[ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping

[bitChipper]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

[broadhurst]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

[monarx911@i.ua]

big changes are possible, link to official source https://factomize.com/forums/threads/exchange-committee-001-exchange-listing-fee.1039/#post-6073

[tempus]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

[monarx911@i.ua]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

Bravo!!!   
I'd rather earn less, but I will be sure that I invested money in what works and not in empty words and noise

[monarx911@i.ua]

You have seen a lot of projects that are used in the real world, that's where the real foundation! link to official source  https://www.factom.com/company/news/press-release/equator-blockchain-solution/

[taki183]

You have seen a lot of projects that are used in the real world, that's where the real foundation! link to official source  https://www.factom.com/company/news/press-release/equator-blockchain-solution/

15% growth on news - good work, Polo

[Galaxyfrop]

In reddit, they write about December, but without specifics.
At the beginning of November in the Ledger will appear, given that the product is ready.
I'm starting to add it to my portfolio!;)

[nabilapimpo]

You have seen a lot of projects that are used in the real world, that's where the real foundation! link to official source  https://www.factom.com/company/news/press-release/equator-blockchain-solution/

15% growth on news - good work, Polo

Yes, in fact at the end of this year as market conditions tend to always improve. There will be a lot of people back into the crypto, and this is an opportunity for to make this project work and pulling his sebanyak-banyak people to join it.
positive news  including a good strategies, effective , and working for marketing.

[Altcoinlover]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

thanks for sharing that perspective.

Sadly, people are more enclain to spread FUD and react for no reason on the bad direction... following the louder whose are surely not doing it to help others... but to selfishly make more money no matter what!

[broadhurst]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

thanks for sharing that perspective.

Sadly, people are more enclain to spread FUD and react for no reason on the bad direction... following the louder whose are surely not doing it to help others... but to selfishly make more money no matter what!

Congratulations Factom for once again excelling yourself by being one of the biggest losers whenever there is a dump - breaking the $4 barrier was a walk in the park - you have asmuch support as a house of cards.

[tempus]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

thanks for sharing that perspective.

Sadly, people are more enclain to spread FUD and react for no reason on the bad direction... following the louder whose are surely not doing it to help others... but to selfishly make more money no matter what!

Congratulations Factom for once again excelling yourself by being one of the biggest losers whenever there is a dump - breaking the $4 barrier was a walk in the park - you have asmuch support as a house of cards.

Why don't you sell your FCT and buy some BCH or Zcash or ICX or XMR etc.? Oh wait, they all lost as much or even more than FCT today... damn.

[GlobalProtection]

A great coin is going to bounce back fast and Factom has done just that.

Thanks Factom 

[broadhurst]

A great coin is going to bounce back fast and Factom has done just that.

Thanks Factom  

Dead Cat Bounce

[Altcoinlover]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

thanks for sharing that perspective.

Sadly, people are more enclain to spread FUD and react for no reason on the bad direction... following the louder whose are surely not doing it to help others... but to selfishly make more money no matter what!

Congratulations Factom for once again excelling yourself by being one of the biggest losers whenever there is a dump - breaking the $4 barrier was a walk in the park - you have asmuch support as a house of cards.

Why don't you sell your FCT and buy some BCH or Zcash or ICX or XMR etc.? Oh wait, they all lost as much or even more than FCT today... damn.

haha, great comment.. funny...

How weird it is people can be so biais on stuffs when they only want create FUD...

It seems to be a pleasant activity.... but I cannot see how it can brings good feeling in the life of those fuders.

[sl-avik]

old coin - good coin,
next pump - strat...

[ivsem]

Here is a really good example.The team worked for many years and showed excellent results. It happened at that moment when the whole market collapsed.
This is a very competent combination.
Now the number of people wishing to learn about the project is much more 

I want to congratulate you!
Your team is the best!

[pumman4]

Hopefully Factom will avoid the gutter-trash scam exchanges C-cex and Yobit. Since it will take a bit of work and more than 75 iq points to make these tokens tradable I doubt that will be an issue.

[Bytem3]

Factom is performing very well, eventho the whole crypto market is crashing :O

[tempus]

A great coin is going to bounce back fast and Factom has done just that.

Thanks Factom  

Dead Cat Bounce

When you said the above the price was at about or even below $5.

Now:

$8,71 USD
+ 43,88%
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/factom/