Open Transactions development has reached a point where it is time to start figuring out how best to handle "shorting" of assets. Since I already support a number of altcoins on my server, looking into how shorting of altcoins would work seems a reasonably good idea. Since shorting involves borrowing an asset from someone, it would seem that introducing shorting to an asset introduces a demand for loans of that asset, thus it provides people who own that asset an opportunity to earn interest by loaning it. Possibly shorting might therefore create a demand for loans of assets that hitherto no one had any desire to borrow. How much interest are people likely to want on loans when they know the loan is going to be used to try to drive down the value of that which is loaned? Might shorting drive up demand for an asset due to people wanting to own some to loan in order to earn interest? Are there, for each altcoin type, people in the community who hold large numbers of that type and are willing to loan them out for shorting? Each type of coin the server supports will of course be shortable against each other type of coin, supply of coins available to be borrowed permitting. Thus it is not only altcoins that will be short-able. You will also be able to short Bitcoins and, in general, any asset available for borrowing. -MarkM- Didn't Roger Ver just have 24k btc stolen because of lending his bitcoins out? Once again sounds like it could start another run with people's money. I'm not saying anyone in particular. Just the concept is sketchy with btc.
|
|
|
100 is quite a ballpark figure, could be 97 My sentiment is based on valuations of potentially as disruptive payment processing companies in a similar stage of development. Look at early paypal for example. Look at square and dwoola. 800mil$ valuation after some major adoption announcements coming up this year is not that insane as some may think. Just treat Bitcoin as a company not as currency. Every BTC is a share. Try to value it considering growth, current biz, near term potential and some deals/projects under development. Feel free to do the math and tell me if I am wildly off base here. I actually think I am being damn conservative with my valuations here. Thank you for answering my question.
|
|
|
Even 100 $ this year can be realistic.
Totally agree with this sentiment (it is to be expected from me). Not on some TA basis but based on fundamentals I believe that Bitcoin is grossly undervalued by the market. I am not worried at all about Bitcoin part of my portfolio and I think up to 30% of one's investment portfolio shall be be allocated to Bitcoin. I, personally, would want to have more than 30% because most other asset classes are just plain scary these days, but it would be bad to be too concentrated. Why $100? Just humor me please....thanks
|
|
|
the pressure is there. remember this key concept: "WALLS ARE FOR MARKET MANIPULATION ONLY" the agenda behind putting up a wall is never to buy or sell coins but to keep the price high/low before a set time to make a switch (ie. this weekend). the reason they want to keep the price low till the weekend is they don't want to have as much competition for cheap coins. All the REAL trades are done in "the trenches." When people actually want to buy or sell coins they will do it "in the trenches" discreetly selling/buying a couple hundred coins at a time.
So essentially what i'm saying may sound counter-intuitive but here's what i think of "walls" : A large ask wall thats up all day friday is a BULLISH sign. Assuming that they make the switch to the Bid side when the banks close. also a large bid wall thats up all day sunday is a BEARISH sign, because they plan on switching to the ask side when banks open.
The almost perfectly linear Diagonal line shape of the bid side is much more healthy than the "r" shape of the ask side. this is because the bid side is full of "real" traders. People who actually want to buy coins. any time the price changes up or down the bid side is always buying "in the trenches"
Right now, in my opinion, the people that are selling "in the trenches" are being manipulated by that ask wall.
Wow I actually learned something important here. Thanks!
|
|
|
I find it surprising there were buyers for that many sc.
Probably all 5 of them sockies and kingtard...
|
|
|
+20,999,999 million bitcoins
I wouldn't give him all the bitcoins, but if he confirms the random acts of pizza address is valid (no transactions so far), I may send him a tip. you are probably right
|
|
|
I don't have any LTC rigs going but here is my Solidcoin rig soon to be a Microcash rig as soon as it launches. LOL that made my day right there hahahahahahahaha~!
|
|
|
I'll play if someone trusts me. 1NkvgHRXZyuaWjM6wCbmuS1L7aknHzBVz9
Edit: Wife calling me to bed. I'm going to play a different game (hide the salami) so I can't make the six hour deadline.
LOL
|
|
|
I'll play...
Send to:
17uYzLfJC81HPei5Ly8XZQZVrVzwNDzf3P
|
|
|
Is bitcoin ready for the solidcoin collapse ?
LOL i think so...
|
|
|
.......... Guys,
I think we must fork CGMiner to add Scrypt to it.
Please, don't botther ckolivas about this... He does not want to do it. Let's fork cgminer!
We can call it SGMiner!
The features I would like to see within "SGMiner" are:
1- Add Scrypt to it (of course); 2- When mining Scrypt coins using CPU, use the Pooler's code from his cpuminer; 3- When mining Scrypt coins using GPU, use the Reaper's code; 4- Ability to mine for both Bitcoin and Litecoin simultanously, I mean, I would like to choose the proper algorithm (SHA256 or Scrypt) for each pool;
NOTE: For the CPU mining code, when using new CPUs from AMD (APU) with a Radeon integrated within the CPU, make sure that the code is actually using the integrated video (new CPU flags) hardware too.
I can invest arount 5~10 Bitcoins (~2500 Litecoins) in a couple weekes.
Cheers! Thiago
well cgminer is open source, ltc has been going since november = anyone with the skills could have done it by now...but havent go ahead and make a reaper/minerd miner no-one is saying competition is bad Thanks to the guys that have pledged so far Well, my idea is to invest on it... Since I am not a developer... Those first 3 features "should be/must be/can be" part of this whole "CGMiner for Litecoin" idea... Don't you think?! Cheers! Thiago the thing is why use reapers code since ( IMO ) doing it in cgminer will outperform reapers code, Reapers code does have it's problems with glitches and that is why i am agree with just building a new kernal for CGminer And I vote for the LGminer ( LitecoinGpuMiner Hence LGminer ) or ACminer ( AltCoinMiner Hence ACminer ) I'm guessing no one is mining on your LTC pool?
|
|
|
People need to take responsibility of depositing their bitcoins with anyone. I don't care if they are your mamma. You keep them bitcoins safe!
|
|
|
Can I ask you why you have such large amount of money in a third party site?
I was attracted by the high interest rates and the money I thought I could earn by depositing bitcoins with them. I never made a single trade on Bitcoinica. I simply held a balance and collected interest. This right here sounds like what is going on with pirate's deal... Roger, I have one honest question: After all of the hacks and stolen bitcoin stories, why would you deposit so much bitcoins with anyone?I truly feel sorry for you and I give you credit for your tremendous contribution to the bitcoin community, but bitcoin is supposed to give the people 100% control of their money as you have said yourself many times over (even in the recent porc fest video). Vladimir is right when he said that the ONLY way to keep your bitcoins safe is to heavily enrcypt your wallet, put it in a locked room/safe/, or have a brain wallet or paper wallet kept in a very secure place. Let this once again be a lesson to everyone (not as a troll) but sincerely a lesson to keep your bitcoins in your possession and do everything it takes to keep it from being stolen.
|
|
|
Since I have been asked many many times I am going to post where to get software to run a pool First your Frontend Software Simplecoin 5.0 https://github.com/simplecoin/simplecoinThen your backend Software. https://github.com/ArtForz/pushpoolNeed help installing Pushpoold? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=10321.0This is not a easy task.. running a pool will take a lot of work and custom code.. IT IS NOT TURN KEY AND GO. Why did I not post up MMCFE? Because MMCFE is BROKEN.. anyone mining on a MMCFE pool is at risk of blocks not being reported. In fact the only Litecoin MMCFE pool i know that has fixed this is g2x3k. (Pool-X) Good luck running your pool Its a thankless job. lool, yea maybe the ONLY pol YOU know, you are a troll dude, just becuase you couldn't handle mmcFe, maybe some else can Pool ops trolling pool ops...classic!
|
|
|
But this all goes back to who makes more money........the miners or the guy selling you mining supplies. Yeah, going with that, a company might make more money digging for gold with the 5 shovels they themselves would need to mine than they would from selling just the 5 shovels. But if instead they don't mine and just sell thousands of shovels to all the miners out there, then they will likely make more than they could have by digging for themselves with 5 shovels. Analogous point for BFL. Point #1: No one digs for gold (serious miners) with a shovel now days. Point #2: Manual labor and running software can't be compared. One is physical and one is more virtual/electrical/automated. Hardly a good analogy..lol An analogy is just that - an analogy. It doesnt matter if miners ACTUALLY use shovels now. It's the logic. And the manual labor/software here is perfectly warranted too. Again, its the logic. The cost/development of shovels from Miner Company is analogous to the cost/development of ASIC from BFL. The selling of shovels is analogous to the selling of ASIC devices. The chance of actually finding gold and selling it is analogous to the difficulty rate/block chain of bitcoin mining. the logic, not the actual practicality is what matters Whatever floats your boat man lol I dont swing that way bro...lol I'm sorry to further de-rail this thread by adding another post about this topic, but seriously... Smoothie, are you fucking serious? His analogy fits the situation perfectly regardless of the fact that gold miners no longer use shovels. And FFS, did you call him out on using the word analogy because it has a root word of anal? You used the word too, you idiot. We pardon the interruption. Your regularly scheduled programing will now resume. Just laugh bro...chill I was only joking... Some people on this forum are so uptight.
|
|
|
I have been looking to buy a few pieces of silver but when I go and check out the silver and gold sellers that take bitcoin, the USD conversion is WAY over the current price of silver AND the spot price is inflated.
Note to sellers. If you want to accept bitcoin please don't treat us like idiots and tag a premium on silver and gold prices. If anything your spot prices should be lower than the USD sites.
Just a thought.
Our spot price isn't over the current spot price. Our prices are where the premium is. But how come your premium is more than double what it normally is? I mean it's a bit disappointing, especially since shipping isn't included.. I would never use your shop just because of the premium that you charge. I'd first go to an exchange, sell my BTC, get fiat and find a reasonable local dealer. You might want to think about the price you charge a bit. Well being in BTC has its risks so ...its up to them on what price they feel they should charge. No complaints here...i'm not buying...
|
|
|
I still don't think $28k is necessary to get a project off the ground.
|
|
|
|