It's a known fact that casinos make money by having a built-in advantage over players, called the "house edge." This means that, over time, the casino will usually make more money than it pays out in winnings. But, it's not true that casinos pay winners with losers' money.
Most casinos have their investors who supply the money for the casino to operate. They're usually wealthy folks who believe they can make a profit by investing in a casino. The same goes for online casinos, which are also businesses that need investors who supply them with funds they can use to run their operations.

For me, it's just too risky. I mean, spending 1.4 million dollars to bet on a 1.01 odds? That's crazy. The potential winnings aren't worth it, in my opinion. But hey, everyone's got their own risk tolerance and opinions. I guess it just depends on how much you're willing to risk for a chance at a big payout. But it's important to consider all possible outcomes, not just the potential reward. And you better have a plan if things don't go your way.

Yeah, you're right on point that 2FA is a common security measure, but it doesn't really work with non-custodial wallets. With non-custodial wallets, you're in charge of your own private keys and access to your funds, so 2FA wouldn't really add much. Instead, many desktop wallets support using a hardware device for an extra layer of security.

On the other hand, custodial wallets, like the ones you find on exchanges, are controlled by a third party and they hold your private keys for you. That's why you see 2FA used more on custodial wallets, to add an extra layer of protection for your account.

It sounds like you've had some bad experiences with people who wanted you to help them invest in crypto but didn't put in the effort themselves. I get it, it's frustrating when people are lazy and expect you to do everything for them. But, you know, everyone's different and maybe they just had different priorities or circumstances. Everyone's experiences with crypto can be pretty different depending on where they live and what resources they have. I don't mean to be a jerk but it sounds like you're being a little judgmental about their situation. It might help you look at them more sympathetically if you knew that a lot of people around the world don't have access to basic resources or education, and are out of options. Sometimes they're just trying to find a way out because even selling their labor isn't an option.

To block members from sending you private messages on bitcointalk.org, go to your "Profile" and then to "Personal Message Options" (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;sa=pmprefs). On that page, you will find the "Ignorelist" feature, where you can add the members you wish to block.

It's only fair that criminals get what's coming to them for their actions, but unfortunately, life isn't always fair, and neither is the legal system. Especially when politics are involved.

The Ulbricht case involved a significant amount of political influence and it appears that politics also play a role in the SBF case. However, the difference is that last time the politics worked against the accused, this time it looks like it might be working for him.

I get your point and I agree that there are certainly some unscrupulous individuals out there who may use such drastic actions. However, I still don't see how online casinos are fundamentally different from brick-and-mortar ones in this regard. Let's say that I am the CEO of a company that runs a chain of casinos across the country. Should I be afraid to walk down the street because of all the losers who lost their life savings in one of my casinos? Well, maybe I should. But I am still required by law to publish my personal information in public records as the CEO of the company. Why should an online casino be any different?

The OP has already admitted creating the accounts in question, which makes them his alt accounts. The act of exchanging merits between these accounts and participating in a contest with multiple accounts constitutes cheating. Should we believe that he no longer has control over these accounts? There is no evidence, such as log records of password changes, to suggest that these accounts have been transferred to other individuals.

He actually offered a constructive suggestion: "sign the address", but you chose to disregard it and belittle those whose opinions you disagree with. This raises questions about your credibility and character. Can you at least try to communicate like an adult?

False accusations are simply refuted with proper evidence. It's not that hard.

Here is a quote that I find particularly amusing:


This quote is a playful and humorous way of expressing the idea that taking risks is a part of life, and that by not taking risks, one might miss out on potential opportunities. It's suggesting that it's important to take risks and try new things in life, to discover what the fate holds for you.

That's an interesting point of view, but I think they're wrong. Yes, online gambling is more accessible and potentially more addictive now, but the same can be said for any activity that can be done online and from the comfort of your home. If you have an addictive personality and a tendency toward compulsive behavior, then yes, gambling online can be dangerous. But if you're aware of your tendencies and take steps to protect yourself (perhaps by setting limits on how much money you spend or by only gambling with money that's disposable), then there's no reason why it can't be as safe and enjoyable as playing at a land-based casino. Plus, with the advancement of technology, there are now tools and resources available to help prevent compulsive gambling. It's all about finding that balance and being responsible with your choices. In my opinion, it's not the medium that's the problem; it's the individual's inability to practice self-control. And, when you play at a land-based casino, it's much harder to say no when you see an opportunity for instant gratification, imho.

I don't know. I still believe that transparency and accountability are important principles for any business, and hiding behind anonymity can breed mistrust and suspicion. While it's true that there is always a potential for danger when personal information is known, the fact is that these types of attacks and threats are relatively rare. And I still disagree that the owners of cryptocurrency casinos would be in any more danger than the owners of traditional casinos and other physical businesses. And besides, we have laws and police to protect them, it's not like we live in the wild west.

$5 wrench attack on the casino owner? For what? It's not like they're walking around with the casino's entire bankroll in their pocket. And let's be real, all physical business owners handling large sums of cash are in the same boat.

And what is encircled in red in this image? Isn't that the deviation Poker Player was talking about in the first post?



Royse77 says that this happens often in his Telegram, but I looked through dozens of screenshots on the forum and elsewhere on the Internet and didn't find it anywhere. There is probably some logical explanation, so I'm interested in your opinion on what could be the cause.

---

Sure, why not. If you have skills why not use them. 

I would just like to echo this. It's important to keep in mind that online communication can be easily manipulated and fabricated. It's also understandable that you have doubts about the credibility of the screenshot evidence, whether it was fabricated or not, and about the existence of the supposed client. The moment I read the alleged communication, I had my doubts about its credibility. But, even if the screenshots were genuine, there is no way to confirm the identity of the person on the other end. It could even have been that disgraced user naim027, who is still hanging around on the forum and has a history of some weird stuff like that.

In my opinion, it's important to understand the house edge for each game you play. Different casinos and different rules of the games can affect the house edge, and it may vary for different games and different variations of the same game.

I was once unpleasantly surprised when I realized that a game I had thought to be a simple variation of blackjack was actually much more complex than that. It turned out that the house edge of the variation was higher than regular blackjack, and I lost quite badly by not knowing how the game played before sitting down to play it! That's why it's important to read up on the rules of any game you play so that you can understand the odds and make an informed decision about whether or not it's worth your time.

I agree that betting on any outcome carries a level of risk. It's important for individuals to conduct their own research and make informed decisions before placing a bet. It's also important to be cautious when taking advice from others, as they may not have access to reliable information or may not have the best interests in mind. I don't like to blindly follow advice without considering the source or trying to understand why they're making the recommendation.

Yes, that is generally how slot games work. To play a slot game, you typically select your bet amount, press the spin button, and then the reels will spin. The combination of symbols that land on the reels will determine whether you win or lose.

I'm always confused when I hear someone claim to follow some techniques or strategies while they play slots. Slots are games of chance, and the outcome of each spin is determined by a random number generator. There are not strategies that will increase your chances of winning.

A crypto gambling platform that accepts only its own tokens and offers new, unique, and addictive games could drive demand for the token, making it more valuable. However, this depends on factors such as the platform's user base, marketing, and overall adoption of the token by the crypto community. A platform with a large user base could drive demand for its tokens, but if there are only a few users on the platform, it may not be enough to drive up demand for the token.

If it is a new platform, I think it makes more sense that it accepts a wide range of popular coins and tokens. The more options, the better. This will help to bring in more users, and hopefully it will be a self-sustaining cycle. It is likely that the platform will attract users who want to play games with their favorite cryptocurrency, but this may not be enough to drive up demand for the token.

And how about you stop doing those stupid things that annoy others, so we don't get annoyed in the first place?
What are you trying to accomplish with this, anyway?