129 users who were wearing a yobit signature and had at least 1 good report against them in the last 14 days are banned for 14 days. All yobit signatures are wiped. Signatures containing "yobit.net" are banned for 60 days.
Can someone parse all these users into a list? |
|
|
|
You call people a shitposter because their mother tongue isn't in English, no one doesn't have to speak perfect English.
I bet if I joined a campaign that only paid for posts in the Russian section, I'd get mocked and ridiculed for it--and I'd deserve it. People who can't make themselves understood and who have nothing to say shouldn't be posting in the English section. Of course you would, you'd be a prime shitposter unless you were doing it primarily to improve your language skills which 0% of these users are doing. Whether English is your native language or not is completely irrelevant to whether you are a shitposter or not. |
|
|
|
Lauda, I am agree with you. Would you also tell us your arguments without wearing the Fortune Jack Signature ?  [Double Standards] Unlike you, mr. Pajeet, I am not required to make a single post.  Double-standards only if you're a shitposting baboon with limited eye sight brain power. |
|
|
|
|
I'm sure scammers, account farmers and trolls will be dearly missed. How many more threads of crying are we going to see before you stop?
|
|
|
|
It seems a core of about 5 or 6 DT are doing this, but the entire DT system is full of others that will do NOTHING about this kind of abuse and will actually condone it.
Would it be optimistic to ask for a list of names, or are you just going to continue ranting vaguely? Me, pick me!  |
|
|
|
Yeah, me too actually, I wish the muslims would just stop killing innocent people.
If they keep this up it will end very badly for them.
-snip- I'd wager that Muslims didn't even have a hand in this. "A foreign intelligence agency has reported that the NTJ (National Thowheeth Jama'ath) is planning to carry out suicide attacks targeting prominent churches as well as the Indian high commission in Colombo," said the alert.
The NTJ is a radical Muslim group in Sri Lanka that came to notice last year when it was linked to the vandalism of Buddhist statues.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/04/21/sri-lanka-explosions-casualties-churches-hotels-targeted-easter/Quite the kool-aid drinker you are. It's not unlikely that this was the US's doing nevertheless; way too coordinated for some random faith-bamboozled monkeys.
Can we get back to the topic at hand? You can play out your "religion is good" nonsense here. |
|
|
|
Can you point to me another instance where someone got tagged for a 3 year old account sale attempt? No? Then shut the fuck up already.
He probably could in my sent rating history, but that is irrelevant anyway. Nothing he says will influence me to tag you or to remove any other tags. |
|
|
|
..however I feel that most would agree that the trust system should be purely backed by deals..
Quite the lovely waste of time. It is called a system of trust not a system of trades. Favoritism and entitlement
There is no favoritism. Even legendary accounts get permabanned for breaking the rules (most common plagiarism.) This is what spreading false information does to others (like OP); but hey we need a system of trust that is only for trust-farming via pocket-change deals.  |
|
|
|
put on the big boy pants and auction starting at 0!
Let's do this.  |
|
|
|
To be fair banning their signatures will be a little bit unethical from this forum because it automatically means theymos and whole administration rejects yobit service and let other scam services to run here.
It does not as Yobit would be allowed to have an ANN thread like any other service. Signature AD ban =/= service ban. |
|
|
|
but theymos is too lazy I agree we need a heavy handed approach here, but I don't think it has anything to do with laziness. If theymos wanted to ban the YoBit campaign and their spammers, I'm sure he would do so. It's more an issue of how far you let individual users' freedom to say what they want (including spamming) encroach on everyone else's ability to actually use the forum. If it were down to me, I would immediately hand out a 7 day ban to the majority of the YoBit spammers, and disable all signatures which mention YoBit for 7 days. Obviously theymos disagrees. Which is fallacious stance. Banning all of YoBit ADs does not touch the 'freedom to say anything'. You can say everything you want to without their signature. |
|
|
|
Since you're playing that card: Here's another negative rating because the rules allow it. ...because i don't have a job and my 3 kids need something to eat...
Get a real job and stop being a leech, the forum is not a welfare state. |
|
|
|
|
Leaving this to the moderators has never worked before. Why exactly would anyone argue for this? It will not work again, stop drinking kool-aid. This warrants the nuclear option (kill all yobit ads of any kind), but theymos is too lazy.
|
|
|
|
This is quite the disaster.  |
|
|
|
Still on same short view guys, Now BTC is painting a BAT pattern , we should keep close eyes on the mini rising channel where the BAT inscribed in, if price keep holding below the previous high may signal huge dump ahead.
Which is exactly what someone who just shorted would predict. Try again. |
|
|
|
All i have said was that any system can get compromised and that no system is secure directly after installing.
It is the configuration which makes it more or less secure. The possibilities and simplicity of unix-based OS's are the reason linux can be made more secure in an easier way.
This has nothing to do with linux = secure; windows = horrible. It all depends on the configuration and the management.. always.
Which is incorrect. Windows is insecure regardless of your "configuration and management" bullshit. Just because you didn't see X, it means X doesn't exist ? What kind of an argument is that ?
Also.. why are you hating so much ? There is not a single reason to be aggressive at all..
You are posting false information and using fallacies which I utterly despise. Thus you are directly, or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally harming the readers. Here you go again, with a red herring. Just stop. Then again, you gotta earn your shitposting sig. money somehow. This solves my own question why pseudo-randoms have been posting pseudo-science in this section for a while now; it's time to exclude it from everything. |
|
|
|
And dynamite will destroy both.
With proper network- / privileges-management and some common sense a windows network can be as secure as a linux network.
It all depends on the security mechanism / -management.
A miserably managed linux network is way more prone to being compromised than a moderately good managed windows network.
That is, again, nonsense. You were talking about the out of the box security. Windows is garbage, especially windows server. Luckily for that garbage OS this discussion does not involve performance. But saying linux is more secure per se, is kind of wrong.
Is not.
For the sake of reference: the last time anything running Linux that I've seen was compromised was never. The again, that might be partially because of proper security practices. So.. you mean there never were linux kernel exploits, privilege escalations or any other exploits which only affected linux and were severe (*cough* shellshock *cough*) ? What has me never seeing a linux system get compromised have to do with the existence of exploits? Strawman facepalm. I'm well familiar with exploits, especially those that were planted by NSA undercover contributors[1]. Read before you respond next time or just avoid responding at all (the later is the better option).
[1] Greetings to all american kool-aid drinkers again; you live in such a lovely country. |
|
|
|
Anyone know why Theymos didn't think it a good idea to use multisig with the treasurers?
It was brought up in the old thread, but I haven't seen talk about it in recent time. You got to wait for master to answer. The forum should move the existing funds that are held by single users into multi-sig ASAP. I know folks like OgNasty are reliable, but shit happens and people die every day.
|
|
|
|
While i agree that it is safer to use Linux, i would not agree that linux is a more secure OS per se.
Then you need to do a lot more reading. When compared: Windows = swiss cheese; Linux = brick wall. But saying linux is more secure per se, is kind of wrong.
Is not.
For the sake of reference: the last time anything running Linux that I've seen was compromised was never. The again, that might be partially because of proper security practices. |
|
|
|
And for Swissborg 500k is either not a high amount, they did collect more than 50$ million USD, didn't they?
100 lambos for the team and that garbage project is going to be broke. Proof-of-funds, not proof-of-trust. Thanks. The garbage project is new, FJ isn't. Don't dare to compare FJ to trash like that. Thanks again. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
