Bitcoin Forum
October 21, 2017, 09:04:54 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 [129] 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 ... 389 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] AMP - The Currency That Powers Your Attention On Synereo  (Read 778137 times)
Diego24
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
October 12, 2016, 10:06:27 PM
 #2561

Why would anyone sell their AMP bought at 40K for 27K ? I would expect the idiots that bought at 40K did it for a longterm investment or else they are double idiots.
1508576694
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508576694

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508576694
Reply with quote  #2

1508576694
Report to moderator
1508576694
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508576694

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508576694
Reply with quote  #2

1508576694
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508576694
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508576694

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508576694
Reply with quote  #2

1508576694
Report to moderator
1508576694
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508576694

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508576694
Reply with quote  #2

1508576694
Report to moderator
1508576694
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508576694

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508576694
Reply with quote  #2

1508576694
Report to moderator
jvper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


DECENT Witness and Day One ICO Investor


View Profile
October 12, 2016, 10:44:00 PM
 #2562

Why would anyone sell their AMP bought at 40K for 27K ? I would expect the idiots that bought at 40K did it for a longterm investment or else they are double idiots.
That's why I believe most will hold, and that's why I would buy today if I had BTC for that, not after the AMPs are released.

Nearly nobody is buying for 40k. I mean people who bought at 31k minus discounts and expected to sell for more than that and do an almost instantaneous profit.

           ▄▄███████▄▄
        ▄███▀▀
▄▄▄▄    ▀▄
     ▄▄█████████████▄▄  ▀▄
  ▄▀▀██▀           ▀▀██▄▄▀▄
▄▀  ██                 ▀██
  ██       ▀▀█▀▀         █
█▀        █ █ █        ▄█▀▄
▀▄         █ █ █       ▄█  █
 ██         █▄▄▄█      ▄█  ▄▀
  ██▄                ▄█▀  ▄▀
  ▀▄▀██▄▄          ▄█▀  ▄▀
   ▀▄ ▀▀███▄▄▄▄▄▄█████▀▀
     ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
UTRUST▀████████▄
  ▀███████▄
    ▀██████▄
      ▀██████
       ▀█████
        ▀████▄
         █████
          ▀███
           ███
           ▀██
            ██
             █
●  Download WHITEPAPER  ●
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ▼ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
facebook      twitter      slack
▀████████▄
  ▀███████▄
    ▀██████▄
      ▀██████
       ▀█████
        ▀████▄
         █████
          ▀███
           ███
           ▀██
            ██
             █
Elokane
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 837


Truth is a consensus among neurons www.synereo.com


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2016, 11:00:25 PM
 #2563

"The Synereo team has consulted with its community and economic experts, and deliberated the subject for a long time to come up with a sale mechanism that was considered fair for all parties involved, and that would prevent price manipulation and market turbulence."
 
What's going on? Synereo's last funding stage ends in one week and the price doesn't follow. Devs should at least try to prevent further dumping by putting up some walls like before. And don't come with the "BTC rise" excuse this is an official crowdfund ffs.

You want us to take people's money, sent to us so that we can finance the project, and use it to buy the AMPs on the market?

Synereo: liberating the Internet from abusive business models.

Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
<br>
Elokane
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 837


Truth is a consensus among neurons www.synereo.com


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2016, 11:00:51 PM
 #2564

"The Synereo team has consulted with its community and economic experts, and deliberated the subject for a long time to come up with a sale mechanism that was considered fair for all parties involved, and that would prevent price manipulation and market turbulence."
 
What's going on? Synereo's last funding stage ends in one week and the price doesn't follow. Devs should at least try to prevent further dumping by putting up some walls like before. And don't come with the "BTC rise" excuse this is an official crowdfund ffs.

I Agree with you. Devs should protect price during the ICO, otherwise AMP become a playground for whales and price manipulators.

How should we protect the price?

Synereo: liberating the Internet from abusive business models.

Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
<br>
jvper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


DECENT Witness and Day One ICO Investor


View Profile
October 12, 2016, 11:25:36 PM
 #2565

"The Synereo team has consulted with its community and economic experts, and deliberated the subject for a long time to come up with a sale mechanism that was considered fair for all parties involved, and that would prevent price manipulation and market turbulence."
 
What's going on? Synereo's last funding stage ends in one week and the price doesn't follow. Devs should at least try to prevent further dumping by putting up some walls like before. And don't come with the "BTC rise" excuse this is an official crowdfund ffs.

I Agree with you. Devs should protect price during the ICO, otherwise AMP become a playground for whales and price manipulators.

How should we protect the price?

Please, don't listen to them. They don't make any idea of what they are writing here.

           ▄▄███████▄▄
        ▄███▀▀
▄▄▄▄    ▀▄
     ▄▄█████████████▄▄  ▀▄
  ▄▀▀██▀           ▀▀██▄▄▀▄
▄▀  ██                 ▀██
  ██       ▀▀█▀▀         █
█▀        █ █ █        ▄█▀▄
▀▄         █ █ █       ▄█  █
 ██         █▄▄▄█      ▄█  ▄▀
  ██▄                ▄█▀  ▄▀
  ▀▄▀██▄▄          ▄█▀  ▄▀
   ▀▄ ▀▀███▄▄▄▄▄▄█████▀▀
     ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
UTRUST▀████████▄
  ▀███████▄
    ▀██████▄
      ▀██████
       ▀█████
        ▀████▄
         █████
          ▀███
           ███
           ▀██
            ██
             █
●  Download WHITEPAPER  ●
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ▼ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
facebook      twitter      slack
▀████████▄
  ▀███████▄
    ▀██████▄
      ▀██████
       ▀█████
        ▀████▄
         █████
          ▀███
           ███
           ▀██
            ██
             █
Elokane
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 837


Truth is a consensus among neurons www.synereo.com


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2016, 11:28:02 PM
 #2566

"The Synereo team has consulted with its community and economic experts, and deliberated the subject for a long time to come up with a sale mechanism that was considered fair for all parties involved, and that would prevent price manipulation and market turbulence."
 
What's going on? Synereo's last funding stage ends in one week and the price doesn't follow. Devs should at least try to prevent further dumping by putting up some walls like before. And don't come with the "BTC rise" excuse this is an official crowdfund ffs.

I Agree with you. Devs should protect price during the ICO, otherwise AMP become a playground for whales and price manipulators.

How should we protect the price?

Please, don't listen to them. They don't make any idea of what they are writing here.

That is clear, but other people reading this may not understand that these complaints and accusations are baseless. A simple exercise of thinking this through, of the options available, of what would happen if Synereo sold AMPs at market price or if we changed the rules of the sale now, etc etc would make anyone reach the same conclusions we have. Asking these questions is a way to provoke these thoughts into existence.

Synereo: liberating the Internet from abusive business models.

Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master.
<br>
jvper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434


DECENT Witness and Day One ICO Investor


View Profile
October 12, 2016, 11:37:39 PM
 #2567


It is no disaster at all! Millions of dollars (btc) have been successfully collected at the VERY conditions previously stated. No one has any right to be disappointed with Synereo team, just because the tokens devalued afterwards! Grow up and deal with it! So far, it has been strictly running under the rules. Stop moaning about the rules you adhered to.

The rules are typical rules of what we call a FOLLOW ON OFFERING (please refer to the following link if you don't know it http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/followonoffering.asp)

Everything has been done according to traditional public companies financing (except for the bonuses and the three steps thing of 33k, 36.5k and 40k, which are pretty much crypto world).

If the price is too low this week, buy more or shut down the computer and stop suffering. People are selling this week because they anticipate that many people will receive AMPs and dump into the market, so they want to buy cheaper when it happens. Just let it be and wait... I myself would rather buy this week, because many people might want to buy the other week under this assumption, thus the buying pressure might be even stronger than the selling one, as the majority will probably hold the AMPs. The important thing here is: if the project is good, AMP will appreciate after that. Period.

My congratulations for Synereo Team for holding such a smooth second crowdfunding.

You are right. They don't seem to understand the price may fall or rise, and it is not up to the developers. I decided to quote myself again, on how these things happen with publicly listed companies.

           ▄▄███████▄▄
        ▄███▀▀
▄▄▄▄    ▀▄
     ▄▄█████████████▄▄  ▀▄
  ▄▀▀██▀           ▀▀██▄▄▀▄
▄▀  ██                 ▀██
  ██       ▀▀█▀▀         █
█▀        █ █ █        ▄█▀▄
▀▄         █ █ █       ▄█  █
 ██         █▄▄▄█      ▄█  ▄▀
  ██▄                ▄█▀  ▄▀
  ▀▄▀██▄▄          ▄█▀  ▄▀
   ▀▄ ▀▀███▄▄▄▄▄▄█████▀▀
     ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
UTRUST▀████████▄
  ▀███████▄
    ▀██████▄
      ▀██████
       ▀█████
        ▀████▄
         █████
          ▀███
           ███
           ▀██
            ██
             █
●  Download WHITEPAPER  ●
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ▼ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
facebook      twitter      slack
▀████████▄
  ▀███████▄
    ▀██████▄
      ▀██████
       ▀█████
        ▀████▄
         █████
          ▀███
           ███
           ▀██
            ██
             █
fezington
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 12:31:40 AM
 #2568

"The Synereo team has consulted with its community and economic experts, and deliberated the subject for a long time to come up with a sale mechanism that was considered fair for all parties involved, and that would prevent price manipulation and market turbulence."
 
What's going on? Synereo's last funding stage ends in one week and the price doesn't follow. Devs should at least try to prevent further dumping by putting up some walls like before. And don't come with the "BTC rise" excuse this is an official crowdfund ffs.

I Agree with you. Devs should protect price during the ICO, otherwise AMP become a playground for whales and price manipulators.

How should we protect the price?

Please, don't listen to them. They don't make any idea of what they are writing here.

That is clear, but other people reading this may not understand that these complaints and accusations are baseless. A simple exercise of thinking this through, of the options available, of what would happen if Synereo sold AMPs at market price or if we changed the rules of the sale now, etc etc would make anyone reach the same conclusions we have. Asking these questions is a way to provoke these thoughts into existence.

Tell this to the people who have no clue of poloniex etc and currently buy in at 40k. those people will get dumped on by the people who bought at 36k who will get dumped on by the people who bought at 33k who currently get dumped on by the people who already had this coin. don't forget the huge dump at the end of this crowdsale. were these your price manipulation prevention mechanisms?
DecentralizeEconomics
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


White Male Libertarian Bro


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 03:23:28 AM
 #2569

"The Synereo team has consulted with its community and economic experts, and deliberated the subject for a long time to come up with a sale mechanism that was considered fair for all parties involved, and that would prevent price manipulation and market turbulence."
 
What's going on? Synereo's last funding stage ends in one week and the price doesn't follow. Devs should at least try to prevent further dumping by putting up some walls like before. And don't come with the "BTC rise" excuse this is an official crowdfund ffs.

I Agree with you. Devs should protect price during the ICO, otherwise AMP become a playground for whales and price manipulators.

How should we protect the price?

Please, don't listen to them. They don't make any idea of what they are writing here.

That is clear, but other people reading this may not understand that these complaints and accusations are baseless. A simple exercise of thinking this through, of the options available, of what would happen if Synereo sold AMPs at market price or if we changed the rules of the sale now, etc etc would make anyone reach the same conclusions we have. Asking these questions is a way to provoke these thoughts into existence.

Tell this to the people who have no clue of poloniex etc and currently buy in at 40k. those people will get dumped on by the people who bought at 36k who will get dumped on by the people who bought at 33k who currently get dumped on by the people who already had this coin. don't forget the huge dump at the end of this crowdsale. were these your price manipulation prevention mechanisms?

There is no such thing as a "price manipulation prevention mechanism" in free crypto / free capitalism.  There is no way for anyone to prevent market swings except for implementing price fixing.  Deal with it.

YOURCHAIN - MAKE RCHAIN YOURS AGAIN!
"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties." - Areopagitica
fezington
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 04:14:04 AM
 #2570

"The Synereo team has consulted with its community and economic experts, and deliberated the subject for a long time to come up with a sale mechanism that was considered fair for all parties involved, and that would prevent price manipulation and market turbulence."
 
What's going on? Synereo's last funding stage ends in one week and the price doesn't follow. Devs should at least try to prevent further dumping by putting up some walls like before. And don't come with the "BTC rise" excuse this is an official crowdfund ffs.

I Agree with you. Devs should protect price during the ICO, otherwise AMP become a playground for whales and price manipulators.

How should we protect the price?

Please, don't listen to them. They don't make any idea of what they are writing here.

That is clear, but other people reading this may not understand that these complaints and accusations are baseless. A simple exercise of thinking this through, of the options available, of what would happen if Synereo sold AMPs at market price or if we changed the rules of the sale now, etc etc would make anyone reach the same conclusions we have. Asking these questions is a way to provoke these thoughts into existence.

Tell this to the people who have no clue of poloniex etc and currently buy in at 40k. those people will get dumped on by the people who bought at 36k who will get dumped on by the people who bought at 33k who currently get dumped on by the people who already had this coin. don't forget the huge dump at the end of this crowdsale. were these your price manipulation prevention mechanisms?

There is no such thing as a "price manipulation prevention mechanism" in free crypto / free capitalism.  There is no way for anyone to prevent market swings except for implementing price fixing.  Deal with it.

That's why people who buy tokens for 40.000 sats will be instant bagholders. Do you consider this fair as synereo stated? Nobody knows how this project will work out. Price development with this amount of coins held by devs? Time will tell. Big investors could have used these market swings to fill their bags even without bonuses. I know price movements are unpredictable. But they themselves stated that they had mechanisms to prevent market turbulences. Look at the Waves ICO. They also worked with buy walls to keep the price above ICO level. This is not a totally new or exotic idea as Elokane asked. How is this second crowdfunding round different from an ICO for new investors? All I'm saying is there should have been some safeguards installed for the investors sake.
DecentralizeEconomics
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


White Male Libertarian Bro


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 04:22:55 AM
 #2571

"The Synereo team has consulted with its community and economic experts, and deliberated the subject for a long time to come up with a sale mechanism that was considered fair for all parties involved, and that would prevent price manipulation and market turbulence."
 
What's going on? Synereo's last funding stage ends in one week and the price doesn't follow. Devs should at least try to prevent further dumping by putting up some walls like before. And don't come with the "BTC rise" excuse this is an official crowdfund ffs.

I Agree with you. Devs should protect price during the ICO, otherwise AMP become a playground for whales and price manipulators.

How should we protect the price?

Please, don't listen to them. They don't make any idea of what they are writing here.

That is clear, but other people reading this may not understand that these complaints and accusations are baseless. A simple exercise of thinking this through, of the options available, of what would happen if Synereo sold AMPs at market price or if we changed the rules of the sale now, etc etc would make anyone reach the same conclusions we have. Asking these questions is a way to provoke these thoughts into existence.

Tell this to the people who have no clue of poloniex etc and currently buy in at 40k. those people will get dumped on by the people who bought at 36k who will get dumped on by the people who bought at 33k who currently get dumped on by the people who already had this coin. don't forget the huge dump at the end of this crowdsale. were these your price manipulation prevention mechanisms?

There is no such thing as a "price manipulation prevention mechanism" in free crypto / free capitalism.  There is no way for anyone to prevent market swings except for implementing price fixing.  Deal with it.

That's why people who buy tokens for 40.000 sats will be instant bagholders. Do you consider this fair as synereo stated? Nobody knows how this project will work out. Price development with this amount of coins held by devs? Time will tell. Big investors could have used these market swings to fill their bags even without bonuses. I know price movements are unpredictable. But they themselves stated that they had mechanisms to prevent market turbulences. Look at the Waves ICO. They also worked with buy walls to keep the price above ICO level. This is not a totally new or exotic idea as Elokane asked. How is this second crowdfunding round different from an ICO for new investors? All I'm saying is there should have been some safeguards installed for the investors sake.

Yes, it seems fair to me.  Nobody is going to guarantee you instant profits.  The price fell 40% after the first crowdfunding.  Do you honestly want them to take money away from project development to buy back AMPs from people who are selling at a loss?  Honestly, it might be a good way to raise additional funds for them if they buy back at 28k sat, since they sold them for 40k sat, but then people would be screaming bloody murder.  This is just the way things work.  It's a much smarter and more ethical plan to use the funds to further development of the platform, because then everyone benefits.

YOURCHAIN - MAKE RCHAIN YOURS AGAIN!
"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties." - Areopagitica
fezington
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 04:45:37 AM
 #2572

h
"The Synereo team has consulted with its community and economic experts, and deliberated the subject for a long time to come up with a sale mechanism that was considered fair for all parties involved, and that would prevent price manipulation and market turbulence."
 
What's going on? Synereo's last funding stage ends in one week and the price doesn't follow. Devs should at least try to prevent further dumping by putting up some walls like before. And don't come with the "BTC rise" excuse this is an official crowdfund ffs.

I Agree with you. Devs should protect price during the ICO, otherwise AMP become a playground for whales and price manipulators.

How should we protect the price?

Please, don't listen to them. They don't make any idea of what they are writing here.

That is clear, but other people reading this may not understand that these complaints and accusations are baseless. A simple exercise of thinking this through, of the options available, of what would happen if Synereo sold AMPs at market price or if we changed the rules of the sale now, etc etc would make anyone reach the same conclusions we have. Asking these questions is a way to provoke these thoughts into existence.

Tell this to the people who have no clue of poloniex etc and currently buy in at 40k. those people will get dumped on by the people who bought at 36k who will get dumped on by the people who bought at 33k who currently get dumped on by the people who already had this coin. don't forget the huge dump at the end of this crowdsale. were these your price manipulation prevention mechanisms?

There is no such thing as a "price manipulation prevention mechanism" in free crypto / free capitalism.  There is no way for anyone to prevent market swings except for implementing price fixing.  Deal with it.

That's why people who buy tokens for 40.000 sats will be instant bagholders. Do you consider this fair as synereo stated? Nobody knows how this project will work out. Price development with this amount of coins held by devs? Time will tell. Big investors could have used these market swings to fill their bags even without bonuses. I know price movements are unpredictable. But they themselves stated that they had mechanisms to prevent market turbulences. Look at the Waves ICO. They also worked with buy walls to keep the price above ICO level. This is not a totally new or exotic idea as Elokane asked. How is this second crowdfunding round different from an ICO for new investors? All I'm saying is there should have been some safeguards installed for the investors sake.

Yes, it seems fair to me.  Nobody is going to guarantee you instant profits.  The price fell 40% after the first crowdfunding.  Do you honestly want them to take money away from project development to buy back AMPs from people who are selling at a loss?  Honestly, it might be a good way to raise additional funds for them if they buy back at 28k sat, since they sold them for 40k sat, but then people would be screaming bloody murder.  This is just the way things work.  It's a much smarter and ethical plan to use the funds to further development of the platform, because then everyone benefits.

That's the point. True, nobody guaranteed instant profit. BUT synereo themselves said that their sale mechanism would prevent market manipulation and turbulences which in my opinion should work both ways for old AND new investors. Ask the people who bought at 36 or 40k if they consider the recent price developments as turbulences or not. And setting up some walls with some reserves from a 4 Million Dollar budget (plus the budget pre second crowdfund) wouldn't risk any development acitivties in my opinion. Why wouldn't they buy their own tokens if they think it has so much potential. Again, waves' CEO did the same exact thing post ico to prevent excessive dumping at least for some amount of time.
DecentralizeEconomics
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


White Male Libertarian Bro


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 05:11:00 AM
 #2573

Why wouldn't they buy their own tokens if they think it has so much potential.

Probably because they believe that their technology has a lot of potential and that the market price will reflect that soon enough.  The point of this crowdsale is to raise money for development, not support the price action or soothe speculators nerves.

YOURCHAIN - MAKE RCHAIN YOURS AGAIN!
"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties." - Areopagitica
fezington
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 05:15:19 AM
 #2574

Ok.  If I haven't made my point clear by now, how about this: Would you buy AMP at 0.0004 BTC each right now? Exactly.
DecentralizeEconomics
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


White Male Libertarian Bro


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 05:25:18 AM
 #2575

Ok.  If I haven't made my point clear by now, how about this: Would you buy AMP at 0.0004 BTC each right now? Exactly.

I wouldn't.  I'd buy from Poloniex.  Do your own thing.  Be smart.

People who bought from the crowdsale received a discount.  They took the risk that their discount would put them at a greater advantage than buying off an exchange.  At some points of the sale, it did.  Now, it's cheaper to buy from the exchange depending on the amount you purchase.

This is the way it works.

YOURCHAIN - MAKE RCHAIN YOURS AGAIN!
"Give me the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties." - Areopagitica
fezington
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 06:26:32 AM
 #2576

Ok.  If I haven't made my point clear by now, how about this: Would you buy AMP at 0.0004 BTC each right now? Exactly.

I wouldn't.  I'd buy from Poloniex.  Do your own thing.  Be smart.

People who bought from the crowdsale received a discount.  They took the risk that their discount would put them at a greater advantage than buying off an exchange.  At some points of the sale, it did.  Now, it's cheaper to buy from the exchange depending on the amount you purchase.

This is the way it works.

The thing is, setting up some small safeguards would've been beneficial for the developers too. If the current price difference wouldn't be so high, more investors would buy into stage 3 of the crowdfund and secure their bonus which means more funds for development. At this point 40k won't attract anyone with minimum knowledge about crypto trading.
beeframen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 06:28:19 AM
 #2577

Scam coin is still so high? I am waiting for 15k again. Only fools buy from second or more rounds of ico
GoogleBit
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 135


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 11:09:32 AM
 #2578

... I shaking my head ...

AMP is a brilliant coin and will be very successful one day, period

Little daytraders with 0.00004 btc moaning ... grow up, little fellows !
Investors stay calm and don't move, big time is coming ;-)
luckygenough56
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120



View Profile
October 13, 2016, 11:33:29 AM
 #2579

most people bought first 24h with bonus

too many unknown on this project, supply/distribution is retarded and release date is too far away to support that price
Diego24
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
October 13, 2016, 12:07:24 PM
 #2580

Well in all honesty I think the 40k AMP selling is retarded. And I don't care who was contacted for making this decision. Than the people you contacted are idiots. Why would you literally screw an investor ? An investor that sponsors you should get more rewarded than someone that buys cheap AMP on Poloniex; not getting burned 2 days later by seeing his investment crash by almost 50 %. Íf all companies would do what Synereo did, nobody would ever invest in a company. If AMPs were sold then it is because investors were badly informed. But you can be sure that anyone that finds out about AMP being half the price of ICO, will never again buy AMP from ICO.

I am amazed there are really people around here that defend in the most sick ways that it is OK and normal to sell people something that crashes 2 days later with 50 %.
Pages: « 1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 [129] 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 ... 389 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!