bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2017, 10:41:39 PM |
|
It takes like half a minute for all the cards to start hashing on a dualcore Pentium but after that it's going great (100% GPU usage) so you topped the default intensity. Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 with +80 Mhz core OC and stock memory: - at 80% TDP I get 2.71 Gh/s; - at 100% TDP I get 2.8 Gh/s; - at 111% TDP I get 2.94 Gh/s without temp throttling (above my go to temp target). I could OC higher but won't bother. At 2.8 Gh/s it's $1.59 per day at the moment which is not very good. PS: None of my G1's are stable at 2100 Mhz for more than a few minutes.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2017, 10:45:05 PM |
|
PS: None of my G1's are stable at 2100 Mhz for more than a few minutes.
Did you lower the memclock -500?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2017, 10:49:36 PM |
|
It takes like half a minute for all the cards to start hashing on a dualcore Pentium but after that it's going great (100% GPU usage) so you topped the default intensity.
Yes, I changed a few lines of code..
|
|
|
|
Kompik
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2017, 10:51:07 PM |
|
It takes like half a minute for all the cards to start hashing on a dualcore Pentium but after that it's going great (100% GPU usage) so you topped the default intensity. Gigabyte GTX 1070 G1 with +80 Mhz core OC and stock memory: - at 80% TDP I get 2.71 Gh/s; - at 100% TDP I get 2.8 Gh/s; - at 111% TDP I get 2.94 Gh/s without temp throttling (above my go to temp target). I could OC higher but won't bother. At 2.8 Gh/s it's $1.59 per day at the moment which is not very good. PS: None of my G1's are stable at 2100 Mhz for more than a few minutes. 100% inline with my results. I also clock my cards to 2000 Mhz exactly, not stable to go above in multi-gpu rig.
|
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2017, 10:52:56 PM |
|
What do you get on the 1.8.4 opensource on the same clocks?
|
|
|
|
Kompik
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2017, 11:07:46 PM |
|
What do you get on the 1.8.4 opensource on the same clocks?
It was about 2600 at maximum if I remember correctly, maybe even a little less. Still need about 10% more to make it most profitable than zcash. I also get insane lags when running your miner, its almost impossible to move a mouse. Testing on i7 2600k + single 1070 with my pc. I needed to lower the intensity.
|
Bitrated user: Kompik.
|
|
|
Squall10
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 04, 2017, 11:50:21 PM |
|
GTX 1070 Founder Edition, TDP 65% + 200 core - 500 mem :
1.8.4 opensource : 2,46 GHASH sp_ beta mod : 2,53 GHASH
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 01:50:34 AM |
|
All this dcr talk...
Need to rewind back to february/ march 2016. Gtx 980 could only do 24Mhash on eth so it was more profitable to mine dcr with it, they did 2.2GH with sp_mod, that was $5/ day back then.
Now people are building 1080 rigs with i7's. Really effective way to loose money. But that black box shows some really nice numbers.
How much does 1070/ 1080 on bbr?
|
|
|
|
Vetal_inside
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 01:56:36 AM |
|
Betatesters needed...
Rig: 1070, +150 core(~1875MHz effective)/-400 mem/75% tdp with 1.7.1-alexis ~2700 MH/s with your mod ~2770 MH/s Single card: Your mod with different tdp: 75%(1875MHz core) 2800MH/s 85%(1975MHz core) 2900MH/s 95%(2012MHz core) 2970MH/s 105%(2050MHz core) 3000MH/s 114%(2063MHz core) 3040MH/s Also, desktop freezes, delay between move mouse and picture reaction is few seconds.
|
|
|
|
DragonSlayer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 02:03:25 AM |
|
These are my results on decred using tpruvot 1.8.4. These are with default settings and clocks. It is the best open source that I have found. If only we had a miner with built in dev fee.
evga gtx 1070 ftw - 2.72-2.77Gh/s titan x pascal - 4.62Gh/s evga gtx 980 - 2.08Gh/s msi gtx 980 - 2.02Gh/s
He does an outstanding job with both ccminer and yiimp pool.
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 02:13:46 AM |
|
What are you getting guys? faster than 1.8.4??
I thought you have a private version that was getting 3100 on a 1070? Hrmmm... Nicehash has a public alpha of their Pascal pool miner out... Who is interested can try our public alpha release: http://nicehash.com/tools/excavator_v1.0.0a_Win64.zipPascalCoin CUDA miner with full stratum support coming soon: ==================== www.nicehash.com ==================== Excavator v1.0.0a GPU Miner for NiceHash. Copyright (C) 2017 NiceHash. All rights reserved. ==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
[01:37:50][0x00000ef4][info] Log started [01:37:50][0x00000ef4][info] Miner starting up, press [CTRL + C] to quit [01:37:50][0x00000ef4][info] net | Connecting to pasc.suprnova.cc:5279 [01:37:50][0x000022f8][info] net | Connected! [01:37:50][0x000022f8][debug] net | Sending mining.subscribe message [01:37:50][0x000022f8][debug] net | Sending mining.authorize message [01:37:50][0x000022f8][debug] net | Sending mining.extranonce.subscribe message [01:37:50][0x000022f8][debug] net | Extranonce1 is: 535550524e4f5641524f58585858585858585858585851755943 [01:37:50][0x000022f8][debug] net | Difficulty changed to: 8 [01:37:50][0x000022f8][info] net | New job 'cb', diff=8 [01:37:50][0x000022f8][info] net | Authorized with stratum server [01:37:50][0x00001da0][info] device#0 | Initializing thread #0 (CUDA-Pascal) GeForce GTX 1080 #0 [01:37:50][0x0000251c][info] device#1 | Initializing thread #1 (CUDA-Pascal) GeForce GTX 1060 6GB #1 [01:37:50][0x00001e84][info] device#3 | Initializing thread #3 (CUDA-Pascal) GeForce GTX 1060 3GB #3 [01:37:50][0x00000568][info] device#2 | Initializing thread #2 (CUDA-Pascal) GeForce GTX 1070 #2 [01:37:51][0x00001da0][debug] device#0 | Ready to perform work [01:37:51][0x00001da0][debug] device#0 | Resetting speeds... [01:37:51][0x00001da0][debug] device#0 | Fetched new work, job 'cb' [01:37:51][0x0000251c][debug] device#1 | Ready to perform work [01:37:51][0x0000251c][debug] device#1 | Resetting speeds... [01:37:51][0x0000251c][debug] device#1 | Fetched new work, job 'cb' [01:37:52][0x00000568][debug] device#2 | Ready to perform work [01:37:52][0x00001e84][debug] device#3 | Ready to perform work [01:37:52][0x00000568][debug] device#2 | Resetting speeds... [01:37:52][0x00001e84][debug] device#3 | Resetting speeds... [01:37:52][0x00000568][debug] device#2 | Fetched new work, job 'cb' [01:37:52][0x00001e84][debug] device#3 | Fetched new work, job 'cb' [01:37:56][0x00000568][debug] device#2 | Found nonce: 44d36202 diff=55.1885 [01:37:56][0x00000568][debug] net | Sending share #4 [01:37:56][0x000022f8][info] net | Share #4 accepted [01:37:56][0x00001e84][debug] device#3 | Found nonce: 6642a19e diff=18.8302 [01:37:56][0x00001e84][debug] net | Sending share #5 [01:37:56][0x000022f8][info] net | Share #5 accepted [01:38:06][0x00000ef4][info] =====> 3.531165 GH/s [01:38:06][0x00000ef4][debug] device#0: 1.300067 GH/s [01:38:06][0x00000ef4][debug] device#1: 661.227041 MH/s [01:38:06][0x00000ef4][debug] device#2: 1.011750 GH/s [01:38:06][0x00000ef4][debug] device#3: 558.121203 MH/s [01:38:19][0x00001da0][debug] device#0 | Found nonce: 18417c74 diff=45.3857 [01:38:19][0x00001da0][debug] net | Sending share #6 [01:38:19][0x000022f8][info] net | Share #6 accepted [01:38:21][0x0000251c][debug] device#1 | Found nonce: fdc7a18c diff=17.6644 [01:38:21][0x0000251c][debug] net | Sending share #7 [01:38:21][0x000022f8][info] net | Share #7 accepted [01:38:22][0x00001e84][debug] device#3 | Found nonce: d68945ee diff=17.5643 [01:38:22][0x00001e84][debug] net | Sending share #8 [01:38:22][0x000022f8][info] net | Share #8 accepted [01:38:22][0x00000ef4][info] =====> 3.538254 GH/s [01:38:22][0x00000ef4][debug] device#0: 1.301676 GH/s [01:38:22][0x00000ef4][debug] device#1: 662.859283 MH/s [01:38:22][0x00000ef4][debug] device#2: 1.014682 GH/s [01:38:22][0x00000ef4][debug] device#3: 559.036978 MH/s
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
gghost
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 03:26:14 AM |
|
Quick comparison - Decred EVGA GTX 1070 FTW, 60%Pow, Core ~1785, Mem -502 Mhz offset SP Mod #9: 2600 MH/s Test build based on alexis opensource: 2664 MH/s (~+2.4% increase)
|
|
|
|
cdmkultra
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 04:27:11 AM |
|
I agree that the miners with a dev fee are the best way to go.
The devs and my incentives are aligned perfectly.....
.....until the point that the dev makes all the money s/he wants (needs) to make.... then that proprietary code becomes a huge risk to any sustainable business model.
|
|
|
|
ivan1975
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1169
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 06:35:26 AM |
|
My results (tdp 90%, core +200, mem -500): 1.8.4: gtx1070 - 2600MH/s, gtx970 - 1320MH/s SP MOD: gtx1070 - 2750MH/s, gtx970 - 1370MH/s
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 08:09:43 AM |
|
All this dcr talk...
Need to rewind back to february/ march 2016. Gtx 980 could only do 24Mhash on eth so it was more profitable to mine dcr with it, they did 2.2GH with sp_mod, that was $5/ day back then.
Now people are building 1080 rigs with i7's. Really effective way to loose money. But that black box shows some really nice numbers.
How much does 1070/ 1080 on bbr?
not to mention that decred is not that good right now, it just that everything else look very bad to mine, maybe lbry the only exception some times...
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 09:37:59 AM |
|
All this dcr talk...
Need to rewind back to february/ march 2016. Gtx 980 could only do 24Mhash on eth so it was more profitable to mine dcr with it, they did 2.2GH with sp_mod, that was $5/ day back then.
Now people are building 1080 rigs with i7's. Really effective way to loose money. But that black box shows some really nice numbers.
How much does 1070/ 1080 on bbr?
not to mention that decred is not that good right now, it just that everything else look very bad to mine, maybe lbry the only exception some times... People using Awesomeminer are taking a dump on that. All the alt coins has about 7 distinct groups of hashrate that bounce back and forth between them tanking the difficulty for six hours then moving to a different coin. That's where my rant came from a couple days ago. It's not profitable if people don't understand how much their hashrate influences the difficulty of what is being mined. Profit auto-switchers for the loss.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 06:25:49 PM |
|
not that it matter anymore i guess because profitability is the same now, but klaus is still stuck with that bug on the pascal miner, preventing it to work with a pool?
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 08:02:57 PM |
|
not that it matter anymore i guess because profitability is the same now, but klaus is still stuck with that bug on the pascal miner, preventing it to work with a pool?
Still crashes on startup on Linux.
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 05, 2017, 11:23:21 PM |
|
NICEHASH EXCAVATOR BY DJEZO WORKS ON NVIDIA-- I get about 1.9GH/s mining PascalCoin with a 5-card GTX 960 rig. Here is the link: http://nicehash.com/tools/excavator_v1.0.0a_Win64.zip . It is a new release, today. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 06, 2017, 07:40:41 AM |
|
www.Chronobank.io will launch is a few days. Multiple blockchais supported. Can it be mined? Look's like this is going to be one of the biggest launches in 2017...Estimated 4-5MUSD backing at star.t..
|
|
|
|
|