CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

2x6 pins deliver 150 watt. so you are drawing 40 watt per card from the motherboard. with 6 cards 240watt from the motherboard. To much load will increase the heat and reduce the speed. Sometimes cause cards to trottle, and motherboards to crash or melt....

..but you have 2* Molex powering the PCI-E bus on the BTC motherboard.

You need to make sure that each molex come from a clean plug(nothing else is connected to the cable but the motherboard) . And that your PSU is single railed. If not you need to calculate the load on each rail. I normally only use one of the Molex on the btc boards. If you use one, you should plug it into the molex that is closest to the pci slots.

[go6ooo1212]

With 2x 6pins you don't have enough power. Open gpu-z and check the vcap reason. if it shows VREL, try to reduce memclock the lowest you can get, and increase the intensity & core clock. The 1060/1070 kernals are not ready yet. Waiting for the cards to arrive.

Tested many combinations , I didn't see that "vcap reason" My GPU-Z shows PerfCap reason , end the state is Pwr.
I could gain 160 MH max , with power limit 106% (the max you can tweek in AB).

[bensam1231]

If 1070 will make 340, I am ready to pay 0.1 BTC + 1 minute or 2 minutes only (not  0.1 BTC)

Claymore will make dual eth+lbry and who you will pay the price?

Do not be greedy.

Algos can't just be turned into a dual miner and they're automatically better. Some algos use more memory then GPU resources and vice versa, that's why they work out in a dual miner setup. If they have to fight for resources, they aren't going to be better. Fucking ethbabies.

"It cost 0.1BTC AND it comes with 2minute donation mining per hour."

isn't that too much? shouldn't be one or the other?

0.1 + 3.3% fixed (with 1% of the pool and more with the exchange), means that the final amount it's more or less the half of what advertized, and frankly speaking with the added 0.1 it's too much for my taste. The one or the other, not both.

Keep in mind that the frequency of a 1070, as you know, it's related to the boost clock (1750/1800, even 2k in some cases.. Stock clocks)

Pool fee being included with miner fee? Oh yeah? I hear developers are also responsible for transaction fees, exchange fees, and BTC withdrawl fees. Silly goose.

0.1 with fee is insane for the 1070 owner, unless you can pull off a crazy 20% or something, and i really doubt you can it's not optimizable anymore, pallas wolfo and epsylon all agree on this...

Because 20% is crazier then 15%. "I know nothing about coding, but I'm going to flat out say you can't improve this algo." You're dumb.

sp, i respect your work and i´ll gladly consider buying it when you optimize the 1070 part.

but, please, dont make your numbers on miner´s profit. Weight your work, not our income.

keep on the good work!

Translation: This guy owns one BIG ASS FARM and doesn't want it taxed. In other words, you'll make more then .1 BTC off him in the long run easily.

stock 1070 give 280 mhs on the latest miner. GPU 2050, mem -800

This is a heavy OC. Most people wont be stable at 2050. Looking closer to 1950, SPs numbers are quite realistic. Also it wouldn't be 280Mhs, it's around 270. I have a couple GPUs running at these clocks.

stock 1070 give 280 mhs on the latest miner. GPU 2050, mem -800

ccminer 1.8.1 gives more than 270 mhs on 1070 GPU 1960

While I see no reason to buy your miner.

Yeah, that's a 2080mhz OC, maybe even higher... Probably also crashed after he took the picture.

You realize people actually mine Lbry so they know rates like this aren't normal, right?



So all this shit aside, good SP is finally trying to make a long term solution here... There is literally no one else doing this except Claymore. Funny all the people bitching about fees. I do agree though that dev fee and flat fee combined are kind of silly though. The whole reason for a miner fee is for long term support and so you can get all the smaller miners in there as well.

A lot of people are now running 1070s. You probably wont see that many people purchasing this till there is some headway made with those units.


What was also mentioned about dual mining profit is true. I really don't think many Nvidia miners have tried out Claymores dual miner yet. Before the recent Lbry pump, 1070 and 970s were making more money on ETH+SIA. It's been that way for about a week.

[go6ooo1212]

My 980Tis  Palit Super Jetstream , give me some improvement with the new miner 255MH on 1467MHz clock , compared with 228MH with the public miner. But the integrated fee will cover that improvement , I think..
I'm waiting to the next version...

[sp_]

Tested many combinations , I didn't see that "vcap reason" My GPU-Z shows PerfCap reason , end the state is Pwr.
I could gain 160 MH max , with power limit 106% (the max you can tweek in AB).

I will look into this in release #2.

[sp_]

My 980Tis  Palit Super Jetstream , give me some improvement with the new miner 255MH on 1467MHz clock , compared with 228MH with the public miner. But the integrated fee will cover that improvement , I think..
I'm waiting to the next version...

12% faster, 3.3% fee...

[go6ooo1212]

My 980Tis  Palit Super Jetstream , give me some improvement with the new miner 255MH on 1467MHz clock , compared with 228MH with the public miner. But the integrated fee will cover that improvement , I think..
I'm waiting to the next version...

12% faster, 3.3% fee...

Yeah , you are right, I wish to kindly suggest you , to consider lowering that fee...
I have another model of 970s , will test it on them too...

[sp_]

Yeah , you are right, I wish to kindly suggest you , to consider lowering that fee...
I have another model of 970s , will test it on them too...

How about keeping the fee and add 12% on the pascal 1070 and 1060 cards as well. Don't think about the fee. Think about the increased profit, Increased speed and Increased support in future releases..

[grrrgrrr]

20% of miners hold 80% of hashing power;
80% of developer market is in 20% of miners;
The rest 80% of miners are going to whine on forums when treated "unfairly"

Anyway it would be nice to have a subscription miner with lower fee and a free miner with higher fee.

[go6ooo1212]

Yeah , you are right, I wish to kindly suggest you , to consider lowering that fee...
I have another model of 970s , will test it on them too...

How about keeping the fee and add 12% on the pascal 1070 and 1060 cards as well. Don't think about the fee. Think about the increased profit, Increased speed and Increased support in future releases..

Sounds quite good , yes , waiting to see it as well
Edit: I don't like cheap cards such as 1060. My opinion is to focus on the top cards 1080 and 1070....

[pallas]

20% of miners hold 80% of hashing power;
80% of developer market is in 20% of miners;
The rest 80% of miners are going to whine on forums when treated "unfairly"

Looks a lot like a Pareto distribution ;-)

[CoffeeCat]

Sp_ please ditch the 0.1 fee, we subscribed a few times for that amount for different miners but you always come up with something else we should subscribe to.

I am curently testing the donation code in the LBRY sp-mod #1.

I plan to release Optimized Pascal lyra2v2,skein,pentablake,x17 etc.. as well. free for the the donators in the past(but with a donation %). The sp-mod ultimate.

You are late to the party with LBRY. And what kind of boosts are we going to see? One percent? Two percent?

[PovertyByte]

As someone with 1 GPU, this is not a worth it deal. I can just do and dual mine ether and decred.

If you made a donation free miner that did 5 or even 6 minutes of mining for you instead of 2, it would be worth while for owners of only 1-2 GPU's to use, where as all the farm owners can go and pay 0.1 btc for the reduced miner fee. 6 minutes an hour is 10% of all mining from a user. Assuming this hashes 15% higher it remains profitable for the miner.

[bensam1231]

I don't think it's a good idea to encourage miner fee gouging for small miners. While flat fee plus miner fee isn't a good system, a 10% fee will just encourage someone to try and tear it apart to remove it.

[Nikolaj]

Sp_ please ditch the 0.1 fee, we subscribed a few times for that amount for different miners but you always come up with something else we should subscribe to.

I am curently testing the donation code in the LBRY sp-mod #1.

I plan to release Optimized Pascal lyra2v2,skein,pentablake,x17 etc.. as well. free for the the donators in the past(but with a donation %). The sp-mod ultimate.

Sorry, so in the new versions whoever paid you (0.1, and stop) will have a new version with a new 3.3% fee on it?

[Nikolaj]

So all this shit aside, good SP is finally trying to make a long term solution here... There is literally no one else doing this except Claymore. Funny all the people bitching about fees. I do agree though that dev fee and flat fee combined are kind of silly though. The whole reason for a miner fee is for long term support and so you can get all the smaller miners in there as well.

A lot of people are now running 1070s. You probably wont see that many people purchasing this till there is some headway made with those units.

Well, you're surely one of them, you possess at least 80 gtx 1070

You forget many others, like tpruvot and wolf (lbry).

The main issue is that there's a general statement about the new miner capabilities, but is it confirmed by third party? What amount reaches a 970 at 1478MHz with the sp "ultimate? 1?

I am curious to see the new results mainly on the pascal architecture, because of maxwell right now isn't so useful. It could have a month ago on lbry, right now it's mediocre in average. A 980ti heavy overclocked have got a power consumption in the 260W range, if not more, so the efficiency (MH/W) goes down, and so the main reason to buy a "faster" kernel.

If there will be released a public version with a fee on it, hopefully not more than 2% like claymore, I"ll make an article about the MH/W ratios, with tpruvot 1.7.8, 1.8.1 and the new kernel.

[bensam1231]

So all this shit aside, good SP is finally trying to make a long term solution here... There is literally no one else doing this except Claymore. Funny all the people bitching about fees. I do agree though that dev fee and flat fee combined are kind of silly though. The whole reason for a miner fee is for long term support and so you can get all the smaller miners in there as well.

A lot of people are now running 1070s. You probably wont see that many people purchasing this till there is some headway made with those units.

Well, you're surely one of them, you possess at least 80 gtx 1070

You forget many others, like tpruvot and wolf (lbry).

The main issue is that there's a general statement about the new miner capabilities, but is it confirmed by third party? What amount reaches a 970 at 1478MHz with the sp "ultimate? 1?

I am curious to see the new results mainly on the pascal architecture, because of maxwell right now isn't so useful. It could have a month ago on lbry, right now it's mediocre in average. A 980ti heavy overclocked have got a power consumption in the 260W range, if not more, so the efficiency (MH/W) goes down, and so the main reason to buy a "faster" kernel.

If there will be released a public version with a fee on it, hopefully not more than 2% like claymore, I"ll make an article about the MH/W ratios, with tpruvot 1.7.8, 1.8.1 and the new kernel.

I have no idea what you're talking about with Tpruvot and Wolf0. Wolf0 is almost exclusively AMD and Tpruvot doesn't always continue to try and improve algos, also tends to work on whatever he likes, just like Pallas (Pallas didn't even bother compiling his M7 improvements for Windows). SP has a history of continually trying to improve performance across broad algos.

Not sure what Ultimate edition miner has to do with the Lbry miner.

Pascal and Maxwell are different, yes, but that wasn't what he first introduced... There are plenty of people with 970s still running that started mining before the Ethereum bubble. It still is worthwhile mining on them compared to trying and sell them on eBay.

Current miner is a 2% fee, regardless of all the random fees that have nothing to do with it you tried to lump in with it... It should either be flat fee or miner fee, not both as I've mentioned though.

[sp_]

Sp_ please ditch the 0.1 fee, we subscribed a few times for that amount for different miners but you always come up with something else we should subscribe to.

I am curently testing the donation code in the LBRY sp-mod #1.

I plan to release Optimized Pascal lyra2v2,skein,pentablake,x17 etc.. as well. free for the the donators in the past(but with a donation %). The sp-mod ultimate.

Sorry, so in the new versions whoever paid you (0.1, and stop) will have a new version with a new 3.3% fee on it?

I plan to release a pascal version of the other algos and include a fee.

[sp_]

You are late to the party with LBRY. And what kind of boosts are we going to see? One percent? Two percent?

Speed improvements where verified by one of the 0.1 donator.s (go6ooo1212)

Spmod #1 980ti 1467 core clock +12%

go6ooo1212 also got his 970 to mine @ 160MHASH. My kernal could be clocked higher than the opensource, and stable.

[Amph]

0.1 with fee is insane for the 1070 owner, unless you can pull off a crazy 20% or something, and i really doubt you can it's not optimizable anymore, pallas wolfo and epsylon all agree on this...

Because 20% is crazier then 15%. "I know nothing about coding, but I'm going to flat out say you can't improve this algo." You're dumb.

you are surely retarded, 20% was just an example, and no i actually coded something in the past, if 3 dev tell you that it cannot be improved anymore, that's it

1-2% of improvement it's not what i call a real improvement it's a joke