dermo
|
|
June 10, 2013, 05:51:49 PM |
|
Is this correct : --scan-time 30 --expiry 30 --queue 0
Thanks
EDIT: When I put the line as extra flags in Guiminer Scrypt Alpha the workers wont connect to the pool
Try this: -Q 0 -s 30 -E 30 Thanks mate, the stales are just below 2% with the settings..still quite high then.. -Q 0 -s 15 -E 15
|
|
|
|
z0rr0
|
|
June 11, 2013, 01:25:01 AM |
|
Is this correct : --scan-time 30 --expiry 30 --queue 0
Thanks
EDIT: When I put the line as extra flags in Guiminer Scrypt Alpha the workers wont connect to the pool
Try this: -Q 0 -s 30 -E 30 Thanks mate, the stales are just below 2% with the settings..still quite high I use such settings just for very fast coins like wdc or dgc, with "-q 0 -s 1 -e 1", and dont use any for ltc mining. I have 1.55% rejects, but may be this is because I'm in Russia, and Balthazars ltc server seems too.
|
|
|
|
dermo
|
|
June 11, 2013, 05:39:00 AM |
|
I've try a default conf yesterday for a 8h run
A:2640 / R:26
"queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "60", "expiry" : "120",
you can try
|
|
|
|
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
|
June 11, 2013, 10:09:55 PM |
|
I use such settings just for very fast coins like wdc or dgc, with "-q 0 -s 1 -e 1", and dont use any for ltc mining. I have 1.55% rejects, but may be this is because I'm in Russia, and Balthazars ltc server seems too.
LTC pool is based in Ukraine.
|
|
|
|
YipYip
|
|
June 12, 2013, 05:42:46 AM |
|
The payout times seem to be slipping ~ 15-20 mins every 24 hour period ...it is making it harder to calculate farms/rigs performamnce due to time not being exactly 1 hour
Can you go back to on the hour payouts or anytime but in 60 min iterations ??
Thanks
|
OBJECT NOT FOUND
|
|
|
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
|
June 12, 2013, 04:21:48 PM Last edit: June 12, 2013, 04:42:08 PM by Balthazar |
|
Slipping is a simple solution, which allowed us to use cheaper hardware by decreasing database locks amount. I'm working on new algorithm, which will make average time closer to 1h. But it's already very close. Just an example for some set of last 24 payments: 2013-06-12 15:47:29 2013-06-12 14:47:11 2013-06-12 13:45:31 2013-06-12 12:44:59 2013-06-12 11:44:32 2013-06-12 10:43:33 2013-06-12 09:42:37 2013-06-12 08:41:32 2013-06-12 07:40:42 2013-06-12 06:39:30 2013-06-12 05:38:35 2013-06-12 04:37:36 2013-06-12 03:37:35 2013-06-12 02:36:37 2013-06-12 01:36:31 2013-06-12 00:36:09 2013-06-11 23:35:35 2013-06-11 22:34:31 2013-06-11 21:34:30 2013-06-11 20:33:37 2013-06-11 19:32:35 2013-06-11 18:31:35 2013-06-11 17:31:27 2013-06-11 16:30:37 postgres=# select timestamp '2013-06-12 15:47:29' - timestamp '2013-06-11 16:30:37' as time; time ---------- 23:16:52 (1 row)
postgres=#
postgres=# select extract('epoch' from interval '23:16:52'); date_part ----------- 83812 (1 row)
postgres=# I.e. average paymets speed up is only ~3% (83812 seconds resulting cycle time instead of 86400). Next algorithm update will make deviation even lower. Also I can calculate time deviation for last 24 hours and show it with another statistics... At the rewards page, for example. P.S. I think that payments volume for last 24 hours addition would be helpful.
|
|
|
|
YipYip
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:41:13 PM |
|
Slipping is a simple solution, which allowed us to use cheaper hardware by decreasing database locks amount. I'm working on new algorithm, which will make average time closer to 1h. But it's already very close. Just an example for some set of last 24 payments: 2013-06-12 15:47:29 2013-06-12 14:47:11 2013-06-12 13:45:31 2013-06-12 12:44:59 2013-06-12 11:44:32 2013-06-12 10:43:33 2013-06-12 09:42:37 2013-06-12 08:41:32 2013-06-12 07:40:42 2013-06-12 06:39:30 2013-06-12 05:38:35 2013-06-12 04:37:36 2013-06-12 03:37:35 2013-06-12 02:36:37 2013-06-12 01:36:31 2013-06-12 00:36:09 2013-06-11 23:35:35 2013-06-11 22:34:31 2013-06-11 21:34:30 2013-06-11 20:33:37 2013-06-11 19:32:35 2013-06-11 18:31:35 2013-06-11 17:31:27 2013-06-11 16:30:37 postgres=# select timestamp '2013-06-12 15:47:29' - timestamp '2013-06-11 16:30:37' as time; time ---------- 23:16:52 (1 row)
postgres=#
postgres=# select extract('epoch' from interval '23:16:52'); date_part ----------- 83812 (1 row)
postgres=# I.e. average paymets speed up is only ~3% (83812 seconds resulting cycle time instead of 86400). Next algorithm update will make deviation even lower. Also I can calculate time deviation for last 24 hours and show it with another statistics... At the rewards page, for example. P.S. I think that payments volume for last 24 hours addition would be helpful. If a 24hour time frame average and also if you could have an average over the dif change time period ...now that would be awsome and something that all miners would really get value from !!!!
|
OBJECT NOT FOUND
|
|
|
dermo
|
|
June 13, 2013, 08:56:54 PM |
|
Hi, Anyone can explain me why sometimes stale shares are accepted Stale shares must not to be rejected all the times ? Thanks !
|
|
|
|
dermo
|
|
June 14, 2013, 02:28:09 AM |
|
Why cgminer spam me about new block, when I check on the website those are not reported oO I'm confuse Still don't understand why some stale share are detected but accepted Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
|
June 14, 2013, 06:14:27 AM |
|
Hi, Anyone can explain me why sometimes stale shares are accepted Stale shares must not to be rejected all the times ? Thanks ! Because it's not stales actually.
|
|
|
|
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
|
June 14, 2013, 06:20:07 AM |
|
Why cgminer spam me about new block, when I check on the website those are not reported oO It's messages about the new blocks on the network, not blocks found by pool. P.S. Anyone knows how to resize win8 on-screen keyboard?
|
|
|
|
dermo
|
|
June 14, 2013, 06:31:09 AM |
|
Why cgminer spam me about new block, when I check on the website those are not reported oO It's messages about the new blocks on the network, not blocks found by pool. P.S. Anyone knows how to resize win8 on-screen keyboard? how can I disable that ? you are on what OS for the on screen keyboard ?
|
|
|
|
dermo
|
|
June 14, 2013, 06:33:56 AM |
|
Why cgminer spam me about new block, when I check on the website those are not reported oO It's messages about the new blocks on the network, not blocks found by pool. P.S. Anyone knows how to resize win8 on-screen keyboard? how can I disable that ? you are on what OS for the on screen keyboard ? nvm for the on screen keyboard ^^ I'm using Comfort On-Screen Keyboard Pro on win8 and the problem is solved
|
|
|
|
wedgy2k
|
|
June 22, 2013, 04:54:53 PM |
|
Hi Been with the pool a couple of weeks now and I am pleased with the choice
I have checked the x for worker notifications and was expecting to receive an email alert when one them went down I didn't receive a mail. The receiving address is registered correctly with my account. Do I need to anything else? or is there an issue with the alerting?
Cheers
Wedgy2k
|
|
|
|
kronut
Member
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
|
|
June 22, 2013, 08:25:25 PM |
|
Hi Been with the pool a couple of weeks now and I am pleased with the choice
I have checked the x for worker notifications and was expecting to receive an email alert when one them went down I didn't receive a mail. The receiving address is registered correctly with my account. Do I need to anything else? or is there an issue with the alerting?
Cheers
Wedgy2k
Unfortunately I have had issues too with this, it works intermittently on my gmail, in fact in the last few outages, the workers stay online, but the kh/s shows 0, and no notification is sent.
|
|
|
|
nhatsport
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
June 24, 2013, 05:45:47 AM |
|
why can not I use google authenticator to log into my account? I deleted and re-exploration QR code many times you can do! Please help! My username is nhatsport
|
|
|
|
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
|
June 24, 2013, 04:20:09 PM |
|
why can not I use google authenticator to log into my account? I deleted and re-exploration QR code many times you can do! Please help! My username is nhatsport
Checked your account. Everything seems OK, your code generated at 10 Jun 2013 10:41 GMT. Maybe you have time syncronization problem?
|
|
|
|
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
|
June 25, 2013, 12:28:17 PM |
|
Software upgrade scheduled tomorrow at ~ 2:00 GMT+4.
|
|
|
|
Balthazar (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
|
June 27, 2013, 06:27:01 AM Last edit: June 29, 2013, 06:00:53 PM by Balthazar |
|
LTCMine work generation server successfully switched to litecoind-0.8 8 hours ago. Wallet will be switched later, after sources will be published.
|
|
|
|
13v12
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
June 29, 2013, 01:24:32 PM |
|
Good day. Why I can not sent my LTC from LTCmine to my Wallet to BTC-e. System respond me - Previous operation is not yet complete. Why? What happened? What did I need doing? I wrote letter for you, but you don"t answered.
|
|
|
|
|