Bitcoin Forum
April 20, 2024, 03:29:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 [1037] 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 ... 1348 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It  (Read 3916315 times)
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 09:09:58 AM
 #20721

in short, it legitimizes B/bitcoin further which helps it for the long run.

I share the same mindset here also but the original question was aimed more towards the current situation of miners. Roughly speaking, there are hundreds of PH/s that will be coming online in the next couple months. A sudden down swing in price will having miners thinking twice about purchasing and bringing it online while an upswing could potentially send the network into the Exahash region.

Anyone care to share their speculative thoughts on which way it will swing (with semi-substantial rationale) and how AM might react to such a shift?

FYI: The U.S. Gov still owns ~144k Bitcoins so they still have a decent sum left in their wallets.

AM is one of the few entities in position to compete through self mining if selling miners becomes questionable. They have the ability to cut out all the added incremental costs of supplying miners and employ their own product at lower startup costs if necessary. I believe with the cost of building miners we are still a ways from that point and the price of miners is currently set by what the market will accept while maximizing profits. This may be a reason to push for Gen4 sooner than later as efficiency will become an even more significant factor if the margins become so tight that the arms race is data center vs data center.
1713583760
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713583760

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713583760
Reply with quote  #2

1713583760
Report to moderator
1713583760
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713583760

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713583760
Reply with quote  #2

1713583760
Report to moderator
1713583760
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713583760

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713583760
Reply with quote  #2

1713583760
Report to moderator
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713583760
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713583760

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713583760
Reply with quote  #2

1713583760
Report to moderator
chriswilmer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2014, 10:43:34 AM
 #20722

I see a market opportunity for "defensive" mining opening up with all of this GHash based fear...
silverfuture
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 947
Merit: 1008


central banking = outdated protocol


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 11:07:36 AM
 #20723

I wonder if FC is going to bid at the auction? Cheesy

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NastyFans - The Fan Club for Bitcoin Enthusiasts | MININGCOINS | POOL | ESCROW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
yokione
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 11:28:04 AM
 #20724

I wonder too. It's a good opportunity to convert the income fiat into BTC with low price.

I wonder if FC is going to bid at the auction? Cheesy
elasticband
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 11:58:20 AM
 #20725

how much would the market move if someone tried to buy 144,000 btc on bitstamp.

I have a feeling the auction will end above market price but way bellow the price effect trying to buy 144,000 btc would have on a exchange price.

its a great entry opportunity for those with the capital to spare
Another User
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 12:00:42 PM
 #20726



WHERE IS THE HERO WE NEED BUT NOT DESERVE?!

RoadStress Sock Puppet
rudi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 141
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 01:14:16 PM
 #20727



WHERE IS THE HERO WE NEED BUT NOT DESERVE?!

Once AM starts self-mining again, I would really love to see them use p2pool.
I expect that more miners would jump into p2pool if p2pool's share of the total hashrate is greater than now (i.e. greater than ~1% of the total hashrate). This would really be great for all of bitcoin. As a side-effect it would also once again paint AM in a very positive light.

I noticed that this was proposed before, a very long time ago, when it was considered plausible that AM capture more than 50% of the total hashrate:

Yea that won't be a problem. The network is huge, even with massive production of ASICS it won't reach 51% and even if it would, they would have no incentive to attack the system as their whole investment is based on the Bitcoins they mine and that they can sell them off to make a profit. If they each 51% I suggest mining a p2pool.
//DeaDTerra

Thanks for answering when I was away. Yes, we are part of the Bitcoin world and rely on the security of Bitcoin to succeed. And if we ever reach 51%, we could use p2pool, or scatter our hashrates to different mining pools with explicit names like ASICMINER, and hence make the statistics public to all people who are concerned.
Anotheranonlol
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 504


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 01:31:57 PM
 #20728

With the dropping rate of the BTC from the U.S. Gov selling off the 29,656 BTC, does anyone anticipate any significant movement in the mining industry/total network hashrate? Since the drop of the news here, BTC has taken quite a tumble from mid 600 to now upper 500s.

Here is the timeline of event:

June 23rd: Bidder Registration
June 27th: Auction from 6am - 6pm EDT
June 30th: Winners notified
July 1st: Wire Transfer Deadline for Winning Parties

This is not meant to start a flame war about political views or speculation of BTC price in the coming weeks; rather how does this potentially effect all current miners with potential massive price swings in either way. Moreover, does this news mean a change of plans for the end of June and early July?

U.S. Marshall's Announcement of BTC Auction: http://www.usmarshals.gov/assets/2014/bitcoins/

Funniest part of that was the clause that $200k deposit is non refundable upon a late bid.

NotLambchop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 254


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 02:08:51 PM
 #20729



WHERE IS THE HERO WE NEED BUT NOT DESERVE?!

Sorry for [kinda] OT, but...

Greetings Eligius miners,

So, after some investigation over the past month or so, it turns out a couple of clients/addresses were involved in a “block withholding attack” against Eligius which has cost us an estimated 300 BTC, and likely miners of other pools as well. A block withholding attack is where a miner submits low difficulty shares but does not submit block solutions— so they appear to be working for the pool and continue to get paid while not actually doing useful work for the pool.
[...]
laustcozz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 07:22:47 PM
 #20730

https://i.imgur.com/FTRhqlb.png

WHERE IS THE HERO WE NEED BUT NOT DESERVE?!

Once AM starts self-mining again, I would really love to see them use p2pool.
I expect that more miners would jump into p2pool if p2pool's share of the total hashrate is greater than now (i.e. greater than ~1% of the total hashrate). This would really be great for all of bitcoin. As a side-effect it would also once again paint AM in a very positive light.

Either this or start our own pool that mimics the payouts of Ghash.io.  I think most people would like to get off of Ghash if there were an option as profitible to hop into.  Running a pool would be a really nice way to get continuing income as well.  With the hashrate we command it shouldn't be hard to get the ball rolling on a ghash competitor, maybe even just straight up buy out a smaller pool that already exists.
TheJuice
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 608


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 07:42:58 PM
 #20731



WHERE IS THE HERO WE NEED BUT NOT DESERVE?!

Once AM starts self-mining again, I would really love to see them use p2pool.
I expect that more miners would jump into p2pool if p2pool's share of the total hashrate is greater than now (i.e. greater than ~1% of the total hashrate). This would really be great for all of bitcoin. As a side-effect it would also once again paint AM in a very positive light.

Either this or start our own pool that mimics the payouts of Ghash.io.  I think most people would like to get off of Ghash if there were an option as profitible to hop into.  Running a pool would be a really nice way to get continuing income as well.  With the hashrate we command it shouldn't be hard to get the ball rolling on a ghash competitor, maybe even just straight up buy out a smaller pool that already exists.

A crowdfunded 0% pool would be nice. I wish I had more time to take up that endeavor.
mc_lovin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


www.bitcointrading.com


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2014, 10:42:11 PM
 #20732



WHERE IS THE HERO WE NEED BUT NOT DESERVE?!

Once AM starts self-mining again, I would really love to see them use p2pool.
I expect that more miners would jump into p2pool if p2pool's share of the total hashrate is greater than now (i.e. greater than ~1% of the total hashrate). This would really be great for all of bitcoin. As a side-effect it would also once again paint AM in a very positive light.

Either this or start our own pool that mimics the payouts of Ghash.io.  I think most people would like to get off of Ghash if there were an option as profitible to hop into.  Running a pool would be a really nice way to get continuing income as well.  With the hashrate we command it shouldn't be hard to get the ball rolling on a ghash competitor, maybe even just straight up buy out a smaller pool that already exists.

ASICMINERPOOL.

DOOOOO EEEEEEET!
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 13, 2014, 10:47:49 PM
 #20733



WHERE IS THE HERO WE NEED BUT NOT DESERVE?!

Once AM starts self-mining again, I would really love to see them use p2pool.
I expect that more miners would jump into p2pool if p2pool's share of the total hashrate is greater than now (i.e. greater than ~1% of the total hashrate). This would really be great for all of bitcoin. As a side-effect it would also once again paint AM in a very positive light.

Either this or start our own pool that mimics the payouts of Ghash.io.  I think most people would like to get off of Ghash if there were an option as profitible to hop into.  Running a pool would be a really nice way to get continuing income as well.  With the hashrate we command it shouldn't be hard to get the ball rolling on a ghash competitor, maybe even just straight up buy out a smaller pool that already exists.

mmpool.org does the same merge mining as ghash.io, and uses DGM, which is a more fair method of mining.
so, there is already a pool out there to compete with ghash.io.... you just need to point your workers there.

here's me: http://mmpool.org/user/rgs (that particular worker has been hashing there from ~46hours into this round)

if you feel the large pools are dominating, join a smaller pool... there are plenty of options if you want to choose something else.
but.. please, join mmpool.org if you feel ghash is becoming scarily close to a network breach.

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
kingcrimson
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 02:43:11 AM
 #20734

With the recent 51 % news, ASICMiner is the only company right now that can save bitcoin.
spartan82
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 14, 2014, 03:30:56 AM
 #20735

June-July is here, lets get mining already! AM should have its own pool for solo mining and our franchisees mining operations too.
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 04:35:03 AM
 #20736

With the recent 51 % news, ASICMiner is the only company right now that can save bitcoin.

I must disagree!

Fordee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 146
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 05:17:01 AM
Last edit: June 14, 2014, 05:28:13 AM by Fordee
 #20737

With the recent 51 % news, ASICMiner is the only company right now that can save bitcoin.

I must disagree!

Cool.. is Spondoolies selling cheap chips and providing open source designs too???  

(I have nothing against Spondoolies machines, they look well made and sexy for datacenter stuff..  I just can't afford one, because i've lost 90% my BTC simply by proudly holding my Asicminer shares...  Stockholm syndrome and all that stuff)..
bitcoin.newsfeed
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 05:51:52 AM
 #20738

Network hashing speed crossed 100 Ph

Quote
May-June for air cooling and June-July for immersion cooling. They are only capable of 3PH. Most should go franchising or as chips for other vendors' OEM products.

It would be nice to see live hash meter from ASICminer farm, or does Friedcat want to mine in secret ? its not very honest way to shareholders ... we're waiting so damn long, its summer again.  Undecided

... Question Everything, Believe Nothing ...
necro_nemesis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 10:24:05 AM
 #20739

Brief Answers to Shareholder Questions

4) When will dividends start, and how frequently will they occur?
When the cash-flow becomes positive. After we decide to put significant quantity of chips on ASICMiner owned farms it should be per week. Before that, per month.


Any updates into where these dates now stand?
Lohoris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


Bitgoblin


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 11:05:04 AM
 #20740

Funniest part of that was the clause that $200k deposit is non refundable upon a late bid.
I don't understand, can you clarify please?

1LohorisJie8bGGG7X4dCS9MAVsTEbzrhu
DefaultTrust is very BAD.
Pages: « 1 ... 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 [1037] 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 ... 1348 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!