Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 06:55:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 ... 437 »
1221  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Proof of stake mining of bicoin on: December 30, 2014, 04:11:10 PM
There is no white paper because the wiki is speaking in general terms.
One example is Meni's implementation of adding proof of stake
checkpoints.... One of the key words here is adding proof
of stake, NOT replacing proof of work entirely.

If you were meaning to say that replacing proof of work entirely
with proof of stake shouldn't even be considered (rather than
being in the category of "disputed"), then I would generally
agree, as it is too huge of a change.

And by the way, this is a perfect example.  Meni's idea sounds
appealing, but the core devs (and even Meni) dispute it being
implemented because they do not believe it will make bitcoin
more secure.
I think Meni had an ulterior motive for including it in the wiki. Perhaps he will remove once PoS has found its niche.
1222  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Proof of stake mining of bicoin on: December 30, 2014, 03:58:13 PM
i was wandering in the future can bitcoin switch to proof of stake?

This is an obvious troll thread that belongs in alt coins. Bitcoin has never considered any other design. Please move this thread.

Who is this bitcoin you speak of and when can we get an official statement?

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Prohibited_changes
There is nothing stopping you from making a hard fork. This isn't even a dispute. I don't know why the wiki says such nonsense. Good luck getting miners to switch to your fork.

The wiki says adding Proof of Stake elements to the Proof of Work would be a disputed change...because it is.  Why is that nonsense?
Claiming something and doing something are two different things. Apparently this is the wiki author's opinion. That doesn't make it so. If someone wants to do it then they should go ahead and do it. Unless what you mean is that begging everyone to follow you is a bad idea. The begging part is in dispute.

Ok fair enough, but then by the same token, we can also say that the assertion "it is nonsense" is simply your opinion too.  Agree?
Technically rejecting an unsubstantiated argument doesn't require evidence.

You're not making sense.

The wiki says this.

Quote
Disputed

    Adding alternatives to Proof of Work such as Proof of Stake. This could change core bitcoin too much, but with widespread agreement of some sort might be possible.

I think that's pretty accurate.  You can disagree, but so far you haven't convinced me why you're right and the wiki is wrong.


I concede the point because I don't understand it. Maybe someone should write a white paper on how it would be done so I have facts to deal with.
1223  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Proof of stake mining of bicoin on: December 30, 2014, 03:44:54 PM
i was wandering in the future can bitcoin switch to proof of stake?

This is an obvious troll thread that belongs in alt coins. Bitcoin has never considered any other design. Please move this thread.

Who is this bitcoin you speak of and when can we get an official statement?

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Prohibited_changes
There is nothing stopping you from making a hard fork. This isn't even a dispute. I don't know why the wiki says such nonsense. Good luck getting miners to switch to your fork.

The wiki says adding Proof of Stake elements to the Proof of Work would be a disputed change...because it is.  Why is that nonsense?
Claiming something and doing something are two different things. Apparently this is the wiki author's opinion. That doesn't make it so. If someone wants to do it then they should go ahead and do it. Unless what you mean is that begging everyone to follow you is a bad idea. The begging part is in dispute.

Ok fair enough, but then by the same token, we can also say that the assertion "it is nonsense" is simply your opinion too.  Agree?
Technically rejecting an unsubstantiated argument doesn't require evidence.
1224  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Proof of stake mining of bicoin on: December 30, 2014, 03:39:28 PM
i was wandering in the future can bitcoin switch to proof of stake?

This is an obvious troll thread that belongs in alt coins. Bitcoin has never considered any other design. Please move this thread.

Who is this bitcoin you speak of and when can we get an official statement?

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Prohibited_changes
There is nothing stopping you from making a hard fork. This isn't even a dispute. I don't know why the wiki says such nonsense. Good luck getting miners to switch to your fork.

The wiki says adding Proof of Stake elements to the Proof of Work would be a disputed change...because it is.  Why is that nonsense?
Claiming something and doing something are two different things. Apparently this is the wiki author's opinion. That doesn't make it so. If someone wants to do it then they should go ahead and do it. Unless what you mean is that begging everyone to follow you is a bad idea. The begging part is in dispute.
1225  Economy / Speculation / Re: Stop your BTC cheerleading and mass delusion and face the reality on: December 30, 2014, 03:31:51 PM
Bitcoin is purely logical.

Kool Aid on sale again?
Can you disprove the math?
1226  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Proof of stake mining of bicoin on: December 30, 2014, 03:23:04 PM

There is nothing stopping you from making a hard fork. This isn't even a dispute. I don't know why the wiki says such nonsense. Good luck getting miners to switch to your fork.

Non Sequitur. Pointing out that your statement is delusional and a defensive act of Repression has nothing to do with how I feel about PoS or if it is likely Bitcoin will switch consensus mechanisms.

There are plenty of developers who have considered other designs and are still considering other designs for bitcoin. This is a simple fact. I understand you will not call such a hardfork bitcoin, but you must acknowledge you are not bitcoin.

i was wandering in the future can bitcoin switch to proof of stake?

This is an obvious troll thread that belongs in alt coins. Bitcoin has never considered any other design. Please move this thread.

Who is this bitcoin you speak of and when can we get an official statement?

p.s..... Don't read into my statements either as I am not advocating for such a fork.
Bitcoin cannot change to PoS. It is impossible. Why don't you understand? Bitcoin is the collective of users. Is that concept too difficult for you? Your "official statement" is a strawman.
1227  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Power companies should mine bitcoins on: December 30, 2014, 03:06:08 PM
A lot of grid is wasted during off peak times. Energy is stored or sold in inefficient manners. Instead, they should use any excess energy in mining bitcoins to sell. Rather than raising electric rates, they can increase their customer base. Their price discovery will be the electricity/btc pair. They can choose which will be most profitable. Storage can then be bought by customers for their needs based on rates. This just seems more efficient than being forced to sell to only one market.

Actually, I think its more profitable and better for ASIC manufacturer as compare to power company to mine bitcoin. Power company can do other related business like selling battery.
If ASIC is more profitable for ASIC manufacturer, then power company can become ASIC manufacturer instead of battery.

Not all the extra-energy is stored in batteries. Do you know about Pumped storage hydroelectricity? (and it's only an example). Bitcoin is not profitable for the electricity companies.

Bye!
That's only a tiny percent of electricity produced.
1228  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Proof of stake mining of bicoin on: December 30, 2014, 02:57:02 PM
i was wandering in the future can bitcoin switch to proof of stake?

This is an obvious troll thread that belongs in alt coins. Bitcoin has never considered any other design. Please move this thread.

Who is this bitcoin you speak of and when can we get an official statement?

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Prohibited_changes
There is nothing stopping you from making a hard fork. This isn't even a dispute. I don't know why the wiki says such nonsense. Good luck getting miners to switch to your fork.
1229  Economy / Speculation / Re: Prepare for a new big drop. on: December 30, 2014, 02:10:32 PM
Shopping centers are out of stock of many things I want. Oh my gods! They are gone forever! This time of year is when I used to like to go on warm weather vacations except now I live there. My point is, this is only a cycle thing. I didn't expect it to go this low, but I'm not too surprised.
1230  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Elon Musk rumored to get into digital payments in 2015 (CNBC) on: December 30, 2014, 02:02:16 PM
Elon Musk isn't desperate like Apple for new ideas.
1231  Economy / Speculation / Re: Damn, any day this should pop below $300 on: December 30, 2014, 01:56:24 PM
We need a bearwhale to get below 300.
1232  Economy / Speculation / Re: Stop your BTC cheerleading and mass delusion and face the reality on: December 30, 2014, 01:53:49 PM
Bitcoin is purely logical. That's why it's survived global assault from every nation for almost six years. Yes. It's that good. Ignorance loses.
1233  Economy / Speculation / Re: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. on: December 30, 2014, 01:40:55 PM
Who actually pegs the transaction? With many different versions of the blockchain, how do you reach  consensus without an actual bitcoin transaction?
1234  Economy / Economics / Re: Bloomberg: Bitcoin was World's Worst Currency in 2014 on: December 30, 2014, 01:38:01 PM
Apparently Bloomberg is okay with N. Korea, Cuba, Iran, and ISIS money.
1235  Other / Meta / Re: Who is the best poster of 2014 ? on: December 30, 2014, 01:30:51 PM
The best posters and mods left. A list en memoriam might be more interesting.
1236  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Power companies should mine bitcoins on: December 30, 2014, 01:25:30 PM
Battery storage suck. We don't even have decent electric cars. Why should power companies buy expensive wasteful batteries?
1237  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Can bitcoin allow people to choose a PoS hard fork? on: December 30, 2014, 01:22:55 PM
This would be super cool to give people a choice. Then they could save the babies, puppies, and rainbows!
1238  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Proof of stake mining of bicoin on: December 30, 2014, 01:18:12 PM
i was wandering in the future can bitcoin switch to proof of stake?

This is an obvious troll thread that belongs in alt coins. Bitcoin has never considered any other design. Please move this thread.
1239  Economy / Speculation / Re: Prepare for a new big drop. on: December 30, 2014, 01:08:50 PM
Everyone that sold for tax purposes has sold. Buying for the new tax season starts in about 40 hours.
1240  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Proof of stake mining of bicoin on: December 30, 2014, 01:02:10 PM
Instead of
Code:
Dollars -> Mining rig -> Cryptocoins
PoS offers
Code:
Dollars -> Cryptocoins

Obviously this part is too technical to some people here though it tells a simple truth.
Logic flow:
Dollars -> aerospace engineering research -> intergalactic travel
therefor dollars -> intergalactic travel
who needs rocket scientists, right?  Roll Eyes
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 ... 437 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!