In this case, use the Android Network Restrictions dialog to make your tethering Wifi network behave as if it were a mobile network.

In the data usage preferences, disable background data. Android allows disabling either for all apps or for individual apps specifically.

Note if you open the app manually, it will still sync as this will count as "foreground".

if it sounds too good to be true it is. any respectable member here who tested this? what's the method?

This is the slowest website I can stand to use. Either it times out or just runs horribly slow...why can it not be fixed? Whoever is hosting this forum obviously is not equipped to handle it. Please find a decent provider or do something.

I can only give one vouch copy and I will give it to first person to send me PM requesting for it between TheButterZone and hilariousandco and I expect a very brutal review from either of them.

Vouch copy sent to TheButterZone

Why were you put in solitary confinement? It was previously speculated that they put you there in order to get you to give up your private keys, but if they found your trezor seed then that would probably not be the case.

I would also think that being forced to give up passwords/encryption private keys would be potentially forcing someone to give up their right to remain silent and provide potentially incriminating evidence against themselves.

Did they prohibit you from discussing the methods of confiscation?

Sorry it took me so long to get back to you guys. I ended up selling to a local coin shop today.

And violating the Fourth Amendment (unreasonable search and seizure, without probable cause).

TheButterZone:  thanks for looking up and posting all that.  While you are at it could you post the current disposition of the other cases found by jbreher earlier in this thread?  I am just curious.

The defendant, Michael Seiler, by appointed counsel Robert S. Berger, moves to withdraw the guilty plea entered on May 11, 2015. [40] Mr. Seiler informed counsel in a telephone conversation on May 14, 2015 that he wanted to withdraw the plea and proceed to a jury trial. Undersigned counsel discussed this motion with AUSA Michele Korver on May 14, 2015 and informs the court that the government opposes withdrawal of the guilty plea.
Rule 11(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:
(d) Withdrawing a Guilty or Nolo Contendere Plea. A defendant may withdraw a plea of guilty or nolo contendere:
(1) before the court accepts the plea, for any reason or no reason; or
(2) after the court accepts the plea, but before it imposes sentence if:
(A) the court rejects a plea agreement under Rule 11(c)(5); or
(B) the defendant can show a fair and just reason for requesting the withdrawal.
1

Case 1:14-cr-00400-CMA Document 43 Filed 05/15/15 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 3
Mr. Seiler’s fair and just reason for withdrawing the guilty plea is stated in his own words as follows:
When I was young, I visited my grand parents in what was then East Germany. I saw how a overbearing government can oppress a people.
I could have been notified by FEDEX (Cost - about $24) that I was operating a unlicensed money transmittal service. It is a open question if the regulations applied to Bitcoin.
Instead, Michelle Korver sent about 16 vehicles, and a group of snipers (Cost $10,000s) - and I've never been in any legal trouble. This is overbearing. Perhaps it takes a bit of an outsider to see what is happening to America. I need to explain these dangers to America to a jury, and to the American people. .
Please void my plea deal so I get my chance.
The court should consider the following factors:
(1) whether the defendant has asserted his innocence;
(2) whether withdrawal would prejudice the government;
(3) whether the defendant delayed in filing his motion, and if so, the reason for the
delay;
(4) whether withdrawal would substantially inconvenience the court;
(5) whether close assistance of counsel was available to the defendant;
(6) whether the plea was knowing and voluntary; and
(7) whether the withdrawal would waste judicial resources.
United States v. Yazzie, 407 F.3d 1139, 1142 (10th Cir.2005).
Accordingly, Mr. Seiler moves to withdraw the guilty plea entered on May 11, 2015 and to set this matter for a jury trial on the indictment and for such further orders as are necessary to prepare for trial.

JUDGMENT as to defendant Katherine Noland (1). Count 1, Dismissed. Count 2, 5 years probation, $100 special assessment, $20,000 restitution.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, DECREED, AND ADJUDGED:
THAT judgment of forfeiture of the following property shall enter in favor of the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1), free from the claims of any other party:
a. $12,410.00 in United States currency;
b. 64.99255187 Bitcoins;
c. Microsoft Surface computer, serial number 017420742153;
d. Samsung Galaxy Note 3, serial number 256691512400004648;
e. Mac Book Air computer, serial number C02G9BV8DJYC; and
f. Apple IPhone 4S, serial number BCG-E2430A;
THAT the United States shall have full and legal title to the forfeited property and may dispose of it in accordance with law.

At least for the case I was sworn on*, both prosecutor and public defender seemed to just want alert, impartial jurors who wanted to be there and weren't stressed from loss of wages (juror stipend is a joke) or unhealthy.

I was ~19 but had graduated from high school at 16, been a intern journalist and copy editor for the local paper, and adults told me I seemed like an old man since I was ~10. I took more notes during the trial than anyone, and when both attorneys talked to us afterward, the jury's consensus was 1) that the defendant was the victim and acted in self-defense, and the "victim" should have been prosecuted instead for drawing blood 2) I would have been the foreman.

*that went to mistrial because of "unavailable witness"