Sure, but you will need to report the PM to the moderators if you want any real chance for anything to be done about it.

If there is no additional context, that is the entire message, and you are unaware of any reason for him to want harm to you, I don't think this breaks the rules.

Again, if you feel you are in danger, you should contact the police. Banning the person is not going to remove any danger, if it exists.

The Iran government had admitted to shooting down the drone...

Can you provide any context? Do you have some kind of dispute with the person?

You can report the post tp the moderators to be reviewed. You should also contact the police if you believe your live is in immediate danger.

No. it is not reasonable to assume what is being suggested is actually true. Further there is blockchain evidence of the theft.

If you are looking for an excuse for saying Hhampuz is innocent, then sure, his landlady actually pays him for living where he lives. Realistically, looking at the blockchain around his known addresses and other public information, I can confidently say this is not the case.

If Hhampuz wants to go on the record to say that he has no/few living expenses, or some other excuse others have offered for him, he is free to do so. If he does make this kind of assertion, unless there is evidence to the contrary, it would be unreasonable to not accept it as fact, however without the assertion coming from him, the mere possibility falls outside of the scope of reasonable doubt. If he were to make an assertion in his defense that is shown to be untrue, he would be shown to have lied, and it would be additional evidence he is trying to cover up what actually happened.

Also

The US position is that it was flying in international airspace.

I trust the US government more than the largest state sponsor of terrorism (Iran government).

This would be most idea, so that few American lives are at risk. However even air strikes risk retaliation by Iran against military bases we have in the region. I believe we have military bases in both the UAE and Saudi Arabia, plus we have military assets in the ocean nearby.

I have no idea what you are saying. It is not a complicated concept that a person needs to pay for living expenses on an ongoing basis. It is also not a complicated concept to expect a person to not be able to use all of their income to go towards a loan.

The loan is only evidence of a motive. There is blockchain evidence to support the underlying accusation that remains true regardless of motive.

Trump just tweeted that Iran made a big mistake.

I would presume the US military is going to respond. The US cannot let its enemy do what can only be described as an act of war and us not respond. If we do nothing, these types of attacks will continue and will possibly escalate.

Text links are preferable. Thanks.

That would appear to be the case.

As an FYI, if you are a merit source, this will not account for your source merit, and will only display your accumulated sMerit.

This is a script I will be using. I like not having to deal with a popup every time I give merit.

I would like the ability to click on a link on a post that starts a PM to the author of the post that says:

One click links on a post to view a person's post history and thread creation history would also be nice. As would a one click link to a user's gettopics link from a post.

I strongly prefer something that can be run from greesemonkey.

Thanks.

The Iran government has recently threatened to carry out something very similar in recent months, and has made these threats multiple times.

The logic of how this would get the US to lift sanctions is these attacks could disrupt the global economy by preventing oil from passing through the area of the attacks, increasing oil prices. If the US wants to be able to have oil resume safely passing through the area, it will need to lift sanctions. The theory is that Iran is basically using extortion with actual and the threat of further violence/property damage if sanctions are not lifted. 

I am not sure that post was even on topic for the thread it was posted in.

My issue with the post is it was posted as text without any kind of attribution. In my experience, most memes are shared as pictures so they can be quickly shared. Most bounty campaigns have minimum post length requirements and posting the post as a picture would not get the OP credit for the post. Attributing the post as a meme might otherwise disqualify the OP from receiving credit if his posts were looked at closely. The other post, posted a few hours earlier very clearly indicated the writing was not his.

Right, lenders have the right to lend on their own terms as they wish.

The point I was making is that the OPs loan request is not automatically a scam attempt on its face. If someone lends to him, the OP may not repay the loan. But it is not a foregone conclusion that he will run away with whatever money he receives.

here is another example from another lender
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3243635.msg51396967#msg51396967

There are plenty of examples of people in similar situations as the OP repaying loans similar to what the OP is asking for.

This is in no way an appropriate use of the trust system. The changes to the trust system results in your abuse not having the same impact as before, but this is still abuse.

Here is an example of someone receiving a loan with nearly zero trading history


The loan was repaid. I wouldn’t personally have lent to either this person or the OP, but I am more conservative as to who I am willing to trust.

It would be insane to trust someone because they are “respected”.

Another example https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5132594.msg51454283#msg51454283

A loan request is not automatically a scam attempt. The scam attempts that are frequently seen here are those made by throwaway accounts.

It may or may not be a good idea to lend to the OP, that is up to potential lenders. There are plenty of people who have received no collateral loans recently.

Also, in general, people asking for loans that warrant a negative rating are typically given the opportunity to first close their thread or offer collateral, or provide a reason why they are not attempting to scam.

100% inappropriate. The OP of the thread is not posting from a newbie account/throwaway account.

If someone decides that guy is a low risk they may decide to lend to him. I’ve seen others receive no collateral loans.

He may it may not be untrustworthy for other reasons but the loan request is not appropriate.

All this reflects poorly on FortuneJack. I am surprised that FJ wants to be associated with that kind of language.