Apropo de asta, mi-am amintit de un banc. Bancul e bun, dar in contextul in care-l spun in contextul actual, devine trist. Ras-plans!

Un prieten s-a dus la psiholog deoarece credea ca are un picior mai scurt. Psihologul l-a lamurit ca celalalt picior este mai lung... Acum este fericit!
La fel si cu pensiile si salariile: ni se spune ca nu sunt ele mici, ci ca sunt preturile mari. Alta viata, nenicule!


Si eu sper

---

Multumesc 


Adevarat, acum am observat si eu... incredibil!


Ma bucur ca a fost un material interesant de citit


M-a amuzant maxim formularea! =))) Desi e de ras-plans situatia...


Pai... vezi bancul pe care l-am scris mai sus. Fix asa o sa fie.


Nu, ai perfecta dreptate. Si eu am observat asta... In zonele unde sunt case de platit cu cardul e mai mereu gol...


Si ostracizati. Mult, mult mai mult decat acum.

Da, da, inteleg si are sens ce spui. Dar asta nu explica, totusi, ce spune IntimitateaG ca a patit... Cine stie...?!

Si in rest, da, ruleaza ca un strat si se realizeaza "offline" tranzactiile. Ma rog, "offline" e un fel de a spune... sunt offline fata de reteaua Bitcoin dar, tehnic vorbind, tot intr-un mediu "online" se fac, nu? Ca altfel nu ar avea cum sa se transmita sumele intre parteneri  Cel putin eu asa vad lucrurile. Dar la un moment dat tot se face si o postare "online" sau on-chain", adica in blockchain-ul Bitcoin. Cred ca asta tine strict de dorinta celui care creeaza canalul...


Si cu asta avem o problema-n minus. Au mai ramas 149 de nelamuriri pe care le mai avem de rezolvat cu LN-ul


De Muun nu stiam. Dar nu vrei sa incerci si celelalte portofele recomandate in topicul international? Ma refer la Phoenix Wallet, Breez Wallet, Blixt Wallet.


Okay Cand mai ai vesti, te asteptam.

Chiar am sunat!   Am gasit numarul pe CoinATMRadar. Am intrebat cand o sa fie pus in functiune aparatul, dar interlocutorul o tot dadea de gard. Ca sa-i scriu pe WhatsApp (pentru saxydev: oațap)), ca daca am Telegram... Eu il tot intrebam cand va fi functional ATM-ul, iar el imi tot dadea solutii alternative. Intr-un final a spus ca are probleme cu exchange-urile si de aceea nu e aparatul functional. Ca nu i se aproba conturile... ca nu-i leaga niciun exchange aparatul la reteaua lor... ceva de genul.

Acum urmeaza partea interesanta.

---

Partea interesanta este ca omul era insa nerabdator sa ma ajute. Sa ii spun ce suma vreau, ce moneda etc. A spus ca practica un comision de ~5% la vanzare si ~4% la cumparare (de la el catre client). Deci clientul cumpara de la el cu pret de 5% peste CoinMarketCap si ii vinde cu 4% sub CoinMarketCap. Dar nu era batut in cuie. A zis ca variaza si in functie de suma si moneda.

Ca sa revin insa la ce scrisese IntimitateaG, cum omul imi tot spunea ca ma ajuta si sa "vin la ei", am intrebat "Unde?". Ce credeti, mi-a spus ca la exchange. Deci, draga IntimitateG, se pare va dorinta ti-a fost indeplinita Sper ca vestea este buna pentru oricine!

Tranzactia este OTC, din moment ce omul nu are legatura cu exchange-urile, deci ar trebui sa ai anonimitate maxima. Ramane doar sa te feresti si de camerele dinauntrul exchange-ului

Alternativ insa, ti-l recomand totusi pe Razvan. S-ar putea sa obtii un comision si mai bun de la el, mai ales luand si in considerare parteneriatul dintre voi, care, din ce observ, tocmai s-a infiintat. Cu ocazia aceasta te si felicit pentru afacerea reusita

---

In continuare, niciun semn de la Pro Hash. Ii intereseaza maxim de clienti. Nici nu vreau sa ma gandesc ce s-ar intampla daca ai avea vreo problema cu un aparat al lor si ar trebui sa-i contactezi.

---

Valeu, pazea! Ferea! saxydev dispera! Ce ne facem, ce ne facem...?!
Apropo, ce inseamna "Fking", ca nu gasesc cuvantul in niciun dictionar. Sau, ca sa vorbesc pe limba ta, ce ansiamna "Fking"?


Si era greu sa te exprimi coerent din prima si nu in dodii?


Nu te mai repeta... mai bine scrie coerent si corect. Nu uita, la inceput de propozitie prima litera trebuie sa fie majuscula; substantivele proprii se scriu si ele cu majuscula. Iar conjugarea verbului "a juca" la modul indicativ, timp imperfect (acesta este un timp verbal, nu fac referire la conditiile meteorologice, in caz ca la asta te gandeai), persoana a III-a, plural, gen masculin, diateza activa, este "jucau", nu "jucai". Romanii jucau. Asta pentru cultura ta generala.

Mi-am adus aminte de ce nu trebuia sa ma mir. Este totul in regula cu autoritatile noastre. Probabil ca prin 2070 vor lua niste masuri.

---

Am cercetat mai bine articolul. Titlul este inselator sau, in orice caz, nu reflecta realitatea:


Cautand pe Google "OneCoin CEO Ruja Found", am dat de un site mai de Doamne-ajuta mai pertinent decat cryptonews.net. Mai precis, am gasit un articol scris de BBC. Aparent, ideea ca a reaparut bulgaroaica s-a nascut de la faptul ca a fost pus la vanzare un apartament de-al ei din Londra. Si, conform unei legi din respectiva tara, care obliga la transparenta, s-a putut observa ca apartamentul pus la vanzare ii apartine. De aici si speculatia ca a fost gasita. Nicidecum insa.

Explicatia apare aici:



Deci cam asta e treaba... "CryptoQueen" e bine-merci in continuare...

You did it before I did it 

I was waiting for seven days to pass before tagging the user, thinking that 7 days are a decent time to wait. However, since you made first step I decided to make the second one, thus now Rbah has two negative feedbacks. Anyway, there are only a few hours until 7 days are met therefore it's okay to give him the feedback since now.

It's very possible for Rbah to be same with Mitch212. There are too many similarities between them. Anyway, this is less important. What matters is that users did not let themselves tricked anymore into jumping with merits on shady giveaway organizers. It seems that the lesson was learned.

(Of course, in case the organizer finally appears and offers a good reason for being online that much; in case he will also make an official rolling; in case he will also pay the prize -- then I will remove my feedback. But there are very small chances for this to happen.)

This is irrelevant for the deal. You two made a deal which implied dkbit98 to present an example of a free service, without talking anything about the quality of the respective service. And he provided what he had to. You, on the other side, scammed dkbit98.


Oh no... poor man, he is overwhelmed...


Correct. it's no shame to realize you are wrong, that you did the wrong thing, that you took the bait for something stupid and so on. But when you realize that you also have to take responsibility for your actions and pay for them. If you drive while being drunk and Police stops you, then you may realize what you just did. However, realizing the fact is not synonymous with paying for doing the wrong thing. If you realize you just drove while being drunk, you still have to pay the sanction given by Police, they may still take your driving license etc. Similar to this case, you realize what you did was wrong. Now pay what you owe to dkbit98 and move forward and try to not scam people anymore.


That would be the second time when you say "there is no such thing".


You are pretty jumpy with this "there is no such things". Last time you used it you got yourself in a ~2300$ debt.


That's just another lie. I never locked this topic.


Good faith? You acted with good faith? Looooooooooooool!


Congrats for reaching this great number! Make sure you post it here: Announce your rank up, merit or any achievements that makes you feel great!

---

True. Yet, if you look again, you'll also notice that it is also the second untrusted feedback saying saxydev scammed someone. True, the other feedback does also not have a reference link. And curiously, saxydev also accused his accuser of being a scammer (however, the reference link he provided shows nothing relevant). Theese feedbacks may not be, indeed, circumstantial evidence.

However, in Romania we have a saying: "there is no smoke without a fire". In our case, it would mean that these feedbacks would not appear just like that, out of nowhere. Maybe there is a grain of truth inside them. Of course, everybody can also say "maybe not". But seeing what saxydev did in plain sight to dkbit98, this could add some traction to the accuses he received as untrusted feedbacks.

Avem un concurs nou!

Fun, fair and transparent BTC giveaway
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5437138.0

Se poate castiga: ‎0.00061600 BTC.

Organizator: iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2

Poate participa oricine daca are minim 5 merite. Extragerea o va realiza un membru cu reputatie al forumului. Organizatorul sustine ca va mai organiza si in viitor tombole similare.

Participantii trebuie sa se inscrie folosind urmatorul formular:


Concursul a fost organizat ca un raspuns pentru cel similar organizat anterior de Rbah, dar care s-a dovedit a fi teapa.

---

Din pacate, concursul acela s-a dovedit a fi o inselatorie similara celei din septembrie. Pe de alta parte, sunt increzator in acest concurs nou

Buna initiativa cu acest topic! Am sa ma alatur si eu discutiei, cu cateva ganduri si, poate, raspunsuri.


Bine gandit, referitor la faptul ca ai anticipat cum ar fi urmat acolo discutia.


Spre rusinea mea, nici eu nu am folosit pana acum. Am citit despre LN, la inceputurile sale, apoi am mai studiat din cand in cand, insa, rescunosc, fara a ma implica activ in cercetari. Stiu despre LN ca lucreaza ca un strat anexat retelei Bitcoin, care nu functioneaza mereu online, de aici avand si tranzactiile aproape instantanee. Platile se fac prin niste canale de plata si, cand se cumuleaza mai multe plati, posesorul unui canal poate opta sa publice online respectivele plati. Poate ma insel, dar asa cred ca functioneaza, in principiu, sistemul. Aditional, LN permite si denominatii sub 1 satoshi. In plus, ofera si mai multa anomintate, neavand tranzactiile publicate pe blockchain (sau nu in totalitate).


Din ce am vazut de-a lungul timpului, un om pe care il respect foarte mult si care are si o expertiza mult superioara multora (inclusiv mie), folosea Eclair. Daca nu ma insel, acesta este si portofelul "oficial", cel care a fost dezvoltat de echipa care a creat si LN. Poate ca ar fi o sugestie buna sa incerci cu acesta?

Aditional, intr-un topic international se mai sugereaza si


Inteleg ca nu esti interesat de Blue Wallet, dar ai putea incerca sa te joci cu celelalte.

In afara de aceasta, ai putea apela la LV, in cadrul aceluiasi topic din care am introdus hyperlink-ul de mai sus, pentru un mic imprumut (1000 satoshis). Imrumutul este pentru o saptamana si nu necesita garantare a fondurilor. Astfel, poti testa si cum functioneaza propriu-zis platile.

Din pacate, mai multe nu stiu sa iti spun. Sunt si eu curios sa vad ce mai scriu si altii

Similar, si eu aproape ca uitasem sa raspund aici


Postacii exista de mult timp la noi in tara si, de-a lungul anilor, au impanzit diverse forumuri sau site-uri unde erau permise comentariile, pentru diverse "mismasuri": propaganda politica, sustinerea unui candidat au a altuia, defaimare si asa mai departe. Deci, cu siguranta, dat fiind ca fenomenul exista si exista si oameni cu state vechi in aceasta meserie activitate, se va apela la ei cand va fi cazul. Am sris cu font strikethrough "meserie", insa nu stiu daca este gresit sa consideri asa totusi... In fond, postacii sunt platiti pentru ce scriu pe Internet.


Ma bucur sa aud ca dansa este constienta de adevarata situatie... Cine stie?, poate va reusi sa mai deschida ochii unor cunoscuti.


Eheheeee, ce vremuri erau cand era Dragnea la putere. Uiti si ca daduse lege pentru dublarea alocatiilor (dublare care nu a avut loc nici pana in ziua de astazi) si pentru marirea punctului de pensie cu 40% (care, de asemenea, nu a avut loc)? Deci nu doar ca dadea din gura, omul chiar dadea legi! Imi amintesc ca in perioada aceea eram tare curios cum o sa si plateasca tot ce primite. Din pacate, nu am reusit sa imi aflu raspunsuri la curiozitati, ca l-au incaltat baietii si cei care au venit dupa el au avut grija sa anuleze toate legile emile anterior


Chiar crezi ca nu este?


Da, vad... trist. In orice caz, paranteza aceea o facusem doar pentru a sublinia inca o data ridicolul, cum prin puterea politica poti schimba si legile matematicii, si pe cele ale fizicii, poti face orice, de fapt.

Although you seem biased to defend the scammer, I will try to answer you point by point.


I think that everybody could see that, since this is your very fist post.

---

You are entitling me with a power which I don't have, never had and, most likely, never will have.

---

I also noticed that you are not him, since your English is way better than his.

---

My answer is the following:
1. First of all, the title of this thread says his is a "possible scammer", not a scammer

2. First sentence of this thread says again the same syntagma: "I'd like to raise awareness about a possible Romanian scammer"

3. Checking money in Romania is illegal. As I told him too (in post 10), if you are unsure, go yourself to ANAF and tell the inspectors there you are doing what saxydev does. If you'll do that I also suggest you to bring a suitcase with some cloths and basic needs as it's possible to not return home for a long time.

4. Speaking at large, many Romanians are focused on pilfering. Do you know what pilfering is? "Gainarie" -- there, you know now. Most of those which are looking for pilfering are also illiterate, underclassmen and, as their intellect did not allow them to follow a proper education (finish high school, go to a college, get a good job), many of them become interested in earning money in a easy way, doing various small thefts and so on. Being Romanian, I believe you know this pattern. Many of them are Gypsies, but there are also Romanians sharing same behavior. Some of them managed somehow to learn a bit about technology and Bitcoin and ended up here, looking for online victims.

Since I came on this forum I also found other Romanians looking for pilfering: andulolika and bekli23. Do you know them? Both are illiterate; both are underclassmen (look at how they type in Romanian and English); both are shady; both try to earn a buck from those which are naive enough to pay them. andulolika was offering translation services, while he was unable even to spell his name (and after he made death threats on the forum and self admitted he is a ban evader), while bekli23 (which has a topic dedicated to him inside Investigations board) was claiming that he can decrypt any Bitcoin wallet or that he moved ("offline", according to him) the coins generated by Bitcoin's genesis block (which are technically not movable).

So each of these guys are trying to catch a fish, with various idiocies. saxydev is just like them: he is selling for money a service which can be accessed for free on Internet and which is also illegal. But, considering his pattern, I said he is a possible scammer (in the end he showed his real character and actually exposed himself as a scammer).

To conclude, while his shitty business did not automatically mean he is a scammer, his kind of being (which is very often found in Romania) made me raise an alarm about this guy. The topic was for raising an alarm. What happened later -- meaning the way he exposed himself as a true scammer, that's another story. But the topic was created for making people aware that he could be a scammer.

---

His shills toward Pi have nothing in common with our subject. The reference I made in OP was solely for mentioning another example of where he showed how illiterate he is and what monumental stupidities he is able to write.

---

I will explain.


Now read again the highlighted part.

Do you sense the difference between "tell" and sign (n.b. sign the deal)? Verba volant, scripta manent. You are showing as a counter-example a situation where you say some words out of your mouth and you compare that with signing an agreement?

Obviously, if you say on the phone to a car dealer that you want a car and then you call back and say you changed your mind, nothing will happen. That's because you did not sign anything. However, if you would have signed a paper with the dealer, the verbal cancellation could not occur. Or, at least not so easy. Maybe you could still cancel after you signed, but you would pay a penalty anyway, as a cancellation policy.

Furthermore, if the call would be recorded, in this hypothetical case of yours, then your "yes" would have the power of a signed agreement and again, you would not be able to cancel anymore (or you'd pay a cancellation policy).

So, as you see, even in your case (which is not saxydev's case), even just by "telling" you'd be in same situation.

Coming back to our case, saxydev and dkbit had no cancellation policy. However, since the deal was made based on mutual agreement of the two parties, it's common sense that it's cancellation would have also to imply both parties and not allow a unilateral cancelling. And, since dkbit98 did not agree with the cancelling proposal of saxydev, this implied that the deal was still valid. Does this make sense?

---

Thanks, I appreciate.


I am sorry for disappointing you. You should know though, while saxydev swore at me, I merely used a medical term for describing his condition. If you'll make some research, you'll find out that imbecility is a medical condition, not a libel. Regarding the low education of saxydev, or my statements about him being an illiterate -- just watch how he types; it's visible from the Moon. About my statement that he is an underclassman -- I admit, it's only a supposition. However, from the way he types I would bet that he is not a Ph.D. Feel free to think the opposite, though.


Perhaps you see him very well educated, uhm?

---

Pardon me for not repeating everywhere the term "possible" in front of "scammer".


Apparently, "scammer" is the correct term, since he scammed dkbit98 soon after I initiated this topic.

---

Thanks for the reminder. I will update OP with the amount scammed of 0.1 BTC.

Later edit: just did it. OP title is also updated accordingly, in order to properly reflect the situation.


The thread doesn't belong to Reputation, as it's dedicated to someone which was believed to be a "possible scammer" and which later became a "real scammer".

---

Probably I bribed them all. Most likely, I bribed dkbit98 as well, for him to create the flag and also to lure poor and naive saxydev with that appealing offer, making sure saxydev will bite the bait?


Yes, like a mafia. For more information, feel free to talk to wolwoo. He was first who exposed this:

---

I placed a screenshot above, perhaps you missed. Let me help you out:


Do you see the highlight from the screenshot? There is the key for your question.

---

I would not dare to speak instead of LV but, however, I believe that he did not understand the whole case from the beginning and he understood it when he said this:

---

Thank you for the compliments, but you tell me: how would you call someone unable to barely spell his name? A cultivated genius?

---

I hope I answered to all your claims. If I missed any, let me know.

Hihi! cred ca multi am inceput assa... Si - vezi? - din acest motiv si sper ca discutiile acestea sa ajunga la cat mai multi oameni si, astfel, sa se poata feri de inselatorii, fie ei utilizatori inregistrati sau nu.

---

Cum frrrate asa ceva?!  Sincer sa fiu, nu am mai urmarit evolutia OneCoin organelor de ancheta de cand vazusem ca bulgaroaica s-a dat la fund si e cautata de Interpol. Nu ma asteptam s-o gaseasca prea curand (ceea ce s-a si intamplat, de altfel) dar, totodata, nici nu ma asteptam ca mizera sa fie inca promovata. Aparent m-am inselat si locotenentii ei au inca destul curaj... Ai vazut documentarul acela pe care il postasem mai sus? Sunt curios daca tot Cristi Calina e la butoane in Romania... in documentar spunea ca e membru diamond in reteaua OneCoin si ca el e bulibasa la noi in tara.


Da, corect. Ce imi doresc insa este sa actioneze imediat dupa ce va incepe sa creeze pagube.

Loooool!

---

To make sure, he will also ignore all DT2 members. At least, this is how things should be done thoroughly. Maybe DT3 too.


Based on his IQ, which is a number lower than the one of his shoe size, saxydev applies the following principle for solving issues: treat the effect, not the cause. For example, if he is driving and hears a weird sound coming from the engine or from under his car, he will simply insert some cotton wool inside his ears and - voila! - no sound is heard anymore! The car runs like it's brand new!

Similar, in this case, creating a personal Trust list will certainly clear his profile. Can't be otherwise, can it?

---

Thank you, NeuroticFish!

I am not sure if this topic will be updated again, since its author is offline for almost a year now, after scamming shasan with 0.01 BTC, after having active flags on his name and after the negative feedbacks he received.

However, maybe someone else will revamp a new edition of this thread.

Until then, let me save here my new post record.



This is my 3000th post

Iuuuhuuuu! De cand o asteptam! M-am inscris in secunda 2 imediat ce am vazut postarea de la tine. Il tot pandeam si eu dar, de fiecare data cand verificam, nu aparea nimic in sectiunea Collectibles (si o fac de 2-3 ori pe zi acum, hihi).

Si, dupa cum anticipasem amandoi, a meritat asteptarea!

Ce premiu iti place cel mai mult? Eu unul mi-as dori (1) masinuta (ca de obicei, de altfel  ), (2) card-ul cu insertia "Don't get Yogged" sau (3) portofelul hardware. As prefera aceste premii chiar si inaintea unei monede incarcate cu BTC Mi se par mult mai atractive. Desigur, n-as zice nu oricarui premiu, daca ar fi sa castig, dar cele 3 imi plac cel mai mult.

Sa fie cu noroc!

If I may, I soooo envy you for those dices They look really nice... When I saw the raffle I wished from first instant to win those dices!

My son started to play "backgammon" with me for a few months now. But his "backgammon" only means to open the backgammon box, put all checkers to a side and roll many dices inside the box, in order to have many doubles, triples, quadruples and so on. He has about 21 dices now and throws all at once (He is only 3 years old...) And he's so cute when he is laughing after getting 6-6 or multiple sixes...

When I saw the raffle I wished I'd have the chance to win a dices set which I intended to use for playing with him. Maybe MJ will set this prize in the future, at future raffles though... I did not lose my hope

02 - GazetaBitcoin

Thank you, OP, and sincere congrats for reaching this unbelievable number of free raffles!

After less than one month (which is absolutely incredible!!!) my package arrived!  

Here it is:



The deck of card is very nice, shiny and the cards have a nice grip when I hold them in my hands. I did not read yet the comic book, but I am barely waiting to do it! And the mantis logo and the sticker were a nice addition to the package

Thank you once more MJ for this raffle which had enough prizes for almost all participants to win  

Is it possible to make a similar one on Easter?  

This is why Besides, the scammer could also delete the post and I wanted to make sure it's still visible (here) for everybody.

---

Yup, very fun! And, apparently I was right before, when I said


Oh well, he did not get a negative feedback (yet), but he has a flag created against him.

---

Looooool!

---

It was funny the way you said but the truth is that while Tate has collection of Lambos inside his garage this pauper is eating the mess from under his fingernails while trying to scam innocent people from the forum.

---

Being serious now, I kept thinking about this case for the last days. I was first tempted myself to create a flag against the possible scammer. I believed that a type 1 flag (or even type 2) are correct. Then I thought again and I abandoned the idea. However, after more "analyse" (/s) I truly believe now that saxydev deserves that flag.

I saw LoyceV and NeuroticFish asking dkbit98 same question: "Be honest: you never expected to be paid 0.1 Bitcoin for this, right?.

The fact that dkbit98, I, others (most likely saxydev himself too) did not really expect to end up with a payment made by the scammer to dkbit98 does not change the fact that saxydev broke the deal unilateral.

Furthermore, the fact that "Deal. Let's see" was posted out of impulse and changed after 20 minutes is not a reason for a unilateral breaking of a written deal. And this is what saxydev did. Out of impulse or not, everybody is responsible for his actions. And has to respond for his actions. If I am brave idiot at a moment and decide to go in the middle of the street saying I won't be hit by any car and in the next 20 seconds I say "I changed my mind and I understand that cars may hit me" -- but just before finishing saying this a car hits me -- then what? I am allowed to travel back in time because I stepped in the middle of the street out of an impulse? No. I will go to a hospital instead (hoping that I am still alive) and I am paying for my actions, be it taken or not out of impulse.

Furthermore, the case here is not a hypothetical one as the one I wrote above. The case here has two parties, both responsible for their actions, which settled a deal together, on their own will, nobody forcing a party or the other to accept the deal. And the deal was the following:


This deal did not involve any clauses such as "deal can be cancelled unilateral if a party changes his mind within 20 minutes" / "the deal can be cancelled if a party acts out of the impulse" etc. The only specified clause is the highlighted part.

Having the deal terms set, the deal was sealed here:


At this point the deal is real, it's settled; it's written down.

Next, the party which respected his party of the deal proves the fact that he made his part and is waiting for the second part to honor his part as well:


The counter-party initiates the scam, by not willing to respect his part:


Again, being sad, gay etc. was not written as clause, therefore it can not be mentioned as a reason for not honoring the deal. At this point, the second party exited the deal, trying to unilateral cancel it. Furthermore, remember that the scammer already changed his mind once, at post #22. So at post 20 he accepted the deal; then tried once to cancel it, by editing his post. At post #22 he still wants the deal, only for trying to cancel it once more, after dkbit98 actually delivered his part of the deal. So he accepted, wanted out, accepted again and wanted out once more. This behavior can simply not be tolerated when it comes about written deals!

And this is the moment when (normal) consequences appear and each one has to be responsible for his own actions:


So we have (1) dkbit98, which honored his part of the deal and (2) saxydev, which did not honor his part. As a consequence, dkbit98 created the flag.

The definition of the flag says precisely what happened:



In this case, the damage consists in 0.1 BTC which dkbit98 did not receive from the other party, although he was entitled to receive this amount. dkbit98 was scammed by saxydev. Therefore I, for one, have to agree with dkbit98 when saying the following:


The following part is emphasizing even more the possible outcomes in the theoretic situation when he would actually have to sweat in order to deliver his part and, again, I fully agree:



Of course, it was no joke, but a written agreement. If saxydev considered it a joke then, again, it's his fault and, once more, he has to be responsible for the consequences of his actions.

Vielen Dank für die Bestätigung, dass die Karte angekommen ist, gbianchi! Ich bin froh, dass der Umschlag während des Versands nicht verloren gegangen ist, da dies bei Umschlägen oft passieren kann. Ich hoffe, Sie genießen die Karte und fügen sie Ihrer Sammlung von Krypto-Gegenständen hinzu

Spoiler-Alarm: Da die Karte, die ich als Preis angeboten habe, gesucht wurde, werde ich vielleicht ein paar Verlosungen für ein paar weitere ähnliche Karten organisieren, die ich noch habe. Bleib dran!

---

Abgesehen davon schrieb NeuroticFish für den Fall, dass 1miau es nicht bemerkte, einige Kuriositäten, mit denen er konfrontiert war, nachdem er den Preis von Betnomi gewonnen hatte. Schauen Sie sich gerne seinen Beitrag an, und wenn Sie die Informationen für nützlich halten, können Sie sie auch hier teilen. Ich hoffe das hilft.

There is no need to trust me. What mattered was OP to be trustworthy or to elect a trustworthy member to run the rolling, instead of following the words of a Ponzi promoter.


This sentence hows how few you are able to understand with that peanut brain. Nobody can do what he wants, even if it's his own giveaway. Everybody has to respect the rules of the giveaway and first one to respect the rules is OP himself! And this applies to any giveaway, not only to this one.

Your words shows that you also don't understand that you placed OP in a very delicate situation now, which may also end by having the account tagged with negative feedback. And, the more he remains offline, the higher are chances for this to happen. Under no circumstances the organizer of a giveaway can break the rules. And, in our case, absolutely no rule was respected:


Furthermore, OP did not even pay the prize to the fake winner so there is one more reason for being tagged soon.