Sure, because when I pay for travel insurance and I don't fall sick on holiday it is perfectly fine if the insurance company never actually had me covered even when they said they did. They haven't stolen the insurance premium I paid, right?

QS, you routinely display signs and symptoms of serious personality disorder, the above is but one of them.

What don't you get? Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, gives a flying fuck if you 'blame' BadBear or not, the ONLY issue is that you lied about having been banned for your own gain.

Dishonesty and deceit are your trademark.

Despite what you keep attempting, which is to deflect attention away from the fact you are provably untrustworthy, the only person you are convincing is yourself and your sock-puppet accounts.

Are you on medication? If you are you're either not taking the required dosage, you're mixing them with other drugs, or you need your prescription reviewed, urgently.

If you are not on medication, you need to be in order to have a chance at controlling this erratic and compulsively dishonest behaviour of yours, otherwise whatever ails you on this forum is going to become exponentially more self-destructive in your real life over time.

It would appear that this weekend saw a flurry of rather suspect posts attempting to float the "maybe it isn't a scam" turd.

My favourite was: Because that totally makes sense, right?

Although I did chuckle at the guy who asked that the title be changed to reflect the fact it is a scam, you know, to help people out in case they mistakenly believe scrypt.cc isn't an already-proven fraud. Where do these numpties suddenly appear from after all this time?

Uhuh, sure, like I've got that much time to spend on this account as I do *and* all those others? But deflection is all you have I guess, as evidenced by your further response below.

I don't give a shit about payment proof, as I've explained it isn't evidence of anything.

You know something? I haven't even bothered looking up Bit-X, because it isn't something that pings up on threads with people pointing out obvious scam-flags, like you get with cloudmining.website and scrypt.cc and clouminr.io and all the other obvious-ponzi-is-obvious fraudulent operations.

I'll go take a quick look now.
*paused*
*done*

Bit-X could well be a *really* elaborate scam, I mean *really* *really* elaborate to the degree that they have the largest ASIC hardware manufacturer in the world partnering up with them and yet they still end up fucking everybody over in the long run.
Other than, perhaps, the risk of fractional mining, exactly what can be deduced about them that is sufficiently shady to warrant a confident -ve rating?


So, as I said, you can't keep deflecting on to other issues as though the act of deflection answers the question, it doesn't. All it does is make you look either stupid, dishonest or both.

Are you ready to concede that your repeated use of cloudmining.website's payment history serves as NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER as to whether they are actually mining?

Oh, hello, GermanGiant/SpanishSoldier/RussianRaibow

*waves*

What a surprise to see you popping up to defend your criminally fraudulent scam operation.


By all means, please explain to me how your scam's regular payment history, which you so love to tout as being evidence of legitimacy, is *any* different from, say, Bernie Madoff, who made sure his ponzi-based scheme was able to pay out reliably for more than thirty years, with regards to such being evidence of anything?

Don't forget the ever-lulzy: http://joshgarza.brandyourself.com/

You *do* know this is not a legitimate cloud mining service, right? That it's just the usual ponzi-based scam, yes?

I'm assuming you'll say you do know this, which leads me to my next question:

As a 'Legendary' member your opinion of various aspects of this industry will carry much more weight, do you not think your effusive comments about this fraudulent scheme will most likely encourage others to join it and eventually result in many many people losing their savings when it eventually runs for the "We wuz haxxored!!!!!!11!!!" door and takes their money?

You may say that you are merely reporting on the numbers you are getting out of it but, if so, why would you so willingly continue posting just about your gains and no cautionary caveat to other members about the reality of the situation? Especially considering that, if you are really receiving a steady rate of payments out of their system and into your local wallet (because scam-side balances don't count), it is *highly* likely to be because you are such a high ranking member here and they want to make sure you report positively on them.

It is a Ponzi, that's why it is in 'Investor-based games' sub-forum, on the basis that the only 'investment' going on is in the idea that you might be able to eventually withdraw your funds with a profit off the back of other suckers coming later to the scam, before it eventually collapses.

It is almost as if they think the SWAT team will just shrug their shoulders and be all, "Awww shucks! We were pranked into thinking there was an armed conflict here. Never mind, let's go home and not bother tracking down who made the false report".

Consequence. It isn't just a word.

No, it does not put a more positive spin on things. That money-monitor website is just a Ponzi promo service, no different from the, equally shilly cmmonitor.com 'cloud mining' monitor.

Recyclix explicitly state in their T&C's they are paying users out with other users funds.

Which part of that confuses you? It is a ponzi-based scam, their small print tells you it is a ponzi-based based scam.

This isn't rocket-surgery, people. Use your brains.

Funny that, considering the OP has been compared to GermanGiant who also came running to you to whine about his ratings at the exact same time RussianRaibow came running to me to try the "I am the new owner of this account, therefore noscam!" bollocks.

See, this is what happens when people buy and sell accounts, a business based almost entirely on fraud and deception and promoted by sellers who have access to multiple forum accounts and frequently use them to provide some sock-puppet support to their alts or even fraudulently conduct 'escrow' trade deals with themselves as both the 'escrow' and the trading partner.

Hey, Vitamin King, there is little point in posting the key parts of your post history in this thread because it is all pretty much the exact same promotion of CM, although if you can't see for yourself how obvious-shill-is-obvious then you are either lying or an idiot. In any event, you continue to promote a known ponzi scheme as though it is a legitimate cloud mining service, even though you know it isn't. That makes you untrustworthy.


I'm starting to believe that QS is suffering from a serious mental disorder, he certainly displays definite symptoms of dysfunctional neurology/psychology. No joke.

There goes another irony-meter.

^^^ This.


Have you seen your post history? You even keep reposting the same promotional content from previous posts from months earlier. You are actively trying to encourage others to join what is clearly a ponzi-based scam and it looks very similar to kind of spam GermanGiant has been posting, too.

That you have posted *some* negative comments here and there is no different to the sort of tactics used by shills to try and avoid the accusation they only speak positively about a scam.

Oh I see, like that is it, QS? Done having your tantrum over being put in your place about your transparent attempts to deflect from the truth that you are a proven and even self-confessed scammer and now are looking to make wild accusations about me, for which you have absolutely no evidence and will never have any evidence because it is, unsurprisingly considering you are involved, a big fat fucking lie.

Here's the thing, the Trust system allows people to rate negatively if you have reason to suspect a person is a scammer.

You scammed people by performing 'escrow' trades with yourself. That is fraud. You even admit to having done it.

Which part of that behaviour qualifies you as being trustworthy? Ergo, the rating I gave you is correct.

As for RussianRaibow, GermanGiant and SpanishSoldier, check the history and you will see that it has already been proven they are connected to the cloudmining.website scam.

Seems that scammers with an axe to grind are starting to get shitty because more and more people are making it harder for them to operate so easily around here.

I can confirm that Alpha Tech has just paid the full amount of the five-figure judgement against them, albeit a month after the court deadline and only after I had engaged dcbltd.com to enforce it.

Whether it was because DCBL enforcements are featured on a UK television reality series and Muhammed didn't want to risk the public humiliation, or it is simply down to Alpha getting refinanced in some fashion and trying to keep the creditors at bay, I don't know.

But glad to finally have resolved it.

It's almost as if he believes nobody knows about Coinfire's actual history when it comes to getting the scoop on three-letter-agency investigations into this industry.

Do they think Coinfire would piss away all the credibility they earned with their GAW/Garza/Paycoin reporting, on publishing a similar expose about Cryptsy but for it not to be supported by the same standard of evidence?

Cryptsy would have done better to have spun a little more of a reasonable response into their statement, at least along the lines of admitting that, due to the situation with Garza they were cooperating with the ongoing investigation and that the allegations they were implicated in wrongdoing were false.

*That* would have at least been a sensible way to react, instead of their ridiculous knee-jerkery of denying absolutely everything and anything and then trying to question Coinfire's credibility, in the face of a proven history of their journalism being on the mark!

Swing and a miss, Vern.

Jesus Fucking Christ, QS, is this all you've got in your locker, to post reams of absurdity where Vod proclaims himself to be God?

Here's the thing, Vod can proclaim himself to be God all he likes, it still doesn't change the fact that you were caught out demonstrably being untrustworthy and as a result you received negative trust ratings.

Which part of the process confuses you? Is it the bit where your obvious personality disorders are screaming at you in your head about how unfair everybody is being over the tiny matter of you fraudulently performing escrowed trades with yourself? After all, everybody else is to blame, in some way, for something, and besides, erm, reasons. Give it up, you were caught being untrustworthy and your ratings correctly reflect that fact. Accept it.



Anyway, of course Vod is not God, I am and so's my wife.

So after all this time is nobody mentioning the fact it is a proven fraud? Surely they can't be that . . .oh, nevermind.

Where did you see that it was used by 'many people' but nowhere was it mentioned it is a criminal fraud?