|
The Turkish economy has a very large share of shadow exports. Although sanctions have been introduced against Russia, a lot of goods still come from Turkey and payment for these goods also includes cryptocurrencies. So any tightening of legislation could harm the Turkish economy, which already has many problems. And in Turkey, just like in Russia, there are many laws that are not respected.
|
|
|
|
А вот интересно, что происходит с теми токенами, которые держит команда проекта ? Ведь это довольно большое количество. Понятно, что часть отколовшихся от коллектива сливает при первой же возможности. Но где-то монеты все таки концентрируются. У кого то из команды и еще у некоторых китов до тех пор пока они их покупают.
Этот процес теоретически должен быть в некотором смысле стандартизован. Точнее схема одна и та же.
И что делает команда, которая уже явно понимает, что пропампить в очередной раз не получится, хомяки пропали, а нужность монеты просто стремится к нулю ?
Это ведь и есть судьба 99% всех монет.
Может это не очень касается Полкадота, но Акалы с Кусамой касается.
Половина токенов Дот в стейкинге. https://www.stakingrewards.com/asset/polkadotНе зря они это делают. Вторым шагом будет сокрашение эмиссии Стейкинг в крипте вообще дело дрянь, но, это по моему. Ну может только для китов стейкинг монеты это и актуально. Но с учетом поведения практически всех альтов и с учетом того факта, что количество настейканных монет при сопоставлении их с ростом курса за счет бычки биткоина просто моментально дает понять, что те, кто стейкал просто развлекались себе в убыток, ублажая себя светлой мыслью, что монет то у них прибавляется. А по факту их бабло уменьшается, но эта мысль она приходит в башку уже после радости от увеличивающегося количества монет  Я тоже не поклонник стейкинга, но здесь нужно разбираться кто этим занимается и какая стоимость монет у тех, кто стейкает. Если это делает манипулятор с дешовыми монетами и ждет момента чтобы распродаться по 50-100 иксов, то это хорошая стратегия. Хомяк, залетевший по цене выше 20 долларов тоже может стейкать или усредняться или фиксировать убытки. Я хоту отметить, что у меня еще монеты не разлочены за первые аукционы на 2 года, и последние разлоки будут в нанале 2024 года. Да по сути все монеты со стэйкингом имеют одну модель... Вначале жирные холеры распродают свои мешки, потом хомяки получают свой небольшой стэйк, с надеждой на альтсезон... Иногда даже может повезти...  Но чаще приходится сидеть с дыркой от бублика в итоге... И это уж точно стратегия не про долгосрок... В Доте много ходлеров с ценой выше текущей 4,22$. Я говорил что брать не ошибка на перспективу, потому что есть технология и много они в первой тройке по разработчикам. Моя средняя к 10 долларам ближе, но я не считаю тут прибыль, которую получил на аукционах и еще дополнительные монеты, которые нужно заклеймить. Новичек, купивший по этой цене будет всегда большинства инвестоов, если он хочет инвестировать в технологию и стейкать не профит а монеты. __ Я не шилю ДОТ, мне нужна диверсификация. Хранить в 1-2х монетах и стейблах это тоже "риски-ириски". |
|
|
|
Now my question is that in my country, crypto is not legalized, so in case if anyone is scammed through P2P, we can't take up this matter in the legal court because the country does not recognize the transactions of crypto in the first place.
I have to discuss this in three scenarios. Scenario 1 Your country did not legalize bitcoin and has also laws to punish bitcoin users. This is just like your own country. In this scenario, the scammers have free hands to operate and it is assumed only those breaking the law by using bitcoin would be scammed. Scenario 2 Your country doesn't legalize cryptocurrency and at the same time does have anything against the citizens using the cryptocurrency. In this case, the scammers would be tried as in the normal case of scam. Scenario 3 Your country making bitcoin a legal tender. In this case, the scammers should be in a mess if caught. Does this gives a free hand to scammers as they know that they cannot be punished by a court of law  Yes, if it is scenario 1. Unfortunately, scammers are very difficult to catch because they do not violate the laws of the countries in which they live. And what they do in other countries is very difficult to prove, but for the victim in all cases, getting the stolen money back will be a big problem. Because when the fraudster is caught, this money will be spent. |
|
|
|
I don't know how bitcoin mixers resident in US will have to handle this. The mixer is always seen as a bad player as it gives an opportunity for even criminals to use, but then you cannot undermine the importance of privacy and its preservation. I am imagining if the government could eventually win the war against privacy. Is ev everyone's data eventually gona be exposed and stored by the government? More broadly, the Treasury Department is aggressively combating illicit use of all aspects of the CVC ecosystem by terrorist groups, including Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.”"
___
The games are over. Now the owners of cryptomixers face a very serious charge, for which in the USA you can get a life sentence in a very harsh prison.
Does this have anything to do with the current war in Gaza between Hamas and Israel? I mean, has it really been revealed that Bitcoin mixing operations were carried out by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad? Maybe they are just covering all the loop holes. Is it possible that war could be financed with bitcoin? If yes, the prevent it. If you read this, you will understand that some countries have a lot of experience https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5441385.msg61825995#msg61825995Any military conflict requires at least several hundred million dollars of expenses per day, and such expenses cannot be paid using cryptocurrencies, because such transfers will immediately be very suspicious. Therefore, cryptocurrencies cannot play a decisive role in war. |
|
|
|
this just makes me wonder if truly the system is actually working or are some folks actually bigger than the LAW? I would go with the latter. Sam's family knows several politicians, and I'm pretty sure that someone put Sam in charge, let's be serious, do we really want to believe that this guy pretty much built all alone the second biggest cryptocurrency in the world in a few months, he got all the approval and permits that others couldn't get, etc etc just working hard? You don't become a multi-billionaire in a few months, of course there is way more behind this story. I fully support this opinion. Sam Bankman Freed is an ordinary clown who was given a lot of money to hold. This saga should end after the elections, but for now the trials will drag on. I also said that not all cards are open in this criminal case and we will still see a lot of interesting information about internal relationships. |
|
|
|
If a bitcointalk user is wearing a paid signature for a service, should readers view them as either personal endorsements from that bitcointalk user?
What is your opinion?
My opinion:
The advertisement should be considered as a paid advertisement, not a personal endorsement from the wearer.
However, users should be responsible for ensuring that the signature they are wearing is not a scam.
Similarly, readers should do their own research & due diligence before using any service, including ones within paid advertisements/signatures.
If the project turns out to be fraudulent, other forum members will warn the user about this and ask him to remove the signature. But if a forum member has an advertising signature, then he must follow the project. I fully support the project that is in my signature, because I have been using it for more than 6 years. This project is useful for the crypto community, but I will never support a gambling project, because such projects make gambling people poor. |
|
|
|
I believe Shasan doesn't give a loan to an account that has never participated in a campaign or has not joined campaign for long period of time, so he knows how to handle such cases and his request will be turned down. However, there is every possiblity that this account is being hacked from the original owner or possibly being sold out so, there is no need to worry anyone and the only way possible is to ask him to sign a message using his previously used btc address to prove ownership and that doesn't mean that s/he's loan will be approved by lender.
If the account were sold, then either the email or the password were probably changed, but this did not happen. But if the account is sold, the buyer will also require a private key from the Bitcoin address that was used for the signature. But this method will protect against account hacking. Don't you think people can be so smart nowadays after seeing the drama going on here they might decide not to change password to avoid being suspected. I can remember a case like that were someone login another person profile and request for a loan from Shasan and he gave, while the original owner didn't request for a loan it ended up were the account owner will have to start paying loan he didn't request. I think from what I read there the original owner said the loan was requested when he was asleep and all this happened through pm. In your state of reasoning would you ever believe this story or you will think the account owner is just formulating and cooking up stories that he didn't take the loan? Issuing loans without collateral is an even riskier business than investing in new crypto projects. I think whoever does this should request confirmation via a signature in the Bitcoin wallet. But to be honest, I don't really like loan sharks. I asked LoyceV to put a neutral tag on my profile so that if someone gains access to my account, they will not be able to receive credit. And I advise everyone who does not plan to take out loans to do this. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5459055.msg62530353#msg62530353 |
|
|
|
А вот интересно, что происходит с теми токенами, которые держит команда проекта ? Ведь это довольно большое количество. Понятно, что часть отколовшихся от коллектива сливает при первой же возможности. Но где-то монеты все таки концентрируются. У кого то из команды и еще у некоторых китов до тех пор пока они их покупают.
Этот процес теоретически должен быть в некотором смысле стандартизован. Точнее схема одна и та же.
И что делает команда, которая уже явно понимает, что пропампить в очередной раз не получится, хомяки пропали, а нужность монеты просто стремится к нулю ?
Это ведь и есть судьба 99% всех монет.
Может это не очень касается Полкадота, но Акалы с Кусамой касается.
Половина токенов Дот в стейкинге. https://www.stakingrewards.com/asset/polkadotНе зря они это делают. Вторым шагом будет сокрашение эмиссии Стейкинг в крипте вообще дело дрянь, но, это по моему. Ну может только для китов стейкинг монеты это и актуально. Но с учетом поведения практически всех альтов и с учетом того факта, что количество настейканных монет при сопоставлении их с ростом курса за счет бычки биткоина просто моментально дает понять, что те, кто стейкал просто развлекались себе в убыток, ублажая себя светлой мыслью, что монет то у них прибавляется. А по факту их бабло уменьшается, но эта мысль она приходит в башку уже после радости от увеличивающегося количества монет Я тоже не поклонник стейкинга, но здесь нужно разбираться кто этим занимается и какая стоимость монет у тех, кто стейкает. Если это делает манипулятор с дешовыми монетами и ждет момента чтобы распродаться по 50-100 иксов, то это хорошая стратегия. Хомяк, залетевший по цене выше 20 долларов тоже может стейкать или усредняться или фиксировать убытки. Я хоту отметить, что у меня еще монеты не разлочены за первые аукционы на 2 года, и последние разлоки будут в нанале 2024 года. |
|
|
|
|
From the very beginning, Charles Hoskinson wanted to come up with a cryptocurrency for a corporate segment with all the regulations, but he didn’t succeed. But the coin had a good pump, and now we need to wait until disappointed investors sell their assets again. This can be repeated for a long time until the regulator begins an investigation.
|
|
|
|
I just don't know what to do with this circus. : US billions, of course, will not go to finance the war, but 90 million in cryptocurrency, 82 of which are a pure failure, immediately worried all opponents of cryptocurrency.
It is more propaganda than something based on real fears. Some reports indicate that the misuse of funds in banks amounts to billions of dollars a year, so 80 million dollars cannot bring about transformations in conflicts. Such legislation will remain locked away because it is based on temporary emotions, and after two to several months, public opinion will shift toward new issues, as happens every once in a while. I expect this draft law to disappear, but it will be the basis for less/more severe laws and legislation depending on the public mood. I think that the amount of money in cryptocurrency is not important. The United States wants to maintain a monopoly on the financing of military conflicts, so any transfers in cryptocurrencies cause a lot of negativity in the United States. A world war is impossible because of nuclear weapons, but an economic war in such a situation can be very successful. |
|
|
|
|
Поздравляю cryptoman77777 и Lannakosa с их новыми достижениями!
|
|
|
|
I'll add my 3 cents.
It seems that the period of insults has already passed, and it was said that members of the DT should behave with restraint.
The word insult “rat”( кpыca) in Russian is very bad; for such an insult the opponent’s face will be beaten no less than for telling the opponent to go to hell or saying bad things about his mother or relatives.
Maybe in English this is not a very strong insult, but in Russia such words can cause death. And any verbal phrases associated with distorting the opponent’s last name usually lead to fights or murders.
Cause of death? That's funny. “Rat” in both the French and Russian lexicon just means “to sneak around.” In Russian, a rat is an insignificant person who steals from his own people. But this is a brief description. Don't even think about calling people rats in Russia. This is a very offensive word for a Russian person. The word "Rat"(кpыca) and the word to "sneak around" (пoдкpacтьcя нeзaмeтнo) in Russian have completely different meanings. I am telling you as a native Russian speaker. |
|
|
|
Ratimov's garbage topics The epic moment when even a mod says that Ratimov is a shitposter. I've been waiting that for years. Finally, the truth prevailed! I'll add my 3 cents. It seems that the period of insults has already passed, and it was said that members of the DT should behave with restraint. The word insult “rat”( кpыca) in Russian is very bad; for such an insult the opponent’s face will be beaten no less than for telling the opponent to go to hell or saying bad things about his mother or relatives. Maybe in English this is not a very strong insult, but in Russia such words can cause death. And any verbal phrases associated with distorting the opponent’s last name usually lead to fights or murders. Ratimov is not a nickname, but a real surname. And you, intentionally or unintentionally, continue to insult your opponent. |
|
|
|
I believe Shasan doesn't give a loan to an account that has never participated in a campaign or has not joined campaign for long period of time, so he knows how to handle such cases and his request will be turned down. However, there is every possiblity that this account is being hacked from the original owner or possibly being sold out so, there is no need to worry anyone and the only way possible is to ask him to sign a message using his previously used btc address to prove ownership and that doesn't mean that s/he's loan will be approved by lender.
If the account were sold, then either the email or the password were probably changed, but this did not happen. But if the account is sold, the buyer will also require a private key from the Bitcoin address that was used for the signature. But this method will protect against account hacking. |
|
|
|
https://thedefiant.io/yearn-overhauls-yfi-tokenomicsYearn Overhauls YFI Tokenomics "OG Yield Aggregator Introduces Locking Mechanism, Will Use YFI Accumulated Via Buybacks To Fund New Rewards Program Yearn Finance, DeFi’s oldest yield aggregator, has revamped its tokenomics to embrace a Vote Escrow mechanism. YFI stakers can convert their assets into non-transferable veYFI tokens by locking up their funds for between one week and ten years. Stakers receive dYFI tokens and voting power in exchange, allowing them to vote on which pools will receive the largest allocation of dYFI rewards."
|
|
|
|
To play devils advocate, the upside of this is it will deter criminality in those particular pools. E.g., hackers, thieves, scammers & fraudulent team members / influencers will be forced to use other methods for the sake of dumping their ill-gotten tokens. On the downside, KYC sucks & is stupid, and I think it can still be faked using stolen identities. Honestly it makes no difference to me... I use Uniswap about once a year on average. Unfortunately, now, for most services, registration with fake data is impossible and it doesn’t work that way. Now a 3D video of the owner in front of a camera is required, and even in Europe there are people willing to undergo such verification for 30-50 dollars. Uniswap founder Hayden Adams burned 99% of the HayCoin token supply https://twitter.com/haydenzadams/status/1715440623480652025https://cointelegraph.com/news/uniswap-hayden-adams-burns-650b-haycoin-speculation |
|
|
|
|
Digitalization of assets is, of course, a trend of the future, but so far there are a lot of legal issues in different countries and purchases require registration and provision of documents. For now, it is easier to buy real estate in the classic way, but maintaining real estate is not feasible everywhere due to high taxes and service payments.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
