Actually, I'm not even seeing this to be possible You're somehow lowering the ICANN fee?
|
|
|
bitaddress.org is great for brainwallets. I've looked at the source code, monitored network activity while generating addresses, and tried to generate addresses after unplugging the ethernet cord (it worked). I am reasonably convinced that it does not store your private keys. I have a copy of the website saved to my flash drive. In order to get into my brainwallet, you'd need to know my full name, SSN, driver's license ID number, and other things, not to mention the several-word salt I memorized. The novel part is that due to hashing algorithms, the brainwallet's passphrase includes none of this information
|
|
|
I have encrypted the private key using AES 128bit pass phrase. I call BS. There's no way anybody could decrypt something like that without the pass phrase (unless it was very weak, in which case it was not 128 bit) Bitcoin Address: 169N4izDwoUb73Abwv8Qc1hSUTwpXanSwK Private Key (Wallet Import Format): 5KMKBQAUGDayBLVLDxYGky3LfmYvs1U5HK8mGaVER2EeQDUY9ri Passphrase was "bitcointalk.org" There you go. "bitcointalk.org" is not 128 bits. it was not a "AES 128bit pass phrase." In fact, given where we are right now, I'd say the entropy is close to 0 bits NIMDA
Do you wish to put up a larger bounty with a much stronger pass phrase?
If I put up a bounty with a pass phrase which was actually "AES 128bit," you would never crack it.
|
|
|
I have encrypted the private key using AES 128bit pass phrase. I call BS. There's no way anybody could decrypt something like that without the pass phrase (unless it was very weak, in which case it was not 128 bit)
|
|
|
That's not going to help AES is a pretty good encryption mechanism, and bruteforcing 32 bits is hard even with MD5.
|
|
|
You sent me 2.0 BTC and I sent it on and I am not even in the master list!
That is called block-chain pruning; I'm surprised we got to it before Gavin did
|
|
|
-- looking bullish BUY BUY BUY
|
|
|
Use a brainwallet. That way, you have plausible deniability. "I don't own that address!"
|
|
|
I think the longest chain is below.
Oh I see, so now we're competing for the longest chains. Did you orphan any blocks?
|
|
|
Oh lol, I'm just always used to seeing the Deepbit account.
|
|
|
I want to know who has Al the Alpaca's .011 BTC. That was his facet money. Don't get the Alpaca upset, for I see he's starting to leave droppings on threads he dislikes. ~Bruno~ I believe it was used to cover fees. And did you actually send to 1VayNert? That's DeepBit's address... Edit: nope you didn't.
|
|
|
Wow, I'm still confused about your niche... tucows offers names for $15 each
|
|
|
and I used a new blockchain.info wallet, so that I could combine it with one other address I own (which only got one input) to pay the transaction fee. Also please don't send to either of the two addresses I used (the one it received on and the one which contributed 0.001 BTC) because I have deleted them.
|
|
|
who wants to bet on when "they" default?
|
|
|
*can't tell if you could tell if I was joking*
also we need someone else to post an address
|
|
|
But wait... it's going back to Garr in the end. Now I see the light! It was all a scam in the hopes that people would add to it! rofl Seriously though, if you're going to add to it, calculate the number of transactions left on it and multiply that by 0.00051, so you can cover people's tx fees
|
|
|
I sent it, but you might want to post your address and "received" again to keep things simple
|
|
|
lol, verified alpacas. Just waiting on the TX fee which is coming from a faucet. Also waiting on more confs
|
|
|
1EWRJ5BeibZxMguujPLzqM8WWiHpFJtLLx
Only "Full members" and above can participate, just to avoid someone creating an account to steal the coin
|
|
|
This will be interesting 1KiZGitw2zEr4uPzZsT7dh7F6e5yoKGvE7 Received
|
|
|
|