That's not the reason mate why Anthony Davis was sent to the Los Angeles Lakers:

a) Anthony Davis requested a trade and he shows interest to be part of the Lakers team. New Orleans Pelicans is suc*s in surrounding Davis with a good bunch of role-player teammates for years that's why it just makes sense for him to ask for a trade.

b) Lakers just did a good job of trading their young players because having a young core seems not effective to them. Honestly, they tried to build a young core team and give chances to their young players to show what they got. The Lakers are playing with full young cores for several seasons and they didn't even make it to the playoffs until LeBron James came to the franchise. The Lakers are also taking advantage of LeBron's still on prime-performance that's why they try to acquire a Superstar-level to be part of the team and it's a timing that Davis wants to be a Laker. The Celtics even try to talk with Davis but he's not interested.

Regardless if there's a market crash or not, I don't see a long-time operating casino will really receive some impact in a negative way.

Not all gamblers are traders, and there is no doubt that gamblers will just gamble for their own reason and I'm sure that's not a market-related concern.

The gambling industry, whether fiat or crypto-gambling, will be bigger and bigger whatever the market situation is. Good examples are: when the pandemic hit the world and in crypto, during the long-term bearish market, and the FTX related-issues.

What an intense 4th Quarter battle between the Los Angeles Lakers and Milwaukee Bucks.

Starting from around the 6-7 minute mark, every play of both team are crucial and a mistake can cost a turnaround event. It's like every possession is a must. Both teams also show good offense and they are literally exchanging leads. Everyone will be impressed too with how both teams show their good defense, especially those amazing blocks. Damn Giannis. He is really no doubt unstoppable and even defended well, he really nailing those shots at the paint. However, the Lakers were able to maintain their good phase until the final buzzer.

Actually, there's a chance for the Bucks to force an OT after Russel Westbrook missed his last free throw (he will surely be criticized if the Lakers lose that game even though his overall game is good ) and when Giannis grab the ball on their possession, he should not think twice to attack the paint as he is unstoppable and might draw a foul for a 3-point play. But instead, he passed it to Holiday for a 3-point attempt to tie the game but failed to do so.

For let's say a KO win won't be a priority for Paul Butler, of course, what matters is to win, how can he gain more points each round if he will not go brawling with Inoue? There's no choice but to go toe-to-toe as there's no such thing as snatching an open blow if we talk about the defense side of Inoue.

The Japanese monster is also quick, agile, and versatile that's why it will be hard for Butler to play safe and avoid Inoue most of the time just to snatch a point. And with Inoue fighting Donaire, it's a good reference for him that's why he already formed a strategy on how to encounter a fast-phase and counter boxers like Donaire. Butler doesn't fall into that category of being quick and best at something.

Butler might be a smart fighter but so is Inoue. I like Butler to show the boxing fans that he will try to counter the phase of Inoue and not just by doing running, safety, and avoiding close bouts. It's good to see a boxer lose when it's clearly shown that they did their best effort to win at any cost.

There is no doubt that the league only hires professional referees so we can conclude that quality is not really a question. Honestly, questionable or considered missed calls are being reviewed by the league especially if that call plays a big role in the final result of the game. Unfortunately, even after being reviewed or successfully changed, or modified, it doesn't change the actual result of the game.

The only action that the league is being imposed is suspending or giving a penalty to the involved referee and that's it. It will now be forgotten later on.

The referee's actions in a crucial moment really affect the result of the game. Might be favorable or not to a certain team.

Nice for Casimero. He really achieved that required catchweight and it seems no problem at all. Around 12 1lbs is now really considered as his comfort weight class even without affecting his usual lifestyle. Never heard any news that he struggles to reach that weight during his training.

I do happy that my speculation is wrong that this fight might not be possibly listed because this fight is not that big to consider. Good thing that it is still listed by some crypto-bookies and what everyone else is waiting for?

I will give a 90% chance that Casimero will win this fight although choosing what method he will win is a tough choice for us bettors.

That's what you called "upset" since if by luck, an underdog cock can land its "tari" (a metal pointed blade attached to a fighting cock's legs) into an opening spot and that means a sure Knock Out already. However, you can't rely on that most of the time that's why it's still better to refer to the fighting cocks' record and stats. It was an effective strategy most of the time although expect low odds for favorites (sometimes between 1.7 to 1.8 depending on the number of bettors on that round).

However, there are some flaws in this game too especially in manipulating the result. One way is thru the involvement of what we called here as "saltador" (the one that acts as a referee) where during the verdict stage, he might possibly give the other cock additional injury to somehow weakened and lose that match. There are lots of professional "saltador" here where even in front of the camera, they can hide their tricks.

Note: The terms I used here and a bit of shared gameplay are based on our country's way of doing cockfighting. I'm not sure how cockfighting is being played in other countries.

The cashout money won't be the same because the risk-money or the amount put on the bet is different if OP instead bets alone compare to when he shared his bankroll with his friend. Generally, because of their joined money, they are able to bet more passing the limit of their own supposed affordable amount. Although yes, OP has a chance to win alone.

We also have to point out that OP and his friend shared analysis with each other forming a final decision on what or where should they bet that's why we aren't sure if OP will have the same winning result if he decides on his own.

Well then, what matters here is, they have won already at this point. Of course, others should not think that they will have the same good result by doing such a way of cooperating with friends every time. It's no different from betting alone and we are talking about gambling here.

Actually, OP is referring to a specific casino game and not a gambling site as a whole where his game-winning chance is much better compare playing other games. That's why OP always considers playing on that game if bad lucks occur on other games he played with.

Sort of trying his chance to regain some of his losses by playing what is considered a "lucky casino" for him.

If you are talking about a site, as in the whole site, then it means regardless of the casino game, you are doing fine there. Good for you then.

Honestly, even if we propose something balanced here, what else we can do if KYC now becomes a must requirement for a gambling site? No choice but to follow or leave that site if anyone is not interested and feel comfortable on doing so. For me, as long as KYC will only be required in certain activities that a user can trigger their alarm, that would be fine.

As for my own approach, if KYC will really be mandated, I will study first the KYC terms of that site. From there, my decision to play on that site will depend on how the term goes. Besides, I'm open to comply with KYC for a gambling site that I'm using for long.

On the other hand, if it's about complying KYC with other sites that I rarely used to or those who are new to business, I will refrain from using them unless I saw something "special" that can lure me on that site.

Ayun nga bro e. Kaya nga ako napataya ng Parlay kasi maganda iyong sets ng game nung araw na yan at sigurado ako by 80% to win. 3 digits sana panalo dyan kung nagkataon hehe. Kahit nasa low tier yang Detroit Pistons at 6 pa lang panalo, pumuputok sila minsan at bigatin din mga tinalo nila this season. Kaya tiwala ako maguupset nila NYK pero nagkatamaran na agad kasi tambakan sa simula.

Moving forward, langyang Mavericks to. Alam ko naman na di sila maasahan sa handicap at ilan beses na sila nahahabol kahit malaki lamang pero kung paano tinalo iyong Golden State Warriors nitong nakaraan, na upset naman sila ng Detroit Piston recently.

What's your definition of "anything great" that we are supposed to see in Japan? It's no doubt that they are one of the most crypto-friendly in the world and crypto can be used as a means of transaction there. Maybe we are not just updated on how crypto is going on in that country but it doesn't mean we can generally assume that they are falling behind the crypto industry. Instead, I believed it was growing more.

I want to suggest that you can bring this concern to the Japanese local section here in this forum to somehow target the specific audiences that can give a much better response for you but it seems the community there isn't active.

Anyhow, for research purposes, maybe you can consider spending time doing self-study and key-in on your favorite search engine with the keyword "Crypto in Japan" or related terms to somehow see some news related to it. From there, decide if Japan is really falling behind the crypto industry.

There's a big difference in the way of handling strategies between a demo account and an actual trade.

First of all, your friend didn't feel any pressure when doing demo trades since obviously, no money is at risk. Therefore, no such thing as him being worried or under emotional stress since everything is just fine whatever the result is. In other words, stress-free.

In actual trades, we have a priority that we need to do and every action should be careful since real money is at stake here. Even a paper loss can already have an impact on our emotions that might affect our way of handling our trading activity. There's always a risk associated with each of our actions. One mistake can result in a big loss but on other hand, with a strategy, a big profit is possible in return.

Not because we are successful at the demo account, the same goes will happen in actual trade. Actually, losing in real trades is the best foundation that will make us better traders while we progress, of course, if we are really serious about doing that.

More importantly, the market will not adjust for us and not all the time, the situation will favor us.

No one knows what will be the result until you try.

If you think what's the best strategy to apply, you should do it without hesitation. Besides, both options are considered good to do at this point unless you are really looking forward seriously and expecting aggressively that prices will be much lower.


Difficult to imagine that price will crash to $12,000. The possible reason for another crash should be a "big thing" to consider before it can trigger the pull. However, there's nothing wrong if that's what you think since everyone has their own factors in forming an analysis.

Conclusion: Follow your own analysis whether properly and technically analyzed or just a product of your instinct based on your own factors.

Much better to activate Romeo in the semis if they can make it. At least in the semis, there are a series of games where Romeo can do some adjustments unlike in a few game series in the Quarterfinals. I understand your point that activating Romeo right now might destroy their current momentum. It's different in Fajardo's case since The Kraken is not a playmaker while Romeo shares the role of some of the key guards of the SMB right now.

And according to some reports, if Romeo will be activated, Coach Leo Austria will remain on the sideline and he will allow his deputy coach George Gallent to take over since according to Coach Leo, he doesn't want to destroy the momentum between Romeo and Gallent. Honestly, it doesn't make sense to me.

As much as I want to understand what OP really wants (even after the edited post), I really don't get what he's trying to voice out. To OP, I think just go with the flow on how live casinos are currently set up. Actually, no need for some big changes or modifications.

Don't make things too technical or complicated.

For clarification, what are you really aiming for? Maybe we can provide you with a much good response.

Actually, it's not the strategy but the most beneficial part of associating a friend/s in gambling is the combined capital.

Obviously, the big the bankroll is the better profit in return. That's the advantage of having a "cooperation mode".

OP is just fortunate that their analysis yields them a good return. Hopefully, they will continue their wild winning streak.

Emotions are really part of doing trades. No one can avoid that as it was human nature.

That's where the part that we need to withstand no matter what. Might be harmful to those people that already dealing with "weak feelings and emotions" for a long, since the market can really give stress and disappointment to anyone, no excuse.

In that case, I suggest those people under that tier stay away from trading if they don't understand the risks they are dealing with. Like you said, there are other ways and opportunities to earn aside from doing trades.

The idea of involving in crypto is good but don't purely our future on it. Make it well-balanced.

Besides, if you will just hold, how will you support your daily expenses? Fiat might be losing its value over time but it doesn't mean they are basically useless. Instead of treating fiat as a non-sense financial aspect, why not take advantage of their good use while holding bitcoin at the same time?

Try to think outside the box, or much better if we will totally removed the box.

It's because most people, especially newbies, are smart and bright during the bull run. They think profiting is easy as 1,2,3. The same goes with Future Trading, once they successfully gained some profits during the first phase of their actual run, their mindset is, it's not that hard to gain profit in crypto.

And after the series of wins, consecutive losses take place which leads to frustrations, disappointment, and regrets.

It's good for me to see newbies struggling since that will be their foundation in becoming good traders in the future.