I wonder if Bitmain's Chinese Patented method of using Merkle Collisions (I do like that name better...) lists your work and that of the ASICBoost Authors as Prior Art? I would hope that the Chinese Patent process would at least require mention of that...
I don't have any information about Bitmain's patent, except rumors that it is copy of ASICBoost. Found it... Surprised no one else bothered to Google it... https://www.google.com/patents/WO2015077378A1?cl=enThe fact that it lists Timo Tobias HANKE, Sergio Demian Lerner as the Authors suggests to me that Bitmain bought the rights to it (for in China). Hmm. The Plot thickens. Filed Nov 19, 2014 What you found is Timo & Sergio original patent. Not Bitmain's patent. The important date is the priority date: Nov 19, 2013 The date the provisional patent was filed.
|
|
|
I wonder if Bitmain's Chinese Patented method of using Merkle Collisions (I do like that name better...) lists your work and that of the ASICBoost Authors as Prior Art? I would hope that the Chinese Patent process would at least require mention of that...
I don't have any information about Bitmain's patent, except rumors that it is copy of ASICBoost.
|
|
|
btw ck, what's solo.ckpool.org position or how the miners can vote? same question regarding kano ckpool
|
|
|
To be clear are you saying it's the pools job to signal?
Yes? It's a combination of giving those miners who want to signal the option to do so, and as a way to represent the remainder that have no opinion on the matter. Basically I'm saying a pool should either give miners a choice, or have a position. Pools are the miners' voice and the miners are the only ones who can reliably activate substantial change. People want to either choose a pool based on what it's signalling or want the pool they're already loyal to to give them the option of signalling what they want. The fact that there are lots of miners that choose pools only due to profit doesn't change the fact that pools are the ones with the actual power to effect change. Pools should be proactive and ahead of what is happening in the bitcoin development space even if the miners are less inclined to be so. Lack of more concrete messages from the pools is the reason garbage like User Activated Soft Fork and much worse, change of PoW are being bantered around. I understand there is potentially conflict since you're representing bitmain who have a (very unpopular) position of sorts, but you have said you're an independent entity. What about miners that want to actively abstain from choosing a side in this scaling war? Those miners can choose this pool as a way to signal their discontent from the scaling war and both sides.
|
|
|
We're excited to announce the launch of ConnectBTC.com The first pool developed by Bitmain's R&Dcenter in Israel. ConnectBTC pool is developed and operated by Bitmaintech Israel, Bitmain’s first R&D center outside of China, working to innovate pooled mining services, and deliver advanced capabilities to bitcoin mining operations of all sizes. Being the newest product out of Bitmaintech Israel’s lab, the ConnectBTC pool puts the latest in pooled mining services directly in the hands of miners. ConnectBTC’s pool provides highly detailed real-time information and analytics to miners, and gives mining operators a better understanding of their performance, without having to develop custom internal monitoring tools. Signup to enjoy:- 106% PPS
- Real time information
- Automated creation of workers, no limitation of number of workers
- Downloadable excel sheets to keep track of historical data
Visit our website at connectbtc.comJoin the conversation on Telegram https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEI1Msq45F-6F0FGLgFacebook https://www.facebook.com/connectbtcpool/Twitter https://twitter.com/connectbtcpoolemail info@connectbtc.com Congratulations Gadi and team
|
|
|
Another exciting project from Israel. Alon and team, good luck! You deserve it. Amazing project.
|
|
|
Not meaning to thread-crap, but Guy offered to help (he remains the most helpful person in the crypto community, btw). Thanks to the whole Spondoolies crew for building the SP30 and SP20. My impression has been that second-hand demand for them is still high, even today. I run HashPlex, a mining company in WA. We're looking for an M&A partner to get to scale (we're sorta stuck at 1MW with 7+ on tap). Everything we've built was custom-designed and built from the ground up (no retrofit jankery) with top-shelf new equipment (SquareD I-Line, etc.). The evap system consumes 8000 gallons of water in 12 hours and drops intake temps 25F. 100A / phase, 3-phase, switched, fused, current logging PDUs. 650,000 CFM of filtered air per MW. Lots more. If you're interested in scooping up a datacenter for pennies on the dollar or working out a long-term lease etc. get in touch. We'll probably close a deal in the next couple months. Some mining pr0n to make things more fun: Approved.
|
|
|
awesome
Good to see you are still around Guy. Happy new year !
|
|
|
Bah!
Unmineable POS coin pump and dump.
That was my first impression too, but I believe that the proposed Spectre protocol for Bitcoin is completely different from the new cryptocurrency SPECTRE based on Shadowcash. Correct. There is no relation between the two
|
|
|
What is your take on SPECTRE? awesome
|
|
|
Coming soon
|
|
|
Any updates on new hardware being released ?
In Two Weeks. *ducks*
|
|
|
|