That s what puzzles me. If Factom s really that good and this potentil s been recognized by several great names in the industry, how come XMR volume s 5x Factom or even more. It s gotta be related to the Polo margin lending which makes people keep their Factoids on the exchange, lending them for peanuts which supresses the price and consequently volume. Exodus s gonna change that big time and then we ll see the real market value of Factom. I ve got no other sane explanation.
I think best scenario if is Poloniex goes bust today or tomorrow. That'll burn some factoids at least from all the lazy holders not having used paper-mill. Thin out the herd so to speak Oh boy!  But no, it wouldn't burn Factoids. If Poloniex would go down it would be because of a hack for example and in such a scenario it's likely that the hacker would be Factoid-Millionair and the price would crash. Another scenario would be some kind of bankruptcy out of another reason or an inside-job. But as long as they don't lose their keys to the cold-wallet for FCT - nothing would get burned. What they could do: Factomizing each and every trade that is done on Polo - THAT would burn Factoids. ;-) |
|
|
|
That s what puzzles me. If Factom s really that good and this potentil s been recognized by several great names in the industry, how come XMR volume s 5x Factom or even more. It s gotta be related to the Polo margin lending which makes people keep their Factoids on the exchange, lending them for peanuts which supresses the price and consequently volume. Exodus s gonna change that big time and then we ll see the real market value of Factom. I ve got no other sane explanation.
The question why XMR has more volume than Factom: It gets more attention. One reason is: The idea behind is easy to understand. XMR is a cryptocurrency with a focus on anonymity and it might very well be that it's the one with the highest potential since there are a lot of doubts about ZCash. Factom: Many don't understand what it is about. We, who are kind of focused on this and following since some time believe that the whole Crypto-space should react on all the good news, but I believe that just a minority even is aware of it. They don't look into this thread, they don't look into the Factom-Sub-reddit, they don't follow it on Twitter. And if one has no overview about this - it's not possible to understand how much potential Factom has. But, is that positive or negative if we focus on the question how future prices may look like? It's positive, because it's potential. More and more people will pay attention and more and more people will understand it's potential. And since some months it even became obvious that more and more people have an eye on this. And what also may be significant: Since many people don't like the GUI, don't have the patience to read the how-to's - they hold it on Poloniex. Once there is a more "easy-to-use-Factom-wallet" plus Exodus, that also might change. Another important element re miners. Almost all high volume coins on Polo re mineable. Miners create volume, buy/sell/trade. Factom does not have that element. Yes, right! Plus: Since Miners are very interested in high prices it's likely that many of them do something for it - some kind of PR and Miners often have some connections and what I believe is true for a lot of Coins on Polo: It's likely that it's Miners who manipulate the prices up. I'm very surprised about ETH for example. The price is down in comparison to some months ago. But if we focus on what happened since May: - DAO (which was a bad and rushed out idea even without all what followed - and maybe even shady) - Hack - Chain-split --> Ethereum-classic - plus constantly other concerning news like this one, just days ago: Has Ethereum Just Forked by Accident? Some Transactions May Disappear
https://cointelegraph.com/news/has-ethereum-just-forked-by-accident-some-transactions-may-disappearIn my opinion there would be enough reason that it would have gone down to maybe $400 M by marketcap over the time, but it's still at $800 M. And that must have a reason. Btw, this is something what I say since a long time: "Still, of course, large complexity brings more errors, and this project is extremely sensitive to any kinds of bugs." Monero and it's price is more understandable in my opinion. Seems to have some real potential when it's about what they want it to be. |
|
|
|
That s what puzzles me. If Factom s really that good and this potentil s been recognized by several great names in the industry, how come XMR volume s 5x Factom or even more. It s gotta be related to the Polo margin lending which makes people keep their Factoids on the exchange, lending them for peanuts which supresses the price and consequently volume. Exodus s gonna change that big time and then we ll see the real market value of Factom. I ve got no other sane explanation.
The question why XMR has more volume than Factom: It gets more attention. One reason is: The idea behind is easy to understand. XMR is a cryptocurrency with a focus on anonymity and it might very well be that it's the one with the highest potential since there are a lot of doubts about ZCash. Factom: Many don't understand what it is about. We, who are kind of focused on this and following since some time believe that the whole Crypto-space should react on all the good news, but I believe that just a minority even is aware of it. They don't look into this thread, they don't look into the Factom-Sub-reddit, they don't follow it on Twitter. And if one has no overview about this - it's not possible to understand how much potential Factom has. But, is that positive or negative if we focus on the question how future prices may look like? It's positive, because it's potential. More and more people will pay attention and more and more people will understand it's potential. And since some months it even became obvious that more and more people have an eye on this. And what also may be significant: Since many people don't like the GUI, don't have the patience to read the how-to's - they hold it on Poloniex. Once there is a more "easy-to-use-Factom-wallet" plus Exodus, that also might change. |
|
|
|
yea everybody is waiting for the M2.
I hope it comes out within 2 or 3 weeks otherwise it wont be for this year.
To have a good pump I think it would be better to have the release before or after the holidays.
Last year it was this way: It launched in early October and didn't get much attention. Low price and low volume. 2 2/1 months later things changed. First there was Azure and right after Factoids were listed in China (Yuanbao) and the price skyrocket. Maybe we will see a similar pattern this year - on a higher level of course, because now there is zero doubt left what they are able to do. |
|
|
|
When exchange in market bitrex ?
Lykke is it's own exchange: https://lykke.comThat doesn't mean LKK won't ever be on other exchanges as well, but it would be a little bit too paradox if the Lykke-team would ask other exchanges to list Lykke-shares. ;-) shares of the stock exchange are often listed on another exchanges  Yes! And I have no doubt that it will come. But Lykke is a young project and what can be bad in Crypto once a project becomes a Poloniex-gamble: Community-pressure and constant demands to do something for the price etc. It would attract another kind of Crypto-Investors/Speculators while the team is very focused on fundamentals and basebuilding in a lot of ways, also on business-side etc. I believe it's a smart strategy to do this step by step and also to attract more long-term-oriented Investors first. It's also kind of "base-building". But sure, I personally would love to see this on other exchanges as well, because it would give a boost when it's about attention - Poloniex more than Bittrex. But maybe the team believes that it's too early. But what I know is: This is much bigger than it might seem (also much more people are working on it) and they have a lot of connections. It won't be boring. With other words: I don't know exactly what will happen but I know it won't be boring. |
|
|
|
Everyone can see there is a new handle being formed between 260-330k we will stay there untill m2 or after m2 when more big companies will join fct.
And oh boy i cant even say where it will stop but deff much higher then eth's run
So people keep selling ur fct i would love to take them selllllll give me moar
I believe there is some up-potential before M2, because: 1) If I'm right, Tiana Laurence said in the CryptoShow last night that the Gates Foundation also will push out an announcement about the partnership. (she didn't say that it will be before M2 of course - but something will come) 2) Blockchain authentication company Factom Inc. will demonstrate an integrated physical document verification and authentication solution called dLoc next week.http://siliconangle.com/blog/2016/11/22/smartrac-launches-document-authentication-solution-using-factoms-blockchain/3) In a few weeks there will be M2 (and the market will begin to anticipate it) 4) Exodus right after M2 (and the market will begin to anticipate it) 5) All what is needed is a stable or even dropping Bitcoin. And because of the blocksize-problem: Mempool - new ATH today: https://blockchain.info/de/charts/mempool-count?timespan=1week...even that could happen. Yep u got it but dont forget to buy more fct if u have some spare money left . We can see the devs dont care about current price thats a confirmation it can only go up The devs might not care but don't forget about crooked POLONIEX and there margin trading scams that manipulate the price day in and day out. They're corrupt to the bone! almost 3 million factoids are help at polo... what would happen if people withdrew 1/3 or 2/3 into their own wallets? how many of the factoids do you all believe to be constantly loaned out or how much downward pressure do the 3 million factoids stored at polo create? That's another very interesting point: Most likely there is also some pressure on the price because too many don't like the current GUI etc and hold their Factoids on Polo. With M2 that might change. Plus Exodus will implement Factoids. By the way: Where is visible how much FCT is on Polo? the 1st address on the rich list is believed to be polo Okay, it's possible. Another possibility would be the Factom-foundation. But since that address has a lot of deposits - Poloniex could be more likely. No out-transactions btw. http://explorer.factom.org/address/FA25J1QymXgkk5FwLfu7dePKsK1CxZM4saLMBJYRWvwoDp8WSx9y |
|
|
|
Everyone can see there is a new handle being formed between 260-330k we will stay there untill m2 or after m2 when more big companies will join fct.
And oh boy i cant even say where it will stop but deff much higher then eth's run
So people keep selling ur fct i would love to take them selllllll give me moar
I believe there is some up-potential before M2, because: 1) If I'm right, Tiana Laurence said in the CryptoShow last night that the Gates Foundation also will push out an announcement about the partnership. (she didn't say that it will be before M2 of course - but something will come) 2) Blockchain authentication company Factom Inc. will demonstrate an integrated physical document verification and authentication solution called dLoc next week.http://siliconangle.com/blog/2016/11/22/smartrac-launches-document-authentication-solution-using-factoms-blockchain/3) In a few weeks there will be M2 (and the market will begin to anticipate it) 4) Exodus right after M2 (and the market will begin to anticipate it) 5) All what is needed is a stable or even dropping Bitcoin. And because of the blocksize-problem: Mempool - new ATH today: https://blockchain.info/de/charts/mempool-count?timespan=1week...even that could happen. Yep u got it but dont forget to buy more fct if u have some spare money left . We can see the devs dont care about current price thats a confirmation it can only go up The devs might not care but don't forget about crooked POLONIEX and there margin trading scams that manipulate the price day in and day out. They're corrupt to the bone! almost 3 million factoids are help at polo... what would happen if people withdrew 1/3 or 2/3 into their own wallets? how many of the factoids do you all believe to be constantly loaned out or how much downward pressure do the 3 million factoids stored at polo create? That's another very interesting point: Most likely there is also some pressure on the price because too many don't like the current GUI etc and hold their Factoids on Polo. With M2 that might change. Plus Exodus will implement Factoids. By the way: Where is visible how much FCT is on Polo? |
|
|
|
Everyone can see there is a new handle being formed between 260-330k we will stay there untill m2 or after m2 when more big companies will join fct.
And oh boy i cant even say where it will stop but deff much higher then eth's run
So people keep selling ur fct i would love to take them selllllll give me moar
I believe there is some up-potential before M2, because: 1) If I'm right, Tiana Laurence said in the CryptoShow last night that the Gates Foundation also will push out an announcement about the partnership. (she didn't say that it will be before M2 of course - but something will come) 2) Blockchain authentication company Factom Inc. will demonstrate an integrated physical document verification and authentication solution called dLoc next week.http://siliconangle.com/blog/2016/11/22/smartrac-launches-document-authentication-solution-using-factoms-blockchain/3) In a few weeks there will be M2 (and the market will begin to anticipate it) 4) Exodus right after M2 (and the market will begin to anticipate it) 5) All what is needed is a stable or even dropping Bitcoin. And because of the blocksize-problem: Mempool - new ATH today: https://blockchain.info/de/charts/mempool-count?timespan=1week...even that could happen. Yep u got it but dont forget to buy more fct if u have some spare money left . We can see the devs dont care about current price thats a confirmation it can only go up The devs might not care but don't forget about crooked POLONIEX and there margin trading scams that manipulate the price day in and day out. They're corrupt to the bone! It's normal that there is manipulation and Margin Trading is one tool of course. But what's even more a fact: For every sell there is a buy and that's the same with Margin Trading and shorting etc. I believe there is at least one important difference between investing and gambling. Gambling is more betting on short-term. I don't mean that critical, because sometimes I do that as well, but it's very risky. But Investing - that is about the tendency of the price over time and as reflection of real value. Market-manipulations don't play much of a role for that. It's much more predictable because one can analyze a project as deep as possible and try to find out the tendency. And Factom: One of a very few pearls. They prove it again and again. Btw, great blog-post (and that guy even quoted me): Factom. Is. Awesome. And This is Why
https://medium.com/@maxmiddelman/factom-is-awesome-and-this-is-why-c3c4780211db#.91myr4j64 |
|
|
|
Like predicted: NeuCoin Project update: Foundation to cease supporting NeuCoin services, destroy its remaining coins and dissolve itselfNearly 3 years after the NeuCoin Project was born, the founding team and the NeuCoin Growth Foundation have concluded that the Project’s plan to create a leading consumer-driven digital currency based on the premise of distributing tokens to all participants that help drive growth and adoption -- consumers, service providers, distribution partners, miners, developers, etc -- has proven unfeasible, at least with the current team, structure and resources. (...) http://forum.neucoin.org/t/neucoin-project-update-foundation-to-cease-supporting-neucoin-services-destroy-its-remaining-coins-and-dissolve-itself/2770 Edit: Kind of interesting/revealing is that not even such a disaster-update leads to a higher volume than currently 0.23833293 BTC on Bittrex. |
|
|
|
Everyone can see there is a new handle being formed between 260-330k we will stay there untill m2 or after m2 when more big companies will join fct.
And oh boy i cant even say where it will stop but deff much higher then eth's run
So people keep selling ur fct i would love to take them selllllll give me moar
I believe there is some up-potential before M2, because: 1) If I'm right, Tiana Laurence said in the CryptoShow last night that the Gates Foundation also will push out an announcement about the partnership. (she didn't say that it will be before M2 of course - but something will come) 2) Blockchain authentication company Factom Inc. will demonstrate an integrated physical document verification and authentication solution called dLoc next week.http://siliconangle.com/blog/2016/11/22/smartrac-launches-document-authentication-solution-using-factoms-blockchain/3) In a few weeks there will be M2 (and the market will begin to anticipate it) 4) Exodus right after M2 (and the market will begin to anticipate it) 5) All what is needed is a stable or even dropping Bitcoin. And because of the blocksize-problem: Mempool - new ATH today: https://blockchain.info/de/charts/mempool-count?timespan=1week...even that could happen. |
|
|
|
Does anyone have questions for Tiana they want answered on air?
—How do you see Factom-the-protocol evolving beyond M2 and M3? Is it a matter of developing products and services on the base-layer tech, or do you see that base layer evolving as well down the line? —Can you imagine, theoretically, a point in the future where all data has full integrity? Or do you think there will always be a pull toward manipulation by those with vested interest? —Factom’s Chief Scientist, Brian Deery, has said that it takes about as long to wrap your head around FCT as it does BTC. Why do you think this is the case? The details of the tech aside, do you think there are general conceptual hurdles that prevent a quick understanding of Factom? —Do you see any potentially negative consequences to large-scale blockchain adoption? Can blockchain tech be used for evil, or is it always on the side of good? I also asked these questions of Paul in the Q+A for CryptoCompare, so if Tiana's unable to get to them, no problem. Anyway ... thanks for soliciting from the peanut gallery, Brian. Also, when/where will Tiana be appearing? Great questions! Both (including Brian Deery) are live now - here: http://thecryptoshow.com/listenlive/ |
|
|
|
I have ANS,how can I convert them to ANC?Will it happen automatically when I send them to my wallet? I entered priv keys in ico website and then in web wallet but web wallet still not showing any ANS or ANC
same here, i already claim and still waiting my ANS on web wallet dunno when will receive it He already said that they do that manually and it's also said on the site after claiming. Something like "you'll receive your ANS within a week". How else can it be done manually? I have input all my details like priv keys in ICO dashboard and then manually input the same in web wallet.Now how can I manually sync it? Good question. I have the same problem. Claimed it 2 days ago, but obviously there is a problem with the web-wallet at least on Mac? Are you also on Mac? Looks like there is a misunderstanding about the meaning of "manually" here: What len01 means, is, that the antshares team sends tokens to the address you claimed your ICO share with. This is not an automated process, there is somebody typing it in by hand. This is what is meant by "manually". If your wallet isn't synced and you want to check whether your funds have been transferred already, the blockexplorer is to be found at antcha.in. I understand it more like a sarcastic joke: "how can I manually sync it?" Because many (including me) seem to have the problem, that the wallet doesn't sync. And the problem with it is that the private key is not cold any more. |
|
|
|
I have ANS,how can I convert them to ANC?Will it happen automatically when I send them to my wallet? I entered priv keys in ico website and then in web wallet but web wallet still not showing any ANS or ANC
same here, i already claim and still waiting my ANS on web wallet dunno when will receive it He already said that they do that manually and it's also said on the site after claiming. Something like "you'll receive your ANS within a week". How else can it be done manually? I have input all my details like priv keys in ICO dashboard and then manually input the same in web wallet.Now how can I manually sync it? Good question. I have the same problem. Claimed it 2 days ago, but obviously there is a problem with the web-wallet at least on Mac? Are you also on Mac? |
|
|
|
When exchange in market bitrex ?
Lykke is it's own exchange: https://lykke.comThat doesn't mean LKK won't ever be on other exchanges as well, but it would be a little bit too paradox if the Lykke-team would ask other exchanges to list Lykke-shares. ;-) |
|
|
|
This is so interesting ... really hope there's a video of the presentation.  Yep, same here! There is a lack of attention on this! A video could change that. |
|
|
|
Sadly my own technical knowledge is that limited that I can't say much about it. LykkeX most likely knows much more (but he isn't there right now) and the Core-Dev's of course. Are you a Coder? I've seen that you've discussed in the thread you linked to. Do you think it's impossible? Yes and no. But I ve too less skin in that game yet. I d guess atomic swaps (change) will work if both assets are in a double block chain where one asset might be pegged to dynamically and the other one should ideally be bitcoin, but have never seen this be realized yet or tryied coding as well... Sadly I've never written a line of code. Wish I would have those skills! ;-) But thanks for the info that there is a thread - I've just posted it there: |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
