BTW, please be careful about the address reuse. If you issue a tx and send some iotas from the address, do remove that address from the post.
Iota is going to need some sort of system like monero uses. The destination of each CryptoNote output (by default) is a public key, derived from recipient’s address and sender’s random data. So that an infinite series of valid addresses can be derived from a single string of data. That way we can post one string of data everywhere and everyone can sent to it and no one would ever have to worry about the problem you mentioned because every address would be one time use. USTIWCLSWCOBHXJNNJBZANJGZVOHIZWHLKQWHWGTWBJRYLEEZJMQBIHSFKHFGZKQKDVITJJAAMFDOAPT9NXRBOMVAU |
|
|
|
but this is all doable.
indeed |
|
|
|
hello boyz n gals. i was caught by me missus brazzers subscription , consider i can pay xmr to porn . i am addicted to the porn stars on site  Sure buddy if "brazzers" accepts bitcoin you can either use xmr.to or shapeshift.io to pay in monero. |
|
|
|
http://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/1246/how-does-moneros-transaction-fees-change-according-to-pricedynamic fees currently do not exist yet and currently the fee is hardcoded This concerns me. Unfortunately when Monero will be more widely adopted, hardforking will get harder and harder. Or at least consensus in what will be changed in the hardfork. Monero's fees are not dependent on price. They are based on the size of the transaction (0.01 monero per kB, rounded up) I know this is not easy to solve, but potentially a big problem when the price of a monero increases. As I said above, it could be that no future hardfork will take place / there is no consensus reached on how high the fee should be. Monero is really elegant in it's dynamic block size and slowly decreasing blocksize, it learned from (the mistakes of) it's big brother. However the arbitrary and hardcoded fee amount feels very similar to Bitcoin's fixed block size. Any thoughts or ideas on this? Why (for example) can't I as a user determine the fee, and let the miner decide whether or not to include the transaction? We dont have political crisis in this community. If FP proposes a hard fork to lower that value everyone will support it. |
|
|
|
Evidently the GUI is hiding in the woods in Winston Salem? I'm confused. Why Winston Salem? Witch hunts, etc.Gotcha. |
|
|
|
Evidently the GUI is hiding in the woods in Winston Salem? I'm confused. Why Winston Salem? |
|
|
|
What a funny thing to think of, thanks Anon136  And your carefully crafted sentences have a response: Yes, there is such a process. A fundamental one, inherent to humankind and forever present: stupidity.By simply being stupid, a state or a nation, by the actions of those claiming or elected to be their executives, derives the right to engage in any action it so sees fit. And by pursuing said stupidity, such entities can bestow upon other such entities the enforcement of any immoral action, as considered by the bestowed party, not only as moral but rightfully necessary, in the most absolute legitimacy for the bestowing party, thus not changing the character of said action in either case. You may consider it as a corollary from the quantum nature of the Universe itself: the action is both immoral and moral at the same time, both legitimate and illegitimate.  Let's have some tips, please, I'm IOTA poor EBSHJABZRJWEFQ9ZZCJGLOUWRNHZWWNKNWSFQXKQZ9UEKHHB9NQISNASQNGOFQNXOTKWGNLCTAOZRPGGFOBVEOVRUS I predicted this sort of response. That's why I carefully selected to insert the word "legitimately" in front of the word transformed. I wouldn't consider human stupidity to be a legitimate reason for claiming that an immoral transaction had been changed into a moral one without changing the character of the action itself. Of course that is a subjective thing, legitimacy. I just like to think that if you burrow down to peoples core beliefs, clear away the intellectual clutter so to speak, you will often find they would agree but that maybe they simply haven't thought about it the right way. Sending bigger tip than usual for the thoughtful response. Thanks. KIPFWVQBLWUXCQTYHLGHMUJOPCAHPTXMLWXOBDWHVHJILPHK9MOU9HFEVOUWWLBFJDVAWIRUPGHDQJIUCNOMPTB9DY |
|
|
|
How do you get pikachu onto a bus? YOU POKE'M ON! AH HA HA HATip for the first person who can tell me how to hide the punch line until its highlighted. BJNQFYDFLSAIPAHWRNMEKZBHJCPIUDOQESVSCGGX9GXUJOJAWC9HJFCDIVBCWKSLPHLWTUSZPFYQGCYUCLMPYH9SP9 |
|
|
|
Quoting my signature: If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited? Is there any process, procedure or ritual through which an immoral action can be legitimately transformed into a moral one with out changing the character of the action itself? I spent a lot of time trying to come up with the most important sentence in the world. Ended up I couldn't condense the concepts down to only one sentence. But I was able to pretty much condense everything I wanted to say down to two sentences. Each individual word, and the order in which they are presented, was extremely meticulously chosen. NCKQFHHXQNMVTBBEPPAPWITBE9QJXEDDAMZBWIGCPJQXNWDHFVRNFONQWLLIPIDLKDVJU9ZXPJGLZLTVTCZJKT9NV9 |
|
|
|
|
The whale is probably out of the market now. He did what he was going to do. Now this market is trading the effect that the whale had on sentiment. Its going to be interesting to see what if any effect he had on the less short term.
|
|
|
|
FAQ/Tips for getting the most out of this thread:- 1Mi=~0.01USD at current exchange rates. So if you want to send someone your 2 cents try 2Mi.
- Use a different address with every post so you know specifically which post people appreciated.
- Inorder to tag as code highlight the relevant text and press the bottom right most option in the formatting section (above the crying face)
- There is no rule against chit chatting in this thread, just don't expect anyone to donate to that cause.
- Spread the word about this thread. More participants equals more fun.
ZAJYCMLPZXJJKG9DXPKCMAXTQGXZOCIFYGUPXCUZDWMNJTFXQL99HBUJINHCTFGLYWSMCJUDAZFSNP9ZEMLL9DMJDB
|
|
|
|
So one of the main advantages of IOTA is that no micro payment is too small. Lets have some fun with that. Try to post something of value to others in this thread (probably humor but not necessarily) and if someone posts something of value to you than send them some iota. The 2 Rules: Every post must be concluded with an address for tips to be delivered to (Please use "code" tag); And no tip is too small! If you do not have any iota to play with try posting something here that others will appreciate, and no matter how little they send you, you can probably split it up into a million times as many parts as you need in-order to to turn around and tip others. I was kind of hoping this could be our better more fun version of a faucet. Do you think this thread is a good idea? Than send tip here : EPNOTXIJVHMCJFSRSVNCEAUSKDALERCWJ9CSEDNNGOKLIZVUDNOIAMKVSZOTDQXHEMNUIZHJEXWMXLSGLYMU9SPUPE |
|
|
|
Whelp. That just happened.
Shorts covering or a big ass market buy by??? Someone trying to run the stops I bet . Look at the level he bought to. No, you are right... interesting. If that is what it is he is a big long term player who is only interested in long term xmr maximizing. |
|
|
|
Whelp. That just happened.
Shorts covering or a big ass market buy by??? Someone trying to run the stops I bet . Look at the level he bought to. |
|
|
|
|
Whelp. That just happened.
|
|
|
|
Selling 85.4 gIOTA for 1.25 BTC. Escrow of course.
There appears to be a bid order in excess of your ask. BID orders:
0.01501 BTC/Gi | 5.0 BTC | 333.0 Gi | @tomoaki
0.0141 BTC/Gi | 14.1 BTC | 1000.0 Gi | @lifehasnobackspace
0.01300 BTC/Gi | 0.13 BTC | 10.0 Gi | @sagitta
0.012 BTC/Gi | 24.0 BTC | 2000.0 Gi | @icfiedler
0.0115 BTC/Gi | 11.5 BTC | 1000.0 Gi | @coinling
0.01114 BTC/Gi | 5.57 BTC | 500.0 Gi | @sprat
0.0111 BTC/Gi | 11.1 BTC | 1000.0 Gi | @anon136
0.01100 BTC/Gi | 1.1 BTC | 100.0 Gi | @teletobi
0.01 BTC/Gi | 10.0 BTC | 1000.0 Gi | @superresistant
0.01 BTC/Gi | 2.0 BTC | 200.0 Gi | @lauri
ASK orders:
0.01463 BTC/Gi | 1.25 BTC | 85.4 Gi | @cy
0.015 BTC/Gi | 15.0 BTC | 1000.0 Gi | @buratino
0.016 BTC/Gi | 4.0 BTC | 250.0 Gi | @liqio
0.01850 BTC/Gi | 1.85 BTC | 100.0 Gi | @nick
0.01998 BTC/Gi | 3.996 BTC | 200.0 Gi | @eiota
0.02777 BTC/Gi | 2.5 BTC | 90.0 Gi | @sheepofwallstreet
0.029 BTC/Gi | 14.5 BTC | 500.0 Gi | @tone
0.03 BTC/Gi | 15.0 BTC | 500.0 Gi | @naj
0.033 BTC/Gi | 3.3 BTC | 100.0 Gi | @mladen00
0.034 BTC/Gi | 3.4 BTC | 100.0 Gi | @novelty
0.035 BTC/Gi | 35.0 BTC | 1000.0 Gi | @wizzardtim
0.038 BTC/Gi | 380.0 BTC | 10000.0 Gi | @windjc
0.05 BTC/Gi | 2.5 BTC | 50.0 Gi | @nrg1zer
0.05 BTC/Gi | 25.0 BTC | 500.0 Gi | @jamespower
0.063 BTC/Gi | 13.86 BTC | 220.0 Gi | @raganius
|
|
|
|
|
You know. I'm doing escrow with this guy. Or rather he just keeps sending me bitcoins and then asking for them back because "his buyer isnt coming through". Which of course could be totally true, I don't know, but I cant help but feel the existential dread of "maybe he is just trying to use me to clean his bitcoins". It's the first time its been personal rather than just intellectual. Monero adoption will not be propelled by intellectual musings, it will be propelled by that unpleasant gut feeling.
*edit* Starting this day forward I am probably going to begin segregating my bitcoin into trusted unsure and likely dirty. Isn't that just sad? Can you imagine segregating your dollar bills out by how likely you thought they were to have microscopic specs of cocaine on them?
|
|
|
|
Hi guys, I believe I'm as much hyped and "in love" with my Trezor as most of the guys around here.
One thing that stills puzzles me is if I can trust that there is no backdoor in these wallets? There is any resources of security experts that audited the product?
I understand Satoshi Labs is not a small BTC player and as miners they have interest that people feel secure in order to mine and buy BTCs without problems.
Just asking, real noob here. Cheers!
This guy, Jochen Hoenicke, must have taken a pretty good run at trying to exploit it considering he succeeded. That vulnerability has since been patched and now hes listed as a team member. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
