JoeGreen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
April 15, 2015, 12:50:02 AM |
|
Found another block today, that 1 block is definitely possible. I not sure what John is talking about when he mentioned soloing on this pool: http://pool01.vanillacoin.net/I tried mining that pool for 2 hours @ 1 gh's and had no luck so I left and went to suprnova. This was the info I used to mine with. Does it look correct? Thanks stratum+tcp://pool01.vanillacoin.net:3032 worker name: my vanilla coin address password: any password
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
April 15, 2015, 01:10:56 AM |
|
Please test new Smelter versionShould work with Nicehash now (but keep an eye on it!), more GPUs are supported (270, 290x and other GCN)
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
|
junkozane
|
|
April 15, 2015, 02:26:12 AM |
|
TYVM smolen, smelter runs 181MH/s on my poor 7850
|
|
|
|
AliMan
|
|
April 15, 2015, 04:21:13 AM |
|
Found another block today, that 1 block is definitely possible. I not sure what John is talking about when he mentioned soloing on this pool: http://pool01.vanillacoin.net/I tried mining that pool for 2 hours @ 1 gh's and had no luck so I left and went to suprnova. This was the info I used to mine with. Does it look correct? Thanks stratum+tcp://pool01.vanillacoin.net:3032 worker name: my vanilla coin address password: any password That pool just found one block: http://pool01.vanillacoin.net/tbsYour address looks fine, but it's like comparing the odds of ~2/(current difficulty) for finding a block on that pool, the reason why I haven't joined it as I could do that myself if I were to solo. If it were at least 5 blocks a day, then that's fine. I'm also at supernova, but I think it's quite stupid for the entire dam hash to be on one pool, only if the hash were split up between at least two pools, then us smaller miners could certainly do better.
|
|
|
|
z0n0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 15, 2015, 04:31:26 AM |
|
TYVM smolen, smelter runs 181MH/s on my poor 7850 I get just 165MH/s on HD7850
|
|
|
|
z0n0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 15, 2015, 05:06:01 AM |
|
TYVM smolen, smelter runs 181MH/s on my poor 7850 I get just 165MH/s on HD7850 And I get ~271MH/s on it. Sure you do, you're "tha wolf" I'm not surprised
|
|
|
|
CryptoClub
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
cryptocollectorsclub.com
|
|
April 15, 2015, 05:08:17 AM |
|
TYVM smolen, smelter runs 181MH/s on my poor 7850 I get just 165MH/s on HD7850 And I get ~271MH/s on it. Why don't you release some full speed version where you get a percentage?
|
...
|
|
|
z0n0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 15, 2015, 05:20:51 AM |
|
TYVM smolen, smelter runs 181MH/s on my poor 7850 I get just 165MH/s on HD7850 And I get ~271MH/s on it. Sure you do, you're "tha wolf" I'm not surprised There was a point to that comment: had you took the time to read what junkozane quoted, you might have realized that he probably isn't using the stock SGMiner (as I am not.) TYVM smolen, smelter runs 181MH/s on my poor 7850 I get just 165MH/s on HD7850 And I get ~271MH/s on it. Why don't you release some full speed version where you get a percentage? I'm working on it. I need to write my own miner from scratch first, so it's not infected with the GPL. I'm getting that speed with smelter version posted above - I believe junkozane was talking about smelter too (with stock sgminer I get about 50)
|
|
|
|
Karn
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation."
|
|
April 15, 2015, 05:21:39 AM |
|
hello, any news rgarding the c-cex mess?
Honeybadger from Polo (together with us) is waiting for C-cex Yuriy to send the wallet files over so he can fix them. We are getting "Sending them soon, I'm busy" every day. Please ask for it on the C-cex trollbox, in a C-cex support ticket or on their IRC channel: #c-cex-exchange. Polo and Bittrex are still operating perfectly. Good luck with ccex support, after a 4 day wait they finally responded with this just now. "Hello! Apologies for being late with this answer. VNL wallet is beta software with lot's of issues inside and unfinished functions supplied by dev without any warany and support. We had lot's of problems with VNL wallet and spent many hours to resolve it. The last problem when wallet refused to send coins having enough balance in it (returning "connection input failed" message) could not be solved without dev help. Instead of collaboration JohnConnor refused to help to fix his software and posted this: https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/130/c-cex-de-list-request/4 So we removed wallet from exchange without any chance to fix wallet and send VNL balances to users. According to our rules https://c-cex.com/?id=terms this is exactly the case when we had to remove wallet without any compensation. HoneyBadger honestly offered us to help fixing this problem and we already negotiating our terms of collaboration with him. We give no guarantee but it is possible he can solve a problem with wallet and send us sendable coins so we can compensate user balances. Thanks!"
|
“But it's a poor fellow who can't take his pleasure without asking other people's permission.” ― Hermann Hesse, Steppenwolf
|
|
|
z0n0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 15, 2015, 05:31:03 AM |
|
TYVM smolen, smelter runs 181MH/s on my poor 7850 I get just 165MH/s on HD7850 And I get ~271MH/s on it. Sure you do, you're "tha wolf" I'm not surprised There was a point to that comment: had you took the time to read what junkozane quoted, you might have realized that he probably isn't using the stock SGMiner (as I am not.) TYVM smolen, smelter runs 181MH/s on my poor 7850 I get just 165MH/s on HD7850 And I get ~271MH/s on it. Why don't you release some full speed version where you get a percentage? I'm working on it. I need to write my own miner from scratch first, so it's not infected with the GPL. I'm getting that speed with smelter version posted above - I believe junkozane was talking about smelter too (with stock sgminer I get about 50) Really? Because with the version I released a while ago, you should be getting FAR more than 50MH/s. With "official" I get ~50, with yours ~84 (I'm not sure if I have the latest yours - link to download pls?), with smelter ~165
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
April 15, 2015, 05:34:40 AM |
|
I get just 165MH/s on HD7850 Were Smelter as advanced as sgminer and company, many problems could be diagnosed by plain screenshot Try to play with worksize, change '-W 64' in .cmd file to -W 128 or 256, select the best value, lower memclock and start to raise core clock. Keep an eye '5s:' speed, it catches up quickly. And I get ~271MH/s on it.
Something new? Why don't you release some full speed version where you get a percentage?
We are more or less at par with Wolf0, he is obviously better at OpenCL, I think I can show a trick or two at math. Our miners are roughly equal. I spared my best kernel to throw Smelter into wildness of buggy drivers, weird software, rare GPUs, newbie users and other real-life issues. When all it will be over, Smelter will be mature miner, ready to make money - with other algorithms. Sadly, this move devastated profits on Vanillacoin for OpenCL developers, at least until next breakthrough with AES-like kernels. EDIT: damn, I just have to buy sample GPUs, or insert remote kernel loading, or something else to handle all that GPU zoo.
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
z0n0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 15, 2015, 05:36:10 AM |
|
What's up with that "red dot" transaction? Why still receiving? (e7db627ea8a652091c87e35c96e4727ec57e73aea7424f949347a3c40e4625d6)
|
|
|
|
|
z0n0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 15, 2015, 06:10:23 AM |
|
EDIT: ~200 mh/s with HD7850
|
|
|
|
qwep1
|
|
April 15, 2015, 06:11:43 AM |
|
with 270 ~265
|
|
|
|
traumschiff (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
|
April 15, 2015, 07:48:11 AM |
|
Thank you very much, added to the OP.
|
|
|
|
traumschiff (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
180 BPM
|
|
April 15, 2015, 07:56:26 AM Last edit: April 15, 2015, 08:21:21 AM by traumschiff |
|
hello, any news rgarding the c-cex mess?
Honeybadger from Polo (together with us) is waiting for C-cex Yuriy to send the wallet files over so he can fix them. We are getting "Sending them soon, I'm busy" every day. Please ask for it on the C-cex trollbox, in a C-cex support ticket or on their IRC channel: #c-cex-exchange. Polo and Bittrex are still operating perfectly. Good luck with ccex support, after a 4 day wait they finally responded with this just now. "Hello! Apologies for being late with this answer. VNL wallet is beta software with lot's of issues inside and unfinished functions supplied by dev without any warany and support. We had lot's of problems with VNL wallet and spent many hours to resolve it. The last problem when wallet refused to send coins having enough balance in it (returning "connection input failed" message) could not be solved without dev help. Instead of collaboration JohnConnor refused to help to fix his software and posted this: https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/130/c-cex-de-list-request/4 So we removed wallet from exchange without any chance to fix wallet and send VNL balances to users. According to our rules https://c-cex.com/?id=terms this is exactly the case when we had to remove wallet without any compensation. HoneyBadger honestly offered us to help fixing this problem and we already negotiating our terms of collaboration with him. We give no guarantee but it is possible he can solve a problem with wallet and send us sendable coins so we can compensate user balances. Thanks!" "Without warranty and support .... removal without compensation" Purely my (researched) opinion (at the moment): they lost part of the coins and want to shift the blame. Leaving this here: https://twitter.com/KryptRichards/status/585875672415002625Polo still at 0 lost coins, obviously the code is the problem. /s
|
|
|
|
smolen
|
|
April 15, 2015, 08:54:10 AM |
|
connection input failed Can't find exactly this string not in sources, nor in windows wallet binary, were they on private wallet build? If by chance it was bool transaction::connect_inputs( // ... if ( prev_out.n() >= tx_previous.transactions_out().size() || prev_out.n() >= tx_index.spent().size() ) { log_error( "Transaction connect inputs failed, " << get_hash().to_string().substr(0, 10) << " previous out n is out of range [" << prev_out.n() << "-" << tx_previous.transactions_out().size() << "]" << " previous transaction " << prev_out.get_hash().to_string() << "\n" << tx_previous.to_string() ); return false; }
then the problem needs developer attention, regardless who's to blame. Corrupted db, network attack, bad blockchain branch switching, malformed wallet transaction - what really happened? My own uneducated guess they put wallet.dat on cheap SSD drive
|
Of course I gave you bad advice. Good one is way out of your price range.
|
|
|
john-connor
|
|
April 15, 2015, 09:03:47 AM |
|
hello, any news rgarding the c-cex mess?
Honeybadger from Polo (together with us) is waiting for C-cex Yuriy to send the wallet files over so he can fix them. We are getting "Sending them soon, I'm busy" every day. Please ask for it on the C-cex trollbox, in a C-cex support ticket or on their IRC channel: #c-cex-exchange. Polo and Bittrex are still operating perfectly. Good luck with ccex support, after a 4 day wait they finally responded with this just now. "Hello! Apologies for being late with this answer. VNL wallet is beta software with lot's of issues inside and unfinished functions supplied by dev without any warany and support. We had lot's of problems with VNL wallet and spent many hours to resolve it. The last problem when wallet refused to send coins having enough balance in it (returning "connection input failed" message) could not be solved without dev help. Instead of collaboration JohnConnor refused to help to fix his software and posted this: https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/130/c-cex-de-list-request/4 So we removed wallet from exchange without any chance to fix wallet and send VNL balances to users. According to our rules https://c-cex.com/?id=terms this is exactly the case when we had to remove wallet without any compensation. HoneyBadger honestly offered us to help fixing this problem and we already negotiating our terms of collaboration with him. We give no guarantee but it is possible he can solve a problem with wallet and send us sendable coins so we can compensate user balances. Thanks!" "Without warranty and support .... removal without compensation" Purely my (researched) opinion (at the moment): they lost part of the coins and want to shift the blame. Leaving this here: https://twitter.com/KryptRichards/status/585875672415002625Polo still at 0 lost coins, obviously the code is the problem. /s +1 Thank you for your support.
|
|
|
|
|