Bitcoin Forum
June 27, 2024, 10:17:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 [1502] 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 ... 2248 »
  Print  
Author Topic: KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2437 blocks  (Read 5350878 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (50 posts by 3+ users deleted.)
kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4536
Merit: 1847


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
October 29, 2017, 12:45:45 PM
 #30021

A stale???  The situation just got fuck....d up even more than it was! Just because of this block I think we will get another 10ph or so jumping the ship!  Undecided
Really? What's the reason for your guess?
I know who the ~30PH was and where they went and why they did Tongue

A stale share block is actually a non event.
Most pools don't even tell you about them.

If you are basing your comment on luck, then I'm sure anyone who thought bad luck was a reason to leave would have left after we got the two worst blocks of all time on the pool in short succession.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
renanzz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 29, 2017, 03:28:32 PM
 #30022

BLOCK! by renanvendas Cheesy
Welcome to the acclaim board with your first pool block Smiley
... and 2 payouts Smiley

Edit: that was also a Juvia block Smiley
https://a.wattpad.com/cover/108108657-256-k879517.jpg

Finally my first block!  Cheesy Cheesy

COMEEEE BLOCKKKK
NomadGroup
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 508
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 29, 2017, 03:34:58 PM
 #30023

A stale???  The situation just got fuck....d up even more than it was! Just because of this block I think we will get another 10ph or so jumping the ship!  Undecided
Really? What's the reason for your guess?
I know who the ~30PH was and where they went and why they did Tongue

A stale share block is actually a non event.
Most pools don't even tell you about them.

If you are basing your comment on luck, then I'm sure anyone who thought bad luck was a reason to leave would have left after we got the two worst blocks of all time on the pool in short succession.

You’re right, and from the looks of it almost half of miners though that bad luck was a reason to leave.   Cheesy. I’m just assuming that the stale block makes the luck look even worse, giving more people a reason to doubt and get scared.  I’m not worried though, looks like we did damn good after dropping down to 60’s.  Remember that happening before Kano?  As soon as a bunch of miners left we started hitting them greens!  Lol Smiley
overcon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250


911 IT Admin. I keep 911 up so you get help ASAP!


View Profile WWW
October 29, 2017, 04:13:31 PM
 #30024

Common, a few more blocks! I am almost back up to my 0.0088 per block Smiley

Donate BTC to: 1PXBBTLqXQnT9qAyWsc51XGj2GUt4WW57x
rifleman74
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 21

4 s9's 2 821's


View Profile
October 29, 2017, 04:17:12 PM
 #30025

My 40.5 TH's are coming back online today.  Let's get some blocks!
YabaDabaDoo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 29, 2017, 04:22:14 PM
 #30026

My 40.5 TH's are coming back online today.  Let's get some blocks!

w00t w00t!
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3808
Merit: 4005



View Profile
October 29, 2017, 04:55:33 PM
 #30027

I’m not worried though, looks like we did damn good after dropping down to 60’s.  Remember that happening before Kano?  As soon as a bunch of miners left we started hitting them greens!  Lol Smiley

If true, then it almost suggests some kind of a bottleneck.
Like, 50ph OK/great, 60 OK/good, 80-90 so-so, 160- bammmo
Not sure if it is real, but anecdotally, every time pool numbers are climbing fast, we hit a roadblock.
I consider this a major reason that we are at 1% instead of 3-4%

I am still here.

EDIT: looking back, though, it was MUCH more important to have good luck in 2014-2016 than in 2017 for a simple reason that you were getting way more btc then. Both 1000 blocks and 162 wk stats are good here, especially comparing with some other (formely popular) pool that had 93% luck in 2014-2015. Those numbers essentially extinguished that pool.
firetreeactual
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1003



View Profile
October 30, 2017, 01:04:28 AM
 #30028

Yup. Right on.

To infinity and beyond...on two 741s and one of only 3...nope, make that 4...full nodes in Hawaii...on <30A. (I have other gear on the Hoth ice planet)
Minty_Andy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 30, 2017, 01:47:56 AM
 #30029

Hi All.
New here and excited to be a part of the crypto game.

Got a deal on a s7 to dabble in mining, which i only expect to basicly break even on, but thought it would be a good starting experience mining.

I moved my workers here from bitmain after running it for a few days.
Unfortunatly it appears i moved here just before this whole "hell block" phase.
(maybe i am unlucky?)

Im wondering if someone could point me toward the best way to understand the averages over time and what metrics best describe chances to mine more coin here over time then a large pool like bitmain, which seems fairly consistant.

Im wading through the lingo, and im starting to pick it up, but is a bit of a learning curve for sure!

Thanks for any help !
lakerunner22
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 30, 2017, 02:23:14 AM
 #30030

Some large blocks with good rewards are being found today  Smiley  Hope 1 or 3 has our name on them  Grin  I'm feeling lucky today   Tongue
kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4536
Merit: 1847


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
October 30, 2017, 02:41:33 AM
 #30031

Hi All.
New here and excited to be a part of the crypto game.

Got a deal on a s7 to dabble in mining, which i only expect to basicly break even on, but thought it would be a good starting experience mining.

I moved my workers here from bitmain after running it for a few days.
Unfortunatly it appears i moved here just before this whole "hell block" phase.
(maybe i am unlucky?)

Im wondering if someone could point me toward the best way to understand the averages over time and what metrics best describe chances to mine more coin here over time then a large pool like bitmain, which seems fairly consistant.

Im wading through the lingo, and im starting to pick it up, but is a bit of a learning curve for sure!

Thanks for any help !
Basically there are 2 main factors in mining:

1) Variance
2) Fees

Firstly PPS:

Mining on a PPS pool has almost no variance.
You get rewarded exactly for the shares you submit, thus the only (tiny) variance is just the share finding variance of your miners.
Thus if you were mining PPS on AntPool you would have seen a very small variance in your daily reward, i.e. it wouldn't have been exactly the same every day, but close enough.

However, block finding on bitcoin has quite obvious variance.
There isn't a block found every 10 minutes on the bitcoin network, that's just the average expected time for a block on the network.
You'll see blocks found a few seconds apart sometimes, or a few minutes, or even over an hour or more apart.

So lets say, PPSPool gets a 75% Diff block followed by a 150% Diff block - variance Smiley
They can pay everyone after the 75% block, because PPSPool earned more than they have to pay the miners - they earned a full block (100%) but only have to pay the equivalent of 75% worth of shares the miners sent to the pool.
But once the 150% block arrives, they have 225% total shares from miners, but only 2 blocks (200%) to pay them with.
Ouch they now have lost 25% of their stash Smiley

So to handle this problem, they must do 2 things:
1) Keep a safety net of BTC to be able to pay everyone when luck is worse than 100%
2) charge a higher fee to cover that risk of bad luck.

There's a paper all about this here which includes the risks of mining on low fee PPS pools:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.4980v1.pdf

One more important thing to know about all this is transaction fees.

When anyone finds a block, they don't (usually) just get the block reward (currently 12.5 BTC) but they also get all the transaction fees from all the transactions they include in the block.

This has actually been quite a lot of BTC for a while now - currently this month it's averaged about 7.5% more added to the 12.5 BTC of each block.

So this is where the pool fees make a VERY big difference in the equation.

If a PPS pool is paying it's miners 100% PPS - then the pool is charging the miners, on average, for this month, 7.5/(100+7.5) = a 6.98% fee.
Wow that's even higher than the ridiculous fees at nicehash Tongue

In the case of last June, tx fees average for that month was 22.3%, so a 100% PPS pool was charging everyone 22.3/(100+22.3) = a huge 18.2% fee

Some PPS pools pay their miners less than 100% PPS, others pay a bit more than 100% PPS
You'd have to check the PPS pools to see what their fees are from week to week and month to month.

Now PPLNS:

On PPLNS, we reward all miners every time we find a block.

This means that when we are lucky and find more blocks than expected, we are rewarding miners better than expected.
But when we are unlucky and find less blocks than expected, we are rewarding miners worse than expected.

So what does 'expected' mean?
It's what you would 'expect' to get if the pool luck was always 100% (which of course it isn't)

So what is the 'expected' reward on PPLNS?

That again depends on the PPLNS pool's fees.
Here the fee is 0.9% of the total and we include Txn fees.
So if luck was 100%, then the pool's average PPS for a month would be (100%+Txn) * 0.991

But there's the issue of luck/variance to consider.
You wont get the same reward every day, some days you'll get more than you expect and other days less, and at the worst, some days no reward at all.

FYI: AntPool PPLNS keeps the txn fees - so this month they would be charging you a 6.98% fee (ouch)
Last June they would have been charging you a 18.2% fee OMFG!

So how do you 'expect' to be better off here?
Well you expect to be better off in the long run, since the fees here are lower than any other pool worth mining on.

However, sometimes the luck sux and you get paid a lot less, other times the luck is good and you get paid a lot more.
In the long run it averages out - as the Blocks web page history information shows.

It's just a question of how close to a profit or loss your mining is.
If you can deal with getting 70% PPS in a month on rare occasions, without going broke, then you should be OK here.
If you can deal with getting 162% PPS in a month here on rare occasions, then that should be OK also Cheesy

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
Minty_Andy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 30, 2017, 03:52:39 AM
 #30032

Kano.
What an amazing answer to what must be a fairly mundane question from myself !

I can see why your pool gets good reviews for tight comunity here.

Thank you for the clarity.
Im likely going to hold out for the big wins to help make up for the recent dip.
But i can see how some operations could be burried by these dips.

-Andy
NomadGroup
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 508
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 30, 2017, 08:24:34 AM
 #30033

Kano, I just added 2 brand spankin new S9's with 14 TH each! Woot woot! One  averaging 14.80 and the other is like 14.140! Smiley  But I had to take of the shelf the 2 s7's which were hustling like Rick Ross for me for like a year!  Besides, one of them was the reason why my name is on acclaim board!  So sad to see him go  Cry Cry Cry
Waztim
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 15


View Profile
October 30, 2017, 08:25:07 AM
 #30034

Kano - I am new to the mining scene. I expect 4 S9 14 TH/s to be delivered between Dec 1 and Dec 10. I live in the Northern Virginia Area and have 1GB/s up and Down fober connection to the Internet. What settings should I use when setting up these miners to point them to Kano Pool? Sorry if I sound stupid, just a Newbie and want to be with Kano Pool since it is the pool that most reflects what Bitcoin Mining should be all about.

Thanks - Tim
kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4536
Merit: 1847


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
October 30, 2017, 09:01:17 AM
 #30035

Kano - I am new to the mining scene. I expect 4 S9 14 TH/s to be delivered between Dec 1 and Dec 10. I live in the Northern Virginia Area and have 1GB/s up and Down fober connection to the Internet. What settings should I use when setting up these miners to point them to Kano Pool? Sorry if I sound stupid, just a Newbie and want to be with Kano Pool since it is the pool that most reflects what Bitcoin Mining should be all about.

Thanks - Tim
Your closest node should be nya.kano.is (instead of stratum.kano.is)
You can ping them to verify it, but considering your location, it should be nya.kano.is by a pretty good margin.

As for your first backup, it should be stratum.kano.is
Although stratum.kano.is and nl.kano.is should give you similar pings, it's much better to use stratum.kano.is in your case.

The shares you submit (and blocks you find) depend on how close you are to any closest node - that's what decides how quickly they can be processed, so that's why you use nya.kano.is as the first pool.

However, the work change currently depends on the full path back to the US west coast (ish), so you want to minimise both together as much as possible.
When comparing 2 nodes that are similar, then you use the one closest to US west coast (ish), and since stratum.kano.is is US west coast, it's preferable when choosing between nl.kano.is and stratum.kano.is as the backup pool.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
padrinogtr
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 228
Merit: 100

Mine ON!!!


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2017, 01:09:50 PM
 #30036

Hi All.
New here and excited to be a part of the crypto game.

Got a deal on a s7 to dabble in mining, which i only expect to basicly break even on, but thought it would be a good starting experience mining.

I moved my workers here from bitmain after running it for a few days.
Unfortunatly it appears i moved here just before this whole "hell block" phase.
(maybe i am unlucky?)

Im wondering if someone could point me toward the best way to understand the averages over time and what metrics best describe chances to mine more coin here over time then a large pool like bitmain, which seems fairly consistant.

Im wading through the lingo, and im starting to pick it up, but is a bit of a learning curve for sure!

Thanks for any help !
Basically there are 2 main factors in mining:

1) Variance
2) Fees

Firstly PPS:

Mining on a PPS pool has almost no variance.
You get rewarded exactly for the shares you submit, thus the only (tiny) variance is just the share finding variance of your miners.
Thus if you were mining PPS on AntPool you would have seen a very small variance in your daily reward, i.e. it wouldn't have been exactly the same every day, but close enough.

However, block finding on bitcoin has quite obvious variance.
There isn't a block found every 10 minutes on the bitcoin network, that's just the average expected time for a block on the network.
You'll see blocks found a few seconds apart sometimes, or a few minutes, or even over an hour or more apart.

So lets say, PPSPool gets a 75% Diff block followed by a 150% Diff block - variance Smiley
They can pay everyone after the 75% block, because PPSPool earned more than they have to pay the miners - they earned a full block (100%) but only have to pay the equivalent of 75% worth of shares the miners sent to the pool.
But once the 150% block arrives, they have 225% total shares from miners, but only 2 blocks (200%) to pay them with.
Ouch they now have lost 25% of their stash Smiley

So to handle this problem, they must do 2 things:
1) Keep a safety net of BTC to be able to pay everyone when luck is worse than 100%
2) charge a higher fee to cover that risk of bad luck.

There's a paper all about this here which includes the risks of mining on low fee PPS pools:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.4980v1.pdf

One more important thing to know about all this is transaction fees.

When anyone finds a block, they don't (usually) just get the block reward (currently 12.5 BTC) but they also get all the transaction fees from all the transactions they include in the block.

This has actually been quite a lot of BTC for a while now - currently this month it's averaged about 7.5% more added to the 12.5 BTC of each block.

So this is where the pool fees make a VERY big difference in the equation.

If a PPS pool is paying it's miners 100% PPS - then the pool is charging the miners, on average, for this month, 7.5/(100+7.5) = a 6.98% fee.
Wow that's even higher than the ridiculous fees at nicehash Tongue

In the case of last June, tx fees average for that month was 22.3%, so a 100% PPS pool was charging everyone 22.3/(100+22.3) = a huge 18.2% fee

Some PPS pools pay their miners less than 100% PPS, others pay a bit more than 100% PPS
You'd have to check the PPS pools to see what their fees are from week to week and month to month.

Now PPLNS:

On PPLNS, we reward all miners every time we find a block.

This means that when we are lucky and find more blocks than expected, we are rewarding miners better than expected.
But when we are unlucky and find less blocks than expected, we are rewarding miners worse than expected.

So what does 'expected' mean?
It's what you would 'expect' to get if the pool luck was always 100% (which of course it isn't)

So what is the 'expected' reward on PPLNS?

That again depends on the PPLNS pool's fees.
Here the fee is 0.9% of the total and we include Txn fees.
So if luck was 100%, then the pool's average PPS for a month would be (100%+Txn) * 0.991

But there's the issue of luck/variance to consider.
You wont get the same reward every day, some days you'll get more than you expect and other days less, and at the worst, some days no reward at all.

FYI: AntPool PPLNS keeps the txn fees - so this month they would be charging you a 6.98% fee (ouch)
Last June they would have been charging you a 18.2% fee OMFG!

So how do you 'expect' to be better off here?
Well you expect to be better off in the long run, since the fees here are lower than any other pool worth mining on.

However, sometimes the luck sux and you get paid a lot less, other times the luck is good and you get paid a lot more.
In the long run it averages out - as the Blocks web page history information shows.

It's just a question of how close to a profit or loss your mining is.
If you can deal with getting 70% PPS in a month on rare occasions, without going broke, then you should be OK here.
If you can deal with getting 162% PPS in a month here on rare occasions, then that should be OK also Cheesy

this answered so many questions
thanks Kanosan (bow)

230TH Mining For Kano!!!
overcon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250


911 IT Admin. I keep 911 up so you get help ASAP!


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2017, 01:14:21 PM
 #30037

First off, thanks, Kano.

Second, damn man. I've been mining for a while now and all these new miners showing up with more hash power than myself, sigh. LOL. If Bitmain would ACTUALLY SELL SOME MINERS! That and I had to pay off a debt so now we need to seriously start find blocks while the pool is at 60PH cause I get a lot more than I did when it was way higher.

And if Caanan would ship my Avalon, I could add 7 more TH or whatever speed they are Smiley . Better than nothing.

Donate BTC to: 1PXBBTLqXQnT9qAyWsc51XGj2GUt4WW57x
padrinogtr
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 228
Merit: 100

Mine ON!!!


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2017, 01:15:01 PM
 #30038

Kano - I am new to the mining scene. I expect 4 S9 14 TH/s to be delivered between Dec 1 and Dec 10. I live in the Northern Virginia Area and have 1GB/s up and Down fober connection to the Internet. What settings should I use when setting up these miners to point them to Kano Pool? Sorry if I sound stupid, just a Newbie and want to be with Kano Pool since it is the pool that most reflects what Bitcoin Mining should be all about.

Thanks - Tim
Your closest node should be nya.kano.is (instead of stratum.kano.is)
You can ping them to verify it, but considering your location, it should be nya.kano.is by a pretty good margin.

As for your first backup, it should be stratum.kano.is
Although stratum.kano.is and nl.kano.is should give you similar pings, it's much better to use stratum.kano.is in your case.

The shares you submit (and blocks you find) depend on how close you are to any closest node - that's what decides how quickly they can be processed, so that's why you use nya.kano.is as the first pool.

However, the work change currently depends on the full path back to the US west coast (ish), so you want to minimise both together as much as possible.
When comparing 2 nodes that are similar, then you use the one closest to US west coast (ish), and since stratum.kano.is is US west coast, it's preferable when choosing between nl.kano.is and stratum.kano.is as the backup pool.

should i use this node also ( nya.kano.is) ?
since i am in the New York area?

230TH Mining For Kano!!!
Biffa
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3220
Merit: 1220



View Profile
October 30, 2017, 01:17:10 PM
 #30039

Best bet is to ping and see if its got less latency

Mine @ pools that pay Tx fees & don't mine empty blocks :: kanopool :: ckpool ::
Should bitmain create LPM for all models?
:: Dalcore's Crypto Mining H/W Hosting Directory & Reputation ::
padrinogtr
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 228
Merit: 100

Mine ON!!!


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2017, 01:18:53 PM
 #30040

Best bet is to ping and see if its got less latency

....yea i dont know how to do that  Huh

230TH Mining For Kano!!!
Pages: « 1 ... 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 [1502] 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 ... 2248 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!