Scientific proof that God exists?

[BADecker]

If you lack a belief in a particular god, you are an atheist or agnostic  by definition

Not a "particular god," but rather the God over all.

[1714583282]

1714583282

[1714583282]

1714583282

[1714583282]

1714583282

[BADecker]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

God is just a human creation.
I remember a joke that goes around at my place:
If God and Human were to come face to face they'd both say 'Look, my creator'
It's true Isn't just?
We've created a greater power to blame things upon when the path twists in an unwanted way.
God doesn't exist!

Here we go. Another joker setting himself up as god by suggesting that God doesn't exist in the face of strong evidence that He does: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395

fallacies and other stories =/= truth or proof, we already told you this plenty of times badecker, someone has yet to accept your ''proofs''

The churches are full of people who do.



EDIT: Most of them don't have time to waste trying to convince a bunch of atheistic idiots in the Bitcointalk forum.

[BADecker]

I have users in my Flat Earth thread telling me that Atheism is a hoax. What more proof do you need?

Atheism can't be a hoax because my penis is perfectly proportional to a midsummer cucumber.

Do you use salt with your "midsummer cucumber?"

 

[Buffer Overflow]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

God is just a human creation.
I remember a joke that goes around at my place:
If God and Human were to come face to face they'd both say 'Look, my creator'
It's true Isn't just?
We've created a greater power to blame things upon when the path twists in an unwanted way.
God doesn't exist!

Here we go. Another joker setting himself up as god by suggesting that God doesn't exist in the face of strong evidence that He does: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395

fallacies and other stories =/= truth or proof, we already told you this plenty of times badecker, someone has yet to accept your ''proofs''

The churches are full of people who do.



EDIT: Most of them don't have time to waste trying to convince a bunch of atheistic idiots in the Bitcointalk forum.

This is funny.
You've just admitted that some people goto church because they believe in fallacy proof, then amusingly in the same post, claim the atheists are the idiots.

  *rolls eyes* 

[BADecker]

What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

God is just a human creation.
I remember a joke that goes around at my place:
If God and Human were to come face to face they'd both say 'Look, my creator'
It's true Isn't just?
We've created a greater power to blame things upon when the path twists in an unwanted way.
God doesn't exist!

Here we go. Another joker setting himself up as god by suggesting that God doesn't exist in the face of strong evidence that He does: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395

fallacies and other stories =/= truth or proof, we already told you this plenty of times badecker, someone has yet to accept your ''proofs''

The churches are full of people who do.



EDIT: Most of them don't have time to waste trying to convince a bunch of atheistic idiots in the Bitcointalk forum.

This is funny.
You've just admitted that some people goto church because they believe in fallacy proof, then amusingly in the same post, claim the atheists are the idiots.

  *rolls eyes*  

You think this way because you don't know what scientific evidence and proof really are. Here's what I mean.

Most of the great ideas in science nowadays are based on quantum math and quantum mechanics. Even much of the "old" physics is "proven" out by quantum. But nobody looks at what quantum really is. Quantum is probability at its base and core.

What does the fact that quantum is probability actually mean? It means that you can use quantum mechanics and quantum math to prove anything you want. You can use it to prove that the earth is flat, that the earth is round, that the earth is square, that the earth is not flat, and anything else you want, all at the same time, using quantum. What is the significance of this?

The significance is that when you use quantum to prove things that you can tell exist through methods other than quantum, quantum becomes a back-up proof for those things. Then, when you extrapolate, you can use quantum to predict results that you have to go out and prove by other methods. Why do you have to prove them by other methods? Because you can use quantum to predict ANYTHING you want, and not all of the anythings actually exist... at least not in a way that is practical for life and living.

The point is this. We are left with two kinds of science because of quantum math. We are left with science like the electrolysis of water, where water is turned into hydrogen and oxygen via an electrical current passing through it. This is actual, practical science.

We are also left with the science fiction science, like the Big Bang. This is science fiction science because even though it can be predicted through several different models via quantum, there may never be any way that it can be proven... or even close... outside of quantum. After all, quantum can be used to predict many different "beginnings," some that exclude the Big Bang, if the scientist decides he wants to go that route. Quantum can even be used to predict the existence of God if the scientist wants to use it that way.

When you strip away all the science fiction from the thing that most people call science, we know relatively little, percentage-wise, of what there is to know. But the evidence that I have shown over and over at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 suggest the existence of God in a far greater way that is way more accurate than the predicting that quantum is generally used for by scientists.

In other words, atheists are believing what they believe based on virtually nothing other than science fiction and their desire to believe it is true. Believers in God are basing their faith on the evidences of the universe that exist right before their eyes, and even quantum can back it up. It is kind of idiotic to base your reality on science fiction as the atheists do.

Thank Goodness for the atheist idiots so that we the believers in God can clearly see the ways not to be.

[benawesome100]

Dont think its scientific...

[QuestionAuthority]

BADecker, when Jesus was a teen walking around his tribal camp and saw some cute girls do you think he got a hard-on? I expect since his dad was God he was probably packin some meat. You know, would you give your son a baby dick if you were God? Based on the pictures I've seen of Jesus, I can picture him being like a young bitch magnet.

[Buffer Overflow]

Based on the pictures I've seen of Jesus, I can picture him being like a young bitch magnet.

I agree. Those miracles, or as we call them today, magic party tricks or illusions, he performed must of really pulled in the pussy.

[Buffer Overflow]

You think this way because you don't know what scientific evidence and proof really are.

Here we go again, changing offical word definitions around to hammer your square peg proof into the official round hole.

[BADecker]

BADecker, when Jesus was a teen walking around his tribal camp and saw some cute girls do you think he got a hard-on? I expect since his dad was God he was probably packin some meat. You know, would you give your son a baby dick if you were God? Based on the pictures I've seen of Jesus, I can picture him being like a young bitch magnet.

Jesus probably was, as you stated, "a young bitch magnet." Yet because of the times in Israel when Jesus walked the earth, and because we don't understand everything about how the Jesus Psyche operated, the best we can say is that:
1. the gals were conservative in words and actions, no matter what they felt;
2. Jesus didn't think or act in a wrong way, no matter how much He lacked natural bodily function controls.

Personally, though I don't know it, I think that there is a great possibility that Jesus was married at some time before He began His ministry at age 30. If He was married, she either died or left Him through no wrong-doing of His. We don't know this, however, even though there is a tendril of such suggestion in the Bible.

[BADecker]

You think this way because you don't know what scientific evidence and proof really are.

Here we go again, changing offical word definitions around to hammer your square peg proof into the official round hole.

There you go again, ignoring the evidence that is all around you.

[Buffer Overflow]

You think this way because you don't know what scientific evidence and proof really are.

Here we go again, changing offical word definitions around to hammer your square peg proof into the official round hole.

There you go again, ignoring the evidence that is all around you.

Of course. Who of sound mind wouldn't ignore fallacious evidence?

[BADecker]

You think this way because you don't know what scientific evidence and proof really are.

Here we go again, changing offical word definitions around to hammer your square peg proof into the official round hole.

There you go again, ignoring the evidence that is all around you.

Of course. Who of sound mind wouldn't ignore fallacious evidence?

All right. I was too hard on the atheists. They are not really idiots. They are simply not sound of mind.

[the joint]

You think this way because you don't know what scientific evidence and proof really are.

Here we go again, changing offical word definitions around to hammer your square peg proof into the official round hole.

There you go again, ignoring the evidence that is all around you.

Of course. Who of sound mind wouldn't ignore fallacious evidence?

All right. I was too hard on the atheists. They are not really idiots. They are simply not sound of mind.

To set the context, I don't mind if you define evidence, science, scientific method, and proof in your own way, so long as I know what you think they are.

Can you define each in your own way so that I can refer to the post in the future?

[BADecker]

You think this way because you don't know what scientific evidence and proof really are.

Here we go again, changing offical word definitions around to hammer your square peg proof into the official round hole.

There you go again, ignoring the evidence that is all around you.

Of course. Who of sound mind wouldn't ignore fallacious evidence?

All right. I was too hard on the atheists. They are not really idiots. They are simply not sound of mind.

To set the context, I don't mind if you define evidence, science, scientific method, and proof in your own way, so long as I know what you think they are.

Can you define each in your own way so that I can refer to the post in the future?

That's easy. All language except legal language (in the U.S.) is subject to change based on common usage. Since this is so, simply use the dictionary definition that you want, or the common usage definition that has not made it to the dictionary yet.



EDIT: In this way, language is somewhat like quantum. You can use it in any way that you want, to get some idea across. And it can be used in any way to get any idea across. Some ways of using it may give you more difficulty getting your ideas across than others. Language is quantum.

[QuestionAuthority]

BADecker, when Jesus was a teen walking around his tribal camp and saw some cute girls do you think he got a hard-on? I expect since his dad was God he was probably packin some meat. You know, would you give your son a baby dick if you were God? Based on the pictures I've seen of Jesus, I can picture him being like a young bitch magnet.

Jesus probably was, as you stated, "a young bitch magnet." Yet because of the times in Israel when Jesus walked the earth, and because we don't understand everything about how the Jesus Psyche operated, the best we can say is that:
1. the gals were conservative in words and actions, no matter what they felt;
2. Jesus didn't think or act in a wrong way, no matter how much He lacked natural bodily function controls.

Personally, though I don't know it, I think that there is a great possibility that Jesus was married at some time before He began His ministry at age 30. If He was married, she either died or left Him through no wrong-doing of His. We don't know this, however, even though there is a tendril of such suggestion in the Bible.

Yeah, that's probably right. It would be kind of rude for him to get married though. His wife would have urges and he couldn't do anything for her because his dad told him that thing was only to pee out of.

Those religious freakazoids believed sex was only for making babies. Jesus couldn't allow himself to have a kid so he couldn't have sex. How hard would a kids life be if he was known as, the son of the son of God. If he did get married, I hope he had a long tongue and could breathe through his ears.

[Buffer Overflow]

To set the context, I don't mind if you define evidence, science, scientific method, and proof in your own way, so long as I know what you think they are.

Can you define each in your own way so that I can refer to the post in the future?

Sure.

Evidence:- Possible proof of something.
Science:- Human pursuit of knowledge.
Scientific method:- Observe a phenomenon. Ask questions about it. Create an hypothesis. Conduct experiments on the hypothesis. Draw conclusion from results.
Proof:- Evidence(s) that cannot be refuted.


No doubt this post will be dug out in the future to shoot me down over something.

[Buffer Overflow]

BADecker, when Jesus was a teen walking around his tribal camp and saw some cute girls do you think he got a hard-on? I expect since his dad was God he was probably packin some meat. You know, would you give your son a baby dick if you were God? Based on the pictures I've seen of Jesus, I can picture him being like a young bitch magnet.

Jesus probably was, as you stated, "a young bitch magnet." Yet because of the times in Israel when Jesus walked the earth, and because we don't understand everything about how the Jesus Psyche operated, the best we can say is that:
1. the gals were conservative in words and actions, no matter what they felt;
2. Jesus didn't think or act in a wrong way, no matter how much He lacked natural bodily function controls.

Personally, though I don't know it, I think that there is a great possibility that Jesus was married at some time before He began His ministry at age 30. If He was married, she either died or left Him through no wrong-doing of His. We don't know this, however, even though there is a tendril of such suggestion in the Bible.

Yeah, that's probably right. It would be kind of rude for him to get married though. His wife would have urges and he couldn't do anything for her because his dad told him that thing was only to pee out of.

Those religious freakazoids believed sex was only for making babies. Jesus couldn't allow himself to have a kid so he couldn't have sex. How hard would a kids life be if he was known as, the son of the son of God. If he did get married, I hope he had a long tongue and could breathe through his ears.

Who's to say Jesus wasn't homosexual?
Perhaps people found out and that's why he got pinned up on that cross.
We can only speculate.

[Buffer Overflow]

You think this way because you don't know what scientific evidence and proof really are.

Here we go again, changing offical word definitions around to hammer your square peg proof into the official round hole.

There you go again, ignoring the evidence that is all around you.

Of course. Who of sound mind wouldn't ignore fallacious evidence?

All right. I was too hard on the atheists. They are not really idiots. They are simply not sound of mind.

To set the context, I don't mind if you define evidence, science, scientific method, and proof in your own way, so long as I know what you think they are.

Can you define each in your own way so that I can refer to the post in the future?

That's easy. All language except legal language (in the U.S.) is subject to change based on common usage. Since this is so, simply use the dictionary definition that you want, or the common usage definition that has not made it to the dictionary yet.

Why not just use your own words as you was asked?

[QuestionAuthority]

BADecker, when Jesus was a teen walking around his tribal camp and saw some cute girls do you think he got a hard-on? I expect since his dad was God he was probably packin some meat. You know, would you give your son a baby dick if you were God? Based on the pictures I've seen of Jesus, I can picture him being like a young bitch magnet.

Jesus probably was, as you stated, "a young bitch magnet." Yet because of the times in Israel when Jesus walked the earth, and because we don't understand everything about how the Jesus Psyche operated, the best we can say is that:
1. the gals were conservative in words and actions, no matter what they felt;
2. Jesus didn't think or act in a wrong way, no matter how much He lacked natural bodily function controls.

Personally, though I don't know it, I think that there is a great possibility that Jesus was married at some time before He began His ministry at age 30. If He was married, she either died or left Him through no wrong-doing of His. We don't know this, however, even though there is a tendril of such suggestion in the Bible.

Yeah, that's probably right. It would be kind of rude for him to get married though. His wife would have urges and he couldn't do anything for her because his dad told him that thing was only to pee out of.

Those religious freakazoids believed sex was only for making babies. Jesus couldn't allow himself to have a kid so he couldn't have sex. How hard would a kids life be if he was known as, the son of the son of God. If he did get married, I hope he had a long tongue and could breathe through his ears.

Who's to say Jesus wasn't homosexual?
Perhaps people found out and that's why he got pinned up on that cross.
We can only speculate.

God wouldn't let him be a homosexual. If God was LGBT friendly he wouldn't have created Eve for Adams toy. He would have created Ed and given Adam a kinky plaything that actually enjoys sex and never gets a "headache".