Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 04:56:40 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 »
1801  Economy / Services / Re: DaDice Social Media Campaign on: March 31, 2015, 09:56:36 AM



Also please remember to keep an eye out for any posts and tweets you need to share,retweet.


can you plz tell the links of your social accounts?

@DaDice1 for twitter and DaDice for facebook, you can read it on the first page of this thread...
1802  Economy / Gambling / Re: Negative house edge on: March 31, 2015, 09:30:33 AM
If the house edge is negative just bet static bets, lets say 0.001 bets all the time

With a chance of 51% of win you would eventually reach that chance and for example in 1 million bets

you would win 510.000 and lose 490.000 bets

wich means that you won 20.000 bets more than loses 20.000 x 0.001 = 20 bitcoins

There is no argument that would encourage a casino to use a nagative house edge after this post.

So I think everything has already been said after the seceond post in this thread...

Well after that post OP tried to break that strategy saying that the casino would not have an automatic betting system and the bets would be slow wich doesnt do anything but slow the process, whats mind blowing is how people voted that the casino would still win because people would be greedy, like it doesnt even matter as long as someone intelligent does that since he would be profiting forever.
1803  Other / Meta / Re: Bitboy11 Banned on: March 31, 2015, 07:30:26 AM
If you're posting to boost posts count up, you always produce some useless craps, that's why you got banned.

Explain why this guy: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=993776.100

is still not banned then? First of all he bumped his thread like 10 times in the same day, second, he is just posting a bunch of stupid shit in every post he does, yes it may be the off-topic section but come on... from 18 posts 17 of them are his posts
1804  Economy / Lending / Re: Need 0.03 btc 15% Interest on: March 31, 2015, 07:21:38 AM
Seems like you have taken a lot of loans recently and paid them all late, why do you need so many loans? I could give you the loan if you use your account as a collateral.
How are you going to get the money to pay back?
1805  Economy / Gambling / Re: Bitcoin Games Player vs Player on: March 31, 2015, 06:52:54 AM
I can't find what I'm looking for.

Maybe its just me... I actually think there's a good demand for a simple, quick PvP game, with sound logic.

I might actually make one.  Grin

You should because there is indeed a high demand for a PvP game. Im not sure why there are only a few, maybe because you can use bots for some of them to cheat but some games are pretty much not possible to cheat with bots.

Like a race cars game, there is no way to cheat that with a bot, only strategy games. So if you are going to make one make sure its not possible to cheat it.
1806  Economy / Auctions / Re: 999DICE ACCOUNT WITH 5134 Refs Auction! on: March 31, 2015, 06:35:09 AM
The proud winner can help aid the massive fraud/scam that is 999dice.

You guys always call it a scam because some guy proved that their provably fair system was stupid but as long as you verify each bet the site is fair and it was never proven that they were cheating anyone, or do you have some proofs that im not aware of?
You need to proactively check the seeds prior to placing each bet, otherwise it is very easy for them to cheat users, and it would be impossible to tell after the fact because they might as well have changed the server seed after the fact to produce a loosing roll.

If they know that a user is checking then they will treat them fair

Wich is exactly my point, ''they could be cheating'' But in reality there is no proof for that, i know its impossible to prove, i guess but still you cant call it a scam, as i said and you said if you verify you know the site is playing fair.
But hey if they cheat better for the buyer of the 5k ref account because if the site cheats means that the refs will lose their money guaranteed.
1807  Economy / Services / Re: DaDice Social Media Campaign on: March 31, 2015, 06:30:59 AM
Please can the admin confirm who is in and who is not, and when is the campaign going to start, i assume soon? If i make tweets now will they count?
1808  Other / Meta / Re: Please delete my bitcointalk account. on: March 31, 2015, 05:29:19 AM
"This user has changed his password recently" he either did what you guys said or he hacked that account and thats why he wanted to delete it, i guess thats why admins do not delete accounts right?
1809  Economy / Auctions / Re: 999DICE ACCOUNT WITH 5134 Refs Auction! on: March 31, 2015, 05:21:45 AM
The proud winner can help aid the massive fraud/scam that is 999dice.

You guys always call it a scam because some guy proved that their provably fair system was stupid but as long as you verify each bet the site is fair and it was never proven that they were cheating anyone, or do you have some proofs that im not aware of?
1810  Economy / Services / Re: DaDice Social Media Campaign on: March 30, 2015, 08:10:51 PM
Name: Xinxan
Position: jr.member
 i got 10XX followers right now on twitter: https:/twitter.com/lord__enzo
This is my btc address: 1BpaR3ZkDRn5ak5C4xQsnd8reo2pmSUF4F
https://twitter.com/lord__enzo/status/582636769763573760
Thats my tweet for you
1811  Economy / Gambling / Re: Small negative house edge on: March 30, 2015, 06:26:48 PM
Wouldnt negative house edge still be a winning format anyways?

Since there are short falls for the player to eventually keep betting longer term.
Yes but say someone had a auto bet on at .00001 and kept betting for 10 days straight, they would be in positive alot.

I'm glad someone understands.

Well thats what was my initial idea too but then OP just came up with a bet limit thing so the casino wont let you bet fast enough. Still you can do it with friends or just use a ton of bots and you will eventually destroy the bankroll by yourself even if other people lose you would just keep winning over and over
1812  Economy / Lending / Re: Need a 0.001 loan! on: March 30, 2015, 04:58:15 PM
What??0.001 Loan? 0.001 is less than $0.5

Just curious why you need that small loan, while in other thread you try to sell your 999dice account that can give you at least $2.5/day?

Ok I have reduced the price to 1.2 BTC! It earns almost $2.5 a day! Sometimes it earns even more!







Nice catch, unfortunately he probably wanted the 0.001 to gamble but its such a small amount that the lender will not be affected if he doesnt return. And 0.001 is 0.24 USD right now XD

edit: looked at his trust and there are 2 votes both saying he is a gambling addict.
1813  Economy / Gambling / Re: ✔✔✔ChrisPop's SPORTPICKS✔✔✔ BEST IN THE NICHE+High Return Betting Pool(SOON) on: March 30, 2015, 04:52:40 PM
Damn good start man, you should consider an investment option, ive seen some tipsters that do that you could win even more money and you would be helping others aswell. You just need to keep getting good predictions and people will start trusting
1814  Economy / Gambling / Re: what gambling site pays the best affiliate rates? on: March 30, 2015, 04:40:53 PM
Well funnily enough the biggest affiliate rate would be on 999dice if im not mistaken. From their website:

50% of the house edge of EVERY bet made by EVERYONE you refer gets added to your balance (50% x 0.1% = 0.05% of all bets). Whether they win or lose the bet, you still earn money.

Many people say that 999dice is a scam, there are many scam accusations against it. And 0.1% house edge is very fishy.

Stunna also said 999dice is a scam:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=386238.msg10180639#msg10180639

Bets
26364467040
Balance
0 BTC
Referrals
0
Wagered
727658.42021024 BTC
Bets
0
Bets
0
Profit
2694.65651587 BTC (Site)


These figures are also fishy, 26 billion total bet  Shocked

I know i know, thats why i said funnily enough. But their bets could be explained because they have an automatic betting system that pretty much allows you to bet 200 bets per second. Nonetheless their affiliate program is by far the best even if the casino is a scam, i have like 200 refferals there from long ago and i was able to make 0.15 btc so hey something is something.
1815  Other / Off-topic / Re: VOD IS INDEED OYO!! on: March 30, 2015, 04:38:00 PM
Can a moderator please ban this nut for spamming useless posts?  Fourteen (14) posts in the same thread in a span of 39 minutes is insane.  Kind of like how he left me fifteen (15) negative feedback messages on march 17.

I actually reported his posts, as far as i know only 1 bump its allowed every 24 hours, even on the off-topic section, correct me if im wrong but he is just spamming shit and he should be banned even if he doesnt have a sig campaign ad
1816  Economy / Gambling / Re: Negative house edge on: March 30, 2015, 04:36:17 PM
Yes, I had read your post and was going to reply to it, just wanted to first hear your reply to mine. I think, it is no use playing small amounts if you have time limits set or house edge incremented if you use a bot or otherwise try to increase your betting speed


I said in this thread before, but I'll say it again. Having a time limit is absolutely detrimental to a casino. If the point of giving the players an edge is to get more players to play, the amount of players they can get that way is far less than the amount lost because of a time limit. And the quality of players is a lot worse.

What do I mean? Well, if you consider a gambling addict, do they really want to wait say an hour between bets? No, they want to bet again right away to win back their loss, or maybe they're on a winning streak and they're "hot". They're not gonna wait until their "luck changes".

But you read just a part of my message. I didn't mean that those time limits should be firmly nailed down. Actually, I meant to say that the time limits (or rather time gaps between the bets) should ultimately determine the house edge. The faster you bet the higher edge you get...

Perhaps, I should update the opening post to make this clear at the start (since people tend to repeat what has already been said)

No I read your post. My point doesn't really change, people can just find ways around the time limit, or make a bot that plays right when the time is up. It won't really help bring in "real" gamblers, just people looking to make money off of the casino. They won't benefit from this.

You've read but seem to have misunderstood my idea. I don't know how the house edge is actually implemented at dice sites (anyone care to explain?), but I see no problem in keeping track of the time passed since the last bet made by the user. Therefore it shouldn't be difficult to change the house edge appropriately at the moment the bet is executed...

Wowow hold on a second, you are saying that the casino would change the odds in between bets depending on when the last bet was made? Like 51% chance to win, you bet and wait 2 secs and the next bet now has 50.5% chance? That would be a weird but good idea for a casino xD, quick register the patent!!
1817  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: March 30, 2015, 04:33:11 PM
the evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is, the evidence at the link is proof that God exists, but the evidence that suggests that God doesn't exist can't hold a candle to the evidence that He does.

That link is simply evidence of you employing logical fallacies and intellectual dishonesty repeatedly.



I accept the idea that you have brainwashed yourself into thinking what ever you think about the info in the link. Anybody who can think, who reads through it can see the strong evidence showing that God exists. It is common knowledge brought out into the open. That's all.

Smiley

So far seems like everybody knows those are fallacies and the only brainwashed person here is you. Im sorry to tell you but you are brainwashed.

Actually, it's a small group of atheists who don't know that God exists. Well, they are welcome to their religion.

Smiley

Nope, im talking about here in the forum, everyone and i mean literally everyone who has read your ''proof'' said its stupid, even religious people xD...

I would believe that they are few. How many forum members are there? Even if there were thousands, they are few compared with people who believe that God exists, and would understand how He can be proven by the things that I have said at the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 if they took the time to think them through.

These are not the only points that prove God. One of the very strong points in addition to these that I have not mentioned often is the point of mathematical probability. The fact that mathematical probability shows that a built-up universe such as ours is impossible, especially in the light of the existence of life on earth and all the things associated with life, reveals that God MUST exist, Whatever or Whomever He might be.

When you throw in the the standard entropy we see all around us, along with the fact that try as they might, scientists are not able to start life up from inanimate materials, Whatever God is, He is Supremely Great.

Smiley

How does mathematical probability show that our universe is impossible? And scientists are actually able to start life from inanimate objects, get your facts right.
1818  Economy / Gambling / Re: what gambling site pays the best affiliate rates? on: March 30, 2015, 02:29:31 PM
Well funnily enough the biggest affiliate rate would be on 999dice if im not mistaken. From their website:

50% of the house edge of EVERY bet made by EVERYONE you refer gets added to your balance (50% x 0.1% = 0.05% of all bets). Whether they win or lose the bet, you still earn money.
1819  Economy / Digital goods / Re: GET 9 Million Email List (US Businesses – Updated to March 2015) on: March 30, 2015, 02:19:01 PM
So you are selling a list of emails? Thats illegal and you could get reported to the authorities for that.
1820  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: March 30, 2015, 02:11:32 PM
the evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is, the evidence at the link is proof that God exists, but the evidence that suggests that God doesn't exist can't hold a candle to the evidence that He does.

That link is simply evidence of you employing logical fallacies and intellectual dishonesty repeatedly.



I accept the idea that you have brainwashed yourself into thinking what ever you think about the info in the link. Anybody who can think, who reads through it can see the strong evidence showing that God exists. It is common knowledge brought out into the open. That's all.

Smiley

So far seems like everybody knows those are fallacies and the only brainwashed person here is you. Im sorry to tell you but you are brainwashed.

Actually, it's a small group of atheists who don't know that God exists. Well, they are welcome to their religion.

Smiley

Nope, im talking about here in the forum, everyone and i mean literally everyone who has read your ''proof'' said its stupid, even religious people xD...
Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!