I don't have connections to the network, is there a list with masternodes I can add?
Don't want to send coins there if I can't sync it
Please direct technical questions in regards to Aegeus to their communication channels. Here's their Telegram |
|
|
|
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: CAMPAIGN CLOSING
This campaign is now CLOSED. The eSlots crowdsale is also over.
Information in regards to participation will be sent to the eSlot team.
Rewards should be sent out in accordance to the bounty's rules: 3% of the SOLD tokens during the crowdsale.
|
|
|
|
VIEWO IS ANNOUNCING 4,000,000 TOKENS AIRDROP CAMPAIGN!
Viewo is a video sharing network that operates on a blockchain-based rewards system. All participants in the Viewo network are rewarded for their actions, big or small. Rewards come in the form of VEO Tokens, a block- chain-based utility token that has value in both the Viewo network and outside the Viewo network.
Super simple campaign - true airdrop as it should be! Join now and get VEO tokens as a reward!
4M tokens will be distributed among participants.
Follow the procedure:
· Join VIEWO official Telegram group.
· Like and follow our facebook page and share our last post on FACEBOOK.
· Follow us on twitter and retweet our last post on TWITTER.
· Fill out the form to join our Airdrop.
· Wait for the tokens to be distributed after the end of ICO campaign. These 4,000,000 VEO tokens are going to be distributed as follows:
The first 20,000 participants to sign up will receive VEO tokens worth $10. The remaining participants will receive VEO tokens worth $5 till the end of the Airdrop Pool.Rules:
1. Each participant must write at least 5 constructive messages or questions per week;
2. Your messages should be meaningful and constructive. Messages "Hello", "How are you?", "When is the ICO?",
3. Etc. will be deleted, will not be credited, and may entail disqualification from the campaign;
4. Each participant should make a weekly report in the bounty branch about the work done.
5. The report should be provided as a link to the messages.
Edit: to all interested in participating, please pay special attention to the forum's rules. Follow only the necessery steps to join the campaign!
OP P.S. |
|
|
|
Where is the lawsuit ? as this is clearly states that this is a security: You get the share of Mycelium and the right to receive money whenever Mycelium gets more expensive. Let's suppose that this time, with this crowdsale, it will be valued at 100 million USD. Imagine that when we sell another portion one year later it will be valued at 1 billion USD. So you will get 900 million USD multiplied by your portion (if you are the owner of 5% you will get 5% of 900 million = 45 million). Your initial investment stays with you: you keep owning this right and it is non-dilutable. The next 20% we sell will be dilutable.
 Here's one mention to a lawsuit I found on Telegram. There might be other ones too. The operation of Mycelium is currently headlined from Russia with its CEO also being there. From what I understand though, the perpetration of their scam involved trips to California during the crowdsale. |
|
|
|
From Mycelium's telegram:  I don't know what lawsuit is being discussed but it sounds to me like Rassah might be forgetting some things here and there. Not only did he take part in the crowdsale, he tried to convince investors that everything was fine by claiming that the frauds of Mycelium were legitimate practices. Let's not let this guy forget. Look at his replies in this thread and you'll get what I mean. |
|
|
|
Colu's service will be shutting down on the 1st of June 2018. The whole concept of colored coins seems to be dying now. End of an era for Mycelium? The project was dead anyway but not their worthless token will also banish...  Also, remember the person that had stepped down, Rassah? He was spamming this thread to defend Mycelium's scam back in the day. This is him now:  This is what a 5,131.445 BTC crowdfund looks like.  |
|
|
|
This bounty campaign is now CLOSED
BountyPortals will send results to eMarketChain's team for them to distribute tokens based on stakes at the end of the ICO.
ICO ending date: 29th of May 2018 |
|
|
|
I have PMed you with a proposal on what I think is the best solution when it comes to bounty campaigns. Trust me, I'd know. I'm in crypto since 2013.  |
|
|
|
Welp, I tried...  The request was declined. The suggestions is saying that in essence if anyone wants to add reference to bitcointalk in any article he'd have to request specific white-listing for that article. I've seen discussion in the whitelist page but I don't know if there'd be any point trying to bring up counter-arguments to the decision. From what I understand, the pages for blacklist removal requests are archived on a monthly basis. Perhaps someone with an account having more prestigious edit history could try next month. Personally, I don't think the reason given for declining is good. I haven't seen instances of bitcointalk being spammed/abused on wikipedia and the fact that it's a forum doesn't mean it's a de facto bad source... Requiring a request for white-listing every time one'd want to add a reference could deter many editors from adding valuable information in the first place, but it seems like that's willing to be discounted for any potential spam. |
|
|
|
That's weird because I can't find "bitcointalk.org" at the Wikipedia's 2007-2016, 2017 or 2018 Spam Blacklist. And one of the steps to ask for a review is to check the reason why it got blacklisted. I couldn't find it also, which is very weird indeed. At first I got to think that it might have been my fault for not knowing much about WikiPedia's backend. |
|
|
|
What I tried to do was use an archive.org page for bitcointalk.org and it was also not allowed. I assume because of containing "bitcointalk.org" in the URL.
Try to use archive.is (there won't be any mention to bitcointalk in the URL). That would still be against the rules. |
|
|
|
Hey there, I've sent you a PM with my Telegram username. I am active in crypto since 2013. I'm a bitcoin and ICO expert and have helped several successful ICOs with promotion and related services. Reach out to me for the top solution for ICO promotion. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk.org is banned WITHIN Wikipedia. If you try to add a link to the forum as reference when editing any article a message will pop-up saying it's banned. I'll add an image to the OP to make it more clear.
I don't know if this could lead to a ban or not in Wikipedia but if it could be tested and removed after, could you try to put a mirror link for bitcointalk.org (bitcointa.lk for example?) and check if it isn't allowed too? or you can check any other forums or even reddit.com/r/bitcoin. What I tried to do was use an archive.org page for bitcointalk.org and it was also not allowed. I assume because of containing "bitcointalk.org" in the URL. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcointalk.org is banned WITHIN Wikipedia. If you try to add a link to the forum as reference when editing any article a message will pop-up saying it's banned. I'll add an image to the OP to make it more clear.
|
|
|
|
It seems as though bitcointalk is banned in wikipedia. Why is that? It can't be added as a reference or otherwise linked. Edits with that won't go through. Bitcointalk is a forum where significant announcements were made. Having it banned in wikipedia is quite unreasonable. I believe that we should do something to change that. Anyone here with knowledge over how Wikipedia works that could provide advice on if there's something to be done?  |
|
|
|
Can someone with coding skills check what the new update on bytecoin's code is really? They supposedly fixed the issued the network was failing and the release note of the update is: Made early fixes to downloader to prevent long lagging behind. From: https://github.com/bcndev/bytecoin/blob/master/ReleaseNotes.md Does this fix really address issues with the downloader and was it really this issue that caused the network to stall? Now, isn't that fishy? How could a project like Bytecoin have overlooked a trivial issue such as the downloader? Did this effectively manage to shut down its entire network? How was the fix so swift? Makes me wonder if this was a planned incident. |
|
|
|
This is worth re-taking a look to after today's debacle... BCN got into Binance, went a few time 10x up in price then all exchanged oddly disabled deposits... People were buying from poloniex and sending to Binance but to no avail... There's tons of people complaining of losing money and myriads of stuck transactions. Makes me wonder if this was in insider job. Was there yet another backdoor in bytecoin's code that would allow to halt the network? Was this the last avail of developers to dump their coins? I've made a thread to discuss this new incident here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3678079.0Maybe the 82% premine? Ya think? How much of that do you think they've been able to dump? I lost alot of respect for Binance when they listed this scamcoin. There were huge volumes and one'd wonder where those coins were coming from when deposits were disabled.There's still a big difference in price between exchanges.  Image from https://cryptocoincharts.info/pair/bcn/btc |
|
|
|
This is worth re-taking a look to after today's debacle... BCN got into Binance, went a few time 10x up in price then all exchanged oddly disabled deposits... People were buying from poloniex and sending to Binance but to no avail... There's tons of people complaining of losing money and myriads of stuck transactions. Makes me wonder if this was in insider job. Was there yet another backdoor in bytecoin's code that would allow to halt the network? Was this the last avail of developers to dump their coins? I've made a thread to discuss this new incident here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3678079.0 |
|
|
|
Binance listed the coin and now they're blamed for causing a high network load. All exchanges have closed Bytecoin deposits. The price went up more than 10x through the day but really, who's buying the coins? Most importantly, who's supplying the coinc to binance if deposits closed? The development team is alleged of doing this intentionally. Is Bytecoin a scam? How could it be that all exchanged started facing issues with deposits at the same time? Could there be insider activity involved? Edit: a new theory wants Bytecoin's developers involved with insider trading that might be connected to the 693 million bytecoins that were created through a bug. More here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Buttcoin/comments/8i5mw1/a_flaw_in_bytecoins_code_had_allowed_for_693/A supposed fix has been released by bytecoin to address the network issues. Can someone with coding skills check what the new update on bytecoin's code is really? They supposedly fixed the issued the network was failing and the release note of the update is: Made early fixes to downloader to prevent long lagging behind. From: https://github.com/bcndev/bytecoin/blob/master/ReleaseNotes.md Does this fix really address issues with the downloader and was it really this issue that caused the network to stall? Now, isn't that fishy? How could a project like Bytecoin have overlooked a trivial issue such as the downloader? Did this effectively manage to shut down its entire network? How was the fix so swift? Makes me wonder if this was a planned incident. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
