|
What wallet are you using on the Nook?
|
|
|
|
|
Gun-free zone signs are suicide contracts.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the 0.002 BTC  Brilliant, no bad deed goes unrewarded. |
|
|
|
|
No BTC sellers found on LocalBitcoins>Bahamas variables. Maybe ask the Floridians closest to the Bahamas on LBC if they've collected any? There's pink sand on eBay & Amazon, but it looks too uniform to be from that particular beach.
|
|
|
|
The escrow system on OB is definitely going to be the weak link. I think with any transaction involving bitcoin someone is going to have to trust someone else somewhere but that's where the opportunity is for something bad to happen. Escrow is also going to be really difficult for them to judge certain things as well (buyer says he received the item but it was a box of bricks and not a macbook etc - what do they do then?).
Same as ebay customer service does. Scanned receipts, pictures of the item, delivery tracking, etc. Except this is where honest people can get scammed. If I sell an laptop but send a laptop box with nothing but sand in it to the exact weight of the laptop then how can anyone prove otherwise? All I can prove is I sent something that weighs the same as the laptop and the buyer signed for it. Either party can claim wrongdoing and scam whether a laptop or box of sand was sent. This is why it's not watertight and you would hope it doesn't happen but as we know from this forum scammers are rife and will do anything they can to make their money. Shipping services only care if you underweigh your item. It's well known that you can ship an empty box and they'll thank you for overpaying them. This is how an escrow scammer got Bitmit to hold the payment from being refunded to their buyer, despite Bitmit saying an unboxing video was ok for evidence, and then when it was provided showing the cutting open of an empty box, with the seller's paid shipping label, with no evident retaping, Bitmit reneged. In the end the escrow scammer capitulated and let Bitmit refund. |
|
|
|
Will you consider removing your negative trust if he stops selling this?
I don't think it's correct to leave negative trust for something you received for free as a vouch copy. What other free victimful crime guides would you say are incorrect to leave negative trust for? Burglary? Armed robbery? Kidnapping? Rape? Murder? Your opinion is already posted for everyone to see and take their own conclusions. Some have concluded that committing victimful crimes is awesome, others haven't even read my amateur indictment. If it's not ok to sell what he's selling according to the the forum rules it's time for the mod to step in and remove the thread. Finally something reasonable. Yes, they should move it to the hidden forum where it can only be seen by staff and obtained by legal process. |
|
|
|
What I am promoting is just a method to monetize what everybody is selling in this forum and every other big forums, if you can not call the sellers criminals then YOU MUST BE A BIG FOOL TO CALL ME A criminal.
I don't initiate trades unless I reasonably believe them to be legal and intend to finish them, and I don't have an alt account for undercover work. meadefreling, you're welcome and perfectly positioned to gather evidence of credit/debit card fraud, etc. by your fellow criminals and their associates and leave negative trust on them! |
|
|
|
3.2.1 Bitcoin Payments and Escrow
All trade over OpenBazaar exclusively uses Bitcoin. OpenBazaar will support four payment options with Bitcoin:
Direct payment
Alice transfers bitcoin to Bob in a simple payment
Double-deposit 'MAD' escrow
Alice and Bob create a 2-of-2 multisignature escrow address
Alice and Bob need to agree to release funds from that address
Notary escrow
Alice, Bob, and Charlie (a third party 'notary') create a 2-of-3 multisignature escrow address
Two members of this party are required to release funds from the address
Notary pooled escrow
Alice, Bob, and others (multiple third party notaries) create a n-of-m multisignature escrow address
Multiple parties from the pool of notaries are required to release funds from the address
|
|
|
|
So there's absolutely zero chance that OP is suffering weekly nicotine withdrawal from I light 2-3 cigs on the weekends and that's it
? I guess I was transported to an alternate universe where nicotine isn't addictive at all to anyone, then. Bye. |
|
|
|
The highlighted parts indicate plausible deniability so it means that with a good lawyer it's legal, with a bad lawyer it's illegal.
Nope, actually implausible deniability. Let me try to reword it more clearly for morons, but it's rather difficult for me to get down to their level: If meadefreling is actually doing what they said in their guide, the government, which prosecutes over victimless crimes more than actual crimes with victims like credit/debit card fraud, etc., may choose to prosecute meadefreling not because it feels in any way morally/ethically/legally obligated to, but because it decided to take a break from fucking the civil liberties of victimless aka non-actual criminals, into oblivion. When you are quoted in an indictment/information actually or effectively saying that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that establishes probable cause. If you or your lawyer actually or effectively says to a judge/jury that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that eliminates reasonable doubt. If you or your lawyer try to claim you actually thought otherwise, your previous inconsistent statement will be used for impeachment.
Living at the expense of victims of crime is offensive and indefensible. You initially called it a "greyhat money making method" in your vouch copy PM to me. Then you changed the OP to BLACKHAT MONEY MAKING METHOD Now you're doubling down and trying to pull the Robin Hood card? Fuck you and fuck everyone who thinks it's OK to victimize other poor people and pretend they're rich so it's fine. |
|
|
|
You say 'getting greedy', and I say 'getting out of competition with credit/debit card thieves who can offer Amazon purchases for almost any discount and still profit with near-zero expenses'...
Let's call the whole thing off!
Do you know that for sure? Do you know how purse can offer 20%? Are they stealing cards? Theories: Purse itself as opposed to its sellers, is buying cards from Amazon at wholesale discount. See all those cards in retail stores, and the codes that Gyft Coinstars spit out? There's no added fee for buying them, which means they have to be getting them at a discount to be making a profit/enough for operating expenses. Amazon Associates referral fees might be involved too. |
|
|
|
The highlighted parts indicate plausible deniability so it means that with a good lawyer it's legal, with a bad lawyer it's illegal.
Nope, actually implausible deniability. Let me try to reword it more clearly for morons, but it's rather difficult for me to get down to their level: If meadefreling is actually doing what they said in their guide, the government, which prosecutes over victimless crimes more than actual crimes with victims like credit/debit card fraud, etc., may choose to prosecute meadefreling not because it feels in any way morally/ethically/legally obligated to, but because it decided to take a break from fucking the civil liberties of victimless aka non-actual criminals, into oblivion. When you are quoted in an indictment/information actually or effectively saying that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that establishes probable cause. If you or your lawyer actually or effectively says to a judge/jury that you were almost certain that what you were doing was criminal, that eliminates reasonable doubt. If you or your lawyer try to claim you actually thought otherwise, your previous inconsistent statement will be used for impeachment. |
|
|
|
|
You say 'getting greedy', and I say 'getting out of competition with credit/debit card thieves who can offer Amazon purchases for almost any discount and still profit with near-zero expenses'...
Let's call the whole thing off!
|
|
|
|
I don't smoke
I light 2-3 cigs on the weekends and that's it
If you actually breathe the particulates of the cigarettes you light, then you DO smoke. Quit. can really such small amounts have an impact? I mean there are people who smoke 3 packs a day and they do fine xD Can a biochemist please explain how nicotine works, thanks. |
|
|
|
Irregardless, you can't just set a single high-usage background app to stop being high-usage from the Wi-Fi only Android OS settings.
Why not? That's what the "Restrict app background data" checkbox is for. A checkbox that does not exist in Wi-Fi only Android 4.4.2 when selecting any app under Data usage.  |
|
|
|
|
Irregardless, you can't just set a single high-usage background app to stop being high-usage from the Wi-Fi only Android OS settings. You might want to reserve your data transfer for specific high-usage background apps and not be forced to choose between allowing all of them, or none.
|
|
|
|
I don't smoke
I light 2-3 cigs on the weekends and that's it
If you actually breathe the particulates of the cigarettes you light, then you DO smoke. Quit. |
|
|
|
As our faces differs so also is our opinions because one mans food is another man poison.
One man gathers what another man spills.  < Back on topic > $50/day "Easily" would be a big help for me if it was done honestly. Charging money to teach criminal scams doesn't seem like a great plan to secure your future. Do you have any useful skills?
As we discussed, more than 100 people are doing this and I am not forcing anybody to buy.
Practically is not a must.There's illegal as in "we the government have prohibited this victimless action because we can, and you can't vote us out of power because we count the votes" and then there's illegal as in "this action is a crime with an actual victim/s". Everybody is guilty of the former for merely existing on this planet, but few are guilty of the latter. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
