Without knowing anything else about this case, I'm just going to assume that you were ranting about Lauda and/or DT in a thread that had nothing to do with them, your rant was deleted because it was off topic, and now you're complaining because in your mind the "Lauda/DT issue" affects the whole forum and is therefore on topic in any thread (again, only in your own mind). Am I warm?

Barring an unlucky distribution of supervotes, it looks like I'm in line to become DT1. I think we all know who's going to be unhappy about that. And just when I thought the drama was finally starting to die down.

Yogg, Foxpup, and nutildah please.

If this helps the altcoin boards bear less of a resemblance to a restaurant grease trap, I support it.

As others have said, there are no merits to be had in the Altcoin sections, since nobody serious about this forum (which is called Bitcoin Talk) wastes their time there. Really, the only reason we have those sections is to stop people from polluting the real boards with spam about their latest pet project (which, like most pets, often does little more than piss on the floor and eventually die and get replaced with something else).

Sent.

Thanks!

I am. I've always felt like I should buy counter-advertising against all the spam on the forum, but the right opportunity never presented itself. Trolling cryptohunter is just a bonus, honest.

The first payment will be made as soon as it's done (give or take a few hours depending on my sleep schedule and the status of my time machine, respectively).

Since I stand firmly against all these PAID2POST campaigns and feel only NET POSITIVE services should be advertised on the forum, I present...



BTC0.015 per week

Sorry, but the "right" to get sick and die horribly only applies to things that aren't contagious.

@cryptohunter asked for more details, so I replaced my gif with a higher quality one. Am I detailed enough yet?

Well, I'm glad it was at least good for you - I didn't feel a thing. And stop derailing threads you're not involved in.

Ah, yes, a relic from the early days of the forum, when everyone put their sex address in their signature. It's been three years since I've actually received any sex from it. Of course, sex wasn't a big deal back then; people were practically giving it away:

Someone please buy laudasbitches.com and host that cat picture.

Unless you use whole disk encryption, which is supported out of the box by all major modern operating systems without the need for third-party utilities or funky bootloaders. There's no excuse for leaving data unencrypted in this day and age.

First of all, blackmail is the threatened release of harmful information, not the threatened performance of harmful actions. The latter is called "extortion". Second, withholding my fucks from you isn't harmful unless you're an incel. Go back to your date.

Sorry, you'll have to do better than that if you want to see my vixenly "details".

Oh, you want some of this, do you?



Well, you're going to have to give me some encouragement. Lately you've just been posting the same nonsense over and over, and it's getting old. You've got to give me something new to work with, otherwise I'll just have to take my remaining fucks back to the foxhole and let the rest of the trust/merit gang have some.

EDIT: Found the original gif which is of higher quality because it hasn't been inexplicably converted to webm then back to gif again.

That's not healthy. It's especially not healthy if your date finds out you've been blowing him/her off to spend time with a sexy vixen, and a promiscuous one at that - one of these days you should make a giant chart showing exactly who in the DT/merit cycling club is asslicking/felching/fluffing whom (it's getting hard to keep track of at this point).

Well, let me know when you do, because I'm starting to get bored of you just repeating the same nonsense and misrepresenting everything I say.

I didn't say I can't give a fuck, I said I can't give enough fucks. I naturally have a few fucks available to those who are interested. But I'm afraid The Pharamacist and I combined don't have the 13,577 fucks it would take to go through all of your posts. We just don't have that many fucks between us.

And stop calling me "he" unless I'm no longer a vile vixen. (NB: Ceasing to be a vixen may adversely affect the quality of my fucks.)

No person is entertaining this stupidity except for you. The law specifically permits the use of violence to defend oneself against violent crimes, but it takes a dim view of other actions taken against criminals, including blackmail, which fall under the category of "taking the law into your own hands". This is not a difficult concept for normal people to understand.

---

That's because I actually said Alice wouldn't be charged, if only because the Bob can't call the cops on her without being arrested himself, and also because it's downright silly to suggest that Alice would even make such a deal with her assailant in the middle of a robbery in the first place. In the real world, this sort of situation is more likely to result from Alice advertising a "no questions asked" reward for the anonymous return of her stolen property, which is in fact illegal as it directly incentivises future thefts. But that probably doesn't fit with whatever nonsensical point cryptohunter is trying to make, hence these increasingly ridiculous "analogies".