Der Fall ist doch extremst eindeutig, dass der Account nur dazu verkauft wurde, nur um wertvolles BTC durch Signaturen abzugreifen.
Die Auffälligkeiten:
- 2,5 Jahre Pause ohne einen Beitrag.
- Direkt nach dieser Pause wacht der Account wieder auf und wird direkt in einer Signaturkampagne ausgerollt.
- Nach dieser Pause nie mehr einen Beitrag im deutschen Forumsbereich geschrieben, weil der neue Besitzer kein Deutsch kann.
- Keine Stellungnahme des neuen Besitzers, als er kürzlich negativen Trust bekommen hatte. Er weiß ja schon, dass er enttarnt wurde.
Viel deutlicher wird das nicht mehr.

Und Atrax kann durch Signatur der BTC-Adresse belegen, dass er definitiv der legitime Eigentümer ist, was er ja auch getan hat. 
Da sehen die Verantwortlichen mal wieder richtig schlecht aus, dass das so lange dauert...

Entschuldigung, hatte ich falsch von letzt kopiert.
Klar, es kann nur immer 100 DT1-Mitglieder geben, welche aus der Gesamtmenge der potentiell berechtigten Nutzer zustande kommt.
Die potentiell berechtigte Gesamtemenge waren diesmal 126 Nutzer.

Habe ich oben editiert. 

Gerade wurden die Änderungen am Default Trust (DT) für den Monat Juli 2023 bekanntgegeben: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117330.msg62499347#msg62499347
Es waren diesmal 126 Nutzer berechtigt, wovon es 100 letzendlich in DT1 geschafft haben:

Alte DT1-Mitglieder:

---

Neue DT1-Mitglieder:


Aus unserem lokalen Bereich dabei sind: fronti, willi9974, Lafu, Kryptowerk, mole0815, Lakai01, 1miau und bullrun2020bro


Die Liste von LoyceV dürfte demnächst publiziert werden.  

Wenn man sich ähnliche Fälle aus der Vergangenheit anschaut, erreichen solche Reservierungen in der Regel eher das Gegenteil. Also, dass man negativ auffällt, während sich alle anderen Teilnehmer ja regulär bewerben.
Und solche Reservierungen erreichen selbst im Optimalfall nichts: denn der Anbieter müsste dafür einen Platz freihalten, was jedoch eher nicht passieren wird, denn es wird direkt mit allen beim Kampagnenmanager bestellten Teilnehmern aufgefüllt. Bei einer Reservierung müsste der Kampagnenmanager dann nach x Woche einen anderen Teilnehmer rauswerfen oder einen neuen Platz vergeben, was der Anbieter genehmigen müsste.
Eine Reservierung ist daher sehr unwahrscheinlich, weil es den Prozess eines Kampagnenmanagers eher stört.
Neue Bewerbungen sind nicht umsonst ungerne gesehen, wenn die Kampagne aktuell keine neuen Teilnehmer aufnimmt. Sonst würde sich dort laufend jemand mit Reservierungen für in Zukunft neu ausgeschriebene Plätze bewerben.
Das würde rasch aus dem Ruder laufen.
Schlimmstenfalls landet man beim Kampagnenmanager auf einer Liste von Leuten, die negativ vorgemerkt werden. Manche Kampagnenmanager haben da Listen.
Also viel Potential nach unten, wenig nach oben.

Ich denke auch, dass in der Zukunft noch weitere gute Möglichkeiten folgen werden, um viel wertvolles BTC zu sammeln. Wichtig ist, dass man weiter gute Beiträge schreibt, z.B. wie in den 1miau Merit-Kriterien zusammengefasst und z.B. lesenswerte neue Fäden erstellt etc..  
Also wirst du auch in Zukunft weitere gute Chancen bekommen.  

Exactly that, I couldn't have said it any better.
We should always remember that services will advertise here because Bitcointalk is a well visited online place and being a well visited online place is achieved by high quality content. Like tutorials about Bitcoin, educated developers answering questions and giving insights etc.
On the contrary, spam is very harmful because (most) educated members don't want to read spam walls.
There are many crypto related online forums out there, where paid shitposting and low quality spam has turned establieshed members away and / or new members are not interested to sign up there because it's so spammy.
And Services
So, unironically, shitposters are destroying their own source of BTC.  
+1 for your comment.

---

---

Maybe your feeling is a little bit wrong today because in case you've read that and you were capable to understand what I've written there, then you would have noticed, that your claim is completely wrong.
I'm suggesting this nowhere, that self-moderation should get banned.

---

Once again, I'm suggesting this nowhere, that self-moderation should get banned.  
Obviously, you are not capable to read or understand my OP.
So, very slowly and only for you some quotes, what's my opinion on the topic:

(I'm even mentioning reasons for that...)




So, you can see: I've written it multiple times, what's my opinion on the issue.  



The member, who suggested to ban self-moderation, is Unknown01:

And yes, Unknown01 is also not capable of reading properly...

---

So, stop embarrassing yourself, that I would have "suggested" banning self-moderation. I'm opposed of banning it.

The only thing I'm asking in the poll is what Bitcointalk's public opinion on this is. It's a simple question and I've made my opinion quite clear in my OP, that I'm in favor of self-moderation.
After re-reading my OP, it's quite an achivement from you to get it that wrong, since your post is littered with numerous false claims.

---

I've not suggested anything, dude.
Your false claims don't get more accurate if you repeat them 5 times.  

The only thing what needs to stop is people like you who are not capable of reading and despite that, you are still having the boldness to reply here twice (!) to show that you've not understand anything from my OP, even after Nestade and myself pointed it out to you, that your claims are wrong...

---

That's not your business who's on my ignore list. I have no problem at all to call out liars, shitposters and spammers when I'm coming over one.  

---

I agree to your point. But that's exactly what Unknown01 did. He spammed in my topic, violated my rules and got butthurt because his posts got deleted. I even gave him an option to post it again after he will edit the rule-violations.

True, Sherlock.

---

---

Regarding our suvey: it's quite clear that our community is in favor of keeping self-moderated topics:



That's also what I've voted for and expected.  

I really don't know what happened to Piastri, he seemed to have a bad first half of the race and couldn't recover after that. After all, updates are looking great for McLaren and next race, Piastri will have the updates from Norris as well, so maybe we can get a good result from McLaren in Silverstone. 

---

Perez had an amazing performance today after getting criticized for previous races.
So, in general it's still a very unexpected podium but today, everything went well for Perez making that podium possible: good race pace, good strategy where he stayed out longer and especially a weak performance from Mercedes. Hamilton didn't seemed happy at all.
But I'm still hapy for Perez getting such a great achievement done after his recent disappointing performances despite losing my bet, which is very unexpected after an excellent performance from Perez today.

---

Many thanks for the congratulations but I'm not sure if the results on Superbru are arealdy final because some penalties have been applied to Sainz and Hamilton after the race. Positions might change a bit and from what I've checked, Superbru hasn't updated new results yet.

I agree, your bets really look like great value bets. Lando likes Austria but had a lot of bad luck in Sprint yesterday, where he lost many positions during RedBull's incident. I expect him to do much better today. McLaren  looks strong here, so maybe you can win at least one of your bets.
Good luck of course, it'll be an interesting race hopefully. 

---

Spain was very unfortunate for Lando, where he got damage on his car in the first corner and had to make a pit stop.
Maybe if he doesn't get damage early in the race, he could have scored nice points.

Lando really had some bad luck recently, also yesterday in Sprint race...

Das Problem ist doch eher, dass es für manche Forumsteilnehmer zu viel verlangt ist, zusätzliche 30 Sekunden pro Beitrag zu investieren um etwaige Rechtschreibfehler oder auch Denglisch auszubessern. Wobei beides direkt beim Abtippen vermieden werden kann, wenn man sich ein bisschen Mühe gibt.
Fehler passieren aber man sollte bemüht sein, diese zu vermeiden und auszubessern, wenn sie einem auffallen. 
Dann ist alles bestens.

Vielleicht findest du auch ein paar Rosen. 

No and I've just 24$ there currently after wasting all my deposits and free bets. 

---

Yeah, your explanation makes sense, of course.
Sounds like a bigger issue...

Maybe bookmakers expected Perez to be a bit better, at least close to Max because today, we have seen how impressive Red Bull can perform (but only Max). Perez still managed to score 2nd place in Sprint race but Verstappen had a huge lead, over 20 seconds, while Sainz was still close behind Perez. Perez didn't manage to create a gap to Sainz, so overtaking for him in traffic tomorrow will be difficult. Maybe we'll get some rain and Perez can make up more places by a chaotic race but right now, it's looking dry for tomorrow.

At least, we had a fantastic sprint race today. Amazing performance from Hulkenberg one more lap and he gains even more positions but still great result for him.

And yes, I agree, odds of 1.60 are more reasonable, maybe even 1.50.
Now, after Sprint race, odds are down to 1.52:



Still very good odds in my opinion because I don't see Perez making a podium here and then, there's always a possibility for a Verstappen DNF due to a collission or technical issues.

---

Perez is in a RedBull but he's not Verstappen. 
So far, Perez never has achieved a podium this season, when he started outside of the top 10:
Canada = started P12, finished P6
Spain = started P11, finished P4
Monaco = started P20, finished P16
Australia = started P20, finished P5

So, I don't expect an easy podium for him in Austria.
He will need a really god performance and a bit luck to achieve a podium here.

It's probably his best chance but he also needs to get some early overtakes or he's stuck behind midfielders while Ferrari, Aston Martin and Mercedes will pull a gap quickly. Without Safety Car or red flag, it'll be very unlikely to get past P5.

And overtake. 

---

Yes, I've still Perez on Superbru on podium, not sure if changing it is a good move but I'll decide tomorrow, if changing picks is a good idea or not.

---

+1
I can agree here 100%. Today, Perenz finished 2nd but he also started 2nd.
Despite having clean air and no spray due to rain (Verstappen was way ahead of him), Perez struggled to create a gap to Sainz. I just can't see how he's fast enough to overtake 11 cars tomorrow, unless no big crash happens, where for example both Ferraris and Hamilton are involved in. Instead of a Perez podium, a Perez disappointment seems to be more likely. 
Austria doesn't seem to be a track, Perez likes to drive at.

Hello dear Betnomi team 


Today, I wanted to place a bet for tomorrows Formula 1 race. Not much money, not big odds, just normal as usual.
But I've got an error:



Tried on soccer as well, same error. 
I don't want any partner, I just want to place my 20 USD bet...

I've placed my last bet 2 weeks ago on Betnomi, same amount, similar odds and didn't had any problems. Is it just a temporary problem or is Betnomi doing maintenance?
Would be nice to get more information on this issue.

I'll try tomorrow again to place a bet and report if this issue still exists.

In addition, it would be nice if you could disable this horrible sign-up confirmation mail, where we have to log in into our mail account every time to confirm our logins. It always takes me 5 minutes to log in into Betnomi...

Looks like you did not read my OP because I'm not the one who suggested to ban self-moderation. Unknown01 suggested to ban self-moderation. I'm in favor of self-moderation because it helps a lot, like combatting spam. In some sections, spam is a big issue and self-moderation can help to keep our own topic clean.

It's not allowed to ask for other people's views + additional arguments why self-moderation is useful?
And I've added a poll to ask for the public opinion.

---

Exactly that. Any abuse can be proven easily by checking these archive tools. 

Es gibt zwei neue Gewinnspiele, bei denen man wertvolles BTC gewinnen kann:

Link: Gewinnspiel: (neues?) Bitcoin Allzeithoch im Jahr 2023
Veranstalter: 1miau
Gewinn: 1. Platz: 1 mBTC, 2. Platz 0,25 mBTC
Aufgabe: Den höchsten Bitcoin-Preis des Jahres 2023 erraten.
Teilnahmeschluss: 14.07.2023, 23:59:59


Link: Gewinnspiel: Neues Bitcoin (Jahres-)Tief in 2023 ?
Veranstalter: Turbartuluk
Gewinn: 1. Platz: 1 mBTC, 2. Platz 0,5 mBTC, 3. Platz 0,25 mBTC
Aufgabe: Den niedrigsten Bitcoin-Preis des Jahres 2023 erraten (ab Start des Gewinnspiels).
Teilnahmeschluss: bis der Bitcoin-Preis unter 28.000 USD fällt

Beide Gewinnspiele sind ebenfalls im ersten Beitrag ergänzt. 

Achja, musst du mal wieder einen komplett unkonstruktiven Trollbeitrag hier reinrotzen aber gleichzeitig bezeichnest du andere Leute als Trolle. Ist dann doch eher derjenige der Troll, der hier nichts zum Thema beiträgt und nur trollt.

Klar, die Lüge von Unknown01 plapperst du gerne unhinterfragt weiter, das kennen wir ja.
Dass die „Meinungsfreiheit“ nicht „eingeschränkt“ wird, wenn lediglich Beiträge gelöscht werden, die gegen die selbstmoderierten Regeln verstoßen, weil sie Denglisch enthalten und ich sogar darauf hinweise, dass gelöschte Beiträge ohne Denglisch erneut platziert werden können, entbehrt deine Falschdarstellung jeglicher Grundlage.
Vielleicht realisierst auch du das irgendwann.

Wie oft wollt ihr euch noch in der Opferrolle suhlen? Die Lügen, die ihr dazu erfindet, werden immer peinlicher.  

Du bist also zu faul dazu. Alles klar, Shitposter...  

All (originally posted) forum posts are always getting archived. There are several tools like from TryNinja or from LoyceV.
For example from LoyceV, we have a copy of all replies of this topic here as well: https://loyce.club/archive/topics/545/5458161.html



So, in case of a self-moderated topic, all submitted posts are getting archived on LoyceV's site and everyone will be able to look up these posts on LoyceV's site, no matter if these posts are getting deleted here on Bitcointalk. All posts are getting archived there.
A scammer could be exposed easily for deleting replies in a self-moderated topic because we would be able to prove it easily. Every post is getting archived.

---

I'm thinking the same as most likely his motivation is, to ban self-moderated topics because he's a shitposter and OP of a self-moderated topic can delete his low-quality replies, should an OP of a self-moderated topic consider such replies as spammy shitposts.

Yes, it's really sad to see Perez having such bad luck again. On his Q2 laps, he has been really quick but why didn't he get a safe lap in to qualify in Q2? He had 3 laps, all of them getting deleted due to track limits, so I would expect him, after getting 2 laps deleted to set a safe lap but no, on all his Q2 laps, he pushed too much in the same corner and got track limits for this.
Verstappen had his first lap deleted as well but Verstappen managed it much better.

Starting from P15, it'll be a hard race for him once again and when having a look how he has performed recently, I've decided to make a bet because I beleive, RedBull won't be able to get a double podium here: 



In my opinion, the odds are very nice because it'll be very difficult for Perez to get a podium here. He's starting from P15 and would need to overtake Russell, Hamilton, Alonso, one Ferrari and a whole bunch of midfielders to get a podium unless no crash happens. Odds are really good in my opinion.

And speaking about good odds: Ferrari both cars podium finish is at @8.00 odds currently. Considering Leclerc and Sainz are starting from 2nd and 3rd position, while only Norris is behind them, who will be blocking traffic for a while, these odds are looking really valuable:



I've not taken the second bet so far, because we all know how Ferrari is struggling sometimes but @8.00 is really interesting odds.
Opinions?

---

Sportsbet.io is having a Verstappen race win @1.22 
So, bookmakers don't see any real chance for Leclerc to win, unless Verstappen has a mechanical issue or a very bad start.

Actually, it's not my proposal to ban self-moderated topics, it's a proposal from Unknown01, a deranged troll. 

Myself, I'm in favor of self-moderation, have applied this feature in some of my topics and I'm also replying to self-moderated topics frequently.

In fact, self-moderation is a nice, additional feature here on Bitcointalk and it's helpful in many occasions. Mainly to prevent spam but also for various other cases. 

Exactly that. It's quite spammy in the Gambling section, where many topics are flooded with dozens of low-quality spam daily. Even in 50 comments, very little information is contained.
These posts are only made due to paid signature campaigns and that's really a problem.

Luckily, some members dedicated to our Gambling board have launched new, self-moderated topics, where spam posts are getting removed, for example:

Spam topic: Premier League Prediction Thread 2023/2024 (4000 pages of replies)
Self-moderated topic: ⚽ English Premier League Season: 2021/2022 (200 pages of replies)

Hopefully, such incentives will decrease spam in that section even more as some topics are almost impossible to follow, when there are 50+ new replies every day.

Vielleicht sogar bis 100.000 USD. 
Wobei die Chance dazu eher gering ist, da bräuchte es schon eine Entwicklung, wie zuletzt in der zweiten Jahreshälfte des Jahres 2017.

Der Sponsor kam sogar auf mich zu bzw. wurde an mich herangetragen aber ich werde die genauen Details dazu noch erläutern, wenn am Samstagabend niemand gegen diese Änderungen ist. 

If a scammer is abusing self-moderation, we'll have the option of providing and compiling evidence and we can make a scam accusation if OP is using self-moderation to scam people.
Remember, all posts of Bitcointalk are archived by LoyceV here: LoyceV's Topic Details: highlight deleted and edited posts (forum wide)
Finally, such an abuse would be very simple to prove and in case self-moderation is abused to scam anyone, we will be able to give out a negative trust for anyone trying a scam.


That's not true at all as long as such self-moderated rules are reasonable and not affecting a particular opinion. Most often, self-moderation is against trolling and lies, which is not an opinion because such behaviour is just meant to derail a discussion, therefore removing such posts is not "preventing the freedom of expression". Sometimes, trolls are deliberately targeting topics to derail them.
And if someone doesn't like these self-moderated rules, he should not reply there. It's as easy as it gets.
If he's just here to troll, removing these posts is totally deserved.
Forum rules are also not "preventing the freedom of expression" as well.


Then, you haven't applied the self-moderation feature properly because if these are legitimate opinions, deleting them is not ideal. Deleting is only advised if it's a troll post.  

---

Yes, he and his friends are so braindead, it's quite a clown show.

And honestly, demanding to ban the opportunity to create self-moderated topics is so shortsighted, that it's already stupid.
The forum is very big and there are so many cases where creating a self-moderated topic makes sense to remove spam effectively.
Some sections might be less spammy but we all know how spam is a big issue in many forum sections. Obviously, Unknown01 doesn’t know this or it's feeling normal for him, because he's a shitposter.

Let's take the Gambling section as an example: there are topics where dozens of replies are made every single day. These spam megathreads have grown to over 1000 (!) pages or 50k replies.
For example, this one about Bundesliga discussion: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1159912.0
Bundesliga season is over now but still every day our shitposters are making tons of replies. Even yesterday, 25 replies have been left. Nobody is reading these shitposts, maybe a bunch of shitposters searching for crumbs to reply to.

Igebotz made a good job pointing out, how self-moderation can help to prevent shitposters flooding new Gambling topics: Gambling Board Spammers; Concerns, Solutions & Suggestions

The solution is very simple: shitposters will get their replies deleted due to self-moderation, these shitposters will get a PM and realize quickly that it's wasted time to post relies in such topics.
These shitposters will stop to shitpost in such topics and that will result in a cleaner thread.
It's simple and it's working. Great outcome from self-moderation.
But as a shitposter, these self-moderated topics are a big nuisance and it's leading to their shitposts getting deleted.  

Funnily, 2 of the biggest German shitposters (MinoRaiola and bct_ail) are part of that spammers list. And funny as well, that bct_ail is one of the shitposters shitting a reply on page 1777 on that spam megathread.
I hope that Signature campaign managers will consider the list from Igebotz and kick these shitposters out of their campaigns due to massive shitposting.