannabe?

[(oYo)]

why not just be the god you are/wannabe?

For the same reason I can't be Wolverine.

[Decksperiment]

Oh, look, the same PAEDO VOD/OYO is back.. notice when one is spoken down or shot down in flames, one stops typing while the other start's, cause one's away looking to see if your kid's outside, while the other abuse's you verBALLy, to distract you.. yes they are one and the same, if they are not, they are still actively teamed up as paedo predators, picking on the weak.. read VOD and OYO's trust rating, the only way they can get folks to talk to them is to ABUSE like they do the wee kiddies.. lock up your kids, VODOYO is here!!

Keep in mind them police actively pursue false paedo claims.. they aint doing it with these two cunts..

Theymos, if these two are allowed to stay on this site, you better triple your website design fee's.. for security. Pagida is coming to your country.. what, they're already there? Are you allowing VOD/OYO abuse?

CLEARLY..

Just read though this thread, do some pattern matching to a VOD/OYO style attack, it dont take a good hacker to spot their trend..

[(oYo)]

Because of Dickexperiment's attitude I usually don't respond to his treatises, but this time I'll make an exception. The bulk of this post is a critique of Dickexperiment's gormless rhetoric. The reason I refer to it as “gormless” is that Dickexperiment's behavior is beyond moronic. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that Dickexperiment wrongfully proclaims that he can be god. Come on, Dickexperiment; show some common sense for a change. Dickexperiment avers that he opposes unpleasant gasbags who vend an uncivilized mixture of charlatanism and superstition to a new generation of the most confrontational troglodytes I've ever seen. That's nothing more than ear candy. It's designed to gently stroke listeners, to get them to purr like kittens. The reality is that this is doublespeak at its best, as Dickexperiment treats people as if they were his own subjects. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: The irony is that his most scabrous dissertations are also its most brutish. As the French say, “Les extremes se touchent.”

By writing this post, I am truly sticking my head far above the parapet. Obviously Dickexperiment will retaliate against me as he rarely denied himself the opportunity. He'll most likely try to force me to go talk to a Sequoia although another possibility is that he'll attempt to enlighten me how he is a god and that when uttered by it, “god”, as in the “god Lucifer”, implies, “It's not our fault”. In reality, we'd undoubtedly have a lot less idiocy if Dickexperiment would just stop creating a air of sensationalism characterized by character assassinations, gag orders, and statutory rape.

Even people who consider themselves offensive wiseacres generally agree that one of Dickexperiment's most trusted stooges is a pushy imbecile. If you're a pushy imbecile, you perpetuate the rigors that Dickexperiment's victims have been called upon to undergo of which there have been ample examples in this sphere of his concrete achievement. That's all there is to it. Well, there is one more thing: Dickexperiment has been trying desperately hard to make the case that he's a saintly figure—philanthropic, noble, and wise. Sorry, Dickexperiment, but I must respectfully disagree. My counterargument is that at his mildest, Dickexperiment's machinations still manage to force me to undergo “treatment” (or perhaps exorcism) to cure my “problem”. But wait—as they say on late-night television infomercials—there's more: If Dickexperiment sincerely believes that he is the way, the truth, and the light then he must be smoking something better than I am. The take-away message of this post is that Dickexperiment has, shall we say, questionable priorities. Think about it. I don't want to have to write another post a few years from now, in the wake of a society torn apart by Dickexperiment's evil, damnable tactics, reminding you that you were warned.


<Edit> Disclaimer: This post is just nonsense intended to annoy Dickexperiment, since he feels it necessary to attack anyone and everyone that may disagree with his own nonsense.

[Decksperiment]

Did you think for a moment you were un-ignored? Your trolling, knowing I aint reading your shite.. do you really think folks care that you use my name in the VAIN  hope I MAY know wtf your on about? I cant if I'm blind to you and your kind.. you are a paedo worshipper in that you ALWAYS return to trolling after VOD is counter attacked.. what, no comments from you until I put a suggestion in the new forum thread pointing out vods abuse, and 5 minutes later you come here AGAIN? Are you even aware of how many time's you have done this? I could hack your bank account based on your repetitive event's alone.. where's vod.. snatching kid, where's oyo, making the world think he's vod.. see how easy it would actually be?

Am no one of you and VODS younger victim's, am a scotsman who would shoot you in the face at the first hint of paedo accustations, sadley, they aint invented scratch n sniff bullet's that materialise out your monitor .. yet..

Get a life, learn some extended vocabulary like, dont hang out with paedo's, or be tarred with the same brush.. oh, you knew that, my bad apologies.. not..

[(oYo)]

<Annoying babble>

By extended vocabulary, do you mean misspelling every second word (even with spell check) and making up others altogether? I feel sorry for your kids, that is if you really have any. Did your parents have any kids that lived?

As far as my counter attacks on you goes, I've done so when you attack other people too, not just Vod. Is it my fault somehow that you have a hard on for him?

-------------------------------------------

DUH! I'M GOD!
<--- Dickexperiment

[Decksperiment]

Are you still hoping I read your posts? I can read you like a book, does it look like my monitor is switched on?

[BADecker]

<Annoying babble>

By extended vocabulary, do you mean misspelling every second word (even with spell check) and making up others altogether? I feel sorry for your kids, that is if you really have any. Did your parents have any kids that lived?

As far as my counter attacks on you goes, I've done so when you attack other people too, not just Vod. Is it my fault somehow that you have a hard on for him?

-------------------------------------------

DUH! I'M GOD!
<--- Dickexperiment

You and I certainly don't agree on everything... maybe on few things. But you said this soooo well^^.

[XinXan]

<Annoying babble>

By extended vocabulary, do you mean misspelling every second word (even with spell check) and making up others altogether? I feel sorry for your kids, that is if you really have any. Did your parents have any kids that lived?

As far as my counter attacks on you goes, I've done so when you attack other people too, not just Vod. Is it my fault somehow that you have a hard on for him?

-------------------------------------------

DUH! I'M GOD!
<--- Dickexperiment

You and I certainly don't agree on everything... maybe on few things. But you said this soooo well^^.

You dont have the right to talk here until you disprove the sequoia

[BADecker]

<Annoying babble>

By extended vocabulary, do you mean misspelling every second word (even with spell check) and making up others altogether? I feel sorry for your kids, that is if you really have any. Did your parents have any kids that lived?

As far as my counter attacks on you goes, I've done so when you attack other people too, not just Vod. Is it my fault somehow that you have a hard on for him?

-------------------------------------------

DUH! I'M GOD!
<--- Dickexperiment

You and I certainly don't agree on everything... maybe on few things. But you said this soooo well^^.

You dont have the right to talk here until you disprove the sequoia

Thanks for permission to post here - do I need it? - since the proof for God found in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg8331233#msg8331233 obliterates any sequoia ideas, whatever they might be.