|
Fattcatt is sick; there is nothing wrong with your coins.
|
|
|
|
This is under the assumption that the block size wouldn't grow when needed, blocks aren't full without outside attacks so there's no evidence that when the time comes we won't increase the block size to a common sense size.
Well, other than the evidence that blocks were kept small the last time they became persistently full. Which, in itself, is pretty strong evidence. Once the need resurfaces (and it most certainly will), how long do you think it will take to implement the necessary change? That was a short spam attack period, you know damn well that was artificial and everyone knew it. Yes, I remember people posting the addresses of the spammers at the time. That's the good thing about 1mb blocks, spamming gets expensive. Big blocks are a disaster if there isn't sufficient utility. Say you had 32 MB blocks and only < 2 MB of actual traffic. Someone could easily spam 28 MB per block for peanuts. Sustained over 1 day: 4032 MB of garbage for almost free. Good idea indeed. |
|
|
|
Nonsense. Dogie has many exclusions because of a single trade dispute with a single person who happens to be a persistent troll. It has nothing to do with any contribution he has given.
Your exclusions are the result of your long history of unethical behavior.
Whatever helps you sleep at night kiddo. |
|
|
|
9135. -19 (=16 inclusions - 35 exclusions): dogie (Trust: 30: -0 / +3) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
This is what happens when you have one or two crazy people following you with armadas of accounts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1064824.0Welcome to the club. Being #1 excluded is a sign of you making a difference in a certain way.  |
|
|
|
I’m not a fan of ambiguity. From that perspective, allowing account sales on the one hand, and red tagging them on the other seems to me like an unnecessary contradiction.
Which is the same for scamming and many other behavior, hence not a proper argument. This is the correct answer. Even more importantly, ALL members must be treated equally.
Nope. |
|
|
|
I agree that accounts shouldn't be bought or sold, but how to prevent that from happening ?
I don't think it can be prevented, but that doesn't mean account sales should be tolerated. Thus I voted for banning account sales, even if it's not entirely enforceable. The reasons why people shouldn't trade accounts has been written innumerable times, and I don't feel like making the argument again here. Ultimately it enables people to scam or to earn more money by shitposting in campaigns, and there's really nothing good that comes from it. Not a single forum rule is really preventing anything, just enforcing stuff. |
|
|
|
|
Traded accounts will be used to manipulate this poll, thus the results are irrelevant. Tagging is how it should countinue to be handled.
|
|
|
|
Is there any possibility that GUNTHY could pay a dividend someday, either from revenue generated by Gunbot sales, new revenue streams, or the issuing of more GUNTHY to raise capital for a fund running Gunbot to generate profit?
Definitely, although we have not considered this before. Those are some great ideas that should be discussed for the future. |
|
|
|
*whiny butthurt*
Time to go away scammer.
Therefore, it would be best for all involved parties:
1) Remove all ratings.
2) Ignore each other.
Please also lock this thread because mallicious individuals want it to spiral back into the never ending blame-game. Thanks. |
|
|
|
I'm glad to see negative feedback is removed from several profiles who posted here.
I'd be only glad if all the involved parties lock all their threads and stop talking about this ad naseum everywhere. Sometimes this forum is worse than any TV reality garbage that I've heard of. I’d prefer Vod apologized for all the lies he told and causing me to prove it, as it was very inconsiderate of him to waste my and others’ time like this. Alright. The other side probably would prefer something else, and it's unlikely that either one of you will get what they want. Therefore, it would be best for all involved parties: 1) Remove all ratings. 2) Ignore each other. Haven't agreed this much to your "points" before, and I doubt anyone with common sense would disagree to this, it's good to see you lead the "peace dialog"
Ol' kitty is tired.  |
|
|
|
Ask them directly to provide you license number (that is all you need), it is non of their business for what you need it.
Do it. If no response I'll be tagging. |
|
|
|
|
I'm ready for the moon now. Are you?
|
|
|
|
I often find users who completely wiped their custom trust list. This is the opposite of what should happen for a decentralized trust system.
I don't see anything wrong with that. It is their choice. |
|
|
|
I'm glad to see negative feedback is removed from several profiles who posted here.
I'd be only glad if all the involved parties lock all their threads and stop talking about this ad naseum everywhere. Sometimes this forum is worse than any TV reality garbage that I've heard of. |
|
|
|
You must be the most dangerous scammer on this board.
I've gotten quite the reputation tagging people indeed. Dangerous kitty. Welcome to DT and prepare for the butthurt.  Ignores his pal nutildah calling people EVIL for selling their accounts and claiming they can be used to scam
Everyone who I don't tag is my pal? I'll be damned, gotta tag 99.99% of the forum then. |
|
|
|
EDIT - lauda?? where have you gone? we were going to debate your lying and scamming? but you seem to have vanished?
I have better things to do than play around with a child using alt accounts all day. You got to create more threads to attract my full attention, these are rookie numbers. |
|
|
|
Closure or loss of some earnings...hmmmm. No big exchanges will risk it if they try and ban it. It won't have this much volume after the pump is done.
Don't be such an obvious pumper, at least pretend to consider some possible negatives. The fact you believe there was no instamine is the best part.
I'd rather be closed than submit to the foul government. There is no pump going on. We have just started to get the attention of some media, wait for the full impact. There was no instamine, I was there. Nice of you to admit that you're cryptohunter.  |
|
|
|
A step back to centralization hahah. What lauda means is that red trust is being gradually taken away from him to silence whistle blowers that present observable instances of his lying and scamming.
If you make more alt accounts, I'll tag them too. Dodging your red trust via alts does not work (scammer or not). |
|
|
|
|
Seems okay I guess (although this is a step back towards centralization), and it looks like I don't have to modify any existing ratings.
|
|
|
|
Step 1) Confiscate a company's funds. Step 2) Sue the company for being insolvent. Step 3) Profit?  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
