I know you are foreign and its tough for you to follow plain English but the feedback I left had RISKED BTC at 1000. I didn't risk BTC therefore untrue. I deleted that and put up feedback that has no risked BTC but is very true.
I find that hilarious coming from a Yank foreigner that can't read, write or speak actual English. Also, why did you enter 1000 in the first place? You genuinely sound retarded. I'm locking this thread since you can't stay on topic. |
|
|
|
You guys are paying this ponzi operators rent. Hope its worth screwing over hundreds of people so you can make a little bit of "investment"
He's gone
Do you ever go to a casino? How is playing against the house the same thing? In a ponzi you know people are getting screwed. The larger the ponzi; the more people lose money. Use your brain. Your money is gone because of greed. |
|
|
|
|
You guys are paying this ponzi operators rent. Hope its worth screwing over hundreds of people so you can make a little bit of "investment"
He's gone
|
|
|
|
Do you have any jerky available for sale? How many ounces roughly are the $15 ribeye steaks?
Lastly, do you still accept BTC as payment? I don't see it listed as an option on the site.
Thanks!
Yes , I have teriyaki jerky 3.5 oz for BTC equivalent of 8 USD. Shipping for jerky is usually 2 USD. For one packet . Obviously less for increased amounts. Paul a Delicious! I'll take two packs. Let me know details |
|
|
|
Nauro worth his weight in gold for these awesome predictions. I will keep donating for winners  |
|
|
|
I'm not trying to fool anyone. It's 100% transparent, 100% honest in the fact that it's a ponzi scheme, there is a risk of not getting paid out when the week ends. But hey, there's always next week! The users assume the risks by depositing into weeklyponzi. Many users have made a good profit in the last day or so. I don't know what exactly you're trying to prove by creating a thread such as this. There's no mystery surrounding "oh is it a ponzi, idk man - is it?". Yes it's a ponzi. Nothing to debate here.
Are you located in the US? What you are doing is fraud. No sir. Not everyone on the internet is from the US, are they now? Keep your "legal advice" to yourself. Fraud - wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain.. Do you see any deception going on here? No sir. I'm not claiming to be a securities lawyer. But individuals on this board have gone to prison for the same thing http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370539730583#.VLDcMSvF-0yBy definition ponzi is investment fraud. Doesn't matter how you spin it. |
|
|
|
bet now  before event gets over ! Line has dropped 13 cents since this morning. Doesn't make you nervous? |
|
|
|
I'm not trying to fool anyone. It's 100% transparent, 100% honest in the fact that it's a ponzi scheme, there is a risk of not getting paid out when the week ends. But hey, there's always next week! The users assume the risks by depositing into weeklyponzi. Many users have made a good profit in the last day or so. I don't know what exactly you're trying to prove by creating a thread such as this. There's no mystery surrounding "oh is it a ponzi, idk man - is it?". Yes it's a ponzi. Nothing to debate here.
Are you located in the US? What you are doing is fraud. |
|
|
|
The admin got around 25 BTC+ by taking a mere 5% cut from all deposits in less than 48 hours form the start. Over 575 BTC invested now. What fees do you, the owner, take?
I take a very modest 5%. DON'T FRET, you still get exactly 130% of your initial deposit on payout! The trend is not very good. People will be making big losses by the end. The volume is too big making the system completely unstable. Understand that not even 2 days of the 7 are over. To all the members who have some sense, please don't get greedy and put your money there. In the end we all lose. This is not good.  Dude, people know what they are getting into when they send money to that site. Just leave it be, at least it's an honest site. Interrobang anyone‽‽‽‽ Why are you defending a scam? How can it be honest when by definition he will shut down and run when there is no more BTC rolling in. Look it front of you 5 feet and see where this is going to lead. Just because you got paid out in a ponzi doesn't mean they are honest. It makes you complicit in encouraging more scammy behavior. |
|
|
|
|
That is crazy. How is it still sustainable after all those cuts?
It doesn't matter how much you warn people though. As soon as they get a payout, they think it's legitimate. Inherent greed.
|
|
|
|
Can't we just report any ponzi threads and have them thrown into the can? How do they help this community? Forget the warnings
if we did this then if the forum were to incorrectly not trash a ponzi it would essentially be endorsing them and could potentially be liable when it collapses That's a bit dramatic. The removal of them could be "unoffical' and the red caution could still be posted at the top to cover liability. It would free up a lot of spam in the gambling section and save a few users from losing their money to ponzi operators at the same time. You cannot unofficially remove content from the forum. You either remove it as a site moderator or you do not remove it at all. The red warning says that the forum does not moderate scams. Wouldn't removing ponzi's be moderating scams? I see what you're saying. Slippery slope and all. Solution: Create a subforum under gambling next to games and rounds that is labeled HYIP. Anything related to high-yield investment programs or ponzis can be moved there with a header saying "INVEST AT YOUR OWN RISK". |
|
|
|
Did I just witness someone being pressured by other forum members to delete half of his trust list? It's his trust and his responsibility.
"I don't think he should continue to be at depth 1 if he refuses to be more selective with his trust list" = you should kick some people from your trust or we'll have you kicked you from default.
Soon when someone gets added to default trust we'll have a crowd asking for the right to vote him out.
There was no pressure. It was an observation and philipma agreed with it. He willingly pruned the list and even commented that he wasn't sure why certain members were apart of it. |
|
|
|
Can't we just report any ponzi threads and have them thrown into the can? How do they help this community? Forget the warnings
if we did this then if the forum were to incorrectly not trash a ponzi it would essentially be endorsing them and could potentially be liable when it collapses That's a bit dramatic. The removal of them could be "unoffical' and the red caution could still be posted at the top to cover liability. It would free up a lot of spam in the gambling section and save a few users from losing their money to ponzi operators at the same time. |
|
|
|
|
First off, I want to say that the site design is great and Blackjack layout is fantastic
I deposited 0.05 to test out the site and as a result received 0.055 bonus. I've played and worked up to 0.17 and wanted to cashout my original 0.05 but because I haven't reached the bonus requirement (40x) it is preventing me. It has the option to forfeit my bonus but it also says it will forfeit my winnings. So, if I accept this, will I lose 0.055 (bonus) or will I lose 0.12.
My second question is that it says I have wagered 0.05100000 / 2.20000000 but I have played at least 20 hands in which I am wagering between 0.01 and 0.02. How is this calculated?
|
|
|
|
Adding someone to your trust list makes it so that the ratings they give show up in the "trusted" section instead of the "untrusted" section. For everyone, the goal of creating a trust list should be to see many accurate ratings as trusted while excluding most/all inaccurate ratings.
Even for someone in the default trust list, it's OK to trust people who are not trust-with-your-life trustworthy. As long as they've given a handful of accurate trust ratings and you don't think that they are super likely to give inaccurate trust ratings, adding them will be beneficial. It is, however, extremely important for people on the default trust list to very quickly remove/exclude anyone who starts giving inaccurate ratings.
It seems that a lot of people think of adding someone to your trust list as being a far more weighty way of giving them a positive trust rating. But really it's a very different type of trust, which is why I separated it from trust ratings to begin with. You should add people to your trust list if you think that they have good ratings and trust people who give good ratings. It's reasonable to add people to your trust list who you wouldn't trust with much money, and it's reasonable to exclude people who you would trust with a lot of money.
I didn't investigate every user on his list, but I think that the previous version of philipma1957's list was probably fine.
Can someone schedule a trust seminar?  But seriously, this is good information about trust everyone should know. If members of DefaultTrust aren't fully aware of how they affect they trust system, how are newbies going to know how to use and process it? |
|
|
|
Coinbase makes you wait 5 days unless you add a Visa credit card. I would assume it was the same for Circle.
Circle is the same and they only allow $100 instant per week |
|
|
|
|
Can't we just report any ponzi threads and have them thrown into the can? How do they help this community? Forget the warnings
|
|
|
|
I'm on it. Make it 3 in a row? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
