How so? Now I won't buy a Ferrari with bitcoins?  You will be able to. Just like you can buy a house with Bitcoin. But those purchases are already KYC in and of themselves, no matter if you pay with Fiat, Bitcoin or potatoes. Your name and identity/passport/social security number will be registered, along with other data. The European legislation wants to control Bitcoin transactions in the same way as it controls banking transactions, and only P2P with non-custodial wallets will escape. This was a rhetorical question , but I think that many will not be able to do this. Expensive purchases are always controlled by the tax authorities, and in Europe this system works perfectly. After such a purchase, tax inspectors will send many questions about income. Well, with a house, I think it’s even more difficult if you use an escrow account in a bank. |
|
|
|
Here you need to keep an eye on 2 points. If the exchange returns money to clients, then the charges will not be so severe. Although 9 billion is a large amount and I have not yet understood this plan. https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/10/17/ftx-plans-to-return-90-of-customer-funds-but-theres-a-catch/FTX Plans to Return 90% of Customer Funds, but There's a Catch "An amended proposal released early Tuesday will be filed by the FTX Debtors by mid-December if approved." And it is very important who wins the elections, because part of the money is used to finance politicians. |
|
|
|
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2023-222https://www.sec.gov/files/2024-exam-priorities.pdf"The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Examinations today released its 2024 examination priorities to inform investors and registrants of the key risks, examination topics, and priorities that the Division plans to focus on in the upcoming year. This year’s examinations will prioritize areas that pose emerging risks to investors or the markets in addition to core and perennial risk areas. “The Division of Examinations plays a critical role in protecting investors and facilitating capital formation,” said SEC Chair Gary Gensler. “In examining for compliance with our time-tested rules, the Division helps registrants understand the rules as well as ensures that markets work for investors and issuers alike. The Division’s efforts, as laid out in the 2024 priorities, enhance trust in our ever-evolving markets.”"
|
|
|
|
Has everyone seen this news recently?  https://cointelegraph.com/news/clarification-sharing-false-spot-bitcoin-etf-newsClarification on sharing false spot Bitcoin ETF news "Cointelegraph apologizes to its readers and discusses its investigation into what led to the posting of unverified news on X about a spot Bitcoin ETF. Earlier today, during routine coverage, Cointelegraph’s social media team posted a message on X without prior editorial approval stating that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission had approved BlackRock’s iShares spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund, or ETF. This was false, the result of misinformation. The news lead originated from an unconfirmed screenshot posted by an X user who claimed it was from the Bloomberg Terminal." __ Thanks to such news, first the short traders lost their money, and after information about the fake appeared, the long traders lost their money. Losses amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars. That's where the real scammers are.  |
|
|
|
https://cointelegraph.com/news/kyc-hook-uniswap-v4-stirs-community-controversyKYC hook for Uniswap v4 stirs community controversy"A new hook available on an open-source directory for Uniswap v4 hooks is sparking controversy within the crypto community. The hook enables users to be checked for Know Your Customer (KYC) before they can trade in token pools. Criticizing the hook, a user on X (formerly Twitter) noted that the hook opens up the possibility of decentralized finance protocols being whitelisted by regulators: “As I explained in all my posts for the past year: It starts with ‘kyc option’ for LPs. And then eventually it moves into a ‘regulator whitelist approved’ database hosted offchain. And then non-kyc gets labeled as illegal terrorist money laundering. Stop simping for soyboys.”"
|
|
|
|
https://cryptonews.com/news/story-behind-us-governments-5-billion-bitcoin-heres-what-you-need-know.htmThe Story Behind the U.S. Government's $5 Billion in Bitcoin – Here's What You Need to Know "The U.S. government has become one of the largest holders of Bitcoin (BTC), acquiring approximately 200,000 coins (worth around $5 billion) through seizures related to criminal activities. The digital assets were seized from cybercriminals and darknet markets and are securely stored offline in encrypted hardware wallets controlled by various federal agencies, including the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)."
|
|
|
|
https://cointelegraph.com/news/stars-arena-recovers-stolen-funds-after-offering-bounty-exploitStars Arena recovers 90% of stolen funds after offering $257K bounty"The exploiter of the Web3 social media platform agreed to keep a 10% bounty in exchange for returning the remainder of the stolen funds. Web3 social media platform Stars Arena said it has recovered nearly all of the crypto stolen from an Oct. 7 exploit, minus a 10% bounty to the person responsible. In an Oct. 11 X (Twitter) post, Stars Arena said around 90% of the 266,000 Avalanche exploited, at the time worth around $3 million, was returned after reaching an agreement to give a 27,610-AVAX bounty worth nearly $257,000 to the exploiter. The bounty also included compensation for 1,000 AVAX worth over $9,000 seemingly lost by the exploiter in a bridge."
|
|
|
|
Yeah sure, We can't blame to the technology, but we have to strict and alert from the scammers. Because scammers are everywhere in the word. P2P is the most powerful things where we can use the money to deposit are withdrawn.
I wouldn't put my hopes on it too much. If the amount of replenishment of an exchange account through P2P transfers is more than 10 thousand dollars, then the exchange may require you to have a whole list of tax documents on income, so do not think that the exchange will not have questions for you. Centralized exchanges are very bad partners and can block your assets at any time. |
|
|
|
I’ll tell you one more piece of information that may be written about in the news again. This ruling will unfortunately not speed up the launch of a spot ETF. Grayscale will again apply for a spot ETF and the whole procedure will begin again with all the deadlines, and this does not guarantee the result, because the SEC will come up with a more competent justification for its decision during this time. The SEC does not want to appeal, not because they are afraid of losing the case. They don’t want to spend money on this because they already have a lot of legal ways to delay or reject any applications. SEC's failure to appeal the judgement has set a legal precedent. This means that the SEC will have to look for other reasons for denying subsequent applications and not the same reason covered by the ruling of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Washington. I know they will always come up with more reasons but at least they have lost some options. You want to say that SEC will finally start working and write clear refusals LOL If I were paid as much as the lawyers at the SEC, I would have already prepared several options during the deadline. But I am more confident that the ETF is needed so that more hamsters will come to this market. |
|
|
|
How so? Now I won't buy a Ferrari with bitcoins? https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/ferrari-accept-crypto-payment-its-cars-us-2023-10-14/"Ferrari (RACE.MI) has started to accept payment in cryptocurrency for its luxury sports cars in the U.S. and will extend the scheme to Europe following requests from its wealthy customers, its marketing and commercial chief told Reuters. The vast majority of blue-chip companies have steered clear of crypto as the volatility of bitcoin and other tokens renders them impractical for commerce. Patchy regulation and high energy usage have also prevented the spread of crypto as a means of payment." |
|
|
|
Я давно не вникал во все эти свистелки, но слышал что акала это чуть ли уже не проект-призрак, хотя сам хрен мамин Гэвин Вуд обещал что это будет топ дефи на полке....  Кстати полка пробила новое дно после прошлого хая и скоро будет торговаться по ценам двух годичной давности... Наверное по паре баксов можно будет мешок приобрести, но точно не парачейны...  Вроде года три назад и Акала и Кусама звучали в криптосообществе. Даже дропы какие то массовые были под эти модные японские названия. Однако и правда и Акала и Кусама как то стухли. Мне кажется, что в Полке вообще наблюдается творческий кризис. Гевин просто не знает куда дальше двигать свою концепцию парачейнов и этих их аукционов голосований. Ввиду, по моему, слишком замудрености процедур, а по большому счету и ненужности. Вся эта система кажется мне искусствено надуманной и потому не сильно жизнеспособной. Вот в результате и такой результат с приближением к двухлетнему дну. Все проекты на дне. Масса монет просела ниже 90% от АТН. Нир, Кардано,Аваланч на том же ценовом уровне по процентам. Я давно писал что система парачейнов не выживет, потому что у проектов токены кончатся платить. Новая система нравится больше, но если цены аренды будут высокими, то легче работать в атоме или эфириуме L2. |
|
|
|
Для тех,кто по переводам Виталика предсказывает цену https://u.today/ethereums-vitalik-buterin-ends-speculation-on-his-mysterious-eth-transfers"Стремясь развеять слухи и спекуляции вокруг своих недавних переводов Ethereum, Виталик Бутерин, обратился в социальные сети, чтобы развеять растущие опасения криптосообщества. В своем твите Бутерин разъяснил характер транзакций, заявив, что любые сообщения, указывающие на его личную продажу ETH , вводят в заблуждение. Он уточнил, что эти переводы представляли собой в первую очередь благотворительные пожертвования организациям и проектам, что привело к необходимости продажи для покрытия операционных расходов. Я не «продавал» ETH ради личной выгоды с 2018 года – Виталик Бутерин" |
|
|
|
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/savingandinvesting/us-sec-does-not-plan-to-appeal-court-decision-on-grayscale-bitcoin-etf-source/ar-AA1ib9YA"The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will not appeal a recent court ruling that found it was wrong to reject an application from Grayscale Investments to create a spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), said a source familiar with the matter. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Washington in August ruled that the SEC was wrong to reject Grayscale's proposed bitcoin ETF, in a case that has been closely watched by the industry which has been trying for a decade to advance such products. The SEC's decision not to appeal likely paves the way for the agency to review Grayscale's application. A spokeswoman for Grayscale did not immediately provide comment. A spot bitcoin ETF would give investors exposure to the world's largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization without having to own it. The SEC has denied all spot bitcoin ETF applications, including Grayscale's, on the grounds applicants have not shown they can protect investors from market manipulation." ___ I wrote about this on October 4https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5468539.msg62945379#msg62945379I’ll tell you one more piece of information that may be written about in the news again. This ruling will unfortunately not speed up the launch of a spot ETF. Grayscale will again apply for a spot ETF and the whole procedure will begin again with all the deadlines, and this does not guarantee the result, because the SEC will come up with a more competent justification for its decision during this time. The SEC does not want to appeal, not because they are afraid of losing the case. They don’t want to spend money on this because they already have a lot of legal ways to delay or reject any applications.
|
|
|
|
И в Израиле и в Буче было зверьё которое истребляют сейчас, в этом аналогия и вдруг ты говоришь что всё это фейки и всем стало понятно что ты...с низкой социальной ответственностью. Единственное что тебя оправдывает, это то что хуйло уже взрывал своих сограждан и ты это точно знаешь и думаешь что такое приемлимо.
Не приплетайте сюда Бучу. Октройте карту Израиля после 2й мировой и посмотрите на территорию сейчас. Израиль аннексировал чужие территории, а палестинцы хотят забрать их обратно. По вашей логике это приемлимо? к твоим словам "приплели Бучу" т.к. ты назвал задокоментированные на видео и фото кадры убийств израильтян - фейком. точно также как путенская пропаганда объявляла фейком убийства украинцев. Это ТЫ не к месту сейчас полез в историю, пытаешься менять тему, но ты постой, и ответь за свои слова про фейк. эта пропаганда лжива и одного уровня с пропагандой рашистов, хамасавцам этот стиль и тактику подкинули путенцы, а ты лох доверчивый, и хорошо если просто лох а не запутинец. Только без Бучи, постараюсь на пальцах объяснить почему я считаю убийство 40 детей фейком. Израиль каждый год финансируется миллиардами из США на военную оборону, потому что они сами такие расходы не вытянут. В США более 2 десятков спецслужб и 7 в Израиле. Сотня тысяч жителей из сектора Газа каждый день пересекают границу на работу в Израиль. У этих спецслужб тысячи агентов кроме всей массы современных технических средств,которые следят за ситуацией. Могли ли они не знать о нападении? Я уверен что знали и даже помогли спланировать. А дальше как по сценарию красивая картинка с убийствами детей. Бомбежки Израиля уже убили только по официальным данным в 15 раз больше детей в сеторе Газа. Скорее всего это вы доверчивый лох, если верите в такие совпадения, спецслужбы не заметили, техические средства и спутники не заметили, пограничники не заметили, группы быстрого реагирования не среагировали. |
|
|
|
|
Всем спасибо за поздравления, надеюсь я не надоел вам за эти 4 с лишним года!
___
Поздравляю baeva с Legendary! Пора двигаться к 2000 заслуг.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you all for your congratulations!
My colleagues posted these threads on Meta and I did the same.
I wanted to share my thoughts after spending so much time here. Almost 25 days every year I was with you. Support each other and be more positive.
|
|
|
|
Has Binance P2P changed its rules and now the buyer needs to make a bank transfer of dollars or euros to the exchange account?
In this case, it is very difficult to commit fraud, but it will also be difficult for users to work with the crypto exchange.
Not all banks like it when users frequently transfer and receive money from crypto exchanges and block accounts for verification.
I don't think that there is any change in the P2P system for binance, or maybe it is related to the countries where the binance allows direct deposit of fiat money into binance and also transfer the money from biannce to the bank account directly. In my country, where we are not allowed to use our bank accounts directly with binance, nothnig has changed for us. We only have the P2P to buy and sell bitcoins or the USDT. So the chances of scams still exisits specailly for the new users who accept to deal / chat outside of the binance, while the binance P2P order is still in progress. Yes, I think that banks in many countries will be against it if their users send and receive money from crypto exchanges to their bank accounts, which are not intended for this. Therefore, exchanges do not want to get involved with this and they only control cryptocurrencies. And when you control only 50% of the exchange, scammers can always deceive users. |
|
|
|
Хочу быть первым lovesmayfamilis мои поздравления! Поздравляю нашу неповторимую криптоледи с очерендым успехом 4000 заслуг! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
