The transaction stayed unconfirmed for 14 days and most nodes have probably dropped it from their mempool. It should be a local transaction now.
OP, if you no longer want to make that transaction, just right-click on your transaction and remove it.

If OP wants to set the fee rate to an amount so that he/she can use ViaBTC free accelerator, 10 sat/vbyte should be enough.
Note that the transaction is legacy and 10 sat/byte = 10 sat/vbyte.  

It's not that there's a certain algorithm which miners have to follow that.
Miners are free to include any valid transaction they want. They can even include a transaction with zero fee, but they include transactions with highest fee rates to maximize their profit.

Miners prioritize transactions based on their fee rate. The more fee rate you use for your transaction, the faster it can be included in the blockchain.


It doesn't matter when you have broadcasted your transaction. It all depends on the fee rate.

A difference is that coins that have been received in a coinbase transaction can't be spent until 100 more blocks are mined.


The newly generated coins aren't created out of the thin air. Miners work for them.

No. There is no difference between the value of newly generated coins and value of other coins.
When you want to sell your bitcoin, no one will ask you whether you have mined them or you have purchased them.

Yes, that's different.
The 294 satoshi is the dust limit for segwit version 0. The dust limit for segwit version 1 (taproot) is 330 satoshi.

I will do the same thing as you if fees are high, but will consolidate the inputs if fees are low.
Assuming the network isn't congested and the fee rate of 1 sat/vbyte is enough, with using 1 UTXO instead of all 4 UTXOs, you save around 200 satoshi, but you will still have 4 UTXOs after your transaction and this may cause you to have to pay high fee for your next transactions.
When the network isn't congested and you can make transaction with the fee rate of only 1 sat/vbyte, it's better to use all the UTXOs, even if one of them is enough for making a payment.

I feel you are confusing byte with vbyte.
The minimum fee rate to be eligible to use their free accelerator is 10 sat/byte (note that it's 10 sat/byte, not 10 sat/vbyte.)
For a normal segwit transaction with 1 input and 2 outputs, the minimum required fee rate would be around 16 sat/vbyte.

That's because your fee rate was below 10 sat/byte.

Note that the 546 satoshi is the dust limit for legacy outputs. If the output is segwit, the dust limit would be 294 satoshi for that.

I didn't say the block was empty because there was no transaction.
As I already said, that block was mined only 11 seconds after its previous block and that's why it was empty. The miner didn't have enough time to remove outputs from UTXO set and add transactions to the candidate block.

This is wrong.
When the network is congested, miners have so many transactions in their mempool and they always try to include as many transactions as possible to maximize their profit.
You would see empty blocks when there is no new transaction (which is almost impossible nowadays) or the block is mined in a very short time after the previous block.

The block was mined only 11 seconds after its previous block and the miner hadn't added any transaction to the candidate block yet.
Note that AntPool didn't get any transaction fee in that block, but they got the newly generated coins (6.25 BTC) and that's a success.

The size of a normal transaction including 1 input and 2 outputs is around 225 byte. If you add an input to your transaction, so that it includes 2 inputs and 2 outputs, it size would increase to around 375 byte. That's around 67% increase in transaction size. If you increase the inputs to 3, the total size would be around 520 byte.

You had three inputs because you had received that fund in three different transactions.
I'm not a fan of blockchain.com wallet and due to obvious reasons, I would never recommended anyone to use it, but what you said isn't really their fault.

You shouldn't lose your fund even if you have made deposit to expired addresses.
According to their announcement, you should be able to credit the deposits made to old addresses manually.

For more information, visit the following article.
Existing Deposit Addresses to Be Retired (2023-04-18)



Sorry. I edited the link.

Even for altcoins, it's not recommended to use a close-source wallet like trustwallet. Visit the article published on cointelegraph and see how a vulnerability caused some users who created wallet through their browser extension to lose their fund.
Trust Wallet to reimburse users after $170,000 security incident

We don't know how the keys are generated on trustwallet and there is no guarantee that the same thing won't happen to those who are using their application.

Take note that your password encrypts your wallet file locally, so that someone who has access to your device can't access your fund.
Someone who has access to your seed phrase can use it to generate the same wallet and spend your fund. The thief doesn't need your password at all.


Wrong.
They can spend the fund, but there is no way to change your password. As already said, your password encrypts your wallet file locally.

Electrum is surely a trustworthy wallet and if it's in the correct way, your fund would be completely secure, but exodus is a close-source wallet and it's not recommended.
When you use close-source wallet like Exodus, you don't know how the keys are generated and whether they are stored on their server or not.

A seed phrase generated by electrum isn't BIP39. Electrum uses its own algorithm for generating a seed phrase.
Of course, since electrum is open-source, there's  nothing to worry about if you have a seed phrase generated by it and you will be always able to derive your private keys from your seed phrase.

If you want your wallet to be completely secure, your private keys should be generated using a secure tool on a secure device.
One way is to use a open-source trustworthy wallet on an airgapped device and the other way is to use a good hardware wallet.

Note that's it's recommended to generate a HD wallet with a seed phrase instead of generating a single private key. Writing a seed phrase (which is series of words) is much easier than writing a private key and in this way, you can have numerous addresses all generated from a seed phrase.
Don't forget to keep multiple copies of your seed phrase (or your private key, if you want to generate a single private key for any reason) in separate safe places.

When you bump the fee, your transaction is replaced by a new one with a new ID and you should submit the new transaction. Maybe, you submitted the replaced transaction.
I have done what suggested by BlackBoss_ before and I can confirm that it works.

It's not just you. The same thing has happened to any other image uploaded to imgur. Visit the topic created by acroman08 for more information about the issue.
Imgur images suddenly became invalid?