My suggestion for a flag would be:
- Green background (colour of Islam)
- Oil geyser in the middle of the foreground, surrounded by a ring of US (and allies) soldiers.
Are you suggesting that the US is stealing the oil, and upholding Islamic nations simply for that purpose?  The US and UK and friends certainly like the oil. Actually the whole mess in the middle east can be traced back to the UK, and the infamous Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916, where the UK and France almost literally drew a line in the sand where they decided which of them would own what as they carved up the vanquished Ottoman Empire. Sykes looked at a map and decided he wanted "a belt of English-controlled country south of a line from the 'e' in Acre to the last 'k' in Kirkuk." ... completely disregarding local tribal identities and borders established over thousands of years. The result is that the modern borders in the middle east are arbitrary and a f--king mess. Now throw in a vast amount of wealth in the form of oil, stir twice and leave to simmer. ... so actually the flag should probably be a mess of lines against a backdrop of a Union Jack drenched in blood. oil is worthless and it gets more worthless in the future, it was pure mercy for the developed world to consume the environment destroying oil from the middle east the people there would live like zergish savages, by now if no one would have bought their oil Where do you live that oil is worthless, except that you mean 'worth less' right now than it was yesterday. If oil was worthless, people could drive their cars for free. As it is, even electricity that charges electric vehicle batteries comes from oil fired generators, if they aren't coal or nuclear. worthless was an exxageration, but oil can be indeed worthless, in the past, heavy oil lakes where everywhere on earths surface, and people and animals died in them, the oil price is crashing and soon also the euro will crash with russia saying i don't need to support weak economies. regards |
|
|
|
Obama's daddy was a sexual degenerate and Communist African American living in Hawaii. Don't remember his name off the top of my head. Mom was probably CIA and her parents almost certainly were. ...
what is the difference between communist and capitalist? (i mean communism also had a banking cartel) The main difference is what doctrine they espouse and follow (and often actually believe in) on an individual level. Most Communists (and many others besides) see an evolution of governance where nations pass through Capitalism as a necessary step to a final Communist form. Mostly it is because Capitalism is necessary to build and develop I suppose. I would not exactly dis-agree, but I would point out that Communism is not the final form either, and in fact there never is an end-point since everything is cyclic. Communism is 'supposed to' end basically just like it did with the Soviet Union with a collapse and consolidation of wealth into the hands of the Oligarchical class. This explains why some of the most famous 'Capitalists' spend a good deal of their capital fostering Communism. That system is just a more practical way to obtain title to land and resources (including humans) by way of 'collectivization.' These Captialists are just looking beyond the Communist phase when they get what they always wanted (e.g., 'it all') since it almost falls into their laps. and why is communism growing in europe and america and in asia then? It isn't. Communistic leaders simply harnessed the media as a last-ditch way to try to make Communism happen by making things look like it is growing. pah nonsense nationalism doesnt work it creates borders between people which are completely useless, there is no point having a lot of different and useless languages, better fewer langauges but good ones. nationalism is a backstep it is only rising in europe because the people can't free themselves in a different way from spineless politicians and their open border policies. Thanks for sayin’. No borders, huh? Where do you live? No border to your property. I’ll be right over to grab whatever I want. the border to one's property is usually his locked door, i mean barriers, look at europe we speak over 55 langauges, look at north and south america that have been colonised by europe, most people there speak only 3 and those are interconnected through huge economic network, especially the usa. |
|
|
|
Obama's daddy was a sexual degenerate and Communist African American living in Hawaii. Don't remember his name off the top of my head. Mom was probably CIA and her parents almost certainly were. ...
what is the difference between communist and capitalist? (i mean communism also had a banking cartel) The main difference is what doctrine they espouse and follow (and often actually believe in) on an individual level. Most Communists (and many others besides) see an evolution of governance where nations pass through Capitalism as a necessary step to a final Communist form. Mostly it is because Capitalism is necessary to build and develop I suppose. I would not exactly dis-agree, but I would point out that Communism is not the final form either, and in fact there never is an end-point since everything is cyclic. Communism is 'supposed to' end basically just like it did with the Soviet Union with a collapse and consolidation of wealth into the hands of the Oligarchical class. This explains why some of the most famous 'Capitalists' spend a good deal of their capital fostering Communism. That system is just a more practical way to obtain title to land and resources (including humans) by way of 'collectivization.' These Captialists are just looking beyond the Communist phase when they get what they always wanted (e.g., 'it all') since it almost falls into their laps. and why is communism growing in europe and america and in asia then? It isn't. Communistic leaders simply harnessed the media as a last-ditch way to try to make Communism happen by making things look like it is growing. pah nonsense nationalism doesnt work it creates borders between people which are completely useless, there is no point having a lot of different and useless languages, better fewer langauges but good ones. nationalism is a backstep it is only rising in europe because the people can't free themselves in a different way from spineless politicians and their open border policies. |
|
|
|
Obama's daddy was a sexual degenerate and Communist African American living in Hawaii. Don't remember his name off the top of my head. Mom was probably CIA and her parents almost certainly were. ...
what is the difference between communist and capitalist? (i mean communism also had a banking cartel) The main difference is what doctrine they espouse and follow (and often actually believe in) on an individual level. Most Communists (and many others besides) see an evolution of governance where nations pass through Capitalism as a necessary step to a final Communist form. Mostly it is because Capitalism is necessary to build and develop I suppose. I would not exactly dis-agree, but I would point out that Communism is not the final form either, and in fact there never is an end-point since everything is cyclic. Communism is 'supposed to' end basically just like it did with the Soviet Union with a collapse and consolidation of wealth into the hands of the Oligarchical class. This explains why some of the most famous 'Capitalists' spend a good deal of their capital fostering Communism. That system is just a more practical way to obtain title to land and resources (including humans) by way of 'collectivization.' These Captialists are just looking beyond the Communist phase when they get what they always wanted (e.g., 'it all') since it almost falls into their laps. and why is communism growing in europe and america and in asia then? |
|
|
|
I'd make every adult to be a God fearing, Bible thumping, libertarian... with their kids following in their footsteps. libertarians aren't such great people they are tyrants in their own way, communists can be equally god fearing, libertarians want to create spheres of private tyrany |
|
|
|
My suggestion for a flag would be:
- Green background (colour of Islam)
- Oil geyser in the middle of the foreground, surrounded by a ring of US (and allies) soldiers.
Are you suggesting that the US is stealing the oil, and upholding Islamic nations simply for that purpose? The US and UK and friends certainly like the oil. Actually the whole mess in the middle east can be traced back to the UK, and the infamous Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916, where the UK and France almost literally drew a line in the sand where they decided which of them would own what as they carved up the vanquished Ottoman Empire. Sykes looked at a map and decided he wanted "a belt of English-controlled country south of a line from the 'e' in Acre to the last 'k' in Kirkuk." ... completely disregarding local tribal identities and borders established over thousands of years. The result is that the modern borders in the middle east are arbitrary and a f--king mess. Now throw in a vast amount of wealth in the form of oil, stir twice and leave to simmer. ... so actually the flag should probably be a mess of lines against a backdrop of a Union Jack drenched in blood. oil is worthless and it gets more worthless in the future, it was pure mercy for the developed world to consume the environment destroying oil from the middle east the people there would live like zergish savages, by now if no one would have bought their oil |
|
|
|
I think that there is nothing good in unification as it is happening all over the world at the moment. Each country is unique. Each nation has its own unique culture. Therefore, it is important to maintain relations with other countries, to conduct peaceful dialogs, but at the same time maintain their independence.
not working in europe, in europe the independence of nations resulted into many wars. same is the case for africa and the middle east. |
|
|
|
Blacks in America have changed. They don't want to go back to Africa. Why is this?
Look at Obama, for example. He doesn't want to go back to Kenya, his father land, except for a visit, maybe.
Obama's daddy was a sexual degenerate and Communist African American living in Hawaii. Don't remember his name off the top of my head. Mom was probably CIA and her parents almost certainly were. Obama borrowed 'his' kids as props from a family friend. Actually, I don't have the 95% confidence in these conspiracy theories that I would need to make the assertions, but I'd put the odds over 50% just because everything about American politics is so staged and fraudulant. I would by no means rule out these things and ones which are even more crazy. e.g., that Barbara Bush was the child of Alister Crowley   what is the difference between communist and capitalist? (i mean communism also had a banking cartel) |
|
|
|
Any one can create this Union in day dreaming because in reality its not going to happen in next few centuries as most of countries in your list have personal issues and very serious conflicts.
core countries turkey, iran, iraq, syria, saudi arabia, uae, kuwait, oman, potentially also: pakistan, afghanistan, north afrika
These Muslim countries cannot be on same forum because they don't like each other.
jes and muslims don't like each other, and as long as they stay that way they are for foreigners bad slaves, and bad money earning cattle for capitalist nations. and thats bad. Just curious, why did you leave Israel out? Jordon? Egypt? egypt is theoretically in the african union, or is very special as a north african mediteranian state, egypt is not in a constant crisis like hole middle east, is, so you can't say egypt is middle eastern. |
|
|
|
If this keeps up, think of how fat the turkey will be by next Thanksgiving.  turks will not get fat, they think europeans will save them from their own stupidity, migration has to be controlled, for the sake of labour managment, and diversity. turks should controll their migration, like an ordinary region. besides the migration is powering the taliban and islamists where they came from, because the potential workfore is continuosly running way. leaving only the child birth giving radical fatmas and taliban behind. regards |
|
|
|
|
turkey is completely out of mind,
it is attracting in the name of islam and nonracism, by far more people to its own country than it can give jobs to, integrate or educate, and use in its economy
at the same time turkey is saving itself by sending simply a large portion of those migrants further into europe,
now with greece closing the border turkey is finanly forced to think about how it runs its own economy, and finnally support the west in managing migration and securing that all land is being used for development and not just the western world, and turkey finally has to deal with the behavior of migrants in their new home.
and how important it is that that new home doesn't die.
regards
|
|
|
|
Greece and balkan europeans under attack by migrants, is this a Case for Nato?
Turkey is NATO. You did not know? How come? Both Greece and Turkey are in NATO. They will have to make an agreement. Without NATO help. why should nato side with imperialist erdogan who uses islamists to destroy assad in order to establish a corrupt taliban regime in syria NATO dont side with anyone. NATO is a defensive pact of the members of NATO. Turkey and Greece. If any country attack Greece or Turkey NATO will defend them. NATO gives a shit what any member is doing in other countries. That is sole problem of that country and not a problem of defensive pact NATO. jep defensive pact is the name, and currently greece is under attack |
|
|
|
NAWL (National Association of Women Lawyers, a feminist organization) came up with no-fault divorce, alimony, asset division and child support. In one fell swoop, total life destruction was unleashed upon common men through marriage and millions of men were discarded whilst being forced by women’s state husband to continue to pay their X wives handsomely for the sex they’d never again have. If you drop the illusions and enchantments, marriage is just men paying for exclusive sex. Marriage is simply a more complicated and exclusive form of prostitution. What’s more, boys and men are socially conditioned into accepting this man-destroying con game.
mmmm, NAWL national association of women lawyers, i like that. do women have such feminist organisations also in nonwestern countries? Being a strong advocate to “not all women are the same (TM)”, nope, women in the other part of the hemisphere don’t create chaos and very decent, they don’t flooded the internet with sjw politically corrected manners and jurisdiction. Joke aside, they’re miles ahead of women lawyers, they’re now a religion, a women religious group, women only schools, women first service is already a common knowledge among folks, as aggressive as vegan. women worldwide should unite to form their own race and state. so they can finally have what the want and do what they want without men preventing them to take and do what they want. but don't destroy the west with toxic feminism first, start with the middle east and africa first. and then move on to asia and latin america and last the west pls. |
|
|
|
There used be a time when there were very few differences between Democrats and Republicans, and most of those differences were limited to social liberties. Both parties were in favor of supporting the middle class
This I think is the crux of the problem, and it's not limited to the US, it's a global phenomenon. What happened was that the Berlin Wall fell, and with it communism. Then socialism, the more moderate and acceptable face of the political left, was tainted by association. The left moved ever rightwards in an attempt to remain electable during and in the aftermath of the 'greed is good' Reagan/Thatcher years. So the two main parties, once espousing ideologically very distinct philosophies, became more and more similar to one another. They both sought the same sort of voter. The left abandoned its traditional core support of the poor working class. After all, it didn't matter if they moved to the right: so long as they remained the left-most party, then the poor working class would still vote for them, right?.... No, the left did not move right after the Regan years. The left has moved massively further left. the left in america is now supporting segregation and racism. |
|
|
|
|
what do you mean with federalist expansion?
the democratic party has turned anti white and racist.
|
|
|
|
Well it blows out the EU's insane open borders policy anyway.
this is a pointless waste of EU funds italians financial officials need to be taken of their jobs, for incompetence |
|
|
|
I was scrolling through the news and suddenly I read that 16 million people in Italy have been placed under quarantine to stop coronavirus from spreading, and this is alarming to be honest as I feel Milan which has seen highest cases reported is turning into second Wuhan. Further I’m sincerely praying for all those people who’re now stuck in north Italy, as they’ll have to be brave and follow the quarantine rules till 3rd April. Also I feel their economy will be badly hit by this quarantine, and what do you’ll think how long will it take for them to recover from this?. Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-51787238shame on italy for pointless panic and waste of EU funds. europe should drop italian euro alike with worthless italian lira. |
|
|
|
Describe what is women to your kids under ten(10) word counts. Don’t write a wall of text or I will remove them.
Reply at your own risk, I held no responsibility to the backfire that followed.
It is a thread to provide competitive information about the title otherwise stated.
The OP assume no responsibility for any errors or omissions.
The OP disclaim any liability resulting from the definition in this thread.
The definition is not intended to serve as legal advice.
women are a seperate more superior species, that lives with us. |
|
|
|
See your problem is your failure to look at the issue objectively.
A rational and objective scale would look something more like this.
IQ 50-100 = Moronic Human who knows he is no genius
IQ 101-250 = Moronic Human with delusions of genius
What is more dangerous the moron who knows his limitations or the dilusional moron who thinks he is a genius?
many morons can be dangerous, they don't have to think usually someone else spreads some nonsense claim in order to make them hateful destructive zombies regards |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
