Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 02:43:58 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 [107] 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 ... 260 »
2121  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: July 09, 2013, 11:32:04 AM
Well, I think its about time to sell.
2122  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: July 09, 2013, 11:25:00 AM
Some Tuesdays have proven to be interesting in the past, let's see what today brings. Laying on the beach with a cocktail watching how this wall at 80 gets eaten, could become a nice day Grin

Wall at 80 getting eating? We haven't touched 80 on gox since 26 hours.

What kind of cocktail are we talking about?

LOL, something very strong indeed, I could use a little of that Cheesy
2123  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: MtGox withdrawal is back, as they claim on: July 09, 2013, 11:24:06 AM
The three of them were done in June, while there was no "USD hiatus", but it was still a moment where people wrote in this forum about withdrawals taking MONTHS to clear, especially SEPA ones. As I said, not my experience at all: 3 separate and significant withdrawals cleared in 2/3 days (SEPA) in June, just as fast (or even faster I'd say) that pre-bubble.

I need to say this because I've been reading so much FUD about Gox since April that I really don't know if I'm "the lucky one", or is just that there are thousands of customers of Gox (let do not forget they have tens of k's of customers ATM) that have no problems so they just stay quite, while the few that have delays obviously complain bitterly on this board.

Then I read about people saying that "as soon as a big customer ask for a withdrawal Gox will be crumble", and this doesn't seem the case at all. Since April millions of $ have flown out of Gox without any problems, in fact all the reports for "delayed withdrawals" I see in here are for smallish amounts.

BTW: I'm fully verified, including notarized docs.

Have you done any withdrawals since the USD block; or are you planning to?  This way we can follow their progress.

No, I didn't and I do not plan to do. Next thing coming out from Gox will be BTC Wink
2124  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: July 09, 2013, 10:32:10 AM
In what way it achieves that?

5340 (?) dust limit.

Thank you this explained everything. So you think that people play less satoshidice because of this limit? I guess this is the main contributor to the transaction volume isn't it.

No. The minimum SD bet is bigger than 5340 satoshis.
2125  Economy / Speculation / Re: Holders Unite! on: July 09, 2013, 10:12:04 AM
The only way to calculate the value of Bitcoin is by supply+demand - like for the vast majority of other commodities. In this moment the demand driven by the hope for the price to be higher exceeds by a lot the demand of Bitcoin for other uses (including investment, Darknet purchase, international transfers of value, etc.).
sorry but how hope for price to be higher is different than investment? and yet you those two are putting in opposite camps? people are buying bitcoin treating it as investment and because others are closing its investment the price goes lower so how is that a bubble? to me its normal behaviour of unregulated stock and not a bubble.

Investors are less akin to undertake a big risk, so they ideally buy when the price is stable and plan to hold for X years until a certain goal is reached. I will give you a practical example: I invested in Bitcoin when it was at around $13, which was a price that held for a long time. Now there are no investors looking to spend money on Bitcoin, at least no "serious" investors, because they know the price is currently overvalued. As soon as Bitcoin becomes again a good investment (<$50) more money is expected to be thrown at Bitcoin.

Speculators are more gamblers, they are into high-risk, quick-profit trades, and if the gamble go wrong, they just close their position ASAP - wash, rinse and repeat.

And what investors will do if price will never be lower than $50 because there is less bitcoins produced for example and more people wants them and those who are holding large amounts are rich already and don't need to sell their big stacks of bitcoins any time soon. Isn't it a gambling also? I don't see a difference. All i know is that you sold your coins, convinced your friends to do the same and now hoping the price will be lower so you are convincing everybody else to sell so you can buy cheaper. The problem is they might not believe you and do the opposite like they are doing now.

I sold part of my coins. I have two very different approaches: I have a trading position (that now is 95% fiat), plus some BTC in which I invested many months ago (which are in a paper wallet and won't be moving for at least a couple of years).

2126  Local / Español (Spanish) / Re: Petición para que no suban el precio de la luz en España on: July 09, 2013, 09:58:23 AM
Eso si, cuando quede poco para las próximas elecciones nos volverán a comer la oreja con promesas y milagros económicos.

Y nosotros les votaremos, qué te apuestas.

Yo no, eso te lo aseguro.
2127  Economy / Speculation / Re: Holders Unite! on: July 09, 2013, 09:51:32 AM
The only way to calculate the value of Bitcoin is by supply+demand - like for the vast majority of other commodities. In this moment the demand driven by the hope for the price to be higher exceeds by a lot the demand of Bitcoin for other uses (including investment, Darknet purchase, international transfers of value, etc.).
sorry but how hope for price to be higher is different than investment? and yet you those two are putting in opposite camps? people are buying bitcoin treating it as investment and because others are closing its investment the price goes lower so how is that a bubble? to me its normal behaviour of unregulated stock and not a bubble.

Investors are less akin to undertake a big risk, so they ideally buy when the price is stable and plan to hold for X years until a certain goal is reached. I will give you a practical example: I invested in Bitcoin when it was at around $13, which was a price that held for a long time. Now there are no investors looking to spend money on Bitcoin, at least no "serious" investors, because they know the price is currently overvalued. As soon as Bitcoin becomes again a good investment (<$50) more money is expected to be thrown at Bitcoin.

Speculators are more gamblers, they are into high-risk, quick-profit trades, and if the gamble go wrong, they just close their position ASAP - wash, rinse and repeat.
2128  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: MtGox withdrawal is back, as they claim on: July 09, 2013, 09:41:31 AM
For the record Gox worked consistently well for me, done 3 withdrawals of non-negligible amounts and I got the money in my bank in 2/3 days. SEPA transfers, Europe customer.


Dates on these withdrawals?

The three of them were done in June, while there was no "USD hiatus", but it was still a moment where people wrote in this forum about withdrawals taking MONTHS to clear, especially SEPA ones. As I said, not my experience at all: 3 separate and significant withdrawals cleared in 2/3 days (SEPA) in June, just as fast (or even faster I'd say) that pre-bubble.

I need to say this because I've been reading so much FUD about Gox since April that I really don't know if I'm "the lucky one", or is just that there are thousands of customers of Gox (let do not forget they have tens of k's of customers ATM) that have no problems so they just stay quite, while the few that have delays obviously complain bitterly on this board.

Then I read about people saying that "as soon as a big customer ask for a withdrawal Gox will be crumble", and this doesn't seem the case at all. Since April millions of $ have flown out of Gox without any problems, in fact all the reports for "delayed withdrawals" I see in here are for smallish amounts.

BTW: I'm fully verified, including notarized docs.
2129  Economy / Speculation / Re: Holders Unite! on: July 09, 2013, 09:32:02 AM
Well,  seeing that the price dropped substantially and then bounced back slightly, it could have been smart to sell and buy back like many have done, or are doing.  Of course, how do we really know for a fact this will happen?  Also, I was out of town all weekend, with very little wireless service hiking in the mountains so I did not have much of a choice but to hold. Wink

Still, for some of us it is the best choice, if we really do not wan the stress of the roller coaster ride.

Hopefully we are back to triple digits soon enough.  It seems like it is taking a while though.

We are in a downtrend, bubble deflation, so you should expect the price to go down.



     I really don't feel that it is accurate to call this a bubble. A bubble is when an asset class is overvalued through greed. Bitcoin is not overvalued- if people understood and could calculate its true value, it is massively undervalued. This is a combination of profit taking and loss of investor confidence. If people understood either how overvalued the fiat they are trading their bitcoin for is or how undervalued bitcoin is there would be a massive correction. I have been watching the markets off and on for 15 years, have studied the global economic system in university, and travelled enough to have a faint inkling of the potential here, so when I heard about bitcoin for the first time I realized the efficiency gains resulting from bitcoin as a concept will eventually be measured in the trillions of dollars (todays inflation adjusted).
     I understand, not everyone has either my educational background or belief in the wealth creating potential of unimpeded capital flows- we all have our specializations, so I would say we are just seeing the curve of people understanding bitcoin and understanding that it will not be stopped. In 10 years where we are now will still look like the flat, bottom part of the "S" adoption curve on the chart, inshaAllah. This is not a bubble deflation, it is not even a bear trap, it's just a blip.
      Sorry, I've been mulling that one for a while, had to get it off my chest...

So, what we had in 2011 wasn't a bubble neither?

Yes it was, and this one is a bubble too, Bitcoin price went up because people hoped it would go higher, and a speculative mania cycle was triggered when we broke ATH in March. As soon as the price started to go down, people sells and the price goes down even further, which is the classic bubble deflation process.

Speculation has always drove Bitcoin price, its an asset very sensitive to speculation by very design. But during bubble phases, speculation goes nuts, clearly overshadowing the demand of long to mid term investors and "users" (mostly Silk Road and ASIC miners buying hardware). When the peak is reached, speculators to their thing, selling to realize profits or cut losses. And as BTC is 99% speculation, there you have the bubble deflating until final capitulation is reached, and the cycle starts over.

the problem with your thinking is that nobody know the real value of bitcoin. and to call something to be a bubble you have to know value of something and the price have to be higher than its value. how then can you say for sure that something is in bubble state if you dont know its real value? Maybe bitcoin is undervalued all the time? Then how you will call it? underbubble?

The only way to calculate the value of Bitcoin is by supply+demand - like for the vast majority of other commodities. In this moment the demand driven by the hope for the price to be higher exceeds by a lot the demand of Bitcoin for other uses (including investment, Darknet purchase, international transfers of value, etc.).
2130  Economy / Speculation / Re: Sentiment in 2011 on: July 09, 2013, 09:27:29 AM
Thanks Maged, always good to hear your opinion. Smiley
You're welcome  Smiley

I'm not sure how long it will take, but generally I don't think we are going to reverse before around Halloween. Either way, before we make a bottom <50 on high volume (capitulation), we're not done yet in my view.
Agreed. Any heavy volume has always been on my short list of things that would invalidate my earlier prediction. Until then, I constantly have to force myself not to look too much at charts in order to avoid accidentally re-evaluating my prediction using emotion. That is why, although I did doubt myself earlier, I never actually changed my trading strategy.

We're tracing out yet another bull trap right now to clear off the negative sentiment that has built, and then we're ripe to go down and challenge 50 imo.
Agreed. Remember, in Bitcoin there is almost always a bounce when you hit areas of support/resistance.

True, but we went through what were supposed to be "crucial" support points ($88 and $79) very easily and very quickly.

This makes me expect at least 1/2 quite big and long bounces before the bottom, with moments where things slow down for as much as a couple of weeks. This need to cool off and sentiment to build.

This last bounce at $66 looks uncertain, I think it will be interesting to see if the price goes again above the 200 day EMA (which is at $80ish) with decent volume, that could trigger an epic trap.

Whats your ETA on bottoming out? at what price?
When do you think we will surpass the 266 high?

My guess is bottom in 5 months at around 30 and all time high in a year and a half

Considering that the initial crash was very deep and fast, while the following deflation is being slower, I'd also bet for a slow deflation.

I like to think the bottom will be on September/October, but I don't discard at all a slower decline that lasts more. Also because from September to December we will see a huge increase in hashrate, ROI will be very difficult for miners, and a negative cycle can be triggered if prices are down, so the miners rush to sell to recoup their investments before the price goes down further, which obviously brings the price down, wash rinse and repeat...

Many people do not realize that the game changed with ASICs, the majority of hash rate won't be in the hands of tens of k's of amateurs miners like when mining was done with CPUs or GPUs, now the hashrate will be concentrated among few biggish "mining startups" that will function as a business as they have to pay for significant fiat costs - those businesses cannot mine at a loss while hoarding the coins hoping for the price to go up, so I expect some continuous selling throughout the year.

About ATH: breaking it in one year and a half seems too optimist to me. I won't be surprised if the next bubble doesn't happen for 2/3 more years. Next halving could be a nice point for it, it's the kind of "tipping point" where the miners get nervous and start hoarding in the fear they won't be able to cover costs of their operations, which is something that effectively cripples supply and triggers a coin shortage in the market.

We will see...
2131  Economy / Speculation / Re: Holders Unite! on: July 09, 2013, 09:18:43 AM
Well,  seeing that the price dropped substantially and then bounced back slightly, it could have been smart to sell and buy back like many have done, or are doing.  Of course, how do we really know for a fact this will happen?  Also, I was out of town all weekend, with very little wireless service hiking in the mountains so I did not have much of a choice but to hold. Wink

Still, for some of us it is the best choice, if we really do not wan the stress of the roller coaster ride.

Hopefully we are back to triple digits soon enough.  It seems like it is taking a while though.

We are in a downtrend, bubble deflation, so you should expect the price to go down.



     I really don't feel that it is accurate to call this a bubble. A bubble is when an asset class is overvalued through greed. Bitcoin is not overvalued- if people understood and could calculate its true value, it is massively undervalued. This is a combination of profit taking and loss of investor confidence. If people understood either how overvalued the fiat they are trading their bitcoin for is or how undervalued bitcoin is there would be a massive correction. I have been watching the markets off and on for 15 years, have studied the global economic system in university, and travelled enough to have a faint inkling of the potential here, so when I heard about bitcoin for the first time I realized the efficiency gains resulting from bitcoin as a concept will eventually be measured in the trillions of dollars (todays inflation adjusted).
     I understand, not everyone has either my educational background or belief in the wealth creating potential of unimpeded capital flows- we all have our specializations, so I would say we are just seeing the curve of people understanding bitcoin and understanding that it will not be stopped. In 10 years where we are now will still look like the flat, bottom part of the "S" adoption curve on the chart, inshaAllah. This is not a bubble deflation, it is not even a bear trap, it's just a blip.
      Sorry, I've been mulling that one for a while, had to get it off my chest...

So, what we had in 2011 wasn't a bubble neither?

Yes it was, and this one is a bubble too, Bitcoin price went up because people hoped it would go higher, and a speculative mania cycle was triggered when we broke ATH in March. As soon as the price started to go down, people sells and the price goes down even further, which is the classic bubble deflation process.

Speculation has always drove Bitcoin price, its an asset very sensitive to speculation by very design. But during bubble phases, speculation goes nuts, clearly overshadowing the demand of long to mid term investors and "users" (mostly Silk Road and ASIC miners buying hardware). When the peak is reached, speculators to their thing, selling to realize profits or cut losses. And as BTC is 99% speculation, there you have the bubble deflating until final capitulation is reached, and the cycle starts over.
2132  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Assault weapon bans on: July 09, 2013, 09:12:17 AM
.....the gun-loving fucktards that defend that more guns = less deaths are not helping at all.
Are you having fun making this stuff up?  Because the statistics do not seem to agree with you.

What statistics? I know for sure the number of violent deaths per year in the country where I live is less than 1 per each 100,000 habitants, and as much as half of them are domestic husband-wive disputes (passional crimes).

In most of Europe you would NEVER fear for your kid to be killed in the streets by a criminal or a psycho.
In the USA, states which have passed "concealed carry law" show a decrease in crime.  The reasons are somewhat obvious, Bad Guys act differently if they are worried there might be guns in the pockets of people they face.

Regarding your asserts re Europe, you seem to be trying to somehow generalize those to the USA.  But the USA is the exact opposite of a homogeneous culture.  I do not particularly believe that say, residents of a suburb in Boston face the same problems, issues and dangers that a resident of a suburb in El Paso does, with the border of Mexico 300 meters away and high levels of illegal activities close by.  

But you know best, clearly.  

So next time I talk with my friends in El Paso, I will have to relate this story to them of 'un hombre de Internet quien se dice ustedes solamente "gun-loving fucktards" '.

It'll be good for a laugh, right?



I know very well the USA is not a culturally homogenous country, while I also know very well that the parts of the world where kids grow up around guns are those with a higher ration of violent murders per inhabitant.

Its kinda ironic that "US libertarians" despise the Government, which strength resides precisely on the fact that eventually you will be forced to follow its laws at gunpoint, while those same "libertarians" praise those same guns like they are a symbol of individual freedoms. A blatant example of flawed logic.

Freedom resides in individual respecting each other, and that needs to be taught, not enforced. And this is why I wrote "banning is not the answer". If you want to have social peace, you just do not fight violence in society with more violence, you fight it with education towards respect to human life. BTW, did you know that police in Germany only fired 85 bullets in all 2011, and killed only 6 people? That's an 80 million country, so its roughly 1 bullet fired by police per million inhabitants in a whole year. Why? They haven't got the need to fire more, most of the criminals are unarmed because they just do not need the guns. There is a deeper respect for human life, and while Germany is a country where there are 30 firearms per 100 habitants (which is very high for Europe standards), the vast majority of people never sees or touches one in their whole life.

You have a very big problem in the US, I don't deny that: but arming more people will just make it worse. I guess you "libertarians" should know that there is no "good" or "bad" people, no "sane" or "crazy" folks - people is normal until the moment they aren't, your own mind could flip out at a certain point because of external circumstances, and if you have a gun handy and you know how to use its just so much likely that you will end up using it.

I guess that living in a country where the average burglar has a gun and its mentally ready to fight for his life doesn't help at all. Well, maybe there is some work to be done to address THAT, instead of making it easier for criminals to arm themselves.



2133  Economy / Speculation / Re: Holders Unite! on: July 09, 2013, 07:29:28 AM
Well,  seeing that the price dropped substantially and then bounced back slightly, it could have been smart to sell and buy back like many have done, or are doing.  Of course, how do we really know for a fact this will happen?  Also, I was out of town all weekend, with very little wireless service hiking in the mountains so I did not have much of a choice but to hold. Wink

Still, for some of us it is the best choice, if we really do not wan the stress of the roller coaster ride.

Hopefully we are back to triple digits soon enough.  It seems like it is taking a while though.

We are in a downtrend, bubble deflation, so you should expect the price to go down.

2134  Other / Meta / Re: Activity & new membergroup limits on: July 09, 2013, 07:18:57 AM
He's probably confusing it with the stack overflow badge for posting once a day for a year.

Ok,  what badge is that? I've never seen such a badge in here before.

Before you get confused and start spamming again...he's talking about a different website.


Lol.  Fair enough.  But I wasn't trying to spam for a badge.  Just for a privilege (starting a new topic) I had already previously earned.

You are spamming VERY hard since day 1. Your first 30 posts about MHashes vs. KHashes are so depressing I was about to kill myself when I visited your post history. So many posts about a matter you didn't understand and about you could have learnt using google + the search button of this forum.

Friendly advice: write MUCH less and read MUCH more. The fact it took you +30 posts to reach the 4 h logged required to be able to post outside the newbie area is very telling. In half of your lengthy posts you make points which are simply wrong, because they are about matters you obviously don't know well. The other half are about SantaCoin, SoccerCoin or CatholicCoin (I won't even comment on those).

Use Google man. Use the search. Try to post a max. number of posts per day, otherwise your ignore button will be glowing soon.
2135  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Assault weapon bans on: July 09, 2013, 12:24:36 AM
.....the gun-loving fucktards that defend that more guns = less deaths are not helping at all.
Are you having fun making this stuff up?  Because the statistics do not seem to agree with you.

What statistics? I know for sure the number of violent deaths per year in the country where I live is less than 1 per each 100,000 habitants, and as much as half of them are domestic husband-wive disputes (passional crimes).

In most of Europe you would NEVER fear for your kid to be killed in the streets by a criminal or a psycho.
2136  Economy / Speculation / Re: Sentiment in 2011 on: July 09, 2013, 12:16:19 AM
Thanks Maged, always good to hear your opinion. Smiley
You're welcome  Smiley

I'm not sure how long it will take, but generally I don't think we are going to reverse before around Halloween. Either way, before we make a bottom <50 on high volume (capitulation), we're not done yet in my view.
Agreed. Any heavy volume has always been on my short list of things that would invalidate my earlier prediction. Until then, I constantly have to force myself not to look too much at charts in order to avoid accidentally re-evaluating my prediction using emotion. That is why, although I did doubt myself earlier, I never actually changed my trading strategy.

We're tracing out yet another bull trap right now to clear off the negative sentiment that has built, and then we're ripe to go down and challenge 50 imo.
Agreed. Remember, in Bitcoin there is almost always a bounce when you hit areas of support/resistance.

True, but we went through what were supposed to be "crucial" support points ($88 and $79) very easily and very quickly.

This makes me expect at least 1/2 quite big and long bounces before the bottom, with moments where things slow down for as much as a couple of weeks. This need to cool off and sentiment to build.

This last bounce at $66 looks uncertain, I think it will be interesting to see if the price goes again above the 200 day EMA (which is at $80ish) with decent volume, that could trigger an epic trap.
2137  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Assault weapon bans on: July 09, 2013, 12:06:54 AM
http://reason.com/archives/2012/12/22/gun-restrictions-have-always-bred-defian

Even if there were no guns in a country except in the hands of non- criminal/evil/tyrannical/civil rights-violating law enforcement officers (impossible), then murders using all other weapons (including fists and feet) increase. There will always be criminal violence where there is no ultimate equalizer. Law enforcement cannot protect each individual at all times.

The amount of violent deaths of any type in developed countries where no firearms are easily at hand for a large amount of the population are ridiculous compared to those of the US.

Obviously crime exists in similar ratios, but its just less violent, there are less violent deaths per habitant. Thieves, burglars, and other "property criminals" (which are 99% of the criminals) are rarely armed (if at all), which makes a huge a difference. We also have plenty of people that goes nuts for no apparent reason, but its just they do not even know how to use or where to find a gun, and any other weapon is simply uneffective and definitely not as cool as an "assault rifle" when planning to cause as much death as possible.

The statement that school would be safer if teachers carried guns is complete madness, that is the kind of world you want your kids to grow up? The example of Israel speaks pretty much for itself, that's a fucking war zone, is to Israel to what you compare your country to?

You don't have to be a genius to realize that if you have firearms at hand, and they form part of your life, its more likely for you to use one of them at some point... While the thought wouldn't even cross your mind if you never would have seen one closely in your life. And no, a knife is something completely different, you use knifes every day in your kitchen, they have plenty of uses, while a handgun only use is to kill someone. The approach when dealing with both "tools" is completely different, in both a practical and philosophical way.

Banning is never an answer, violence is something that is rotten in culture and that needs to be eradicated by the society as a whole, but for sure the gun-loving fucktards that defend that more guns = less deaths are not helping at all.
2138  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon orders - batch #3 refund requests thread on: July 08, 2013, 11:21:02 PM
Any news regarding pending refunds?
2139  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Assault weapon bans on: July 08, 2013, 11:19:15 PM
The cold hard fact is that in countries where guns are not easily purchasable (ie most of Europe) gun related deaths are negligible.
2140  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: MtGox withdrawal is back, as they claim on: July 08, 2013, 09:52:32 PM
For the record Gox worked consistently well for me, done 3 withdrawals of non-negligible amounts and I got the money in my bank in 2/3 days. SEPA transfers, Europe customer.
Pages: « 1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 [107] 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 ... 260 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!