Are all the wealthy people linked to PEDO some how? Certainly Trump isn't!
Child-grooming DISNEY linked to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein’s PEDO island… #BoycottDisneyIn today’s sickening news, Substack’s Emerald Robinson asks the question, “ Why Was Ghislaine Maxwell Doing Fundraisers For Disney in 1985?” From the story: Photos of convicted pedophile Ghislaine Maxwell hosting an event called “Happy Family Disney Day” in 1985 have surfaced on the Internet today. It’s the ultimate PR nightmare.
It’s going to be very hard for Disney to claim that it’s not a pro-pedophile organization when it literally took donations from the world’s most infamous (still) living pedophile and “groomer to the stars.”En-volve.com also adds to this report in a story entitled, “ REVEALED: Disney Was Sending Kids To Epstein’s ‘Pedophile Island’ For ‘Snorkeling Trips’: For years, a Disney-owned and operated Caribbean cruise line was operating a ‘snorkeling tour’ for kids to Jeffrey Epstein’s renowned “Pedophile Island.”
For kids aged 8 and up, a day trip to Little St James, sometimes known as “Pedophile Island” by locals, cost $60 to $75.
The Disney Cruise did not warn parents that Epstein’s renowned island was owned by the notorious billionaire pedophile, describing it as “sun-soaked.” Rather, the literature spoke of “curious fish” that “dart back and forth in the beautiful blue water.”...  That's crazy Disney agreed to send kids to an island called "Pedophile Island", and even crazier they found parents that agreed to let their kids snorkel there. If it weren't for naturalnews.com I would never know this fact. Epsteins victims were all post-pubescent, so I wonder how the island got it's name? |
|
|
|
"I hope they don't find all the gold we buried in the red forest" |
|
|
|
The operation had a chance to become fast, but very small. Ukraine is the largest country in Europe, after Russia, it is much larger than Germany or France.
Your excuses for Russias military failures aren't true, and even if they were, they don't make sense - unless you're trying to say Putin was surprised at how large Ukraine was geographically after he tried to overthrow their government. If you include Crimea and Donbass, Ukraine is only slightly bigger than France.  If you don't consider Crimea and Donbass as part of Ukraine, France is actually larger. You are the victim of Russian propaganda. |
|
|
|
I think Russia plans to conduct this operation with limited personnel, emphasizing the dominant superiority in military equipment.
Ukraines army is about 240,000. Russia already has 160,000 in Ukraine and they're rotating in new conscripts. They have had to scale down their priorities and retreat from the west after losing several times more soldiers in just a month than the last Chechen war, which lasted 10 years. Maybe Putin wasn't paying attention in "How to invade a country" class when they covered overwhelming force. Russia is really good at fucking up and making what should be a quick invasion and turning it into a long drawn out blood bath. |
|
|
|
Something to ponder on. We know that Russia did not expect the Ukrainians to put up such stiff and determined resistance; this explains why units went in unprepared (many buoys were under the impression that they would be welcome and where only told they were going in 48-72 hours prior); why Russia limited the number of targets it hit, etc but now that things are obviously going ratshit why aren't the Russians deploying some of the capabilities they have but so appeared to have held back?
Seems like there's a decent chance one of the cliffs notes for this chapter of the Global History books will be about what corruption did to Russias Military and Putins miscalculation in relying on the reputation of his army rather than his actual army. Maybe Putin will be the new Potemkin. |
|
|
|
|
Nice job op on creating another spam fest with your throwaway account.
|
|
|
|
1. Why is the drone operator following this particular person, what is the purpose of his mission?
The drone is clearly focused on the the vehicles, zooming in and out on them, and the bicyclist is in the lower right corner most of the time. Only after the shot did the camera zoom in on that location. You are wishful thinking. The drone operator follows the person on the bike, sometimes being distracted and giving a more general view of the column of armored vehicles. Nonsense. The drone operator doesn't seem to have noticed where the bicyclist went - at the end the camera was zooming and panning trying to find what the Russians were firing at. And about 30 of the first 90 seconds (before the shot) the bicyclist wasn't even in the frame. You seem to be just lying for no other reason than to waste my time trying to disprove the shit you make up. You're trying to pull an owl on a globe by giving this video as evidence. I asked four questions about this video, and you essentially didn't even answer one. I hope you are sincerely mistaken, and not deliberately lying in this situation. When investigating any crime, including a military one, the first question to find the culprit sounds like "who can benefit from this?" If you do not ask this question, then you automatically become, at best, just a victim of propaganda. Your question had a false premise. The drone clearly wasn't following the soon to be murdered cyclist. Who are you trying to fool? |
|
|
|
In Bucha, this is definitely a staged fake of Ukrainian propaganda, filmed on professional film equipment. Here is a video of the cleansing of Bucha by the Ukrainian police, there, for the whole time, a corpse in military uniform flashed in the frame once, there are no civilian corpses there. The decision to provocation under a false flag was apparently made by Ukraine later. I think you're being fooled, just like when you were so sure that the reason Russia hadn't surrounded Kiev was because they wanted to let civilians escape and only a fool would think Kiev had any chance against the mighty Russian military. There are satellite images from March 9-11 that show many of the same bodies on the road in the exact same positions that were filmed after Russia retreated from Bucha a few days ago. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/04/world/europe/bucha-ukraine-bodies.htmlI think it is a fairly simple task for a medical examination to distinguish a fresh corpse from a corpse that has lain on the street for three weeks. Of course, not as simple as painting muddy pixels on satellite images, but nonetheless. Until RT tells you that the medical examiner is a Nazi or something. |
|
|
|
In Bucha, this is definitely a staged fake of Ukrainian propaganda, filmed on professional film equipment. Here is a video of the cleansing of Bucha by the Ukrainian police, there, for the whole time, a corpse in military uniform flashed in the frame once, there are no civilian corpses there. The decision to provocation under a false flag was apparently made by Ukraine later. I think you're being fooled, just like when you were so sure that the reason Russia hadn't surrounded Kiev was because they wanted to let civilians escape and only a fool would think Kiev had any chance against the mighty Russian military. There are satellite images from March 9-11 that show many of the same bodies on the road in the exact same positions that were filmed after Russia retreated from Bucha a few days ago.  https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/04/world/europe/bucha-ukraine-bodies.html |
|
|
|
RT is the actual source. So, Russia.  |
|
|
|
What you are doing is
He's defending Russia and blaming Ukraine and US. |
|
|
|
The Biden administration labeled parents who disagree with the Left's supporters (teachers unions), and with their radical ideology as domestic terrorists. But he didn't label them that because they disagreed, which is what you seem to be trying to imply in your misleading statement. The Obama administration helped push a false narrative that Trump was colluding with Russia, preventing his successor from being able to pursue his agenda. Obama went out of his way to not be involved in the investigation. That would be an authoritarian move if he did. Ironically, the reason so many Trump supporters consider the FBIs investigation "Obamas", is because they think that since Trump weaponized and got his hands on all sorts of DOJ/FBI cases, that means it's ok and normal. It's not. The president should go out of his way to avoid providing input on any case that he has any personal or political conflict with. And they do, for the most part. Except for Trump. Also, Trumps campaign was colluding with Russia. The chair of the campaign had recently made over $50 million for helping a pro-russia putin puppet become president of Ukraine. He was meeting with Russian intelligence officers, providing them with polling data, taking pitches about how Trump could help Putin get Ukraine. That's just one tiny bit of the bigger picture. There's a whole report on it, you should read it if you ever figure out a way to see past the "witch hunt, fake news, hoax" chants. https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/download^^Seriously, read it. I dare you. Trump did not go far enough in calling out the press. He called much of the press "fake news", while in reality, it would be more appropriate to call it "propaganda". Misleading. You're implying he didn't do more than call them fake news, which I'm sure you know is not the truth. He called them the "enemy of the people". He attacked them daily. He threatened to have them shut down, licenses revoked. And guess what, he calls things fake news that are actually very true. And he definitely knows they're true while he's calling them fake. Once he's convinced you the media is fake news, then you're going to believe everything else he says. It's working. State election laws/procedures were unilaterally changed without the ascent of the legislature of the various states, which is unconstitutional. It is part of Biden's agenda to prevent states from making their own election laws, as required by the constitution, and to prevent states from verifying voter eligibility via voter ID laws.
Another misleading statement. Here's what you're referring to: Article I, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators. From a common interpretation of the clause: Although the Elections Clause makes states primarily responsible for regulating congressional elections, it vests ultimate power in Congress. Congress may pass federal laws regulating congressional elections that automatically displace (“preempt”) any contrary state statutes, or enact its own regulations concerning those aspects of elections that states may not have addressed. The Framers of the Constitution were concerned that states might establish unfair election procedures or attempt to undermine the national government by refusing to hold elections for Congress. They empowered Congress to step in and regulate such elections as a self-defense mechanism. source |
|
|
|
During the conflict the military of Ukraine has received and keeps on receiving billions in weapons aid which is making it stronger than ever. At this point something should be clear even for Putin: US and Europe are not going to let Ukraine fall. If planes are needed, there will be planes, if tanks are needed, there will be tanks, if more intelligence is needed it will be provided. I don't think this is true at all. The virtue signaling from the US and Europe can only go so far. The West's response can be perfectly encapsulated here. Ukraine needs jets, and Poland was ready to send them if the U.S. was ready to provide military equipment to Poland in return; they chose not to. They instead got a kind poem from Nancy Pelosi, with solidarity of course. I'm sure Putin is trembling in fear. If the West cared about Ukraine, they would not wait for innocent civilians to perish, with dead bodies laying amongst the rubble of imploded buildings. What ever spare change the U.S. and Europe can put together isn't anything meaningful. Ukraine needs military equipment. They've been provided minimal amounts from some European countries and it isn't enough. Did you know so far, just from the US Ukraine has received: Five Mi-17 helicopters; 1,400 Stinger anti-aircraft systems; 4,600 Javelin, 1,000 light anti-armor weapons, and 6,000 AT-4 anti-armor systems; 100 Tactical Unmanned Aerial Systems; 300 grenade launchers, 5,000 rifles, 1,000 pistols, 600 machine guns, and 600 shotguns; Over 60 million rounds of small arms ammunition and grenade launcher and mortar rounds; 25,000 sets of body armor; Four counter-artillery and counter-unmanned aerial system tracking radars; And that list is 2 weeks out of date. They've sent lots more since. In total over $2 billion. But Pelosi read a poem, and Biden said no to the fighter jets (and provided a rational explanation why). So you're take away is "Biden won't send anything but pocket change and Pelosi read a poem instead". You've got Biden Derangement Syndrome. |
|
|
|
the provider insists that there was no malfunction during the specified rounds
This is when you should have payed the player. You asked the provider to investigate, they investigated. It's been over a month now. If wazden hasn't found anything, you need to pay the player. It's impossible to prove the player did not cheat, but if they did, I would expect that your casino wouldn't be the only site they decided to cheat on, and Wazden would have reports from other casinos if they didn't notice themselves. The fact that most of your points and 'questions' for the provider are irrelevant make me think you're just looking for any excuse not to pay. |
|
|
|
In the US, the authoritarian left
No objective, rational person can support Trump while claiming the left is "Authoritarian". It's not "the left" that's launched an attack on the free press, or undermining the election process. You don't have to worry about Biden trying to get the DOJ or the Pentagon to help him stay in power if he loses the next election or fail to respect the peaceful transition of power. The Office of President comes with Authority. Just because you don't agree with the party that currently has that Authority, doesn't make them "Authoritarian". |
|
|
|
.........................
In the world today, that right belongs only to the people who actually live in there.
..................
And the people in Donetsk People's Republic and the Luhansk People's Republic have voted to break away, and have the own country. Zelenskyy, Putin, you, I or anyone else has no say in the matter. Let me remind you coercion is not legal. Putin fabricated the referendum. What are you talking about? .................. And the over 16000 deaths in the last 8 years? How the Nazis defend   Tash, We've been over this. If you're so concerned about Nazis, then it should be the ones running the Donetsk People's Republic, not the ones in Ukraine that have no political power. From your own link: Russian ethnic and imperialist nationalism has shaped the official ideology of the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics.[172] Far-right nationalist groups have played a greater role on the pro-Russian side of the conflict than on the Ukrainian side, especially at the beginning. Leaders of the Donetsk People's Militia are closely linked to the neo-Nazi party Russian National Unity (RNU) led by Alexander Barkashov, which has recruited many fighters.[172][173][174] A former member of RNU, Pavel Gubarev, was founder of the Donbas People's Militia and first "governor" of the Donetsk People's Republic.[172][175] RNU is particularly linked to the Russian Orthodox Army, a religious ultranationalist unit which is part of the Donetsk People's Militia.[174][176] Other neo-Nazi units include the 'Rusich', 'Svarozhich' and 'Ratibor' battalions, which have Slavic swastikas on their badges. |
|
|
|
And this is where hypocrisy lies, people complain how the other side calls it "special operation" yet are so eager to say NATO "intervenes" or sets up no-fly zone. You can't complain about BS from one side only to spit out your own BS. Both of these mean the same thing, attacking and thus starting a war with Russia.
The complaints are Russia making it a crime to call the war a war. Look at all those media outlets that had to close up shop and leave the country because they were afraid if they reported on the war truthfully they would be arrested or worse. Don't you think that's fucked up? Wouldn't it be nice if Russian news was independent of the government and the people were free to disagree with Putin? |
|
|
|
just want to pump this up to warning someone that are still believing in Badger
Is she still active at bitvest with mod flag? |
|
|
|
What was wrong with Trump
Well he didn't give a shit about anyone that criticized him, which was most of the country. He lied constantly. Not "oh politicians all lie" lie, he would lie about the dumbest shit, almost every single day. From his inauguration lies, to the lies about the election he lost, and every day in between. It never stopped. Remember the time he took a sharpie and changed the projection of a hurricane because he told a state to prepare that wasn't in the path of the storm? Over the 4 years his authoritarian tendencies became more and more obvious. His treated Western allies like shit while heaping praise on guys like Putin, Kim Jong and Duterte. He tried to use the Military to cease voting machines after it became clear he lost. He got a bunch of state level politicians to submit fraudulent electoral votes in the states he lost, and then there was the attack on the capital. The guys isn't compatible with democracy. There are plenty of candidates I'd prefer over Biden, but Biden is a hell of an upgrade from Trump. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
