Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 10:25:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 ... 330 »
1801  Economy / Services / Re: Bounties for programming help on: April 11, 2015, 02:58:06 PM
0.01

Summary: Linker library error when attempting to use GLFW 64 bit windows binaries with "Microsoft visual studio community 2013"

I was following this tutorial. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-55D2rsCSE @ 9:20 he gets the exact same errors I'm getting but then instead of explaining how to fix it he just cuts out the part where he solves it. He says "it was a quite simple error it was a linker library error". Well its not quite so simple for me, I've been trying to figure out what the heck to do for days now.

So I am using "Microsoft visual studio community 2013". I started a new visual c++ empty project. Added a main.cpp to the source files directory. I downloaded the 64 bit windows pre-compiled binaries from http://www.glfw.org/download.html. Extracted the whole folder intact to the same location where it is putting my main.cpp. My main.cpp looks like this.

Code:
#include "glfw-3.1.1.bin.WIN64\include\GLFW\glfw3.h"

int main(){
glfwInit();
}

Next I added
Code:
C:\Users\Aaron\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\Project5\Project5\glfw-3.1.1.bin.WIN64\include\GLFW
to
Code:
Property Page -> Configuration Properties -> VC++ Directories -> Include Directories
Then i added
Code:
C:\Users\Aaron\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\Project5\Project5\glfw-3.1.1.bin.WIN64\lib-vc2013
to
Code:
Property Page -> Configuration Properties -> VC++ Directories -> Library Directories
And finally I added
Code:
C:\Users\Aaron\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\Project5\Project5\glfw-3.1.1.bin.WIN64\lib-vc2013
to
Code:
Property Page -> Configuration Properties -> Linker -> General -> Additional Library Directories

Even still I am getting the following error when I attempt to build and run.

Code:
1>------ Build started: Project: Project5, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------
1>main.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol _glfwInit referenced in function _main
1>c:\users\aaron\documents\visual studio 2013\Projects\Project5\Debug\Project5.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ==========
1802  Economy / Services / Bounties for programming help on: April 11, 2015, 02:20:17 PM
I created this thread because I am stuck on a linker library error but I thought rather than make it just about myself, maybe I could open it up to the whole community.

The way this thread works:

If you are in need of assistance, use the size=x-large and bold tag at the beginning of your post to specify how many bitcoins you are offering in exchange for a correct answer to your question/successful resolution to your problem. Next including a brief summary at the beginning of the post giving people some idea what sorts of languages or specific libraries it involves as well as the gist of the problem so that they may more easily determine, without needing to read your entire post, whether or not they possess the requisite skills necessary in order to be able to answer your question. Example:

Quote
0.01

Summary: Linker library error when attempting to use GLFW 64 bit windows binaries with "Microsoft visual studio community 2013"

Insert details here.

Please do not use the large text for anything else, that way new questions will stand out from the chatter even at a quick glance.

If you are answering someones question. Please provide a bitcoin address at the end of your post.

Obviously stackoverflow already exists so there is an expectation here that if someone is paying for resolution that the assistant will be a bit more patient and accommodating.
1803  Other / Archival / Programming questions and answers with tips/bounties for successful solutions on: April 11, 2015, 02:01:46 PM
Basically I just made this thread because I'm stuck on a linker library error that I have no idea how to solve, but I thought maybe other people who need programming help could use it also. I am prepared to tip anyone who can help me, and I think this thread will probably get more traction and be more useful to everyone if those in need of help tip the people who successfully help them. Not setting prices or anything, just if someone puts effort into helping you and saves you a bunch of time and effort, send them w/e you think is fair within your means.
1804  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: April 11, 2015, 03:53:47 AM
In that case only both parties together would be able to retrieve the funds.

Better way is with secret sharing.  Same result as multisig, without the need of multisig.

Sure you could use secret sharing to cooperatively develop a seed but how would you derive a view key pair or public spend key without either party knowing the seed and without also developing a private spend key in the process?
1805  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: April 11, 2015, 02:09:08 AM
Didn't you wanted mainstream?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/326ba2/someone_is_poking_around_at_my_coins/

Bitcoin wasn't made for mainstream.



Quote
Describe the primary use for your coinbase account
Describe the source of your incoming bitcoin transactions
Indicate the source of your income for bitcoin purchases
What's the nature of your outgoing transfers and what services are they related to
...
Please know that we take privacy ... very seriously.

It's like the twilight zone.

I don't think I will be using coinbase any longer. Next time I want to buy bitcoin ill just reach out to the community on the forums here and leverage my impeccable reputation.
1806  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: April 10, 2015, 10:48:56 PM
Just beautiful:



Also, bid side is over 700 btc currently, approaching an alltime high!

Not going to lie. That was my purchase that broke that trend line. Grin There were a couple of other people who came in right after me to make the candlestick more exagerated, but i was the one who bought enough to push it above the trend line initially, they just pushed it further above the trend line. I wanted some more monero sure, but i also saw the opportunity to potentially light a fuse.

I was with ya buddy, .0031x or so Smiley

Ha. Cool. I couldn't help but wonder who that was, though i didn't ever expect to find out.
1807  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: April 10, 2015, 10:36:31 PM
Just beautiful:



Also, bid side is over 700 btc currently, approaching an alltime high!

Not going to lie. That was my purchase that broke that trend line. Grin There were a couple of other people who came in right after me to make the candlestick more exagerated, but i was the one who bought enough to push it above the trend line initially, they just pushed it further above the trend line. I wanted some more monero sure, but i also saw the opportunity to potentially light a fuse. Sort of like akido, i thought that by breaking that trend I could potentially apply a very small amount of pressure in a way that could have a leveraged effect.
1808  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [ESHOP launched] Trezor: Bitcoin hardware wallet on: April 09, 2015, 02:46:26 PM
Does anyone know a website that has integrated "sign in with trezor"? I would very much like to try it out.
1809  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: April 09, 2015, 06:35:43 AM
^I'll send you a PM.

thanks Grin
1810  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I am pretty confident we are the new wealthy elite, gentlemen. on: April 09, 2015, 06:24:08 AM
Ahh the wealthy elite thread!  It always brings a grin to my face during this tough period of growth.

Knowing so many others are in the same boat, waiting for Bitcoin to develop...


To hell with waiting, I'm helping to make it happen Cheesy

www.incryptex.com

that website is bizonkers. i have literally never seen anything like that in my life. i didn't even know that was technically possible. did you guys hire freaking actors, photographers and cinematographers for the wallpaper of your website!?!?
1811  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: April 09, 2015, 06:15:05 AM

With BuyMonero.net, you get your own bot that will place a daily buy order for an amount of XMR that you specify. If no one sells to the bot in 24 hours, your bot will make a second buy order that is sure to be filled. There is a small fee for the service - currently 1% (so 1 XMR lets you buy 100 XMR on the exchange).


You guys are reading my mind. Last few days I thought a lot of such a service for those who don't have trading bots. Based on my observations of my trading bot, each new bot competing with the other bots on Poloniex in order to buy have a big impact on the buy pressure. This is a great service - just don't make your bot better and faster then mine Smiley

What do you use?
1812  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero Speculation on: April 09, 2015, 02:33:59 AM
holy cow. look at that market depth Shocked Shocked Shocked
1813  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: XMR vs DRK on: April 08, 2015, 11:54:05 PM
I was just about to ask for his btc address when I looked over the terms of my bet. It seems I stated that 2.5x is equivalent to 250%, and that's true, but a 2.5x increase isn't equivalent to a 250% increase, so in a string of luck the wording of the bet would still have guaranteed a win. Albeit I was wrong originally.

Weaseling out on a technicality even though the context and intent was clear tells a lot about one's character. Can't say I'm surprised though.

OK let's be like that. The bet is on, you now owe me .4 btc as 2.5x is equal to 250%, which is what I originally bet and to which you agreed.

happy to provide escrow to anyone who wants to bet with each other.
1814  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: April 08, 2015, 11:48:14 PM
Can't believe this political correctness/social justice garbage has filtered through to Bitcointalk.

Since we've fallen and we can't get up...

You ever stop to think how much the words "correctness" and "justice" are changed by the adjectives "political" and "social"?  In fact they are fundamentally changed as to have completely different meanings.
Changed to diametrically opposite meanings, I'd say.

Lol. Big d's just chillin, wasteland style.
1815  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: April 08, 2015, 06:43:38 PM
Listen the interview with our core dev Fluffypony on LetsTalkBitcoin:

https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/ltb-e202-understanding-monero

Anon136, this is what you were asking for right?  Grin

i dont remember asking for it but im glad it exists and i listened to the whole thing Smiley

maybe i did say something about getting monero on LTB. its starting to sound familiar.
1816  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Intelligence Operatives. Are they here? Make the case. on: April 08, 2015, 06:33:45 PM
Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media

Military's 'sock puppet' software creates fake online identities to spread pro-American propaganda



The US military is developing software that will let it secretly manipulate social media sites by using fake online personas to influence internet conversations and spread pro-American propaganda.

A Californian corporation has been awarded a contract with United States Central Command (Centcom), which oversees US armed operations in the Middle East and Central Asia, to develop what is described as an "online persona management service" that will allow one US serviceman or woman to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world.

The project has been likened by web experts to China's attempts to control and restrict free speech on the internet. Critics are likely to complain that it will allow the US military to create a false consensus in online conversations, crowd out unwelcome opinions and smother commentaries or reports that do not correspond with its own objectives.

The discovery that the US military is developing false online personalities – known to users of social media as "sock puppets" – could also encourage other governments, private companies and non-government organizations to do the same.

The Centcom contract stipulates that each fake online persona must have a convincing background, history and supporting details, and that up to 50 US-based controllers should be able to operate false identities from their workstations "without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries".

Centcom spokesman Commander Bill Speaks said: "The technology supports classified blogging activities on foreign-language websites to enable Centcom to counter violent extremist and enemy propaganda outside the US."

He said none of the interventions would be in English, as it would be unlawful to "address US audiences" with such technology, and any English-language use of social media by Centcom was always clearly attributed. The languages in which the interventions are conducted include Arabic, Farsi, Urdu and Pashto.

Centcom said it was not targeting any US-based web sites, in English or any other language, and specifically said it was not targeting Facebook or Twitter.

Once developed, the software could allow US service personnel, working around the clock in one location, to respond to emerging online conversations with any number of co-ordinated messages, blogposts, chatroom posts and other interventions. Details of the contract suggest this location would be MacDill air force base near Tampa, Florida, home of US Special Operations Command.

Centcom's contract requires for each controller the provision of one "virtual private server" located in the United States and others appearing to be outside the US to give the impression the fake personas are real people located in different parts of the world.

It also calls for "traffic mixing", blending the persona controllers' internet usage with the usage of people outside Centcom in a manner that must offer "excellent cover and powerful deniability".

The multiple persona contract is thought to have been awarded as part of a programme called Operation Earnest Voice (OEV), which was first developed in Iraq as a psychological warfare weapon against the online presence of al-Qaida supporters and others ranged against coalition forces. Since then, OEV is reported to have expanded into a $200m programme and is thought to have been used against jihadists across Pakistan, Afghanistan and the Middle East.

OEV is seen by senior US commanders as a vital counter-terrorism and counter-radicalisation programme. In evidence to the US Senate's armed services committee last year, General David Petraeus, then commander of Centcom, described the operation as an effort to "counter extremist ideology and propaganda and to ensure that credible voices in the region are heard". He said the US military's objective was to be "first with the truth".

This month Petraeus's successor, General James Mattis, told the same committee that OEV "supports all activities associated with degrading the enemy narrative, including web engagement and web-based product distribution capabilities".

Centcom confirmed that the $2.76m contract was awarded to Ntrepid, a newly formed corporation registered in Los Angeles. It would not disclose whether the multiple persona project is already in operation or discuss any related contracts.

Nobody was available for comment at Ntrepid.

In his evidence to the Senate committee, Gen Mattis said: "OEV seeks to disrupt recruitment and training of suicide bombers; deny safe havens for our adversaries; and counter extremist ideology and propaganda." He added that Centcom was working with "our coalition partners" to develop new techniques and tactics the US could use "to counter the adversary in the cyber domain".

According to a report by the inspector general of the US defence department in Iraq, OEV was managed by the multinational forces rather than Centcom.

Asked whether any UK military personnel had been involved in OEV, Britain's Ministry of Defence said it could find "no evidence". The MoD refused to say whether it had been involved in the development of persona management programmes, saying: "We don't comment on cyber capability."

OEV was discussed last year at a gathering of electronic warfare specialists in Washington DC, where a senior Centcom officer told delegates that its purpose was to "communicate critical messages and to counter the propaganda of our adversaries".

Persona management by the US military would face legal challenges if it were turned against citizens of the US, where a number of people engaged in sock puppetry have faced prosecution.

Last year a New York lawyer who impersonated a scholar was sentenced to jail after being convicted of "criminal impersonation" and identity theft.

It is unclear whether a persona management programme would contravene UK law. Legal experts say it could fall foul of the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981, which states that "a person is guilty of forgery if he makes a false instrument, with the intention that he or another shall use it to induce somebody to accept it as genuine, and by reason of so accepting it to do or not to do some act to his own or any other person's prejudice". However, this would apply only if a website or social network could be shown to have suffered "prejudice" as a result.

• This article was amended on 18 March 2011 to remove references to Facebook and Twitter, introduced during the editing process, and to add a comment from Centcom, received after publication, that it is not targeting those sites.
1817  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: [ESHOP launched] Trezor: Bitcoin hardware wallet on: April 08, 2015, 05:33:58 PM
buytrezor.com doesn't have a "sign in with trezor" option? Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
1818  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: * MillenniumCoin DAAE * TOR * Anon * Escrow on: April 08, 2015, 03:27:04 AM

Transaction details - MIL 3326.66666666 Sent to: MJ8nwfSqiaC2Bv1Gxmrz3kQrQvm7A6hp7V 2015-04-01 e156a8b5e1749d63c44cc31121d387f0b3e0262836b7c44192e85fe37e1f5487

I don't see this transaction when I search the block explorer.

Your wallet may not have succeeded in sending
this transaction. Since all traffic goes through Tor, there's some
additional complexity in relaying data.

Try restarting the wallet. If that doesn't help, wait til you
have connections and resend the transaction manually

getrawtransaction e156a8b5e1749d63c44cc31121d387f0b3e0262836b7c44192e85fe37e1f5487

then copy the result and paste after sendrawtransaction



Thanks for the response, but I was sending from my poloniex wallet to my local wallet.  I have reinstalled and re-synced my wallet with no success.  I will send their support another email.  Do you have any other suggestions?  

Poloniex is having issue syncing their wallet. We have been in contact with them and they are aware of the issue. Once they are synced your transaction should show up.

polo is going to be willing to put up with VERY little crap from such a small market cap project. tread lightly.
1819  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: April 08, 2015, 03:24:36 AM
Right at this moment I'd say this is a super solid play:



should go post it in their thread with the caption

Quote
*cough* just sayin

i wouldn't do it because i don't have the constitution for trolling but it would be funny.
1820  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - 0.8.8.6 on: April 08, 2015, 03:22:32 AM
In theory, could my anonymity be compromised by too many other people publishing their view keys?

Well let's assume everybody did. Then you would have a coin where all transactions are traceable (except yours, and yours would be the only ones left so...). That's obviously not the goal here, but if everybody wants that, there's nothing you can do. You can't hide a needle without a haystack.

However, it is indeed not good to encourage too much reliance on view keys. That's why, for example, MRL-0004 has an alternate method for auditing of individual transactions that does not involve the broad brush of a view key.

I know you guys aren't aiming to be alphabet proof but perhaps one day in the future it could be a goal and it is concerning because we might imagine that some mass surveillance agency might be able to put together a rather comprehensive database of view keys.

Once the view key has been seen by someone other than yourself, consider the privacy of that address compromised and migrate funds to a secure (private) address. Better yet, never share a view key except for purpose specific, (single use?) addresses.  Let them watch a vacant house all they want.

Correct. View key is 1/2 of your private key. It makes sense to share this for specific reasons, but not in general.



fortunately it will probably be rare for people to share their view key anyway. i mean if they are in monero they are in monero for a reason.
Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 ... 330 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!