Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2024, 05:41:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [LTC] [PPS] [OTP 2FA] [Stratum only] LTCMine PPS mining pool (3.3%)  (Read 227574 times)
dermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 10, 2013, 05:51:49 PM
 #781

Is this correct : --scan-time 30 --expiry 30 --queue 0

Thanks

EDIT: When I put the line as extra flags in Guiminer Scrypt Alpha the workers wont connect to the pool

Try this: -Q 0 -s 30 -E 30


Thanks mate, the stales are just below 2% with the settings..still quite high

then.. -Q 0 -s 15 -E 15
z0rr0
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 303
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 01:25:01 AM
 #782

Is this correct : --scan-time 30 --expiry 30 --queue 0

Thanks

EDIT: When I put the line as extra flags in Guiminer Scrypt Alpha the workers wont connect to the pool

Try this: -Q 0 -s 30 -E 30


Thanks mate, the stales are just below 2% with the settings..still quite high

I use such settings just for very fast coins like wdc or dgc, with "-q 0 -s 1 -e 1", and dont use any for ltc mining.
I have 1.55% rejects, but may be this is because I'm in Russia, and Balthazars ltc server seems too.

dermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 11, 2013, 05:39:00 AM
 #783

I've try a default conf yesterday for a 8h run

A:2640 / R:26

"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "60",
"expiry" : "120",


you can try
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359



View Profile
June 11, 2013, 10:09:55 PM
 #784

I use such settings just for very fast coins like wdc or dgc, with "-q 0 -s 1 -e 1", and dont use any for ltc mining.
I have 1.55% rejects, but may be this is because I'm in Russia, and Balthazars ltc server seems too.
LTC pool is based in Ukraine.
YipYip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 12, 2013, 05:42:46 AM
 #785

The payout times seem to be slipping ~ 15-20 mins every 24 hour period ...it is making it harder to calculate farms/rigs performamnce due to time not being exactly 1 hour

Can you go back to on the hour payouts or anytime but in 60 min iterations ??

Thanks

OBJECT NOT FOUND
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359



View Profile
June 12, 2013, 04:21:48 PM
Last edit: June 12, 2013, 04:42:08 PM by Balthazar
 #786

Slipping is a simple solution, which allowed us to use cheaper hardware by decreasing database locks amount. I'm working on new algorithm, which will make average time closer to 1h. But it's already very close. Just an example for some set of last 24 payments:

Code:
2013-06-12 15:47:29
2013-06-12 14:47:11
2013-06-12 13:45:31
2013-06-12 12:44:59
2013-06-12 11:44:32
2013-06-12 10:43:33
2013-06-12 09:42:37
2013-06-12 08:41:32
2013-06-12 07:40:42
2013-06-12 06:39:30
2013-06-12 05:38:35
2013-06-12 04:37:36
2013-06-12 03:37:35
2013-06-12 02:36:37
2013-06-12 01:36:31
2013-06-12 00:36:09
2013-06-11 23:35:35
2013-06-11 22:34:31
2013-06-11 21:34:30
2013-06-11 20:33:37
2013-06-11 19:32:35
2013-06-11 18:31:35
2013-06-11 17:31:27
2013-06-11 16:30:37

Code:
postgres=# select timestamp '2013-06-12 15:47:29' - timestamp '2013-06-11 16:30:37' as time;
   time
----------
 23:16:52
(1 row)

postgres=#

postgres=# select extract('epoch' from interval '23:16:52');
 date_part
-----------
     83812
(1 row)

postgres=#

I.e. average paymets speed up is only ~3% (83812 seconds resulting cycle time instead of 86400). Next algorithm update will make deviation even lower. Also I can calculate time deviation for last 24 hours and show it with another statistics... At the rewards page, for example.  Roll Eyes

P.S. I think that payments volume for last 24 hours addition would be helpful.
YipYip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 12, 2013, 11:41:13 PM
 #787

Slipping is a simple solution, which allowed us to use cheaper hardware by decreasing database locks amount. I'm working on new algorithm, which will make average time closer to 1h. But it's already very close. Just an example for some set of last 24 payments:

Code:
2013-06-12 15:47:29
2013-06-12 14:47:11
2013-06-12 13:45:31
2013-06-12 12:44:59
2013-06-12 11:44:32
2013-06-12 10:43:33
2013-06-12 09:42:37
2013-06-12 08:41:32
2013-06-12 07:40:42
2013-06-12 06:39:30
2013-06-12 05:38:35
2013-06-12 04:37:36
2013-06-12 03:37:35
2013-06-12 02:36:37
2013-06-12 01:36:31
2013-06-12 00:36:09
2013-06-11 23:35:35
2013-06-11 22:34:31
2013-06-11 21:34:30
2013-06-11 20:33:37
2013-06-11 19:32:35
2013-06-11 18:31:35
2013-06-11 17:31:27
2013-06-11 16:30:37

Code:
postgres=# select timestamp '2013-06-12 15:47:29' - timestamp '2013-06-11 16:30:37' as time;
   time
----------
 23:16:52
(1 row)

postgres=#

postgres=# select extract('epoch' from interval '23:16:52');
 date_part
-----------
     83812
(1 row)

postgres=#

I.e. average paymets speed up is only ~3% (83812 seconds resulting cycle time instead of 86400). Next algorithm update will make deviation even lower. Also I can calculate time deviation for last 24 hours and show it with another statistics... At the rewards page, for example.  Roll Eyes

P.S. I think that payments volume for last 24 hours addition would be helpful.

If a 24hour time frame average and also if you could have an average over the dif change time period ...now that would be awsome and something that all miners would really get value from !!!!  Cheesy

OBJECT NOT FOUND
dermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:56:54 PM
 #788

Hi,

Anyone can explain me why sometimes stale shares are accepted Huh
Stale shares must not to be rejected all the times ?
Thanks !

dermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 14, 2013, 02:28:09 AM
 #789

Why cgminer spam me about new block, when I check on the website those are not reported oO
I'm confuse
Still don't understand why some stale share are detected but accepted

Thanks in advance

Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359



View Profile
June 14, 2013, 06:14:27 AM
 #790

Hi,

Anyone can explain me why sometimes stale shares are accepted Huh
Stale shares must not to be rejected all the times ?
Thanks !


Because it's not stales actually.
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359



View Profile
June 14, 2013, 06:20:07 AM
 #791

Why cgminer spam me about new block, when I check on the website those are not reported oO
It's messages about the new blocks on the network, not blocks found by pool.

P.S. Anyone knows how to resize win8 on-screen keyboard? Roll Eyes
dermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 14, 2013, 06:31:09 AM
 #792

Why cgminer spam me about new block, when I check on the website those are not reported oO
It's messages about the new blocks on the network, not blocks found by pool.

P.S. Anyone knows how to resize win8 on-screen keyboard? Roll Eyes

how can I disable that ? Sad

you are on what OS for the on screen keyboard ?
dermo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 14, 2013, 06:33:56 AM
 #793

Why cgminer spam me about new block, when I check on the website those are not reported oO
It's messages about the new blocks on the network, not blocks found by pool.

P.S. Anyone knows how to resize win8 on-screen keyboard? Roll Eyes

how can I disable that ? Sad

you are on what OS for the on screen keyboard ?

nvm for the on screen keyboard ^^

I'm using Comfort On-Screen Keyboard Pro on win8 and the problem is solved Wink
wedgy2k
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 329
Merit: 251



View Profile
June 22, 2013, 04:54:53 PM
 #794

Hi
Been with the pool a couple of weeks now and I am pleased with the choice

I have checked the x for worker notifications and was expecting to receive an email alert when one them went down
I didn't receive a mail.
The receiving address is registered correctly with my account.
Do I need to anything else? or is there an issue with the alerting?

Cheers

Wedgy2k

kronut
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10



View Profile
June 22, 2013, 08:25:25 PM
 #795

Hi
Been with the pool a couple of weeks now and I am pleased with the choice

I have checked the x for worker notifications and was expecting to receive an email alert when one them went down
I didn't receive a mail.
The receiving address is registered correctly with my account.
Do I need to anything else? or is there an issue with the alerting?

Cheers

Wedgy2k

Unfortunately I have had issues too with this, it works intermittently on my gmail, in fact in the last few outages, the workers stay online, but the kh/s shows 0, and no notification is sent.
nhatsport
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 24, 2013, 05:45:47 AM
 #796

why can not I use google authenticator to log into my account? I deleted and re-exploration QR code many times you can do! Please help! My username is nhatsport
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359



View Profile
June 24, 2013, 04:20:09 PM
 #797

why can not I use google authenticator to log into my account? I deleted and re-exploration QR code many times you can do! Please help! My username is nhatsport
Checked your account. Everything seems OK, your code generated at 10 Jun 2013 10:41 GMT.

Maybe you have time syncronization problem?
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359



View Profile
June 25, 2013, 12:28:17 PM
 #798

Software upgrade scheduled tomorrow at ~ 2:00 GMT+4.
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359



View Profile
June 27, 2013, 06:27:01 AM
Last edit: June 29, 2013, 06:00:53 PM by Balthazar
 #799

LTCMine work generation server successfully switched to litecoind-0.8 8 hours ago. Wallet will be switched later, after sources will be published.
13v12
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 29, 2013, 01:24:32 PM
 #800

Good day.
Why I can not sent my LTC from LTCmine to  my Wallet to BTC-e.
System respond me - Previous operation is not yet complete.
Why? What happened? What did I need doing?
I wrote letter for you, but you don"t answered.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!