Bitcoin Forum
November 01, 2024, 08:24:14 AM *
News: Bitcoin Pumpkin Carving Contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 [875] 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3917001 times)
willBTC
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 134
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 01:19:48 AM
 #17481

Does AM frequently disappear from blockchain.info's mining charts? I don't see it on the piechart..

Yes because it has just enough hashrate to show up (1%). Even less than 1% recently. Will likely jump back to 10% with the launch of gen3.

10% is not quite possible, 5% is more possible. Cause Friedcat willing to sell most of total hashrate (400p-1600p) .

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
ASICMINERTUBE
         The Best $/Gh Bitcoin Miner So Far              Discover now!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
jimmothy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 509



View Profile
March 03, 2014, 01:32:56 AM
 #17482

Does AM frequently disappear from blockchain.info's mining charts? I don't see it on the piechart..

Yes because it has just enough hashrate to show up (1%). Even less than 1% recently. Will likely jump back to 10% with the launch of gen3.

10% is not quite possible, 5% is more possible. Cause Friedcat willing to sell most of total hashrate (400p-1600p) .

We could see 10% solomining hashrate for a while right when gen3 is released. Considering 1 immersion cooled datacenter can hold 1ph or more I think it is possible.

But I agree that they have no chance of maintaining 10% in a network with over 1000ph. 100ph would require too much electricity for one operation alone (unless its cex.io or someone else swimming in cash).

But they don't need to mine with their own hardware. By selling it they would get more btc than it will earn in its lifetime upfront without the need to keep them running.

So they may not be able to maintain a large portion of the network with their own solomining but with hardware sales they could easily earn much more than 10% would earn mining alone.
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 01:57:19 AM
 #17483

Methinks it would be best to sell ASICs when their value is high and mine ASICs when their yield remains positive and selling no longer provides best ROI.

A profound rise in BTC 's price could have an effect on one's approach to this issue.
hdbuck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002



View Profile
March 03, 2014, 02:01:04 AM
 #17484

Methinks it would be best to sell ASICs when their value is high and mine ASICs when their yield remains positive and selling no longer provides best ROI.

methinks thats exactly the way it is going to be done. Smiley

edit: plus they get to do both with franchisees
chriswilmer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2014, 02:15:08 AM
 #17485

So, what's the probability that we'll get a friedcat update in the next 7 days? I'm trying to decide how long to hold my breath... Smiley
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 02:15:40 AM
Last edit: March 03, 2014, 02:52:16 AM by necro_nemesis
 #17486

Me also thinks shareholders should get preferential pricing on ASIC's.  Wink

This would be a great incentive for owning stock.
mb300sd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000

Drunk Posts


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2014, 05:04:13 AM
 #17487

Me also thinks shareholders should get preferential pricing on ASIC's.  Wink

This would be a great incentive for owning stock.

Shareholders already get a rebate for purchasing ASICs through dividends.

1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 10:30:39 AM
Last edit: March 03, 2014, 12:52:41 PM by necro_nemesis
 #17488

Me also thinks shareholders should get preferential pricing on ASIC's.  Wink

This would be a great incentive for owning stock.

Shareholders already get a rebate for purchasing ASICs through dividends.

Agreed, but you also want to attract new investors and I'd argue those who have an interest in mining would be the same who have interest in AM.

Edit:

I would think it's in as much if not more strategic interest for Bitfountain to see the price of it's shares rise as it is to see profits from any of it's business.

My understanding is AM accounts for 163,962 virtual whole shares of Bitfountain's 236,038 total shares. I assume the remainder of Bitfountain shares could be sold off in a conversion to AM shares at some point in the future when the conditions are favorable. If AM shares are valued considerably higher it presents a tremendous return for the holder of Bitfoundtain's shares in selling off shares in the conversion.

The news release of the ASIC presents itself as an opportune time to promote the stock through providing a benefit to AM shareholders.
eastpk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 10

WINSTARS - We are changing the face of gambling


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 01:45:04 PM
 #17489

Me also thinks shareholders should get preferential pricing on ASIC's.  Wink

This would be a great incentive for owning stock.

Shareholders already get a rebate for purchasing ASICs through dividends.

Agreed, but you also want to attract new investors and I'd argue those who have an interest in mining would be the same who have interest in AM.

Edit:

I would think it's in as much if not more strategic interest for Bitfountain to see the price of it's shares rise as it is to see profits from any of it's business.

My understanding is AM accounts for 163,962 virtual whole shares of Bitfountain's 236,038 total shares. I assume the remainder of Bitfountain shares could be sold off in a conversion to AM shares at some point in the future when the conditions are favorable. If AM shares are valued considerably higher it presents a tremendous return for the holder of Bitfoundtain's shares in selling off shares in the conversion.

The news release of the ASIC presents itself as an opportune time to promote the stock through providing a benefit to AM shareholders.

I'm a bit confused as to your statement in bold, going back to the first post in the thread....

Introduction
ASICMINER is a virtual identity totally held by investors of the Bitfountain company. The Bitfountain company's business includes mining with self-built ASIC devices, as well as the sales of them. Currently ASICMINER shareholders holds 163,962 shares, while Bitfountain shareholders holds 236,038 shares. ASICMINER shares have the privilege of getting all net profits till 0.1BTC/share from the day when dividends began to be paid. They also have the exemption of dilution, which means that each ASICMINER share always equals to 1/400,000 of the total profits and voting power of the summed value from both ASICMINER and Bitfountain.

So I dont think that AM accounts for 163,962 virtual whole shares of Bitfountain's 236,038... I think they are seperate - Bitfountain owns 236,038 - then AM has 163,962 shares that are up for purchase. Can someone please correct me if I'm wrong?

I also don't think it would be a great idea to offer discounts to anyone who owns shares... for example - if I owned some shares in Tesla, does that give me the right to have a discount on a car simply because I own shares? Just because one is investing in AM does not give the right to cheaper mining - I understand that would be great, but I don't see the positive for AM when they do this.

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
WINSTARS -   We are changing the face of gamblingWHITEPAPERANN THREADTELEGRAMFACEBOOK ● Twitter
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Franktank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
March 03, 2014, 01:54:11 PM
 #17490

So I dont think that AM accounts for 163,962 virtual whole shares of Bitfountain's 236,038... I think they are seperate - Bitfountain owns 236,038 - then AM has 163,962 shares that are up for purchase. Can someone please correct me if I'm wrong?

I also don't think it would be a great idea to offer discounts to anyone who owns shares... for example - if I owned some shares in Tesla, does that give me the right to have a discount on a car simply because I own shares? Just because one is investing in AM does not give the right to cheaper mining - I understand that would be great, but I don't see the positive for AM when they do this.


There are 400k total shares, of which only 163,962 shares are floated by the public (PT, IPO investors, direct minority shareholders, etc). Each share as voting power; however it doesn't mean much as more than 51% of all shares are held by Bitfountain. Board members are those who hold 5000 shares in their possession, they receive minor updates on what appears to be a weekly basis. Note these updates are not significant, more like "things are still on schedule." Any board members who think otherwise is free to correct me. To all newcomers, I would highly suggest to all reading all of friedcat's posts from Aug 2012 onwards before "investing."
eastpk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 10

WINSTARS - We are changing the face of gambling


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 01:56:09 PM
 #17491

So I dont think that AM accounts for 163,962 virtual whole shares of Bitfountain's 236,038... I think they are seperate - Bitfountain owns 236,038 - then AM has 163,962 shares that are up for purchase. Can someone please correct me if I'm wrong?

I also don't think it would be a great idea to offer discounts to anyone who owns shares... for example - if I owned some shares in Tesla, does that give me the right to have a discount on a car simply because I own shares? Just because one is investing in AM does not give the right to cheaper mining - I understand that would be great, but I don't see the positive for AM when they do this.


There are 400k total shares, of which only 163,962 shares are floated by the public (PT, IPO investors, direct minority shareholders, etc). Each share as voting power; however it doesn't mean much as more than 51% of all shares are held by Bitfountain. Board members are those who hold 5000 shares in their possession, they receive minor updates on what appears to be a weekly basis. Note these updates are not significant, more like "things are still on schedule." Any board members who think otherwise is free to correct me. To all newcomers, I would highly suggest to all reading all of friedcat's posts from Aug 2012 onwards before "investing."

+1

Thank you sir Smiley - exactly what I thought....

I'm sure aahzmundus' post will help bring new people up to speed!

▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
WINSTARS -   We are changing the face of gamblingWHITEPAPERANN THREADTELEGRAMFACEBOOK ● Twitter
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 02:38:17 PM
 #17492

Thanks for the clarification on distribuition of shares. Seen 163,962 + 236,038 = 400,000.

40/60% split with Bitfountain having controlling interest.


whalezy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 05:03:28 PM
 #17493

News from a Chinese miner forum:http://cybtc.com/article-655-1.html

Rockxie, who is the exclusive distributer for Asicminer's mining machine in China, announced that he will produce his own miners.
The sample miner will be availble in April and the chips would be AM's Gen3.

specification: AM gen3 chips, 40nm, 1TH, 500W.
rudi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 141
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 05:09:08 PM
 #17494

specification: AM gen3 chips, 40nm, 1TH, 500W.


So more than twice the power efficiency of the closest competitor? Wow!
Kosmatos
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 05:37:39 PM
 #17495

News from a Chinese miner forum:http://cybtc.com/article-655-1.html

Google Translate brings up information about a 'roast cat'.  Grin
Zubilica
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 837
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 03, 2014, 05:43:26 PM
 #17496

Kamoom . First asic mining are already leased or deployed , we all have seen the the network test a few days ago Smiley)
minerpumpkin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


A pumpkin mines 27 hours a night


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 06:27:07 PM
 #17497

From the translation of http://cybtc.com/article-655-1.html:
Quote
he has created a baked cat mining machine

If I didn't knew what they're talking about, I'd now be worried...

I should have gotten into Bitcoin back in 1992...
Chris_Sabian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1001



View Profile
March 03, 2014, 06:32:08 PM
 #17498

News from a Chinese miner forum:http://cybtc.com/article-655-1.html

Rockxie, who is the exclusive distributer for Asicminer's mining machine in China, announced that he will produce his own miners.
The sample miner will be availble in April and the chips would be AM's Gen3.

specification: AM gen3 chips, 40nm, 1TH, 500W.

I would like to purchase 4 of them...
Teodor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 03, 2014, 06:36:23 PM
 #17499

News from a Chinese miner forum:http://cybtc.com/article-655-1.html
Rockxie, who is the exclusive distributer for Asicminer's mining machine in China, announced that he will produce his own miners.
The sample miner will be availble in April and the chips would be AM's Gen3.
specification: AM gen3 chips, 40nm, 1TH, 500W.
I would like to purchase 4 of them...
Now I can buy 1.2TH machine with 28nm Bitmine A1 chips for the price of 4800$, so depends of their prices...

chriswilmer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
March 03, 2014, 06:38:15 PM
 #17500

News from a Chinese miner forum:http://cybtc.com/article-655-1.html
Rockxie, who is the exclusive distributer for Asicminer's mining machine in China, announced that he will produce his own miners.
The sample miner will be availble in April and the chips would be AM's Gen3.
specification: AM gen3 chips, 40nm, 1TH, 500W.
I would like to purchase 4 of them...
Now I can buy 1.2TH machine with 28nm Bitmine A1 chips for the price of 4800$, so depend of the prices...

What's the power rating on one of those?
Pages: « 1 ... 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 [875] 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!