[ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping

[monarx911@i.ua]

read this:) link to the official channel  https://www.reddit.com/r/factom/comments/9rcn0j/the_factom_asset_token_protocol_smart_contracts/

[1550372496]

1550372496

[1550372496]

1550372496

[1550372496]

1550372496

[1550372496]

1550372496

[sl-avik]

what price we can predict from this new use cases possibilities?  in article some very HUGE numbers in dollars sum,
and if FCT will in Binance one time in future.... so it very interesting and hot

[CreamyCheesecake]

read this:) link to the official channel  https://www.reddit.com/r/factom/comments/9rcn0j/the_factom_asset_token_protocol_smart_contracts/

That's pretty awesome news. The FAT protocol could be a nice reason for corporation adoption. Factom needs to play their cards right to make this successful so we can start thinking about a price recovery.

[muleroaa]

read this:) link to the official channel  https://www.reddit.com/r/factom/comments/9rcn0j/the_factom_asset_token_protocol_smart_contracts/

That's pretty awesome news. The FAT protocol could be a nice reason for corporation adoption. Factom needs to play their cards right to make this successful so we can start thinking about a price recovery.

It still has to be known though that this exists for people to make use out of it. If they handle the promotion, marketing and onboarding the same as they do with FCT then I am afraid not a lot of people will be aware of it and make use of it. Let's see how this pans out.

[broadhurst]

read this:) link to the official channel  https://www.reddit.com/r/factom/comments/9rcn0j/the_factom_asset_token_protocol_smart_contracts/

That's pretty awesome news. The FAT protocol could be a nice reason for corporation adoption. Factom needs to play their cards right to make this successful so we can start thinking about a price recovery.

It still has to be known though that this exists for people to make use out of it. If they handle the promotion, marketing and onboarding the same as they do with FCT then I am afraid not a lot of people will be aware of it and make use of it. Let's see how this pans out.

Like 99.9% of all these projects Factom is a solution looking for a problem.. Bitcoin was the solution to a problem and everything else is just jumping on the bandwagon.. cannot you bagholders see this?

[tempus]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

[bitChipper]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

[broadhurst]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

[monarx911@i.ua]

big changes are possible, link to official source https://factomize.com/forums/threads/exchange-committee-001-exchange-listing-fee.1039/#post-6073

[tempus]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

[monarx911@i.ua]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

Bravo!!!   
I'd rather earn less, but I will be sure that I invested money in what works and not in empty words and noise

[monarx911@i.ua]

You have seen a lot of projects that are used in the real world, that's where the real foundation! link to official source  https://www.factom.com/company/news/press-release/equator-blockchain-solution/

[taki183]

You have seen a lot of projects that are used in the real world, that's where the real foundation! link to official source  https://www.factom.com/company/news/press-release/equator-blockchain-solution/

15% growth on news - good work, Polo

[Galaxyfrop]

In reddit, they write about December, but without specifics.
At the beginning of November in the Ledger will appear, given that the product is ready.
I'm starting to add it to my portfolio!;)

[nabilapimpo]

You have seen a lot of projects that are used in the real world, that's where the real foundation! link to official source  https://www.factom.com/company/news/press-release/equator-blockchain-solution/

15% growth on news - good work, Polo

Yes, in fact at the end of this year as market conditions tend to always improve. There will be a lot of people back into the crypto, and this is an opportunity for to make this project work and pulling his sebanyak-banyak people to join it.
positive news  including a good strategies, effective , and working for marketing.

[Altcoinlover]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

thanks for sharing that perspective.

Sadly, people are more enclain to spread FUD and react for no reason on the bad direction... following the louder whose are surely not doing it to help others... but to selfishly make more money no matter what!

[broadhurst]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

thanks for sharing that perspective.

Sadly, people are more enclain to spread FUD and react for no reason on the bad direction... following the louder whose are surely not doing it to help others... but to selfishly make more money no matter what!

Congratulations Factom for once again excelling yourself by being one of the biggest losers whenever there is a dump - breaking the $4 barrier was a walk in the park - you have asmuch support as a house of cards.

[tempus]

Paul Snow - Market Driven Pegged Tokens (Texas Bitcoin Conference)
https://youtu.be/uszUt0GStJs

Edit: He also answers questions about Factom of course...

Still trying to understand it all, but it almost seems like its just a play to try and bring more factoid burns to the network. He makes it sound like the only people who would maybe use these stable coins would be traders/speculators...

Let's look at it like this though, if it brings more users to the protocol than its a good thing for the price of factoids. Even if no one ends up using it, at-least its an added utility of the protocol.

There has been alot of development over the last year, sad to see price not reflecting at all.

Factom will use any excuse to fall in price - it is a sheep in Wolf clothing
These guys are just living off the ICO - it's a great life when you can print your own money
It's been around for 5 years and going nowhere fast.

1) Living off ICO-money? That's bullshit. Factom has not made much money during their ICO because they've done that in a time when markets were down and long before the ICO-hype, in Spring 2015. As far as I know they didn't get much more than about $500k. Compare that to shit-projects that are building useless Apps and got several millions or blockchain-projects like Tezos or EOS with ICO's about hundreds of millions.

2) Around since 5 years? No, also not true. Launch was in mid 2015, that is three years ago.

3) Going nowhere fast? Yes... but I believe that is true for all teams who are building real stuff. If you compare projects in this space you will not find that many that are already on a level to really get traction when it's about real usage. Some are making money, like Binance - but they are making money as Crypto-exchange. Some may have more partnerships but most of the time that is just testing - like it's also the case for Factom as far as I know.

Prices in Crypto don't reflect quality but money follows money, people tend to those who get more attention and that is often a question of exchanges etc. That's why one of the most asked questions of "Investors" is not about the quality of a project but "when Binance?" etc.

thanks for sharing that perspective.

Sadly, people are more enclain to spread FUD and react for no reason on the bad direction... following the louder whose are surely not doing it to help others... but to selfishly make more money no matter what!

Congratulations Factom for once again excelling yourself by being one of the biggest losers whenever there is a dump - breaking the $4 barrier was a walk in the park - you have asmuch support as a house of cards.

Why don't you sell your FCT and buy some BCH or Zcash or ICX or XMR etc.? Oh wait, they all lost as much or even more than FCT today... damn.

[GlobalProtection]

A great coin is going to bounce back fast and Factom has done just that.

Thanks Factom 

[broadhurst]

A great coin is going to bounce back fast and Factom has done just that.

Thanks Factom  

Dead Cat Bounce