I support this flag! Thank you suchmoon for the compelling evidence in OP which makes opposing such a flag quite difficult. Surely it could even be labelled as misuse of the new flag system?
You are a weak minded puppet. The evidence is not compelling. You are a thieving little weasel. You and suchmoon know information contained in the OP is a lie. Both "B" and "C" listed in the OP are lies. Information in thread "B" directly contradicts how it is described in the OP. The "C" listing is a misrepresentation of the thread in question.
|
|
|
I do have txids
Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address? Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times. I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time. No mouthbreather, all you have proven is that Hhampuz took a loan on May 10th and moved the remaining Bestmixer campaign funds to a different address on May 22nd. The rest of your conclusions are just fabrications of a clouded mind. Since the address you posted shows part of Hhampuz's transactions you can see that he earned ~0.42 BTC between May 10th and May 22nd. He earned over 0.65 BTC before the end of the 23rd, meaning that he is roughtly earning over 0.3 BTC per week. Seems like Hhampuz is perfectly capable of repaying any loan without embezzling campaign funds. Hhampuz has other bills to pay other than the loan. From the 10th until the 27th, he would spend all of the bitcoin he received to that wallet within a couple of days. He has previously publicly said he does not have a traditional 9 to 5 job. He went from having zero on the 27th to over 0.55 BTC to repay the loan on June 8th. You choose to ignore the facts, and are acting in bad faith, as per usual. No, I think we're supposed to admire how sinister and clairvoyant Hhampuz is - he got a loan knowing in advance that Bestmixer is gonna get shut down leaving him exactly the right amount to repay the loan.
He most likely took out the loan because he was in need of money at the time. He took advantage of BestMixer closing to use the money to repay the loan. I think you're onto something. Sounds super smart to wreck his credibility and reputation, risking a steady income of ~1.2 BTC per month, to embezzle 0.5 BTC. Especially since it's a well known fact that many people pay close attention to anything that happens during a closure (or exit scam).
There is no evidence that he makes that much money. No, selling off his assets, or withdrawing BTC from an exchange is not income.
|
|
|
The negative trust by these two seems pretty shady to me. I don't think there was any credible evidence of polo scamming in 2017.
Polo was way behind on their support tickets at the time. They also had taken down their trollbox at the same time. I can see where people were getting leery that another exit scam was looming. Polo has since changed ownership, anyway. So the tags should probably be revised. Unfortunately, Zepher can't revise his. Oh yea, I definitely agree, being behind on support tickets is proof beyond a reasonable doubt, no proof beyond any doubt, that the exchange is scamming its users.
|
|
|
I do have txids
Where is the txid from Hhampuz to Darkstar, linking the ChipMixer outputs to Darkstar's address? Not necessary jackass. It is trivial to move coins from ChipMixer to another mixer, and this can be repeated multiple times. I have proven both that Hhampuz has stolen money from BestMixer, and that he had a loan outstanding in roughly the amount he stole as of this time.
|
|
|
I guess what I am saying is that I would like to see some evidence of QS scamming someone and not anything that points to his accusation of Hhampuz
He would have a red box if a victim of his actions came forward. As it stands now, he is a high risk individual with a yellow box warning. Perhaps if Hhampuz has a loss of business or a certain person in socal gets harrassing phone calls we can put a proper red box on him but for now this will have to suffice. Let me see if I am understanding you correctly. You are wanting me to remove my accusation against Hhampuz? This is your concern? I am not sure if you know this or not, but I have posted blockchain evidence both that Hhampuz took the money, and that he had an outstanding loan as of when he took the money.
|
|
|
I have a similar issue with poloniex for 10 XMR but I don't think they even have an account here.
Apparently they do. This is Poloniex's owner: busoniHe already has 2 *old trust* tags from Lauda and Zepher from 2017. Maybe someone should "update it" with a flag. The negative trust by these two seems pretty shady to me. I don't think there was any credible evidence of polo scamming in 2017.
|
|
|
Is a non-victim creating an otherwise factual flag also considered to be abusing the system?
Is someone who supports a factual flag that was created by a non-victim also considered to be abusing the system?
And is someone who opposes a valid flag also considered to be abusing the system?
That's all misuse of the system. How much proof of "victimhood" do we expect? Ahem
|
|
|
Something strange going on with line 36 in the "opposed by" section giving links.. Thanks, I haven't implemented (or even seen!) all possible states. This Flag is Expired, which apparently breaks stuff. I'll add it to my list. Expired? What causes a flag to expire?
|
|
|
Thanks for this. If I am reading this correctly, I am doing an excellent job in both receiving merit and sending merit to worthy posts. One of the best in the forum.
|
|
|
@suchmoon - I believe what the others are trying to say is that YOU need evidence to back up your claim that people dealing with QuickSeller are at risk of losing their funds - you made that accusation yet show nothing in relative evidence to back up that people will lose their money to QuickSeller - your basing your claim solely on the fact that Quickseller made an accusation against someone.
Amazing that for just yesterday you bashed me for leaving negative feedback on someone who falsely (with no evidence) accused me and 5 other forum members of scamming him - and here you are trying to put one on Quickseller simply because he made an accusation against someone and you dont like it....
I didn't "bash" you, I just said that retaliatory red trust is frowned upon and tried to explain why I think so. You're free to do what you like. Quickseller's case is not comparable to yours. He didn't merely spam someone's trust feedback from a sockpuppet account, he created a frivolous scam accusation thread in retaliation to getting fired and has explicitly stated that he's aiming to cause business problems for Hhampuz. You're welcome to oppose the flag if your disagree. Your entire statement is a lie....
|
|
|
Update on the tax allegations? Shouldn't I be in jail by now?
Be careful, Vod might open up a frivolous Flag against you saying he thinks you are a high risk because you don’t pay your taxes, even though he has no evidence of this.
|
|
|
QS is interested
|
|
|
I doubt we'll ever see them back, no matter what happens, but yeah. I'm not happy.
Yeah, not likely at all. If people were going to get their funds back, this service (Blender, I guess) would not have treated their customers this way. It's just too damn easy for disreputable businesses to run away with money when SHTF and an irreversible currency with no built-in protection is involved. I just find it odd considering for how long blender were operating with, I assume, decent OPSEC. They could have at least given it a couple of weeks for users to withdraw.. Perhaps they are currently suffering the same faith as Bestmixer. No, they posted that Hhampuz returned excess signature campaign money.
|
|
|
Perhaps this is because certain IP addresses used to access your account match that of someone else of particular interest. Did you put a 1 pixile sized image in your signature in order to track that? How would you know the IP addresses of those who log in? Unless you are an alt of admin/mod. (That would be fucking nuts if quickseller was an alt of theymos) Obviously he's just making it up as he often does. Can we please ignore the trolls. It is not made up. I don’t think you want this specific issue addressed. No I do, please come out and say you are a global mod with proof please. It will make my day Global mods don’t have access to IP information. Only admins do. You can ask the Cookie Monster if there is any reason why his IP would sometimes show up as another forum member outside of because of using the same VPN or tor exit node. It might explain why he didn’t receive a PM.
|
|
|
Time to start making some phone calls
Hawaiian for me. Thanks. You aren't presenting any evidence he is likely to lose anyone money. Your beliefs are irrelevant.
[...]
suchmoon alleges: Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe
Due largely to the frivolous accusation against Hhampuz, I believe users dealing with Quickseller have a high risk of losing money, directly or indirectly, as a result of Quickseller's unpredictable and dangerous actions. That is ridiculous. If anyone needs an example of a frivolous flag, this is it. Also, FYI, reporting possible crimes is protected speech under libel laws, so your rational doesn’t hold water.
|
|
|
Some of my balances were indeed nonzero when the exchange went down for the last time..
I’m sorry for your loss, hopefully the amounts involved were not a lot of money to you.
|
|
|
You did lose money from Cryptsy? Correct?
|
|
|
not a lot of evidence.
Let me know when you have some, particularly if a victim of the alleged scam comes forward to accuse Hhampuz. Oh, so you think the scam accusation against Hhampuz is frivolous because the victim is potentially in jail, or is running from the authorities? Or do you have a problem with it because the scam accusation stands to reduce the income of some of your friends? It’s funny you didn’t feel this way when you were harassing many other companies over the years.
|
|
|
Maybe I was unclear. It sounds like you are opening the flag because you don’t like him, and not because you actually believe he is dangerous to deal with.
Further, I don’t see evidence he actually trades with anyone, which implies this is a smear attack against him.
|
|
|
Lots of ad-hominem and smear attacks and not a lot of evidence.
|
|
|
|