Bitcoin Forum
November 01, 2024, 11:18:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 [799] 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3917001 times)
KeyserSozeMC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


I'm dying.


View Profile WWW
December 14, 2013, 08:46:29 AM
 #15961

Price of each share?

Hey, smexy. Don't waste your time. Time's precious.
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 14, 2013, 08:59:14 AM
 #15962

So, after giving it a lot of thought, I've realized that if there was ONE question I would want to ask friedcat... it would be: what is 5 year vision for ASICMINER?
(if thinking 5 years out in the Bitcoin world is too crazy, then maybe just 2 years)

What do other people think about this question?

Vision is sometimes very far away from reality you know ... Friedcat also had "vision" about :

How are things going regarding your business plan? Did you account for the sudden network hashrate increase? How is the international expansion of ASICminer coming along?
The business plan is unchanged. The network hashrate increase was still under our projection. The total hash target originally set for the end of this year would probably achieved earlier.

and look where are we ...

Well he'd have to be about one step up from God to know what was going to happen to bitcoin in 12 months time. You still need to have a vision though, just constantly adjust your plans as you go along. He's only human you know.
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259



View Profile
December 14, 2013, 09:00:29 AM
 #15963

Price of each share?

last 0.26667



empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 14, 2013, 09:06:31 AM
 #15964


and going down daily .............
KeyserSozeMC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


I'm dying.


View Profile WWW
December 14, 2013, 09:09:11 AM
 #15965

Why is that, empoweoqwj?

Hey, smexy. Don't waste your time. Time's precious.
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 14, 2013, 09:18:59 AM
 #15966


because FC has announced Gen3 won't be out until (approximately) springtime, and there is nothing to prop up dividends until then. Since the AM share price is largely a function of last week's dividends, it makes sense that the share price will drop continually. Its actually dropped for 26 weeks now, in line with dividend reductions.
chriswilmer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
December 14, 2013, 02:52:25 PM
 #15967


because FC has announced Gen3 won't be out until (approximately) springtime, and there is nothing to prop up dividends until then. Since the AM share price is largely a function of last week's dividends, it makes sense that the share price will drop continually. Its actually dropped for 26 weeks now, in line with dividend reductions.

Isn't that irrational market behavior? You would think the share price reflects investors feelings about future dividends. The fact that the share price is so highly correlated to the week-to-week dividends is very puzzling to me.
Rival
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502



View Profile
December 14, 2013, 03:36:17 PM
 #15968

Currently BTC is a risky investment by any standard. To invest in a company whose whole business model is based upon that risk carries even more risk. And then once you dump all of that into a blender and mix it up, you get to pour it out amidst the backdrop of hundreds of other BTC companies going bust over the last year and every investor losing everything. The level of risk starts to approach ludicrous speed.

At this point in the history of BTC and AM, the risk is so large that there is no real model that can realistically balance out the enormous risk. And make no mistake, it is enormous. Therefore, the rational investor will see weekly dividends as a way to try and shave off a little of that mountain of risk. Each time the div goes into the wallet, a small portion of risk has been mitigated. The share price is adjusted accordingly to reflect this.
arousedrhino
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 14, 2013, 03:37:29 PM
 #15969


because FC has announced Gen3 won't be out until (approximately) springtime, and there is nothing to prop up dividends until then. Since the AM share price is largely a function of last week's dividends, it makes sense that the share price will drop continually. Its actually dropped for 26 weeks now, in line with dividend reductions.

Isn't that irrational market behavior? You would think the share price reflects investors feelings about future dividends. The fact that the share price is so highly correlated to the week-to-week dividends is very puzzling to me.

Bitcoin securities markets are irrational, people want quick week on week gains so 2 months of no divs means 2 months their money is doing nothing so they take it out of the stock. I agree with you and go long term but to each his own.
Ditto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 330
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 14, 2013, 04:13:48 PM
 #15970

It will only go to 0.5+ when Gen3 is about to happen, when the chips are being poured into that lovely hot liquid Smiley
Not too hot, hopefully.
damiano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000


103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.


View Profile
December 14, 2013, 04:36:08 PM
 #15971

Who wants to bet we will be below IPO by mid January ?
minerpumpkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night


View Profile
December 14, 2013, 08:06:36 PM
 #15972

Who wants to bet we will be below IPO by mid January ?

I don't know... below IPO will be really cheap, I bet there are a lot of people who are more than willing to buy at such low prices. Those who believe in AM's performance next spring.

I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
MilkyLep
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 583
Merit: 500


Bitcoin for all & all for Bitcoin


View Profile
December 14, 2013, 10:53:34 PM
 #15973

For people looking to jump onto a larger stockpile of AM shares, 0.1BTC (+/-.01) will be hard to resist.

Either you own the bitcoins(private keys) or you don't. However with moneroj, nobody knows what you own.
Secure. Private. Untraceable.
muyuu
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 14, 2013, 11:49:34 PM
 #15974


because FC has announced Gen3 won't be out until (approximately) springtime, and there is nothing to prop up dividends until then. Since the AM share price is largely a function of last week's dividends, it makes sense that the share price will drop continually. Its actually dropped for 26 weeks now, in line with dividend reductions.

Isn't that irrational market behavior? You would think the share price reflects investors feelings about future dividends. The fact that the share price is so highly correlated to the week-to-week dividends is very puzzling to me.

Bitcoin securities markets are irrational, people want quick week on week gains so 2 months of no divs means 2 months their money is doing nothing so they take it out of the stock. I agree with you and go long term but to each his own.

They are not THAT irrational.

Dividend payments and verifiable hash rates speak louder than promises, esp. when the company has failed to deliver for a number of months and the competition has stepped up meanwhile.

GPG ID: 7294199D - OTC ID: muyuu (470F97EB7294199D)
forum tea fund BTC 1Epv7KHbNjYzqYVhTCgXWYhGSkv7BuKGEU DOGE DF1eTJ2vsxjHpmmbKu9jpqsrg5uyQLWksM CAP F1MzvmmHwP2UhFq82NQT7qDU9NQ8oQbtkQ
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 15, 2013, 03:37:12 AM
 #15975


because FC has announced Gen3 won't be out until (approximately) springtime, and there is nothing to prop up dividends until then. Since the AM share price is largely a function of last week's dividends, it makes sense that the share price will drop continually. Its actually dropped for 26 weeks now, in line with dividend reductions.

Isn't that irrational market behavior? You would think the share price reflects investors feelings about future dividends. The fact that the share price is so highly correlated to the week-to-week dividends is very puzzling to me.

I would describe it as "partly irrational but highly understandable".

All AM shareholders would love to believe Gen3 will be amazing, regain 10% of the network, AM won't be sabotaged or fall foul of some "regulations" in China, bitcoin won't collapse, FC won't run off with our money etc etc.

So there are lots of risk factors out there. That is why people don't look further than this week.

Just depends on your risk profile. If you love risky stuff, buy some AM shares in the next month when they dip under 0.20. You could well make an amazing profit. But it could equally well blow up in your face. Nobody knows.
Endlessa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 15, 2013, 06:30:13 AM
 #15976


because FC has announced Gen3 won't be out until (approximately) springtime, and there is nothing to prop up dividends until then. Since the AM share price is largely a function of last week's dividends, it makes sense that the share price will drop continually. Its actually dropped for 26 weeks now, in line with dividend reductions.

Isn't that irrational market behavior? You would think the share price reflects investors feelings about future dividends. The fact that the share price is so highly correlated to the week-to-week dividends is very puzzling to me.

I would describe it as "partly irrational but highly understandable".

All AM shareholders would love to believe Gen3 will be amazing, regain 10% of the network, AM won't be sabotaged or fall foul of some "regulations" in China, bitcoin won't collapse, FC won't run off with our money etc etc.

So there are lots of risk factors out there. That is why people don't look further than this week.

Just depends on your risk profile. If you love risky stuff, buy some AM shares in the next month when they dip under 0.20. You could well make an amazing profit. But it could equally well blow up in your face. Nobody knows.

IMO it also has to do with network share and the future (next February?) easily hitting 15 peta hash.  With the currently targeted future AM chips being a generation  behind what's hitting the market now, there are so many risk factors outside of dividends that it's a hard sell, again imo, that AM has a truly reasonable chance of recovery.  The currently 30 gh/s product line finds itself barely palatable to any serious miner.  When AM was showing on the hash chart a huge portion of pie, it was a name that was unavoidable and on the tongues of anybody talking about mining.  Now, truly unfortunately, it has fallen subservient to the likes of P2Pool, Deepbit, and Bitlc.net (?!?!?).  I know the coin grab from miner sells was very enticing, but I feel the raw hash power and publicity of topping the hashing chart was extremely undervalued.  There are individuals on some of these pools sporting more power than AM currently possesses.  Can this one company really compete with the 100s, perhaps 1000s, of individuals already pushing past the peak hash AM has shown.  Don't get me wrong, I have really enjoyed this company and this thread, but I don't have a lot of hope for it.  I just hope that FC & AM didn't spend too much of the piggie bank on all that copper tubing and cooling.  There is a huge mountain in front of AM and I hope they are up to climbing it.
fuji
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 08:58:47 AM
 #15977

Simply I just quit playing for now, lost 82% of my BTC asset. I don't blame anyone but my own poor judgement of investment. Without proper regulation and stable exchange, BTC securities investment is just a kid's play, of course, a dangerous one.
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 09:16:10 AM
 #15978

Simply I just quit playing for now, lost 82% of my BTC asset. I don't blame anyone but my own poor judgement of investment. Without proper regulation and stable exchange, BTC securities investment is just a kid's play, of course, a dangerous one.

it's a kids play if you don't know how to play. Of course crappy exchanges are a big problem, I just hope the free market will take care of it in near future (meaning that there will be at least a few stable and reliant exchanges). I'm holding direct shares which is obviously the safest option right now but if I wanted to trade with them it's pretty hard.
Voodah
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 16, 2013, 10:24:02 AM
 #15979

Simply I just quit playing for now, lost 82% of my BTC asset. I don't blame anyone but my own poor judgement of investment. Without proper regulation and stable exchange, BTC securities investment is just a kid's play, of course, a dangerous one.

it's a kids play if you don't know how to play. Of course crappy exchanges are a big problem, I just hope the free market will take care of it in near future (meaning that there will be at least a few stable and reliant exchanges). I'm holding direct shares which is obviously the safest option right now but if I wanted to trade with them it's pretty hard.

Is there a way to play the game right now??

I have invested in both AM and KNC (2nd day order !) at different times, and both have seriously let me down.

I'm really worried about the mining ecosystem...

1. GHash.io is the largest pool. They have proven to be dishonest.
2. ASICMiner tanked and its health depends entirely on the promise of Gen3 for Q1.
3. I can't find an actual number..  but it seems to me like the vast majority of people who invested on (any) Gen1 ASIC lost money in terms of BTC. Let's not even mention the guys who pre-ordered BFL, they should've known.
4. All ASIC companies have pre-mined with the for-sale equipment (correct me if I'm wrong here, but that is my understanding).

For me it boils down to a dilemma I cannot wrap my head around:

If I make a money printing machine, why would I sell it for less than the money it can print?
If I sell it for less, who would wanna buy it?

It seems like all ASIC companies have chosen to sell for more than the machines can produce, and from their point of view, it was the correct decision.

They knew the answer to the second question: the inexperienced, the misinformed, the lazy and the gullible.

So what I want to know actually, is who profited the most out of Gen1 ?

Clearly it was not the customers.

All clues lead to the ASIC companies.

Why is it not reflected on div or cheaper costs for the next gen ??
How long can this strategy work, where all losses go to the customers and all profits to ASIC makers?

I'm not investing in mining again any time soon, but I see there are lots of people who think it's still a great idea to get on that 1st day pre-order..

I know there's a lot of experienced and heavily invested miners here. Maybe I'm missing something here? Can someone please enlighten me??


jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
December 16, 2013, 10:30:06 AM
 #15980

Simply I just quit playing for now, lost 82% of my BTC asset. I don't blame anyone but my own poor judgement of investment. Without proper regulation and stable exchange, BTC securities investment is just a kid's play, of course, a dangerous one.

it's a kids play if you don't know how to play. Of course crappy exchanges are a big problem, I just hope the free market will take care of it in near future (meaning that there will be at least a few stable and reliant exchanges). I'm holding direct shares which is obviously the safest option right now but if I wanted to trade with them it's pretty hard.

Is there a way to play the game right now??

I have invested in both AM and KNC (2nd day order !) at different times, and both have seriously let me down.

I'm really worried about the mining ecosystem...

1. GHash.io is the largest pool. They have proven to be dishonest.
2. ASICMiner tanked and its health depends entirely on the promise of Gen3 for Q1.
3. I can't find an actual number..  but it seems to me like the vast majority of people who invested on (any) Gen1 ASIC lost money in terms of BTC. Let's not even mention the guys who pre-ordered BFL, they should've known.
4. All ASIC companies have pre-mined with the for-sale equipment (correct me if I'm wrong here, but that is my understanding).

For me it boils down to a dilemma I cannot wrap my head around:

If I make a money printing machine, why would I sell it for less than the money it can print?
If I sell it for less, who would wanna buy it?

It seems like all ASIC companies have chosen to sell for more than the machines can produce, and from their point of view, it was the correct decision.

They knew the answer to the second question: the inexperienced, the misinformed, the lazy and the gullible.

So what I want to know actually, is who profited the most out of Gen1 ?

Clearly it was not the customers.

All clues lead to the ASIC companies.

Why is it not reflected on div or cheaper costs for the next gen ??
How long can this strategy work, where all losses go to the customers and all profits to ASIC makers?

I'm not investing in mining again any time soon, but I see there are lots of people who think it's still a great idea to get on that 1st day pre-order..

I know there's a lot of experienced and heavily invested miners here. Maybe I'm missing something here?

Can someone please enlighten me??




Literally anything you do with btc will not yeild as much return as just holding btc due to the rapid increase in price. In terms of USD almost everyone who bought an asic or invested in asicminer came out ahead.

The reason we are seeing such a price dip is because gen2 chips from AM were skipped which lead to a long gap between new hardware. The reason it was skipped was due to unsatisfactory performance and FC believes gen3 is more promising. Also by skipping gen2, gen3 will arrive sooner.
Pages: « 1 ... 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 [799] 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!