I would say yes it is, unless you are something incredibly ilegal like being a drug cartel lord or whatever.
|
|
|
But how can you have a low volatility and a bitcoin price going up to 5000 usd within this year as more than 50% of bitcoiners believe when asked at the beginning of the year? or can we have a linear growth without huge ups and downs?
|
|
|
(if you haven't done so already) Red line = Est. on-chain daily USD transaction volume divided by 200000. 100k+ peak sometime in 2017. I could live with that. I could sign that with my blood and tears.
|
|
|
Milk with chocolate powder
|
|
|
Didnt poloniex used to show orders and graph without being logged in? was good for a quick check.
|
|
|
Doge and Dark because of great community and mainstream
Beside these and monero (and maybe lite) i dont know any other worth owning thus far. (beside btc obv..)
|
|
|
Market noise. If Bitcoin crashed, there would be a big ass panic sell on all things crypto, no doubt. Of course it doesn't mean eventually some other coin would take the spot or Bitcoin would rise again. As a concept crypto is not going away, but a legitimate crash of Bitcoin means a crash in all things crypto.
|
|
|
Sounds good. Any screenshots?
|
|
|
Have you checked localbitcoins? maybe some sellers are accepting ukash over there.
|
|
|
When you said grow I thought about weed for a second lol
|
|
|
Thats why the average joe doesnt care about Bitcoin, they are happy as long as they can use their dollars to do shopping and the sun rises every morning.
|
|
|
Bitcoin is like it is now and will stay like that, at least in terms of total supply, its insane to try to change the fundamental rules of the game now.
|
|
|
I thought St Petersburg was in czech republic
|
|
|
PoS is a joke. So is PoW, but less of a joke.
|
|
|
Compared to Bitcoin gold doesn't seem real... secure. That's because it's not. The only way to make gold even approach bitcoin's level of security is if you're a billionaire who can afford to store his gold on a space station or on the moon. Other than that, you can't even play in the same league as bitcoin security-wise. Thats pretty silly. Can you store your USB/HD/trezor/whatever on the moon? Then anyone can come to your house, find your wallet and torture you until you sing the password Nothing is safe my friend. And lol at "you cant spent gold". As if you can spend bitcoin in a lot of places.
|
|
|
Generally yes, but the "blow up" kind of money comes from random luck and creativity and being at the right moment right time. Nothing to do with a college degree.
|
|
|
You can donate to the forum, or you can donate to the forum users... i vote for the former.
|
|
|
you forget the English coal mines used even in Roman times and Later (19 century) The German & Belgian Coal mines... europe never hit a real energy crisis as they had access to coal for metallurgy and the industrial revolution, combined with a criss-cross of riverways + mediterranean sea for almost free-energy transportation, communication and trade. In China though coal is much deeper and only in modern times the energy gains pay off. I don't really know the efficiency of chinese trade at the time though.
It seeems reading a bit of history will do the trick, it appears that the English had transformed the China into an opium junkie. They growed opium in india to flood the Chinese market and tip the balance of trade in their favour. So it would seem that the rise of Western Europe and the decline of China could be simple: basic drugdealing About china and the Roman Empire, you can draw a paralel: They both achieved wealth by focusing on producing and being inventive about how to exploit people without people rebeling. This doesnt last forever as we can see tho.
|
|
|
I think it' also relevant to note that financial institutions are kinda flipped upside down in regards to their attitudes towards having money. Having money on hand is a burden for them. They'd much rather lend money out than take your deposits. The National Bank Transfer day orchestrated by some Occupy folks a few years back was idiotic. The credit unions were burdened by the extra deposits. And the banks were none the worse off for the loss of funds.
|
|
|
|